KellyBench
Agents bet through a simulated 2023 to 24 English Premier League season with historical data. The score is long-term bankroll growth.
At launch every tested frontier model lost money. Covered in Latent Space AINews on April 9th, 2026.
- Made by
- General Reasoning
- Released
- April 2026
- Kind
- Social simulation
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Settled by events
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5.4 #27 on the capability index
- Last model added
- March 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Language models are saturating benchmarks for procedural tasks with narrow objectives. But they are increasingly being deployed in long-horizon, non-stationary environments with open-ended goals. In this paper we introduce KellyBench, an environment for evaluating sequential decision-making in sports betting markets. Agents are placed in a sequential simulation of the 2023-24 English Premier League season and tasked with maximising their long-term bankroll growth. They are given detailed historical data, including advanced statistics, lineups, and public odds. To succeed they must build machine learning models, identify edge in public markets, and adapt as the environment changes over time. We find that all frontier models evaluated lose money on average over the course of the season for five seeds. The best performing model achieves an average return of -8%, and many models experiencing ruin across seeds. To judge strategy sophistication, we use a human expert rubric to grade each model and find their approaches to be unsophisticated compared to human baselines; Claude Opus 4.6 achieves a rubric score of 26.5%, which means there is significant room for improvement. KellyBench is available as an open-access API endpoint at https://openreward.ai/GeneralReasoning/KellyBench.
GPT-5.4 leads with -7.90% among models released by March 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in March 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 GPT-5.4 -7.90%
- 2 Claude Opus 4.6 -11.20%
- 3 GLM-5 -51.60%
- 4
Gemini 3.1 Pro -66.00%
- 5 Kimi K2.5 -89.60%
Source: Official KellyBench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.4 | -7.90% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.6 | -11.20% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GLM-5 | -51.60% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | -66.00% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Kimi K2.5 | -89.60% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official KellyBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official KellyBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Forecasting
- ForecastBench In use Models give probabilities for 500 auto-generated questions per round about future events, drawn from prediction markets and time-series datasets. Forecasts are scored with difficulty-adjusted Brier scores once the questions resolve. GPT-5.5 0.11
- Prophet Arena In use Models and agents forecast open Kalshi prediction-market events and are scored once the events resolve. The live board ranks a difficulty-adjusted Arena score and also reports calibration error and market return. Claude Opus 5.5 86.2
- Echo General AI Prediction Leaderboard Not in model cards Models forecast unresolved events drawn from prediction markets, synthesized news questions and expert-written questions. Forecasts made at aligned times are compared in pairwise battles, and an Elo fit ranks the models.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 1,017
- Human Behavior Bench Not in model cards Models predict how specified groups of U.S. adults answer closed survey questions, as a distribution over options. Scored as 1 minus total variation distance.
Gemini 4 Argon 80.6
- BTF-3 Not in model cards Agents forecast already-resolved binary and numeric questions while researching a frozen snapshot of the web. Scoring pools Brier and ranked probability scores. Claude Opus 5 0.12
- FutureX Not in model cards Agents predict upcoming events collected daily from 195 websites in 11 domains, within a one-week window. Answers are scored once real results are crawled, with harder tiers weighted more. Grok 4 27.9