MMIU
Vision-language models answer 11,000 multiple-choice questions over sets of images. 52 tasks cover 7 kinds of multi-image relationship.
Spatial tasks are the weakest area in the paper's results.
- Released
- August 2024
- Kind
- General visual questions
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Last in a system card
- August 2025
- Last model added
- August 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
The capability to process multiple images is crucial for Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) to develop a more thorough and nuanced understanding of a scene. Recent multi-image LVLMs have begun to address this need. However, their evaluation has not kept pace with their development. To fill this gap, we introduce the Multimodal Multi-image Understanding (MMIU) benchmark, a comprehensive evaluation suite designed to assess LVLMs across a wide range of multi-image tasks. MMIU encompasses 7 types of multi-image relationships, 52 tasks, 77K images, and 11K meticulously curated multiple-choice questions, making it the most extensive benchmark of its kind. Our evaluation of 24 popular LVLMs, including both open-source and proprietary models, reveals significant challenges in multi-image comprehension, particularly in tasks involving spatial understanding. Even the most advanced models, such as GPT-4o, achieve only 55.7% accuracy on MMIU. Through multi-faceted analytical experiments, we identify key performance gaps and limitations, providing valuable insights for future model and data improvements. We aim for MMIU to advance the frontier of LVLM research and development, moving us toward achieving sophisticated multimodal multi-image user interactions.
GPT-4o [snapshot unspecified] tops the leaderboard with 55.7%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Idefics2-8B, at 27.8%.
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B leads with 61.3%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in June 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 55.7 GPT-4o [snapshot unspecified]
- 53.4 Claude3.5
- 53.4 Gemini1.5
- 51.7 ByteVideoLLM
- 50.3 InternVL2
- 45.6 Mantis
- 40.2 Gemini1.0
- 37.4 InternVL1.5-chat
- 32.4 Llava-interleave
- 27.8
Idefics2-8B
- 27.0 GLM-4V-9B
- 24.6
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat
- 23.5 XComposer2-1.8b
- 23.2
DeepSeek-VL-1.3B-Chat
- 22.3 flamingov2
- 22.2 llava-v1.6-vicuna-7b
- 21.9 XComposer2
- 21.6
MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5
- 19.2 llava-v1.5-7b
- 18.5
ShareGPT4V-7B
- 16.1 SharedCaptioner
- 15.9 qwen-chat
- 13.7 Monkey-Chat
- 12.8
IDEFICS-9B-Instruct
- 5.20 qwen-base
- 1 GPT-4o [snapshot unspecified] 55.7%
- 2 Claude3.5 53.4%
- 3 Gemini1.5 53.4%
- 4 ByteVideoLLM 51.7%
- 5 InternVL2 50.3%
- 6 Mantis 45.6%
- 7 Gemini1.0 40.2%
- 8 InternVL1.5-chat 37.4%
- 9 Llava-interleave 32.4%
- 10
Idefics2-8B 27.8%
- 11 GLM-4V-9B 27%
- 12
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 24.6%
- 13 XComposer2-1.8b 23.5%
- 14
DeepSeek-VL-1.3B-Chat 23.2%
- 15 flamingov2 22.3%
- 16 llava-v1.6-vicuna-7b 22.2%
- 17 XComposer2 21.9%
- 18
MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 21.6%
- 19 llava-v1.5-7b 19.2%
- 20
ShareGPT4V-7B 18.5%
- 21 SharedCaptioner 16.1%
- 22 qwen-chat 15.9%
- 23 Monkey-Chat 13.7%
- 24
IDEFICS-9B-Instruct 12.8%
- 25 qwen-base 5.20%
Source: Official MMIU leaderboard
- 1
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 61.3%
- 2
Idefics2-8B 27.8%
- 3 GLM-4V-9B 27%
- 4
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 24.6%
- 5
DeepSeek-VL-1.3B-Chat 23.2%
- 6 llava-v1.6-vicuna-7b 22.2%
- 7
MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 21.6%
- 8 llava-v1.5-7b 19.2%
- 9
ShareGPT4V-7B 18.5%
- 10 Monkey-Chat 13.7%
- 11
IDEFICS-9B-Instruct 12.8%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official MMIU leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4o [snapshot unspecified] | 55.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | Claude3.5 | 53.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | Gemini1.5 | 53.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | ByteVideoLLM | 51.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | InternVL2 | 50.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | Mantis | 45.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | Gemini1.0 | 40.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | InternVL1.5-chat | 37.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | Llava-interleave | 32.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | | 27.8% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | GLM-4V-9B | 27% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 24.6% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | XComposer2-1.8b | 23.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | | 23.2% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | flamingov2 | 22.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | llava-v1.6-vicuna-7b | 22.2% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | XComposer2 | 21.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | | 21.6% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | llava-v1.5-7b | 19.2% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 18.5% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | SharedCaptioner | 16.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 22 | qwen-chat | 15.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 23 | Monkey-Chat | 13.7% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | | 12.8% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | qwen-base | 5.20% | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 61.3% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 27.8% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GLM-4V-9B | 27% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 24.6% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 23.2% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | llava-v1.6-vicuna-7b | 22.2% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 21.6% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | llava-v1.5-7b | 19.2% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 18.5% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Monkey-Chat | 13.7% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 12.8% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in August 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official MMIU leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official MMIU leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2025 | | 61.3 | MMIU (Table 5) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%