Benchmark Almanac

MMEnterprise-Bench

GPT-5.6 Sol 68% leads since October 2026
Not in model cards

Enterprise agents answer 1,613 questions over workplace documents, chats and figures that change over time. They must resolve conflicting versions and say when evidence is not enough.

It had 32 Hugging Face paper upvotes and 16 GitHub stars.

Released
October 2026
Kind
Simulated companies
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.6 Sol #13 on the capability index
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Enterprise agents answer questions over workplace records that evolve through team collaboration. As information is shared, corrected, and revised across documents, chats, and figures, multiple versions of the same information accumulate in the workspace. Reliable question answering therefore requires agents to reason over sufficient evidence, resolve cross-source and temporal conflicts, and recognize when the available evidence is insufficient to establish an answer. To systematically evaluate these capabilities, we introduce MMEnterprise-Bench, a benchmark comprising 1,613 questions grounded in evolving multimodal records from simulated collaboration projects, covering three categories: Evidence Reasoning, Conflict Resolution, and Unanswerability. We evaluate 10 proprietary and open-source multimodal LLMs and find that even the strongest models struggle when evidence contains cross-source or temporal conflicts or spans multiple images. Moreover, increasing the retrieval budget or employing a larger retriever improves evidence recall but does not consistently translate into higher answer accuracy. These findings highlight the persistent challenges of reasoning over evolving workplace records and establish MMEnterprise-Bench as a testbed for developing more reliable enterprise agents. Code and data are available at https://mlvlab.github.io/MMEnterprise-Bench/.

Abstract of MMEnterprise-Bench: Evaluating Enterprise Agents over Evolving Multimodal Records (arXiv:2610.27911, CC0)
10
Entries on its own leaderboard, 9 models we track

GPT-5.6 Sol leads with 68% among models released by September 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5.6 Sol Oracle context 68%
  2. 2 GPT-5.6 Luna Oracle context 65.8%
  3. 3 Gemini 3.8 Flash Oracle context 63.9%
  4. 4 Gemini 3.1 Pro Oracle context 62.5%
  5. 5 Qwen3.5-27B Oracle context 50.3%
  6. 6 Qwen3.5-4B Oracle context 43.8%
  7. 7 Qwen3.5-9B Oracle context 43.1%
  8. 8 InternVL3.5-8B Oracle context 36.6%
  9. 9 Qwen3.5-2B Oracle context 25%
  10. 10 Kimi-VL-16B-A3B-Instruct Oracle context 23.1%

Source: Official MMEnterprise-Bench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.6 Sol 68% Oracle context Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.6 Luna 65.8% Oracle context Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3.8 Flash 63.9% Oracle context Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 3.1 Pro 62.5% Oracle context Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3.5-27B 50.3% Oracle context Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen3.5-4B 43.8% Oracle context Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen3.5-9B 43.1% Oracle context Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
8 InternVL3.5-8B 36.6% Oracle context Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen3.5-2B 25% Oracle context Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Kimi-VL-16B-A3B-Instruct 23.1% Oracle context Official leaderboard

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
GPT-5.6 Sol
Retrieved c… Oracle cont…
68%
GPT-5.6 Luna
Retrieved c… Oracle cont…
65.8%
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Retrieved c… Oracle cont…
63.9%
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Retrieved c… Oracle cont…
62.5%
Qwen3.5-27B
Retrieved c… Oracle cont…
50.3%
Qwen3.5-4B
Retrieved c… Oracle cont…
43.8%
Qwen3.5-9B
Retrieved c… Oracle cont…
43.1%
InternVL3.5-8B
Retrieved c… Oracle cont…
36.6%
Qwen3.5-2B
Retrieved c…
25%

Source: Official MMEnterprise-Bench leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
GPT-5.6 Sol Oracle context 68%
GPT-5.6 Luna Oracle context 65.8%
Gemini 3.8 Flash Oracle context 63.9%
Gemini 3.1 Pro Oracle context 62.5%
GPT-5.6 Sol Retrieved context 52.6%
GPT-5.6 Luna Retrieved context 51.3%
Qwen3.5-27B Oracle context 50.3%
Gemini 3.8 Flash Retrieved context 47.6%
Gemini 3.1 Pro Retrieved context 45.9%
Qwen3.5-4B Oracle context 43.8%
Qwen3.5-9B Oracle context 43.1%
Qwen3.5-27B Retrieved context 38.6%
InternVL3.5-8B Oracle context 36.6%
Qwen3.5-4B Retrieved context 36%
Qwen3.5-9B Retrieved context 34.9%
InternVL3.5-8B Retrieved context 32.7%
Qwen3.5-2B Oracle context 25%
Qwen3.5-2B Retrieved context 23.6%

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard 1 leader

Source: Official MMEnterprise-Bench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.6 Sol Gemini 3.1 Pro InternVL3.5-8B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.6 Sol InternVL3.5-8B

Source: Official MMEnterprise-Bench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Economic work

All 97 in Economic work
  • JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
  • GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate. Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
  • GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
  • AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
  • CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Claude Fable 5 75.9%
  • OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%