Benchmark Almanac

LogicVista

Qwen 3.8 Max 91.9% leads since August 2026
In use

Models answer 448 multiple-choice questions on spatial, deductive, inductive, numeric, and mechanical reasoning set in images. Scored by accuracy.

Made by
UCLA
Released
July 2024
Kind
Visual math and diagrams
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen 3.8 Max #29 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2026
Last model added
August 2026

In the authors’ words

We propose LogicVista, an evaluation benchmark that assesses the integrated logical reasoning capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in Visual contexts. Recent advancements in MLLMs have demonstrated various fascinating abilities, from crafting poetry based on an image to performing mathematical reasoning. However, there is still a lack of systematic evaluation of MLLMs' proficiency in logical reasoning tasks, which are essential for activities like navigation and puzzle-solving. Thus we evaluate general logical cognition abilities across 5 logical reasoning tasks encompassing 9 different capabilities, using a sample of 448 multiple-choice questions. Each question is annotated with the correct answer and the human-written reasoning behind the selection, enabling both open-ended and multiple-choice evaluation. A total of 8 MLLMs are comprehensively evaluated using LogicVista. Code and Data Available at https://github.com/Yijia-Xiao/LogicVista.

Abstract of LogicVista: Multimodal LLM Logical Reasoning Benchmark in Visual Contexts (arXiv:2407.04973, CC0)
14
Models scored in lab cards
7
Launch posts list it, from 6 labs
12
System cards report it, from 7 labs

Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 91.9% among models released by August 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen 3.8 Max 91.9%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Pro 81.9%
  3. 3 Seed1.8 78.3%
  4. 4 EXAONE 4.5 33B 73.8%
  5. 5 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 72.2%
  6. 6 STEP3-VL-10B 66.9%
  7. 7 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 66.7%
  8. 8 GLM-4.5V 62.4%
  9. 9 GLM-4.6V 62.1%
  10. 10 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 60.4%
  11. 11 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 58.4%
  12. 12 Cosmos3-Nano 41.8%
  13. 13 LFM2.5-VL-3B 37.4%
  14. 14 Cosmos3-Edge 34.7%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.8 Max 91.9% Aug 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed2.0 Pro 81.9% Feb 2026 Lab model card
3 Seed1.8 78.3% Dec 2025 Lab model card
4 EXAONE 4.5 33B 73.8% Apr 2026 Lab model card
5 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 72.2% Nov 2025 Lab model card
6 STEP3-VL-10B 66.9% Jan 2026 Lab model card
7 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 66.7% Aug 2025 Lab model card
8 GLM-4.5V 62.4% Aug 2025 Lab model card
9 GLM-4.6V 62.1% Jan 2026 Lab model card
10 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 60.4% Jul 2025 Lab model card
11 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 58.4% Nov 2025 Lab model card
12 Cosmos3-Nano 41.8% May 2026 Lab model card
13 LFM2.5-VL-3B 37.4% Aug 2026 Lab model card
14 Cosmos3-Edge 34.7% May 2026 Lab model card

7 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in July 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Z.ai Shanghai AI Lab Qwen ByteDance Seed
Lab claims Passed 85% in Aug 2026, by Qwen 3.8 Max
Qwen 3.8 Max 91.9%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Qwen’s own number for Qwen 3.8 Max passed 85% in August 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Seed2.0 Pro Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B InternVL3.5-241B-A28B GLM-4.5V 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Seed2.0 Pro

Source: Labs’ model cards

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Z.ai
Shanghai AI Lab
ByteDance Seed
LG AI Research
Qwen
Liquid AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 12, 2026 LFM2.5-VL-3B 37.4 LogicVista
Aug 3, 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 91.9 LogicVista
Apr 9, 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B 73.8 LogicVista
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 81.9 LogicVista
Dec 18, 2025 Seed1.8 78.3 LogicVista
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 66.7 LogicVista
Aug 11, 2025 GLM-4.5V 62.4 LogicVista

12 system cards report it, from 7 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
May 31, 2026 Cosmos3-Nano technical report 41.8 LogicVista, Cosmos3-Nano 8B column, Table 10 Capabilities
May 31, 2026 Cosmos3-Edge technical report 34.7 LogicVista, Cosmos3-Edge 2B column, Table 10 Capabilities
Apr 9, 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B technical report 73.8 LogicVista (Table 2, Reasoning mode) Capabilities
Mar 21, 2026 Seed1.8 model card 78.3 LogicVista (Table 2) Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 81.9 LogicVista (Table 8) Capabilities
Jan 14, 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 66.9 LogicVista, SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 71.36 Capabilities
Jan 1, 2026 GLM-4.6V technical report 62.1 LogicVista, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Nov 26, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 72.2 LogicVista (Table 2) Capabilities
Nov 6, 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL technical report 58.4 LogicVista, reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 38.7 Capabilities
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 66.7 LogicVista (Table 2, Table 3). With parallel thinking 67.6 Capabilities
Aug 13, 2025 GLM-4.5V technical report 62.4 LogicVista, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Jul 1, 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report 60.4 LogicVista, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%