CountBench
Models count the objects in natural images from the CountBench image-text set. Lab cards often use a question-answer version, CountBenchQA, scored by accuracy.
- Made by
- Google Research
- Released
- February 2023
- Kind
- Spatial reasoning and counting
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Qwen 3.6 Plus #74 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026
- Last model added
- August 2026
In the authors’ words
Large vision-language models (VLMs), such as CLIP, learn rich joint image-text representations, facilitating advances in numerous downstream tasks, including zero-shot classification and text-to-image generation. Nevertheless, existing VLMs exhibit a prominent well-documented limitation - they fail to encapsulate compositional concepts such as counting. We introduce a simple yet effective method to improve the quantitative understanding of VLMs, while maintaining their overall performance on common benchmarks. Specifically, we propose a new counting-contrastive loss used to finetune a pre-trained VLM in tandem with its original objective. Our counting loss is deployed over automatically-created counterfactual examples, each consisting of an image and a caption containing an incorrect object count. For example, an image depicting three dogs is paired with the caption "Six dogs playing in the yard". Our loss encourages discrimination between the correct caption and its counterfactual variant which serves as a hard negative example. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to extend CLIP's capabilities to object counting. Furthermore, we introduce "CountBench" - a new image-text counting benchmark for evaluating a model's understanding of object counting. We demonstrate a significant improvement over state-of-the-art baseline models on this task. Finally, we leverage our count-aware CLIP model for image retrieval and text-conditioned image generation, demonstrating that our model can produce specific counts of objects more reliably than existing ones.
3 models share the top score of 97.8% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 97.8
Qwen3.5-27B
- 97.8
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 97.8
Qwen3.6 27B
- 97.6
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 97.2
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 97.2
Qwen3.5-9B
- 97.0
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 96.5
ERNIE 5.0
- 96.3
Seed1.8
- 96.3
Qwen3.5-4B
- 95.5
Seed2.0 Pro
- 95.1
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 93.7
Seed1.5-VL
- 93.7
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 93.6
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 92.4
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 91.4
Qwen3.5-2B
- 90.0
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 89.9
Cosmos3-Edge
- 89.0
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking
- 88.8
STEP3-VL-10B
- 87.3 LFM2.5-VL-3B
- 84.8
Cosmos3-Nano
- 77.0
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- 72.5
North Micro Vision Instruct
- 68.0
Gemma 3 27B
- 26.1
Gemma 3 4B
- 17.8
Gemma 3 12B
- 1
Qwen3.5-27B 97.8%
- 2
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 97.8%
- 3
Qwen3.6 27B 97.8%
- 4
Qwen 3.6 Plus 97.6%
- 5
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 97.2%
- 6
Qwen3.5-9B 97.2%
- 7
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 97%
- 8
ERNIE 5.0 96.5%
- 9
Seed1.8 96.3%
- 10
Qwen3.5-4B 96.3%
- 11
Seed2.0 Pro 95.5%
- 12
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 95.1%
- 13
Seed1.5-VL 93.7%
- 14
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 93.7%
- 15
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 93.6%
- 16
LongCat-Flash-Omni 92.4%
- 17
Qwen3.5-2B 91.4%
- 18
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 90%
- 19
Cosmos3-Edge 89.9%
- 20
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 89%
- 21
STEP3-VL-10B 88.8%
- 22 LFM2.5-VL-3B 87.3%
- 23
Cosmos3-Nano 84.8%
- 24
Qwen3.5-0.8B 77%
- 25
North Micro Vision Instruct 72.5%
- 26
Gemma 3 27B 68%
- 27
Gemma 3 4B 26.1%
- 28
Gemma 3 12B 17.8%
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 97.8% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 97.8% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 97.8% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 97.6% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 97.2% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 97.2% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 97% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 96.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 96.3% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 96.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 95.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 95.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 93.7% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 93.7% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 93.6% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 92.4% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 91.4% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 90% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 89.9% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 89% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 88.8% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 87.3% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | | 84.8% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 77% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | | 72.5% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | | 68% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | | 26.1% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | | 17.8% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card |
6 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in February 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Qwen’s own number for Qwen2.5-VL-72B passed 85% in February 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 87.3 | CountBenchQA |
| Aug 12, 2026 | 72.5 | CountBench | |
| Apr 22, 2026 | 97.8 | CountBench | |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 97.6 | CountBench | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 95.1 | CountBench | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 77 | CountBench 77.0/68.6 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 91.4 | CountBench 91.4/86.8 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 96.3 | CountBench | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 97.2 | CountBench | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 97.8 | CountBench | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 97.8 | CountBench | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 97 | CountBench | |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 97.2 | CountBench | |
| Feb 6, 2026 | 96.5 | CountBench | |
| Dec 18, 2025 | 96.3 | CountBench | |
| Nov 11, 2025 | 89 | CountBench | |
| Oct 31, 2025 | 92.4 | CountBench | |
| Sep 23, 2025 | 93.7 | CountBench | |
| Sep 22, 2025 | 90 | CountBench | |
| May 12, 2025 | 93.7 | CountBench | |
| Mar 12, 2025 | 68 | CountBenchQA (PT) |
15 system cards report it, from 7 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2026 | | 84.8 | CountBenchQA, Cosmos3-Nano 8B column, Table 10 | Capabilities |
| May 31, 2026 | | 89.9 | CountBenchQA, Cosmos3-Edge 2B column, Table 10 | Capabilities |
| Apr 17, 2026 | | 95.1 | CountBench (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 96.3 | CountBench (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 95.5 | CountBench (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| Feb 4, 2026 | | 96.5 | CountBench (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Jan 14, 2026 | | 88.8 | CountBench, SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 88.80 | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 93.7 | CountBench (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Oct 31, 2025 | | 92.4 | CountBench (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Sep 22, 2025 | | 90 | CountBench, Instruct (Table 9). Thinking 88.6 (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| May 11, 2025 | | 93.7 | CountBench, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 93.5 | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 26.1 | CountBench VQA, PT, 0-shot (Table 11) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 68 | CountBench VQA, PT, 0-shot (Table 11) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 17.8 | CountBench VQA, PT, 0-shot (Table 11) | Capabilities |
| Feb 19, 2025 | | 93.6 | CountBench, detect then count prompt (Table 7) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%