OCR-Reasoning
Models answer 1,069 human-annotated questions that need reasoning over text-rich images. The questions cover 6 reasoning abilities and 18 practical tasks.
Accepted at ICLR 2026. The data also holds step-by-step reasoning annotations. NVIDIA grades answers with a GPT-4o-mini judge.
- Made by
- SCUT-DLVCLab (Huang et al.)
- Released
- May 2025
- Kind
- Documents, charts and text in images
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- o1 #117 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- October 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Recent advancements in multimodal slow-thinking systems have demonstrated remarkable performance across various visual reasoning tasks. However, their capabilities in text-rich image reasoning tasks remain understudied due to the absence of a dedicated and systematic benchmark. To address this gap, we propose OCR-Reasoning, a novel benchmark designed to systematically assess Multimodal Large Language Models on text-rich image reasoning tasks. Specifically, OCR-Reasoning comprises 1,069 human-annotated examples spanning 6 core reasoning abilities and 18 practical reasoning tasks in text-rich visual scenarios. Unlike existing text-rich image understanding benchmarks that only provide a final answer, this benchmark additionally provides a detailed step-by-step reasoning process. This dual annotation enables the evaluation of both the models' final answers and their reasoning processes, thereby offering a holistic assessment of text-rich reasoning capabilities. By leveraging this benchmark, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the latest MLLMs. Our results demonstrate that even the most advanced MLLMs exhibit substantial difficulties in text-rich image reasoning tasks, with none achieving an accuracy above 50% on our benchmark, indicating that the challenges of text-rich image reasoning are an urgent issue to be addressed. The benchmark and evaluation scripts are available at https://github.com/SCUT-DLVCLab/OCR-Reasoning.
DouBao-1.5-Vision-Pro tops the leaderboard with 46.8%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is o1, at 44.4%.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads with 65.1%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in June 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 46.8 DouBao-1.5-Vision-Pro
- 44.4 o1
- 44.1 GLM-4.1V-Thinking-9B
- 39.3
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 38.8 MiMo-VL-RL-7B
- 37.5
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 36.2
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
- 35.8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 33.3 o3-mini
- 32.7 QvQ
- 30.7 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 27.7 Llama4-Scout-109B-A17B
- 26.5
Qwen2.5-32B
- 26.5
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B
- 22.6
Keye-VL-8B-Preview
- 20.9 DeepEyesV2
- 20.5 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking
- 19.9
InternVL3-78B
- 19.1 VL-Rethinker-7B
- 17.1 InternVL3-32B
- 15.7
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 15.2 Thyme-RL-7B
- 14.4 VLAA-Thinker-Qwen2.5VL-7B
- 14.3 TokenVL-8B
- 13.2 MM-Eureka-Qwen-7B
- 12.2
Qwen2.5-VL-3B
- 11.6 Docopilot-8B
- 11.5
InternVL3-8B
- 10.8
InternVL3-2B
- 7.40 DocMark-2B
- 3.30 mPLUG-DocOwl2-8B
- 1 DouBao-1.5-Vision-Pro CoT 46.8%
- 2 o1 CoT 44.4%
- 3 GLM-4.1V-Thinking-9B CoT 44.1%
- 4
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025, CoT 39.3%
- 5 MiMo-VL-RL-7B CoT 38.8%
- 6
Qwen2.5-VL-72B CoT 37.5%
- 7
Qwen2.5-VL-32B CoT 36.2%
- 8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet CoT 35.8%
- 9 o3-mini CoT 33.3%
- 10 QvQ CoT 32.7%
- 11 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) CoT 30.7%
- 12 Llama4-Scout-109B-A17B CoT 27.7%
- 13
Qwen2.5-32B CoT 26.5%
- 14
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B CoT 26.5%
- 15
Keye-VL-8B-Preview CoT 22.6%
- 16 DeepEyesV2 CoT 20.9%
- 17 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking CoT 20.5%
- 18
InternVL3-78B CoT 19.9%
- 19 VL-Rethinker-7B no CoT 19.1%
- 20 InternVL3-32B CoT 17.1%
- 21
Qwen2.5-VL-7B CoT 15.7%
- 22 Thyme-RL-7B CoT 15.2%
- 23 VLAA-Thinker-Qwen2.5VL-7B CoT 14.4%
- 24 TokenVL-8B CoT 14.3%
- 25 MM-Eureka-Qwen-7B CoT 13.2%
- 26
Qwen2.5-VL-3B CoT 12.2%
- 27 Docopilot-8B CoT 11.6%
- 28
InternVL3-8B CoT 11.5%
- 29
InternVL3-2B CoT 10.8%
- 30 DocMark-2B CoT 7.40%
- 31 mPLUG-DocOwl2-8B CoT 3.30%
Source: Official OCR-Reasoning leaderboard
- 65.1
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- 54.1
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B
- 44.4 o1
- 39.3
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 37.5
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 36.4
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL
- 36.2
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
- 35.8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 33.3 o3-mini
- 26.5
Qwen2.5-32B
- 26.5
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B
- 22.6
Keye-VL-8B-Preview
- 20.5 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking
- 19.9
InternVL3-78B
- 15.7
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 12.2
Qwen2.5-VL-3B
- 11.5
InternVL3-8B
- 10.8
InternVL3-2B
- 1
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 65.1%
- 2
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 54.1%
- 3 o1 CoT 44.4%
- 4
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025, CoT 39.3%
- 5
Qwen2.5-VL-72B CoT 37.5%
- 6
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 36.4%
- 7
Qwen2.5-VL-32B CoT 36.2%
- 8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet CoT 35.8%
- 9 o3-mini CoT 33.3%
- 10
Qwen2.5-32B CoT 26.5%
- 11
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B CoT 26.5%
- 12
Keye-VL-8B-Preview CoT 22.6%
- 13 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking CoT 20.5%
- 14
InternVL3-78B CoT 19.9%
- 15
Qwen2.5-VL-7B CoT 15.7%
- 16
Qwen2.5-VL-3B CoT 12.2%
- 17
InternVL3-8B CoT 11.5%
- 18
InternVL3-2B CoT 10.8%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official OCR-Reasoning leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DouBao-1.5-Vision-Pro | 46.8% | CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | o1 | 44.4% | CoT | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GLM-4.1V-Thinking-9B | 44.1% | CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 39.3% | CoT | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | MiMo-VL-RL-7B | 38.8% | CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 37.5% | CoT | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 36.2% | CoT | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 35.8% | CoT | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | o3-mini | 33.3% | CoT, OCR + LLM | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | QvQ | 32.7% | CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 30.7% | CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Llama4-Scout-109B-A17B | 27.7% | CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 26.5% | CoT, OCR + LLM | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | | 26.5% | CoT, OCR + LLM | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | | 22.6% | CoT | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | DeepEyesV2 | 20.9% | CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking | 20.5% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | | 19.9% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | VL-Rethinker-7B | 19.1% | no CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | InternVL3-32B | 17.1% | CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | 15.7% | CoT | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | Thyme-RL-7B | 15.2% | CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | VLAA-Thinker-Qwen2.5VL-7B | 14.4% | CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | TokenVL-8B | 14.3% | CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | MM-Eureka-Qwen-7B | 13.2% | CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 12.2% | CoT | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | Docopilot-8B | 11.6% | CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | | 11.5% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 29 | | 10.8% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 30 | DocMark-2B | 7.40% | CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | mPLUG-DocOwl2-8B | 3.30% | CoT | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 65.1% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 54.1% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | o1 | 44.4% | CoT | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 39.3% | CoT | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 37.5% | CoT | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 36.4% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 36.2% | CoT | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 35.8% | CoT | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | o3-mini | 33.3% | CoT, OCR + LLM | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 26.5% | CoT, OCR + LLM | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 26.5% | CoT, OCR + LLM | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 22.6% | CoT | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking | 20.5% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | | 19.9% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | | 15.7% | CoT | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | | 12.2% | CoT | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 11.5% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | | 10.8% | CoT | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in May 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official OCR-Reasoning leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official OCR-Reasoning leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in October 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | 65.1 | OCR-Reasoning | |
| Apr 28, 2026 | 54.1 | OCR_Reasoning | |
| Oct 28, 2025 | 36.4 | OCR-Reasoning |
3 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | | 65.1 | OCR-Reasoning (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| Apr 27, 2026 | | 54.1 | OCR-Reasoning, reasoning on, 22.2 reasoning off (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| Nov 6, 2025 | | 33.9 | OCR-Reasoning, reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 21.0 | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%