Benchmark Almanac

GSM8K-V

Gemini 3 Pro 59.1% leads since November 2025
Not in model cards

Vision-language models solve GSM8K word problems that are redrawn as multi-image visual scenes, so the facts must be read from pictures.

32 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.

Released
September 2025
Kind
Visual math and diagrams
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
Last model added
April 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Mathematical reasoning is a key capability for vision-language models (VLMs), yet current benchmarks mainly evaluate text-based or explicitly symbolic visual inputs. It remains unclear whether VLMs can reason mathematically when information must be perceived and inferred from images rather than read from explicit symbols. We introduce GSM8K-V, a benchmark transforming GSM8K into multi-image sequences with semantic equivalence preserved. By mapping text-based problems into visual form via an automated pipeline and human verification, we curate 1,319 high-quality samples. In GSM8K-V, quantities must be extracted through visual perception, and reasoning chains must be reconstructed by integrating implicit cues across scenes. Evaluation of 34 VLMs reveals a striking modality gap: while most models exceed 90% on text, the best model achieves only 59% on GSM8K-V, far below the 91% human accuracy. Notably, models enhanced for visual math reasoning show no improvement on GSM8K-V despite large gains on existing benchmarks, confirming that it evaluates a distinct capability. Error analysis shows that the primary bottleneck lies in Implicit Visual Inference Error (IVIE), where models fail to recover visual semantics that are implied rather than explicitly stated. Our code and data are released at https://github.com/ZJU-REAL/GSM8K-V.

Abstract of GSM8K-V: Can Vision Language Models Solve Grade School Math Word Problems in Visual Contexts (arXiv:2509.25160, CC0)
31
Entries on its own leaderboard, 24 models we track

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 59.1% among models released by April 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 3 Pro 59.1%
  2. 2 Kimi K2.6 47.3%
  3. 3 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 46.9%
  4. 4 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B thinking 42.1%
  5. 5 Qwen3.5-27B 39.9%
  6. 6 GLM-4.6V 37.8%
  7. 7 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B thinking 31.7%
  8. 8 Llama-4-17B-128E-Instruct 31.7%
  9. 9 GPT-5 30.1%
  10. 10 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 29.6%
  11. 11 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B thinking 28.6%
  12. 12 GLM-4.5V 28.3%
  13. 13 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 27.9%
  14. 14 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct 27.9%
  15. 15 Qwen3.5-9B 27.8%
  16. 16 Ovis2.5-9B 27.4%
  17. 17 InternVL3.5-38B 26.8%
  18. 18 Llama-4-17B-16E-Instruct 26.7%
  19. 19 Qwen3-VL-8B thinking 26.5%
  20. 20 Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct 26%
  21. 21 Step 3 25.9%
  22. 22 QVQ-Max-Latest 23.2%
  23. 23 InternVL3.5-30B-A3B 22.8%
  24. 24 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 21.9%
  25. 25 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 21.8%
  26. 26 MiniCPM-V 4.5 19.6%
  27. 27 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 15.2%
  28. 28 Ovis2.5-2B 13.5%
  29. 29 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 11.6%
  30. 30 MiniCPM-V 4.6 thinking 11%
  31. 31 InternVL3.5-8B 10.8%

Source: Official GSM8K-V leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 59.1% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Kimi K2.6 47.3% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 46.9% Official leaderboard
4 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 42.1% thinking Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3.5-27B 39.9% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
6 GLM-4.6V 37.8% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 31.7% thinking Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Llama-4-17B-128E-Instruct 31.7% Official leaderboard
9 GPT-5 30.1% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
10 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 29.6% Official leaderboard
11 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B 28.6% thinking Official leaderboard
12 GLM-4.5V 28.3% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
13 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 27.9% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct 27.9% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen3.5-9B 27.8% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Ovis2.5-9B 27.4% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
17 InternVL3.5-38B 26.8% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Llama-4-17B-16E-Instruct 26.7% Official leaderboard
19 Qwen3-VL-8B 26.5% thinking Official leaderboard
20 Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct 26% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
21 Step 3 25.9% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
22 QVQ-Max-Latest 23.2% Official leaderboard
23 InternVL3.5-30B-A3B 22.8% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
24 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 21.9% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
25 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 21.8% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
26 MiniCPM-V 4.5 19.6% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
27 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 15.2% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
28 Ovis2.5-2B 13.5% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
29 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 11.6% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
30 MiniCPM-V 4.6 11% thinking Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
31 InternVL3.5-8B 10.8% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
thinking
42.1%
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
thinking
31.7%
MiniCPM-V 4.6
thinking
11%

Source: Official GSM8K-V leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
Gemini 3 Pro 59.1%
Kimi K2.6 47.3%
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B thinking 42.1%
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 40.1%
Qwen3.5-27B 39.9%
GLM-4.6V 37.8%
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B thinking 31.7%
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 30.7%
GPT-5 30.1%
GLM-4.5V 28.3%
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 27.9%
Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct 27.9%
Qwen3.5-9B 27.8%
Ovis2.5-9B 27.4%
InternVL3.5-38B 26.8%
Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct 26%
Step 3 25.9%
InternVL3.5-30B-A3B 22.8%
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 21.9%
Qwen2.5-VL-32B 21.8%
MiniCPM-V 4.5 19.6%
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 15.2%
Ovis2.5-2B 13.5%
Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 11.6%
MiniCPM-V 4.6 thinking 11%
InternVL3.5-8B 10.8%
MiniCPM-V 4.6 9.48%

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in September 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2026
Gemini 3 Pro 59.1%

Source: Official GSM8K-V leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro GPT-5 Step 3 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro GPT-5

Source: Official GSM8K-V leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%