MMT-Bench
Vision-language models answer 31,325 multiple-choice questions across many multimodal tasks such as recognition, localization, reasoning and planning.
ICML 2024.
- Made by
- Shanghai AI Laboratory
- Released
- April 2024
- Kind
- General visual questions
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Last in a system card
- November 2025
- Last model added
- November 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) show significant strides in general-purpose multimodal applications such as visual dialogue and embodied navigation. However, existing multimodal evaluation benchmarks cover a limited number of multimodal tasks testing rudimentary capabilities, falling short in tracking LVLM development. In this study, we present MMT-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to assess LVLMs across massive multimodal tasks requiring expert knowledge and deliberate visual recognition, localization, reasoning, and planning. MMT-Bench comprises 31,325 meticulously curated multi-choice visual questions from various multimodal scenarios such as vehicle driving and embodied navigation, covering 32 core meta-tasks and 162 subtasks in multimodal understanding. Due to its extensive task coverage, MMT-Bench enables the evaluation of LVLMs using a task map, facilitating the discovery of in- and out-of-domain tasks. Evaluation results involving 30 LVLMs such as the proprietary GPT-4V, GeminiProVision, and open-sourced InternVL-Chat, underscore the significant challenges posed by MMT-Bench. We anticipate that MMT-Bench will inspire the community to develop next-generation multimodal foundation models aimed at achieving general-purpose multimodal intelligence.
GPT4o (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 65.5%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Qwen-VL-Max, at 62.4%.
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B leads with 72.7%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in March 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 65.5 GPT4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 63.4 InternVL-Chat-v1.2-34B
- 62.4 Qwen-VL-Max
- 62.3
Qwen-VL-Plus
- 61.6 GeminiProVision
- 61.1 GPT-4V
- 60.8
LLaVA-v1.6-34B
- 55.7 XComposer2
- 54.8 BLIP2
- 54.2
Yi-VL-34B
- 53.4 Monkey-Chat
- 53.2
Yi-VL-6B
- 53.2
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat
- 53.0 llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b
- 52.7 TransCore-M
- 52.5 Qwen-VL-Chat
- 52.2 Claude3V_Haiku
- 52.1 XComposer
- 52.0
mPLUG-Owl2
- 51.8 RBDash-v1-13B
- 51.7
LLaVA-v1.5-13B
- 51.6 CogVLM-17B-Chat
- 51.5
ShareGPT4V-7B
- 51.1 LLaVA-NEXT-7B
- 51.1 LLaVA-v1.5-13B-XTuner
- 50.8 LLaVA-InternLM2-7B
- 50.2 LLaVA-v1.5-7B-XTuner
- 49.9 SharedCaptioner
- 49.7 LLaVA-InternLM-7B
- 49.5 llava-v1.5-7b
- 40.4 LLaMA-Adapter-v2-7B
- 38.6 VisualGLM-6B
- 31.7 Frequency Guess
- 1 GPT4o (snapshot unspecified) 65.5%
- 2 InternVL-Chat-v1.2-34B 63.4%
- 3 Qwen-VL-Max 62.4%
- 4
Qwen-VL-Plus 62.3%
- 5 GeminiProVision 61.6%
- 6 GPT-4V 61.1%
- 7
LLaVA-v1.6-34B 60.8%
- 8 XComposer2 55.7%
- 9 BLIP2 54.8%
- 10
Yi-VL-34B 54.2%
- 11 Monkey-Chat 53.4%
- 12
Yi-VL-6B 53.2%
- 13
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 53.2%
- 14 llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b 53%
- 15 TransCore-M 52.7%
- 16 Qwen-VL-Chat 52.5%
- 17 Claude3V_Haiku 52.2%
- 18 XComposer 52.1%
- 19
mPLUG-Owl2 52%
- 20 RBDash-v1-13B 51.8%
- 21
LLaVA-v1.5-13B 51.7%
- 22 CogVLM-17B-Chat 51.6%
- 23
ShareGPT4V-7B 51.5%
- 24 LLaVA-NEXT-7B 51.1%
- 25 LLaVA-v1.5-13B-XTuner 51.1%
- 26 LLaVA-InternLM2-7B 50.8%
- 27 LLaVA-v1.5-7B-XTuner 50.2%
- 28 SharedCaptioner 49.9%
- 29 LLaVA-InternLM-7B 49.7%
- 30 llava-v1.5-7b 49.5%
- 31 LLaMA-Adapter-v2-7B 40.4%
- 32 VisualGLM-6B 38.6%
- 33 Frequency Guess 31.7%
Source: Official MMT-Bench leaderboard
- 72.7
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 63.8
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL
- 62.4 Qwen-VL-Max
- 62.3
Qwen-VL-Plus
- 61.1 GPT-4V
- 60.8
LLaVA-v1.6-34B
- 54.2
Yi-VL-34B
- 53.4 Monkey-Chat
- 53.2
Yi-VL-6B
- 53.2
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat
- 53.0 llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b
- 52.5 Qwen-VL-Chat
- 52.0
mPLUG-Owl2
- 51.7
LLaVA-v1.5-13B
- 51.6 CogVLM-17B-Chat
- 51.5
ShareGPT4V-7B
- 49.5 llava-v1.5-7b
- 1
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 72.7%
- 2
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 63.8%
- 3 Qwen-VL-Max 62.4%
- 4
Qwen-VL-Plus 62.3%
- 5 GPT-4V 61.1%
- 6
LLaVA-v1.6-34B 60.8%
- 7
Yi-VL-34B 54.2%
- 8 Monkey-Chat 53.4%
- 9
Yi-VL-6B 53.2%
- 10
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 53.2%
- 11 llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b 53%
- 12 Qwen-VL-Chat 52.5%
- 13
mPLUG-Owl2 52%
- 14
LLaVA-v1.5-13B 51.7%
- 15 CogVLM-17B-Chat 51.6%
- 16
ShareGPT4V-7B 51.5%
- 17 llava-v1.5-7b 49.5%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official MMT-Bench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT4o (snapshot unspecified) | 65.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | InternVL-Chat-v1.2-34B | 63.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | Qwen-VL-Max | 62.4% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 62.3% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GeminiProVision | 61.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | GPT-4V | 61.1% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 60.8% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | XComposer2 | 55.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | BLIP2 | 54.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | | 54.2% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Monkey-Chat | 53.4% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 53.2% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 53.2% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b | 53% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | TransCore-M | 52.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | Qwen-VL-Chat | 52.5% | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Claude3V_Haiku | 52.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | XComposer | 52.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 19 | | 52% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | RBDash-v1-13B | 51.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 21 | | 51.7% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | CogVLM-17B-Chat | 51.6% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 51.5% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | LLaVA-NEXT-7B | 51.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 25 | LLaVA-v1.5-13B-XTuner | 51.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 26 | LLaVA-InternLM2-7B | 50.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 27 | LLaVA-v1.5-7B-XTuner | 50.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 28 | SharedCaptioner | 49.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 29 | LLaVA-InternLM-7B | 49.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 30 | llava-v1.5-7b | 49.5% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | LLaMA-Adapter-v2-7B | 40.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 32 | VisualGLM-6B | 38.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 33 | Frequency Guess | 31.7% | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 72.7% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 63.8% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | Qwen-VL-Max | 62.4% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 62.3% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GPT-4V | 61.1% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 60.8% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 54.2% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Monkey-Chat | 53.4% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 53.2% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 53.2% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b | 53% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Qwen-VL-Chat | 52.5% | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 52% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 51.7% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | CogVLM-17B-Chat | 51.6% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 51.5% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | llava-v1.5-7b | 49.5% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official MMT-Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official MMT-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
2 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2025 | | 63.8 | MMT-Bench (Val), reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 65.5 | Capabilities |
| Aug 25, 2025 | | 72.7 | MMT (val) (Table 5) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%