MerchantBench
Agents run a seller's e-commerce store for 365 simulated days at order level. Actions constrain later choices, so the test measures long-term coherence.
The headline leaderboard reports mean final net assets in thousands of RMB across three 365-day runs per model and harness.
- Made by
- Alibaba
- Released
- July 2026
- Kind
- Simulated companies
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Settled by events
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5.6 Sol #13 on the capability index
- Last model added
- July 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large language model agents are increasingly evaluated as autonomous tool users, yet most benchmarks focus on bounded tasks with immediate success criteria. Real-world deployments often require Long-Term Coherence, the capacity to preserve purposeful behavior across extended horizons while adapting decisions to accumulated evidence. Evaluating this capacity requires a persistent environment in which actions constrain future choices, feedback arrives at heterogeneous delays, and incoherent behavior produces measurable cumulative effects. Seller-side e-commerce provides a suitable setting for this evaluation through recurrent and interdependent decisions over Product Sourcing, Listing and Pricing Control, Cash-Flow Management, and Mixed-Latency Feedback Adaptation. We introduce MerchantBench, a 365-day order-level simulation grounded in 98,843 real e-commerce product records and equipped with 26 tools for agent interaction. MerchantBench couples promptly observable Upstream Supplier Events with delayed Downstream Order Outcomes, requiring agents to follow individual order lifecycles and revisit earlier decisions. We evaluate eight LLMs under two agent frameworks in 48 runs, each spanning 365 simulated days. Our results reveal a substantial gap between even the latest LLMs and human participants, with the best LLM configuration attaining only 27.3% of the mean final net assets achieved by human participants.
Qwen3.7-Max leads with 59.5 among models released by July 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 15 more
- 1
Qwen3.7-Max 59.5
- 2 GPT-5.6 Sol 52.9
- 3 GLM-5.2 42.3
- 4 Claude Opus 4.8 35.6
- 5
Qwen3.7-Plus 29.4
- 6 Kimi K2.6 25.0
- 7
DeepSeek-V4-Flash 24.7
- 8
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 16.7
Source: Official MerchantBench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 59.5 | Hermes | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 52.9 | Hermes | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GLM-5.2 | 42.3 | Hermes | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 35.6 | Hermes | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 29.4 | Hermes | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Kimi K2.6 | 25.0 | ReAct | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 24.7 | Hermes | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 16.7 | Hermes | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official MerchantBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official MerchantBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Economic work
- JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
- GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate.
Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
- GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
- AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
- CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Claude Fable 5 75.9%
- OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%