Benchmark Almanac

FinQA (Snorkel OpenEnv environment)

o3 81% leads since March 2026
Not in model cards

Agent answers 290 multi-step questions on SEC 10-K data via MCP tools and constrained SQL. Binary reward with 1% numeric tolerance.

Not the 2021 FinQA dataset. Design choices: SQL tool rejects SELECT * and requires filters. No LLM judge. 50-tool-call cap. An RL-trained Qwen3-4B (59.7%) beat Qwen3-235B (51.4%), which Snorkel reads as tool discipline over scale. Also hosted as HF Space snorkelai/finqa-env.

Made by
Snorkel AI
Released
March 2026
Kind
Finance
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
Last model added
November 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026
28
Entries on its own leaderboard, 22 models we track

2 models share the top score of 81% among models released by November 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in November 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 o3 81%
  2. 2 GPT-5 81%
  3. 3 Gemini 3 Pro 80.3%
  4. 4 Claude Opus 4.1 80.3%
  5. 5 GPT-5 mini 79.3%
  6. 6 Claude Opus 4 78.3%
  7. 7 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 77.9%
  8. 8 o4-mini 76.6%
  9. 9 Claude Sonnet 4 76.6%
  10. 10 Grok 4 74%
  11. 11 Grok 4 Fast reasoning 73.5%
  12. 12 Kimi K2 Thinking 71.7%
  13. 13 gpt-oss-120b 66.6%
  14. 14 Grok 3 65.9%
  15. 15 o3-mini 63.8%
  16. 16 GPT-4.1 62.7%
  17. 17 Amazon Nova Premier 62.1%
  18. 18 Gemini 2.5 Pro [snapshot unspecified] 60.6%
  19. 19 Gemini 2.5 Flash [snapshot unspecified] 53.1%
  20. 20 Qwen 3 235B [snapshot unspecified] 51.4%
  21. 21 GPT-5 nano 50%
  22. 22 Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5 44%
  23. 23 Amazon Nova Pro 40.3%
  24. 24 Codestral [snapshot unspecified] 27.6%
  25. 25 Amazon Nova Lite 16.9%
  26. 26 Magistral Medium [snapshot unspecified] 16.2%
  27. 27 Amazon Nova Micro 14.5%
  28. 28 Mistral Large [snapshot unspecified] 13.4%

Source: Official FinQA (Snorkel OpenEnv environment) leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 o3 81% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5 81% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3 Pro 80.3% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Opus 4.1 80.3% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-5 mini 79.3% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Opus 4 78.3% May 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 77.9% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
8 o4-mini 76.6% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Claude Sonnet 4 76.6% May 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Grok 4 74% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Grok 4 Fast 73.5% reasoning Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Kimi K2 Thinking 71.7% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
13 gpt-oss-120b 66.6% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Grok 3 65.9% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
15 o3-mini 63.8% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
16 GPT-4.1 62.7% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
17 Amazon Nova Premier 62.1% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Gemini 2.5 Pro [snapshot unspecified] 60.6% Official leaderboard
19 Gemini 2.5 Flash [snapshot unspecified] 53.1% Official leaderboard
20 Qwen 3 235B [snapshot unspecified] 51.4% Official leaderboard
21 GPT-5 nano 50% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5 44% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
23 Amazon Nova Pro 40.3% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
24 Codestral [snapshot unspecified] 27.6% Official leaderboard
25 Amazon Nova Lite 16.9% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
26 Magistral Medium [snapshot unspecified] 16.2% Official leaderboard
27 Amazon Nova Micro 14.5% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
28 Mistral Large [snapshot unspecified] 13.4% Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Mar 2026
o3 81%

Source: Official FinQA (Snorkel OpenEnv environment) leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) o3 o3-mini Amazon Nova Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) o3 o3-mini

Source: Official FinQA (Snorkel OpenEnv environment) leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 179 in Law, finance and medicine
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy. Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%