- MMBench-V1.1-EN 85.8
- MMBench-V1.1-CN 84.7
- MMStar 72.9
- BLINK 65.1
- MUIRBENCH 74.7
- MMMU 68
- MMMU-Pro 57.1
- VideoMMMU 61
- AI2D 87.9
- MathVista 80.7
- WeMath 63.8
- ChartQAPro 59.5
- ChartMuseum 48.8
- OCRBench 84.2
- MMLongBench-Doc 42.4
- RefCOCO-avg (val) 87.4
- OSWorld 14.9
- AndroidWorld 41.7
- WebVoyageSom 69
- Mean of Webquest-SingleQA 72.1 / Webquest-MultiQA 54.7 63.4
- Design2Code 64.7
- Flame-VLM-Code 72.5
- VideoMME (w/) 73.6
- MMVU 59.4
- LVBench 45.1
- MotionBench 59
GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking places in the top three on CrossVid.
GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
Open weights Small
- MMMU-Pro 57.1% #70 /90
- ERQA 45.8% #32 /36
- MMVU 59.4% #23 /26
Where it ranks
Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.
Knowledge and language
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HallusionBench | 63.2% | #19 of 31 | Lab model card | |
| MMBench-CN v1.1 | 84.7% | #4 of 5 | Lab model card |
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SArena | 0.82 | #12 of 17 | Official leaderboard | |
| Flame-React-Eval | 72.5% | #4 of 4 | Lab model card |
Agents and tools
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | 14.9% | #12 of 13 | Lab model card | |
| SnakeBench | 13 | #179 of 188 | Official leaderboard | |
| AndroidWorld | 41.7% | #22 of 23 | Lab model card | |
| GameHorizon | 55.0 | #36 of 37 | Official leaderboard | |
| WebVoyager | 69% | #12 of 12 | Lab model card |
Vision, audio and robotics
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrossVid | 35.1% | #2 of 13 | Official leaderboard | |
| MMMU | 68% | #41 of 136 | Official leaderboard | |
| MM-HELIX | 23.7% | #6 of 17 | Official leaderboard | |
| MathVista | 80.7% | #28 of 70 | Lab model card | |
| CVBench | 85% | #6 of 15 | Lab model card | |
| BLINK | 65.1% | #14 of 29 | Lab model card | |
| Math-VR | 29% | #14 of 26 | Official leaderboard | |
| AI2D | 87.9% | #30 of 52 | Lab model card | |
| MuirBench | 74.7% | #7 of 12 | Lab model card | |
| CompassArena Multimodal | 1,073 | #5 of 8 | Official leaderboard | |
| MMStar | 72.9% | #23 of 36 | Lab model card | |
| MME-CC | 19.3% | #8 of 12 | Official leaderboard | |
| ZeroBench | 19.2% | #21 of 31 | Lab model card | |
| MMBench-EN v1.1 | 85.8% | #16 of 23 | Lab model card | |
| MMLongBench-Doc | 42.4% | #12 of 17 | Official leaderboard | |
| LogicVista | 60.4% | #10 of 14 | Lab model card | |
| MathVerse | 68.4% | #9 of 12 | Lab model card | |
| RefCOCO / RefCOCO+ / RefCOCOg | 87.4% | #22 of 29 | Lab model card | |
| Video-MME | 73.6% | #39 of 51 | Lab model card | |
| MMMU-Pro | 57.1% | #70 of 90 | Lab model card | |
| OCRBench | 84.2% | #28 of 34 | Lab model card | |
| MATH-Vision (MathVision) | 54.4% | #43 of 51 | Lab model card | |
| We-Math | 63.8% | #11 of 13 | Lab model card | |
| MVBench | 68.4% | #20 of 23 | Lab model card | |
| MMVU | 59.4% | #23 of 26 | Lab model card | |
| ERQA | 45.8% | #32 of 36 | Lab model card | |
| VideoMME v2 (with subtitles) | 14% | #29 of 31 | Official leaderboard | |
| Video-MMMU | 61% | #34 of 36 | Lab model card | |
| DynaMath | 42.5% | #22 of 23 | Lab model card | |
| LVBench | 45.1% | #30 of 31 | Lab model card | |
| MotionBench | 59% | #9 of 9 | Lab model card | |
| ChartQA Pro | 59.5% | #8 of 8 | Lab model card | |
| TreeBench | 37.5% | #7 of 7 | Lab model card | |
| All-Angles Bench | 52.7% | #6 of 6 | Lab model card | |
| OmniSpatial | 47.7% | #6 of 6 | Lab model card | |
| ChartMuseum | 48.8% | #5 of 5 | Lab model card | |
| Ref-L4 | 86.8% | #3 of 3 | Lab model card | |
| WebQuest | 63.4% | #3 of 3 | Lab model card | |
| GeoBench | 76% | #2 of 2 | Lab model card |
Its lab's numbers put it at 129.2, number 281 of 404
The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 28 capability results Z.ai reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 127.3 to 131.2. How we compute it.
- AI2D 87.9
- RefCOCO / RefCOCO+ / RefCOCOg 87.4
- MMBench-EN v1.1 85.8
- CVBench 85
- OCRBench 84.2
- MathVista 80.7
- MuirBench 74.7
- Video-MME 73.6
- MMStar 72.9
- MathVerse 68.4
- MVBench 68.4
- MMMU 68
- BLINK 65.1
- We-Math 63.8
- HallusionBench 63.2
- Video-MMMU 61
- LogicVista 60.4
- ChartQA Pro 59.5
- MMVU 59.4
- MotionBench 59
- MMMU-Pro 57.1
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) 54.4
- LVBench 45.1
- DynaMath 42.5
- MMLongBench-Doc 42.4
- AndroidWorld 41.7
- ZeroBench 19.2
- OSWorld 14.9
Its lab's numbers next to 5 leaderboards
Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.
| Benchmark | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| MotionBench | 59% MotionBench | 59.4% Leaderboard, frames: 2fps | −0.4 pts |
| MATH-Vision (MathVision) | 54.4% MathVision, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) | 54.4% Leaderboard | Same |
| MMLongBench-Doc | 42.4% MMLongBench-Doc | 42.4% Leaderboard, VL; 9B | Same |
| MMMU | 68% MMMU | 68% Leaderboard, thinking | Same |
| MMMU-Pro | 57.1% MMMU-Pro | 57.1% Leaderboard, thinking | Same |
Its launch post
The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.
Its system card
Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 14 of them aren't in the launch post.
Capabilities
- MMBench-EN v1.1 85.8
- MMBench-CN v1.1 84.7
- MMStar 72.9
- BLINK 65.1
- MuirBench 74.7
- HallusionBench 63.2
- ZeroBench 19.2
- GeoBench 76
- MMMU 68
- MMMU-Pro 57.1
- MathVista 80.7
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) 54.4
- MathVerse 68.4
- DynaMath 42.5
- LogicVista 60.4
- AI2D 87.9
- We-Math 63.8
- MMLongBench-Doc 42.4
- OCRBench 84.2
- ChartQA Pro 59.5
- ChartMuseum 48.8
- RefCOCO / RefCOCO+ / RefCOCOg 85.3
- TreeBench 37.5
- Ref-L4 86.8
- OmniSpatial 47.7
- CVBench 85
- ERQA 45.8
- All-Angles Bench 52.7
- OSWorld 14.9
- AndroidWorld 41.7
- WebVoyager 69
- WebQuest
- Design2Code 64.7
- Flame-React-Eval 72.5
- Video-MME 73.6
- MMVU 59.4
- Video-MMMU 61
- LVBench 44
- MotionBench 59
- MVBench 68.4