Benchmark Almanac

Inter-GPS (Geometry3K)

Phi-4-multimodal 48.6% leads since February 2025
Dropped

Models solve high school geometry problems that combine a diagram and text from the Geometry3K test set. Scored by accuracy.

Released
May 2021
Kind
Visual math and diagrams
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
February 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
March 2025

In the authors’ words

Geometry problem solving has attracted much attention in the NLP community recently. The task is challenging as it requires abstract problem understanding and symbolic reasoning with axiomatic knowledge. However, current datasets are either small in scale or not publicly available. Thus, we construct a new large-scale benchmark, Geometry3K, consisting of 3,002 geometry problems with dense annotation in formal language. We further propose a novel geometry solving approach with formal language and symbolic reasoning, called Interpretable Geometry Problem Solver (Inter-GPS). Inter-GPS first parses the problem text and diagram into formal language automatically via rule-based text parsing and neural object detecting, respectively. Unlike implicit learning in existing methods, Inter-GPS incorporates theorem knowledge as conditional rules and performs symbolic reasoning step by step. Also, a theorem predictor is designed to infer the theorem application sequence fed to the symbolic solver for the more efficient and reasonable searching path. Extensive experiments on the Geometry3K and GEOS datasets demonstrate that Inter-GPS achieves significant improvements over existing methods. The project with code and data is available at https://lupantech.github.io/inter-gps.

Abstract of Inter-GPS: Interpretable Geometry Problem Solving with Formal Language and Symbolic Reasoning (arXiv:2105.04165, CC0)
2
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Phi-4-multimodal leads with 48.6%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Phi-4-multimodal 48.6%
  2. 2 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 36.3%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Phi-4-multimodal 48.6% Feb 2025 Lab model card
2 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 36.3% Aug 2024 Lab model card

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Other labs Microsoft
Lab claims Not tested since Mar 2025

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Phi-4-multimodal Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Phi-4-multimodal Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Source: Labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since February 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Microsoft
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Feb 26, 2025 Phi-4-multimodal 48.6 InterGPS

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Mar 3, 2025 Phi-4-multimodal technical report 48.6 Inter-GPS (test) (Table 1) Capabilities
Aug 30, 2024 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct technical report 36.3 Inter-GPS (test) (Table 5) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%