Benchmark Almanac

Phi-4-multimodal

Phi-4-multimodal ranks first on FLEURS.

Microsoft Released February 26th, 2025 Family Phi-4 The lab's model card Compare with others
47
Benchmarks with a score
1
Ranked first, out of five or more models
4
In the top three
Microsoft Feb 2025

Phi-4-multimodal

Open weights Small

No Epoch Capabilities Index score yet
  • MMMU-Pro 38.5% #85 /90
  • BLINK 61.3% #21 /29
  • MMAU 55.6% #15 /15

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MMBench-CN v1.1 74.9% #80 of 178 Official leaderboard
Longform Creative Writing (EQ-Bench) 22.8 #117 of 119 Official leaderboard
POPE 85.6% #7 of 7 Lab model card

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
HiPhO 10.6% #35 of 36 Official leaderboard

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
SnakeBench 20 #132 of 188 Official leaderboard

Vision, audio and robotics

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
FLEURS 4.00% #1 of 6 Lab model card
SEED-Bench-2-Plus 68.5% #26 of 136 Official leaderboard
MMBench 83.4% #30 of 155 Official leaderboard
CoVoST2 39.3 #3 of 14 Lab model card
A-Bench 75.4% #30 of 116 Official leaderboard
CCBench (MMBench Chinese Culture) 55.5% #49 of 152 Official leaderboard
MMBench-EN v1.1 79.5% #59 of 178 Official leaderboard
MMStar 58.9% #63 of 173 Official leaderboard
MM-Vet 51.9% #81 of 164 Official leaderboard
Inter-GPS (Geometry3K) 48.6% #1 of 2 Lab model card
ScienceQA 97.5% #1 of 2 Lab model card
DocVQA 93.2% #21 of 36 Lab model card
Common Voice 6.80% #3 of 5 Lab model card
MMSU 45% #3 of 5 Official leaderboard
CoreCognition 53.5% #75 of 119 Official leaderboard
InfographicVQA 72.7% #17 of 26 Lab model card
VoiceBench 64.3% #10 of 15 Official leaderboard
MMAU v05.15.25 65.7% #4 of 6 Official leaderboard
TextVQA 75.6% #12 of 17 Lab model card
BLINK 61.3% #21 of 29 Lab model card
ChartQA 81.4% #27 of 37 Lab model card
AVMeme Exam 45.8% #3 of 4 Official leaderboard
OCRBench 84.4% #27 of 34 Lab model card
Audio MC 15.5% #15 of 18 Official leaderboard
MathVista 62.4% #59 of 70 Lab model card
AI2D 82.3% #44 of 52 Lab model card
VoxMem 20.4% #8 of 9 Official leaderboard
MMMU 55.1% #92 of 103 Lab model card
MMMU-Pro 38.5% #85 of 90 Lab model card
Video-MME 55% #49 of 51 Lab model card
MMBench-Video 0.87 #28 of 28 Official leaderboard
MMAU 55.6% #15 of 15 Lab model card
Do You See Me 24.9% #5 of 5 Official leaderboard
AIR-Bench (Audio Instruction Benchmark) 6.98 #1 of 1 Lab model card
Golden3 speech summarization (Microsoft) 6.28 #1 of 1 Lab model card
Open ASR Leaderboard 6.14% #1 of 1 Lab model card

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
XSTest 26.4% #7 of 16 Lab model card
RTVLM 6.39 #1 of 2 Lab model card
Harmful content defect rate (Azure AI Evaluation SDK, Microsoft) 4.00% #3 of 3 Lab model card
Microsoft internal multimodal RAI benchmark 7.96 #2 of 2 Lab model card
VLGuard 8.91 #2 of 2 Lab model card

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
OpenVLM Leaderboard 64.7 #58 of 173 Official leaderboard

Its lab's numbers next to 3 leaderboards

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
MMBench 86.7% MMBench (dev-en) 83.4% Leaderboard +3.3 pts
Open ASR Leaderboard 6.14% OpenASR, average WER over 8 sets, lower is better (Tables 3 and 4) 6.02% Leaderboard Same
MathVista 62.4% MathVista (testmini) 62.4% Leaderboard Same

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.

Its system card

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 12 of them aren't in the launch post.

Hallucination