FutureX
Agents predict upcoming events collected daily from 195 websites in 11 domains, within a one-week window. Answers are scored once real results are crawled, with harder tiers weighted more.
ICLR 2026. The live set refreshes weekly and the team posts weekly reports, with 28 agents in June 2026.
- Made by
- ByteDance Seed with Fudan, Stanford and Princeton
- Released
- August 2025
- Kind
- Real-world events
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Settled by events
- Answers
- Prediction
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Grok 4 #85 on the capability index
- Last model added
- July 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Future prediction is a complex task for LLM agents, requiring a high level of analytical thinking, information gathering, contextual understanding, and decision-making under uncertainty. Agents must not only gather and interpret vast amounts of dynamic information but also integrate diverse data sources, weigh uncertainties, and adapt predictions based on emerging trends, just as human experts do in fields like politics, economics, and finance. Despite its importance, no large-scale benchmark exists for evaluating agents on future prediction, largely due to challenges in handling real-time updates and retrieving timely, accurate answers. To address this, we introduce FutureX, a dynamic and live evaluation benchmark specifically designed for LLM agents performing future prediction tasks. FutureX is the largest and most diverse live benchmark for future prediction, supporting real-time daily updates and eliminating data contamination through an automated pipeline for question gathering and answer collection. We evaluate 25 LLM/agent models, including those with reasoning, search capabilities, and integration of external tools such as the open-source Deep Research Agent and closed-source Deep Research models. This comprehensive evaluation assesses agents' adaptive reasoning and performance in dynamic environments. Additionally, we provide in-depth analyses of agents' failure modes and performance pitfalls in future-oriented tasks, including the vulnerability to fake web pages and the temporal validity. Our goal is to establish a dynamic, contamination-free evaluation standard that drives the development of LLM agents capable of performing at the level of professional human analysts in complex reasoning and predictive thinking.
Grok 4 leads with 27.9 among models released by July 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in July 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 27.9 Grok 4
- 26.3 o4-mini
- 24.2 Gemini-2.5-flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 22.2 Seed-DouBao
- 19.2 Qwen3-235B
- 17.6 Deepseek-R1 (snapshot unspecified)
- 16.9 Hunyuan
- 15.1
Doubao-Seed-1.6
- 15.0 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 13.7 GPT-4.1
- 13.5 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 9.78
Qwen3-32B
- 9.14
DeepSeek-V3
- 7.52 GPT-4o mini
- 1 Grok 4 Search; archived event scores 27.9
- 2 o4-mini Search; archived event scores 26.3
- 3 Gemini-2.5-flash (snapshot unspecified) Deep-Research; archived event scores 24.2
- 4 Seed-DouBao Deep-Research; archived event scores 22.2
- 5 Qwen3-235B Search; archived event scores 19.2
- 6 Deepseek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) Search; archived event scores 17.6
- 7 Hunyuan Search; archived event scores 16.9
- 8
Doubao-Seed-1.6 LLM; archived event scores 15.1
- 9 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) Search; archived event scores 15.0
- 10 GPT-4.1 Open-Deep-Research-Smolagents; archived event scores 13.7
- 11 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) Open-Deep-Research-Smolagents; archived event scores 13.5
- 12
Qwen3-32B LLM; archived event scores 9.78
- 13
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025, Open-Deep-Research-Smolagents; archived event scores 9.14
- 14 GPT-4o mini LLM; archived event scores 7.52
Source: Official FutureX leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grok 4 | 27.9 | Search; archived event scores | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | o4-mini | 26.3 | Search; archived event scores | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Gemini-2.5-flash (snapshot unspecified) | 24.2 | Deep-Research; archived event scores | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Seed-DouBao | 22.2 | Deep-Research; archived event scores | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Qwen3-235B | 19.2 | Search; archived event scores | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Deepseek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) | 17.6 | Search; archived event scores | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Hunyuan | 16.9 | Search; archived event scores | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 15.1 | LLM; archived event scores | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 15.0 | Search; archived event scores | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | GPT-4.1 | 13.7 | Open-Deep-Research-Smolagents; archived event scores | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 13.5 | Open-Deep-Research-Smolagents; archived event scores | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 9.78 | LLM; archived event scores | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 9.14 | Open-Deep-Research-Smolagents; archived event scores | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | GPT-4o mini | 7.52 | LLM; archived event scores | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official FutureX leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grok 4 | Search; archived event scores | 27.9 | |||
| o4-mini | Search; archived event scores | 26.3 | |||
| | LLM; archived event scores | 15.1 | |||
| GPT-4.1 | Open-Deep-Research-Smolagents; archived event scores | 13.7 | |||
| GPT-4.1 | LLM; archived event scores | 12.7 | |||
| | LLM; archived event scores | 9.78 | |||
| | Open-Deep-Research-Smolagents; archived event scores | 9.14 | |||
| | Open-Deep-Research-Smolagents; archived event scores | 9.03 | |||
| | LLM; archived event scores | 8.93 | |||
| GPT-4o mini | LLM; archived event scores | 7.52 | |||
| GPT-4o mini | Open-Deep-Research-Smolagents; archived event scores | 6.97 |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official FutureX leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official FutureX leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Forecasting
- ForecastBench In use Models give probabilities for 500 auto-generated questions per round about future events, drawn from prediction markets and time-series datasets. Forecasts are scored with difficulty-adjusted Brier scores once the questions resolve. GPT-5.5 0.11
- Prophet Arena In use Models and agents forecast open Kalshi prediction-market events and are scored once the events resolve. The live board ranks a difficulty-adjusted Arena score and also reports calibration error and market return. Claude Opus 5.5 86.2
- Echo General AI Prediction Leaderboard Not in model cards Models forecast unresolved events drawn from prediction markets, synthesized news questions and expert-written questions. Forecasts made at aligned times are compared in pairwise battles, and an Elo fit ranks the models.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 1,017
- Human Behavior Bench Not in model cards Models predict how specified groups of U.S. adults answer closed survey questions, as a distribution over options. Scored as 1 minus total variation distance.
Gemini 4 Argon 80.6
- BTF-3 Not in model cards Agents forecast already-resolved binary and numeric questions while researching a frozen snapshot of the web. Scoring pools Brier and ranked probability scores. Claude Opus 5 0.12
- KellyBench Not in model cards Agents bet through a simulated 2023 to 24 English Premier League season with historical data. The score is long-term bankroll growth. GPT-5.4 -7.90%