Benchmark Almanac

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct.

Released August 16th, 2024 Compare with others
40
Benchmarks with a score
0
Ranked first, out of five or more models
0
In the top three
Unknown lab Aug 2024

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

No Epoch Capabilities Index score yet
  • BLINK 57% #23 /29
  • HumanEval-V 5.90% #15 /24
  • TextVQA 72% #14 /17

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MMBench-CN v1.1 62.8% #137 of 178 Official leaderboard
POPE 86.1% #6 of 7 Lab model card

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
HumanEval-V 5.90% #15 of 24 Official leaderboard

Vision, audio and robotics

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
SEED-Bench-2-Plus 62.2% #67 of 136 Official leaderboard
CharXiv 32.7% #38 of 77 Official leaderboard
MMBench 76% #77 of 155 Official leaderboard
MMBench-EN v1.1 72.1% #104 of 178 Official leaderboard
CharXiv (DQ) 55% #43 of 67 Official leaderboard
MMStar 47.5% #113 of 173 Official leaderboard
MM-Vet 43.2% #110 of 164 Official leaderboard
ChartQA 81.8% #25 of 37 Lab model card
CoreCognition 52.1% #81 of 119 Official leaderboard
VCR (Visual Caption Restoration) 18.1% #30 of 42 Official leaderboard
MEGA-Bench 25.4% #16 of 22 Official leaderboard
MMVU 38.1% #21 of 28 Official leaderboard
BLINK 57% #23 of 29 Lab model card
MMMU 43% #108 of 136 Official leaderboard
CCBench (MMBench Chinese Culture) 27.6% #121 of 152 Official leaderboard
TemporalBench 15.5% #8 of 10 Official leaderboard
xMMMU 38.8% #4 of 5 Official leaderboard
MMBench-Video 1.20 #23 of 28 Official leaderboard
TextVQA 72% #14 of 17 Lab model card
VRBench 48.5% #16 of 19 Official leaderboard
CrossVid 21.5% #11 of 13 Official leaderboard
TOMATO 20.7% #19 of 22 Official leaderboard
VL-RewardBench 35.7% #7 of 8 Official leaderboard
KRETA 42.6% #15 of 17 Official leaderboard
MMMU-Pro 19.7% #52 of 57 Official leaderboard
AI2D 78.1% #48 of 52 Lab model card
Vision Arena 919 #135 of 136 Official leaderboard
MathVista 43.9% #70 of 70 Lab model card
VISTA 15.2% #54 of 54 Official leaderboard
Video-MME 50.8% #51 of 51 Lab model card
SITE 21.8% #6 of 6 Official leaderboard
Inter-GPS (Geometry3K) 36.3% #2 of 2 Lab model card
ScienceQA 91.3% #2 of 2 Lab model card

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Microsoft internal multimodal RAI benchmark 8.16 #1 of 2 Lab model card
VLGuard 9.10 #1 of 2 Lab model card
RTVLM 5.44 #2 of 2 Lab model card

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
OpenVLM Leaderboard 53.0 #117 of 173 Official leaderboard

Its lab's numbers next to 3 leaderboards

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
MMBench 81.9% MMBench (dev-en) (Table 5) 76% Leaderboard +5.9 pts
MathVista 43.9% MathVista (testmini) (Table 5) 43.9% Leaderboard Same
MMMU 43% MMMU (val), 0-shot (Table 5) 43% Leaderboard Same

Its system card

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 14 of them aren't in the launch post.