Benchmark Almanac

MMT-Bench

GPT4o (snapshot unspecified) 65.5% tops its leaderboard Qwen-VL-Max 62.4% leads the models we track
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 72.7% leads since August 2025
Only in system cards

Vision-language models answer 31,325 multiple-choice questions across many multimodal tasks such as recognition, localization, reasoning and planning.

ICML 2024.

Released
April 2024
Kind
General visual questions
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Last in a system card
November 2025
Last model added
November 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) show significant strides in general-purpose multimodal applications such as visual dialogue and embodied navigation. However, existing multimodal evaluation benchmarks cover a limited number of multimodal tasks testing rudimentary capabilities, falling short in tracking LVLM development. In this study, we present MMT-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to assess LVLMs across massive multimodal tasks requiring expert knowledge and deliberate visual recognition, localization, reasoning, and planning. MMT-Bench comprises 31,325 meticulously curated multi-choice visual questions from various multimodal scenarios such as vehicle driving and embodied navigation, covering 32 core meta-tasks and 162 subtasks in multimodal understanding. Due to its extensive task coverage, MMT-Bench enables the evaluation of LVLMs using a task map, facilitating the discovery of in- and out-of-domain tasks. Evaluation results involving 30 LVLMs such as the proprietary GPT-4V, GeminiProVision, and open-sourced InternVL-Chat, underscore the significant challenges posed by MMT-Bench. We anticipate that MMT-Bench will inspire the community to develop next-generation multimodal foundation models aimed at achieving general-purpose multimodal intelligence.

Abstract of MMT-Bench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models Towards Multitask AGI (arXiv:2404.16006, CC0)
33
Entries on its own leaderboard, 15 models we track
2
System cards report it, from 2 labs

GPT4o (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 65.5%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Qwen-VL-Max, at 62.4%.

InternVL3.5-241B-A28B leads with 72.7%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in March 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT4o (snapshot unspecified) 65.5%
  2. 2 InternVL-Chat-v1.2-34B 63.4%
  3. 3 Qwen-VL-Max 62.4%
  4. 4 Qwen-VL-Plus 62.3%
  5. 5 GeminiProVision 61.6%
  6. 6 GPT-4V 61.1%
  7. 7 LLaVA-v1.6-34B 60.8%
  8. 8 XComposer2 55.7%
  9. 9 BLIP2 54.8%
  10. 10 Yi-VL-34B 54.2%
  11. 11 Monkey-Chat 53.4%
  12. 12 Yi-VL-6B 53.2%
  13. 13 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 53.2%
  14. 14 llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b 53%
  15. 15 TransCore-M 52.7%
  16. 16 Qwen-VL-Chat 52.5%
  17. 17 Claude3V_Haiku 52.2%
  18. 18 XComposer 52.1%
  19. 19 mPLUG-Owl2 52%
  20. 20 RBDash-v1-13B 51.8%
  21. 21 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 51.7%
  22. 22 CogVLM-17B-Chat 51.6%
  23. 23 ShareGPT4V-7B 51.5%
  24. 24 LLaVA-NEXT-7B 51.1%
  25. 25 LLaVA-v1.5-13B-XTuner 51.1%
  26. 26 LLaVA-InternLM2-7B 50.8%
  27. 27 LLaVA-v1.5-7B-XTuner 50.2%
  28. 28 SharedCaptioner 49.9%
  29. 29 LLaVA-InternLM-7B 49.7%
  30. 30 llava-v1.5-7b 49.5%
  31. 31 LLaMA-Adapter-v2-7B 40.4%
  32. 32 VisualGLM-6B 38.6%
  33. 33 Frequency Guess 31.7%

Source: Official MMT-Bench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT4o (snapshot unspecified) 65.5% Official leaderboard
2 InternVL-Chat-v1.2-34B 63.4% Official leaderboard
3 Qwen-VL-Max 62.4% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen-VL-Plus 62.3% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
5 GeminiProVision 61.6% Official leaderboard
6 GPT-4V 61.1% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
7 LLaVA-v1.6-34B 60.8% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
8 XComposer2 55.7% Official leaderboard
9 BLIP2 54.8% Official leaderboard
10 Yi-VL-34B 54.2% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
11 Monkey-Chat 53.4% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Yi-VL-6B 53.2% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
13 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 53.2% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
14 llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b 53% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
15 TransCore-M 52.7% Official leaderboard
16 Qwen-VL-Chat 52.5% Aug 2023 Official leaderboard
17 Claude3V_Haiku 52.2% Official leaderboard
18 XComposer 52.1% Official leaderboard
19 mPLUG-Owl2 52% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
20 RBDash-v1-13B 51.8% Official leaderboard
21 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 51.7% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
22 CogVLM-17B-Chat 51.6% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
23 ShareGPT4V-7B 51.5% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
24 LLaVA-NEXT-7B 51.1% Official leaderboard
25 LLaVA-v1.5-13B-XTuner 51.1% Official leaderboard
26 LLaVA-InternLM2-7B 50.8% Official leaderboard
27 LLaVA-v1.5-7B-XTuner 50.2% Official leaderboard
28 SharedCaptioner 49.9% Official leaderboard
29 LLaVA-InternLM-7B 49.7% Official leaderboard
30 llava-v1.5-7b 49.5% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
31 LLaMA-Adapter-v2-7B 40.4% Official leaderboard
32 VisualGLM-6B 38.6% Official leaderboard
33 Frequency Guess 31.7% Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 72.7% Aug 2025 Lab model card
2 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 63.8% Nov 2025 Lab model card
3 Qwen-VL-Max 62.4% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen-VL-Plus 62.3% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-4V 61.1% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
6 LLaVA-v1.6-34B 60.8% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
7 Yi-VL-34B 54.2% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
8 Monkey-Chat 53.4% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Yi-VL-6B 53.2% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
10 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 53.2% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
11 llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b 53% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen-VL-Chat 52.5% Aug 2023 Official leaderboard
13 mPLUG-Owl2 52% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
14 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 51.7% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
15 CogVLM-17B-Chat 51.6% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
16 ShareGPT4V-7B 51.5% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
17 llava-v1.5-7b 49.5% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Other labs
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2024
Qwen-VL-Max 62.4%

Source: Official MMT-Bench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B Qwen-VL-Max Qwen-VL-Chat 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B Qwen-VL-Max

Sources: Official MMT-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

2 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Nov 6, 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL technical report 63.8 MMT-Bench (Val), reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 65.5 Capabilities
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 72.7 MMT (val) (Table 5) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%