Benchmark Almanac

Muse Wonder Full

Muse Wonder Full ranks first on 8 of the 62 benchmarks with five or more models scored.

Meta Released October 12th, 2026 Family Muse Wonder The lab's model card Compare with others
69
Benchmarks with a score
8
Ranked first, out of five or more models
20
In the top three
Meta Oct 2026

Muse Wonder Full

Closed weights Flagship

166.7 #11 of 404
Self-Reported Index, from the lab's own numbers. No Epoch Capabilities Index score yet.
  • HealthBench Professional 62.3% #11 /26
  • CritPt 73.1% #5 /11
  • Harvey LAB (Legal Agent Benchmark) 21.7% #3 /80

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
ProofBench v1.1 94% #10 of 52 Official leaderboard
BioMysteryBench 73.3% #10 of 30 Official leaderboard
MysteryMechanism 35.1% #12 of 31 Official leaderboard
Riemann-bench 63.2% #9 of 20 Official leaderboard
CritPt 73.1% #5 of 11 Official leaderboard
CritPt v2 73.1% #5 of 11 Official leaderboard

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
DeepSWE 79% #1 of 56 Lab model card
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 34% #1 of 26 Official leaderboard
ProgramBench tests passed 88.5% #1 of 25 Official leaderboard
Code Arena 1,723 #8 of 128 Official leaderboard
ProgramBench almost solved 60% #2 of 25 Official leaderboard
Code Migration 61% #7 of 78 Official leaderboard
SWE-Marathon v1.1 53.1% #2 of 20 Official leaderboard
ProgramBench 8.50% #3 of 25 Official leaderboard
Vibe Code Bench 86% #16 of 120 Official leaderboard
SWE-Marathon 57.5% #2 of 11 Lab model card
IOI v2 (Vals) 79.8% #12 of 45 Official leaderboard
Code Migration v1.1 62.8% #9 of 30 Official leaderboard
Vals RSI Index 0.24 #11 of 27 Official leaderboard

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
LisanBench 37152.2 #1 of 133 Official leaderboard
Agent Arena 8.96% #10 of 56 Official leaderboard
FocusBench (Meta) 54.2% #1 of 5 Official leaderboard
Terminal-Bench 4.0 57.1% #8 of 28 Lab model card
AutomationBench 45.4% #18 of 47 Lab model card
OSWorld 2.1 78.4% #5 of 7 Lab model card
StarSkirmish Bench 21.4% #7 of 9 Official leaderboard

Professional work

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Vals Legal Index 77.9% #1 of 38 Official leaderboard
LegalBench 87.4% #4 of 138 Official leaderboard
Harvey LAB (Legal Agent Benchmark) 21.7% #3 of 80 Official leaderboard
Public Benefits Bench 73.8% #3 of 50 Official leaderboard
JobBench 75.3% #1 of 15 Lab model card
Vals Finance Agent v2 59.1% #6 of 80 Official leaderboard
Legal Research Bench 53.4% #7 of 93 Official leaderboard
MedScribe 89.3% #8 of 97 Official leaderboard
Vending-Bench 2 $12,292 #6 of 67 Official leaderboard
Vals Finance Agent v2.1 67.6% #4 of 40 Official leaderboard
Vals Index v2.1 64.6% #5 of 49 Official leaderboard
Tax Agent Bench 43% #10 of 84 Official leaderboard
Vals Finance Index 64.5% #5 of 40 Official leaderboard
Excel Modeling Benchmark 71.9% #10 of 76 Official leaderboard
Harvey LAB v1.1 (HLAB-Vals-1.1) 23.3% #5 of 38 Official leaderboard
Immigration Bench 71.2% #4 of 25 Official leaderboard
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 75% #7 of 42 Official leaderboard
MedCode 49.9% #18 of 96 Official leaderboard
Vals Index v2.2 66.8% #7 of 37 Official leaderboard
GDPx 9.00% #5 of 20 Official leaderboard
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 13.1% #1 of 3 Lab model card
HealthBench Professional 62.3% #11 of 26 Lab model card

Vision, audio and robotics

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
GDP.pdf 33.2% #7 of 17 Lab model card
Robo-bench 10.4% #4 of 7 Official leaderboard

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
CyberGym 88.4% #3 of 34 Lab model card
LAB-Bench ProtocolQA 89% #2 of 16 Lab model card
BioTIER Refuse 98.7% #1 of 6 Lab model card
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test 66.5% #2 of 9 Lab model card
CyberBench v1.1 (Vals) 73.6% #11 of 44 Official leaderboard
LAB-Bench SeqQA 95.6% #3 of 12 Lab model card
Molecular Biology Capabilities Test 59.6% #2 of 8 Lab model card
Meta BioDesign Proxy 79.4 #1 of 4 Lab model card
Meta chemical-agent refusal evaluation 100% #1 of 4 Lab model card
Agentic misalignment suite (Anthropic) 0% #2 of 7 Lab model card
SRE-Bench 11.8% #11 of 35 Official leaderboard
CyberBench (Liu et al.) 0.80% #1 of 3 Lab model card
Poly-Guard Bench 2.30% #1 of 3 Lab model card
Virology Capabilities Test (VCT) 55.9% #12 of 31 Lab model card
ExploitBench 58.9% #11 of 21 Lab model card
RedCode 8.00% #2 of 3 Lab model card
MASK 87.3% #13 of 19 Lab model card

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 56.0 #1 of 4 Lab model card
Vals Science Index 48.5% #7 of 25 Official leaderboard

Its lab's numbers put it at 166.7, number 11 of 404

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 8 capability results Meta reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 163.0 to 170.4. How we compute it.

Its lab's numbers next to 3 leaderboards

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
ProgramBench almost solved 59% ProgramBench, rollouts passing at least 95% of tests, mini-swe-agent, Muse Wonder Full (max) (capabilities table image, page 3) 60% Leaderboard, mini-SWE-agent −1.0 pts
Vals Finance Agent v2 59.1% Vals Finance Agent V2 59.1% Leaderboard Same
FocusBench (Meta) 54.2% FocusBench (chart label) 54.2% Leaderboard, max Same

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.

Its system card

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 20 of them aren't in the launch post.

Muse Wonder Model Card Oct 12, 2026