Benchmark Almanac

MerchantBench

Qwen3.7-Max 59.5 leads since July 2026
Not in model cards

Agents run a seller's e-commerce store for 365 simulated days at order level. Actions constrain later choices, so the test measures long-term coherence.

The headline leaderboard reports mean final net assets in thousands of RMB across three 365-day runs per model and harness.

Made by
Alibaba
Released
July 2026
Kind
Simulated companies
Level
Expert
Scored
Settled by events
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.6 Sol #13 on the capability index
Last model added
July 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Large language model agents are increasingly evaluated as autonomous tool users, yet most benchmarks focus on bounded tasks with immediate success criteria. Real-world deployments often require Long-Term Coherence, the capacity to preserve purposeful behavior across extended horizons while adapting decisions to accumulated evidence. Evaluating this capacity requires a persistent environment in which actions constrain future choices, feedback arrives at heterogeneous delays, and incoherent behavior produces measurable cumulative effects. Seller-side e-commerce provides a suitable setting for this evaluation through recurrent and interdependent decisions over Product Sourcing, Listing and Pricing Control, Cash-Flow Management, and Mixed-Latency Feedback Adaptation. We introduce MerchantBench, a 365-day order-level simulation grounded in 98,843 real e-commerce product records and equipped with 26 tools for agent interaction. MerchantBench couples promptly observable Upstream Supplier Events with delayed Downstream Order Outcomes, requiring agents to follow individual order lifecycles and revisit earlier decisions. We evaluate eight LLMs under two agent frameworks in 48 runs, each spanning 365 simulated days. Our results reveal a substantial gap between even the latest LLMs and human participants, with the best LLM configuration attaining only 27.3% of the mean final net assets achieved by human participants.

Abstract of MerchantBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Long-Term Coherence in E-Commerce Operations (arXiv:2607.28956, CC0)
8
Models scored on its own leaderboard

Qwen3.7-Max leads with 59.5 among models released by July 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen3.7-Max 59.5
  2. 2 GPT-5.6 Sol 52.9
  3. 3 GLM-5.2 42.3
  4. 4 Claude Opus 4.8 35.6
  5. 5 Qwen3.7-Plus 29.4
  6. 6 Kimi K2.6 25.0
  7. 7 DeepSeek-V4-Flash 24.7
  8. 8 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 16.7

Source: Official MerchantBench leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.7-Max 59.5 Hermes May 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.6 Sol 52.9 Hermes Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GLM-5.2 42.3 Hermes Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Opus 4.8 35.6 Hermes May 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3.7-Plus 29.4 Hermes Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Kimi K2.6 25.0 ReAct Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
7 DeepSeek-V4-Flash 24.7 Hermes Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
8 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 16.7 Hermes Apr 2026 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jul 2026

Source: Official MerchantBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0.00 20.0 40.0 60.0 2026 0.00 20.0 40.0 60.0 2026

Source: Official MerchantBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Economic work

All 97 in Economic work
  • JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
  • GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate. Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
  • GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
  • AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
  • CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Claude Fable 5 75.9%
  • OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%