Benchmark Almanac

EmbodiedBench EB-ALFRED

Claude 3.7 Sonnet 67.7% leads since February 2025
Not in model cards

Agents follow household instructions through high-level actions in AI2-THOR. The score is the published average task success percentage across EB-ALFRED capability groups.

One track of EmbodiedBench. The EmbodiedBench record keeps lab scores that combine tracks.

Released
February 2025
Kind
Simulated robots
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3.7 Sonnet #118 on the capability index
Last model added
April 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Leveraging Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to create embodied agents offers a promising avenue for tackling real-world tasks. While language-centric embodied agents have garnered substantial attention, MLLM-based embodied agents remain underexplored due to the lack of comprehensive evaluation frameworks. To bridge this gap, we introduce EmbodiedBench, an extensive benchmark designed to evaluate vision-driven embodied agents. EmbodiedBench features: (1) a diverse set of 1,128 testing tasks across four environments, ranging from high-level semantic tasks (e.g., household) to low-level tasks involving atomic actions (e.g., navigation and manipulation); and (2) six meticulously curated subsets evaluating essential agent capabilities like commonsense reasoning, complex instruction understanding, spatial awareness, visual perception, and long-term planning. Through extensive experiments, we evaluated 24 leading proprietary and open-source MLLMs within EmbodiedBench. Our findings reveal that: MLLMs excel at high-level tasks but struggle with low-level manipulation, with the best model, GPT-4o, scoring only 28.9% on average. EmbodiedBench provides a multifaceted standardized evaluation platform that not only highlights existing challenges but also offers valuable insights to advance MLLM-based embodied agents. Our code and dataset are available at https://embodiedbench.github.io.

Abstract of EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied Agents (arXiv:2502.09560, CC0)
24
Entries on its own leaderboard, 17 models we track

Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 67.7% among models released by April 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 67.7%
  2. 2 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 64%
  3. 3 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 62.3%
  4. 4 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 56.3%
  5. 5 Gemini-2.0-flash (snapshot unspecified) 52.3%
  6. 6 Qwen-VL-Max (snapshot unspecified) 41.3%
  7. 7 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 39.7%
  8. 8 Gemini-1.5-flash (snapshot unspecified) 39.3%
  9. 9 InternVL3-78B 39%
  10. 10 InternVL3-38B 38%
  11. 11 InternVL2_5-78B 37.7%
  12. 12 Gemma 3 27B 37%
  13. 13 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 33.7%
  14. 14 Llama 3.2 90B 32%
  15. 15 Ovis2-34B 28.7%
  16. 16 Gemma 3 12B 25.7%
  17. 17 GPT-4o-mini (snapshot unspecified) 24%
  18. 18 InternVL2.5-38B 23.3%
  19. 19 Ovis2-16B 16.3%
  20. 20 Llama 3.2 11B 13.7%
  21. 21 InternVL3-8B 10.3%
  22. 22 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 4.70%
  23. 23 InternVL2.5-8B 2.00%
  24. 24 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 1.70%

Source: Official EmbodiedBench EB-ALFRED leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 67.7% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 64% Official leaderboard
3 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 62.3% Official leaderboard
4 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 56.3% Official leaderboard
5 Gemini-2.0-flash (snapshot unspecified) 52.3% Official leaderboard
6 Qwen-VL-Max (snapshot unspecified) 41.3% Official leaderboard
7 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 39.7% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Gemini-1.5-flash (snapshot unspecified) 39.3% Official leaderboard
9 InternVL3-78B 39% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
10 InternVL3-38B 38% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
11 InternVL2_5-78B 37.7% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Gemma 3 27B 37% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 33.7% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
14 Llama 3.2 90B 32% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Ovis2-34B 28.7% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Gemma 3 12B 25.7% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
17 GPT-4o-mini (snapshot unspecified) 24% Official leaderboard
18 InternVL2.5-38B 23.3% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
19 Ovis2-16B 16.3% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Llama 3.2 11B 13.7% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
21 InternVL3-8B 10.3% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 4.70% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
23 InternVL2.5-8B 2.00% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
24 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 1.70% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in February 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2025

Source: Official EmbodiedBench EB-ALFRED leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3.7 Sonnet Qwen2.5-VL-72B Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3.7 Sonnet Qwen2.5-VL-72B

Source: Official EmbodiedBench EB-ALFRED leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Robotics

All 104 in Robotics
  • ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
  • RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
  • RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
  • Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
  • Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
  • Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds. Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%