Benchmark Almanac

OCR-Reasoning

DouBao-1.5-Vision-Pro 46.8% tops its leaderboard o1 44.4% leads the models we track
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 65.1% leads since October 2026
Fading

Models answer 1,069 human-annotated questions that need reasoning over text-rich images. The questions cover 6 reasoning abilities and 18 practical tasks.

Accepted at ICLR 2026. The data also holds step-by-step reasoning annotations. NVIDIA grades answers with a GPT-4o-mini judge.

Released
May 2025
Kind
Documents, charts and text in images
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
o1 #117 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
October 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Recent advancements in multimodal slow-thinking systems have demonstrated remarkable performance across various visual reasoning tasks. However, their capabilities in text-rich image reasoning tasks remain understudied due to the absence of a dedicated and systematic benchmark. To address this gap, we propose OCR-Reasoning, a novel benchmark designed to systematically assess Multimodal Large Language Models on text-rich image reasoning tasks. Specifically, OCR-Reasoning comprises 1,069 human-annotated examples spanning 6 core reasoning abilities and 18 practical reasoning tasks in text-rich visual scenarios. Unlike existing text-rich image understanding benchmarks that only provide a final answer, this benchmark additionally provides a detailed step-by-step reasoning process. This dual annotation enables the evaluation of both the models' final answers and their reasoning processes, thereby offering a holistic assessment of text-rich reasoning capabilities. By leveraging this benchmark, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the latest MLLMs. Our results demonstrate that even the most advanced MLLMs exhibit substantial difficulties in text-rich image reasoning tasks, with none achieving an accuracy above 50% on our benchmark, indicating that the challenges of text-rich image reasoning are an urgent issue to be addressed. The benchmark and evaluation scripts are available at https://github.com/SCUT-DLVCLab/OCR-Reasoning.

Abstract of OCR-Reasoning Benchmark: Unveiling the True Capabilities of MLLMs in Complex Text-Rich Image Reasoning (arXiv:2505.17163, CC0)
31
Entries on its own leaderboard, 15 models we track
3
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

DouBao-1.5-Vision-Pro tops the leaderboard with 46.8%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is o1, at 44.4%.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads with 65.1%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in June 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 DouBao-1.5-Vision-Pro CoT 46.8%
  2. 2 o1 CoT 44.4%
  3. 3 GLM-4.1V-Thinking-9B CoT 44.1%
  4. 4 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025, CoT 39.3%
  5. 5 MiMo-VL-RL-7B CoT 38.8%
  6. 6 Qwen2.5-VL-72B CoT 37.5%
  7. 7 Qwen2.5-VL-32B CoT 36.2%
  8. 8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet CoT 35.8%
  9. 9 o3-mini CoT 33.3%
  10. 10 QvQ CoT 32.7%
  11. 11 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) CoT 30.7%
  12. 12 Llama4-Scout-109B-A17B CoT 27.7%
  13. 13 Qwen2.5-32B CoT 26.5%
  14. 14 DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B CoT 26.5%
  15. 15 Keye-VL-8B-Preview CoT 22.6%
  16. 16 DeepEyesV2 CoT 20.9%
  17. 17 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking CoT 20.5%
  18. 18 InternVL3-78B CoT 19.9%
  19. 19 VL-Rethinker-7B no CoT 19.1%
  20. 20 InternVL3-32B CoT 17.1%
  21. 21 Qwen2.5-VL-7B CoT 15.7%
  22. 22 Thyme-RL-7B CoT 15.2%
  23. 23 VLAA-Thinker-Qwen2.5VL-7B CoT 14.4%
  24. 24 TokenVL-8B CoT 14.3%
  25. 25 MM-Eureka-Qwen-7B CoT 13.2%
  26. 26 Qwen2.5-VL-3B CoT 12.2%
  27. 27 Docopilot-8B CoT 11.6%
  28. 28 InternVL3-8B CoT 11.5%
  29. 29 InternVL3-2B CoT 10.8%
  30. 30 DocMark-2B CoT 7.40%
  31. 31 mPLUG-DocOwl2-8B CoT 3.30%

Source: Official OCR-Reasoning leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 DouBao-1.5-Vision-Pro 46.8% CoT Official leaderboard
2 o1 44.4% CoT Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
3 GLM-4.1V-Thinking-9B 44.1% CoT Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 39.3% CoT Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
5 MiMo-VL-RL-7B 38.8% CoT Official leaderboard
6 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 37.5% CoT Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 36.2% CoT Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 35.8% CoT Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
9 o3-mini 33.3% CoT, OCR + LLM Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
10 QvQ 32.7% CoT Official leaderboard
11 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 30.7% CoT Official leaderboard
12 Llama4-Scout-109B-A17B 27.7% CoT Official leaderboard
13 Qwen2.5-32B 26.5% CoT, OCR + LLM Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
14 DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B 26.5% CoT, OCR + LLM Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
15 Keye-VL-8B-Preview 22.6% CoT Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
16 DeepEyesV2 20.9% CoT Official leaderboard
17 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking 20.5% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
18 InternVL3-78B 19.9% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
19 VL-Rethinker-7B 19.1% no CoT Official leaderboard
20 InternVL3-32B 17.1% CoT Official leaderboard
21 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 15.7% CoT Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Thyme-RL-7B 15.2% CoT Official leaderboard
23 VLAA-Thinker-Qwen2.5VL-7B 14.4% CoT Official leaderboard
24 TokenVL-8B 14.3% CoT Official leaderboard
25 MM-Eureka-Qwen-7B 13.2% CoT Official leaderboard
26 Qwen2.5-VL-3B 12.2% CoT Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
27 Docopilot-8B 11.6% CoT Official leaderboard
28 InternVL3-8B 11.5% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
29 InternVL3-2B 10.8% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
30 DocMark-2B 7.40% CoT Official leaderboard
31 mPLUG-DocOwl2-8B 3.30% CoT Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 65.1% Oct 2026 Lab model card
2 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 54.1% Apr 2026 Lab model card
3 o1 44.4% CoT Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 39.3% CoT Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 37.5% CoT Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 36.4% Oct 2025 Lab model card
7 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 36.2% CoT Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 35.8% CoT Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
9 o3-mini 33.3% CoT, OCR + LLM Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2.5-32B 26.5% CoT, OCR + LLM Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
11 DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B 26.5% CoT, OCR + LLM Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Keye-VL-8B-Preview 22.6% CoT Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking 20.5% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
14 InternVL3-78B 19.9% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 15.7% CoT Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Qwen2.5-VL-3B 12.2% CoT Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
17 InternVL3-8B 11.5% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
18 InternVL3-2B 10.8% CoT Apr 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in May 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI NVIDIA
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2025
o1 44.4%
Lab claims 3 leaders

Sources: Official OCR-Reasoning leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Nemotron 3.5 Super VL Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B o1 Qwen2.5-32B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Nemotron 3.5 Super VL Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B

Sources: Official OCR-Reasoning leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in October 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

NVIDIA
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 65.1 OCR-Reasoning
Apr 28, 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 54.1 OCR_Reasoning
Oct 28, 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 36.4 OCR-Reasoning

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL technical report 65.1 OCR-Reasoning (Table 10) Capabilities
Apr 27, 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B technical report 54.1 OCR-Reasoning, reasoning on, 22.2 reasoning off (Table 7) Capabilities
Nov 6, 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL technical report 33.9 OCR-Reasoning, reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 21.0 Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%