- CVBench2D 84
- OCRBenchV2 (EN) 67
- OSWorld 47.4
- Charxiv Reasoning 63.6
- MMlongBench Doc 57.5
- MathVista_MINI 82.8
- OCR_Reasoning 54.1
- Video MME 72.2
- World Sense (Video + Audio Q/A) 55.4
- Daily Omni 74.5
- Voice interaction (Speech Instruction Following) 89.4
- MMAU (BF16, non-reasoning, quantization table) 74.6
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B places in the top three on 2 benchmarks.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B
Open weights Small
- IFBench 74.2% #27 /80
- SciCode 32% #43 /49
- AA-LCR (Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning) 41% #33 /38
Where it ranks
Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.
Knowledge and language
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| StudyArena Text | 1,281 | #10 of 85 | Official leaderboard | |
| IFBench | 74.2% | #27 of 80 | Lab model card | |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.3% | #97 of 167 | Lab model card | |
| AA-LCR (Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning) | 41% | #33 of 38 | Lab model card |
Math and science
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 72.2% | #165 of 302 | Lab model card | |
| AIME 2025 | 82.1% | #85 of 143 | Lab model card |
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench v5 | 63.2% | #22 of 47 | Lab model card | |
| SciCode | 32% | #43 of 49 | Lab model card |
Agents and tools
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ScreenSpot | 89.3% | #4 of 11 | Lab model card | |
| ScreenSpot-v2 | 92.8% | #7 of 14 | Lab model card | |
| ScreenSpot-Pro | 57.8% | #25 of 32 | Lab model card | |
| OSWorld-Verified | 47.4% | #37 of 41 | Lab model card |
Vision, audio and robotics
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChartQA | 90.3% | #5 of 37 | Lab model card | |
| DocVQA | 95.6% | #5 of 36 | Lab model card | |
| OCRBench v2 | 65.8% | #3 of 14 | Official leaderboard | |
| MMLongBench-Doc | 57.6% | #5 of 17 | Official leaderboard | |
| InfographicVQA | 86.8% | #8 of 26 | Lab model card | |
| MathVista | 82.8% | #24 of 70 | Lab model card | |
| Daily-Omni | 74.5% | #5 of 14 | Official leaderboard | |
| VoiceBench | 89.4% | #5 of 12 | Lab model card | |
| WorldSense (omnimodal) | 55.4% | #5 of 12 | Official leaderboard | |
| TreeBench | 51.6% | #3 of 7 | Lab model card | |
| RefCOCO / RefCOCO+ / RefCOCOg | 90.5% | #13 of 29 | Lab model card | |
| TextVQA | 81% | #8 of 17 | Lab model card | |
| OCRBench | 86.6% | #17 of 34 | Lab model card | |
| AI2D | 88.5% | #27 of 52 | Lab model card | |
| MMMU | 70.8% | #58 of 103 | Lab model card | |
| CVBench | 84% | #9 of 15 | Lab model card | |
| OCR-Reasoning | 54.1% | #2 of 3 | Lab model card | |
| CharXiv (DQ) | 88.9% | #5 of 7 | Lab model card | |
| MMAU | 74.6% | #11 of 15 | Lab model card | |
| ParseBench | 48.5% | #34 of 44 | Official leaderboard | |
| CharXiv | 63.6% | #60 of 75 | Lab model card | |
| Video-MME | 72.2% | #42 of 51 | Lab model card |
Its lab's numbers put it at 136.7, number 210 of 404
The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 27 capability results NVIDIA reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 135.1 to 138.4. How we compute it.
- DocVQA 95.6
- ScreenSpot-v2 92.8
- RefCOCO / RefCOCO+ / RefCOCOg 90.5
- ChartQA 90.3
- VoiceBench 89.4
- ScreenSpot 89.3
- AI2D 88.5
- InfographicVQA 86.8
- OCRBench 86.6
- CVBench 84
- MathVista 82.8
- AIME 2025 82.1
- TextVQA 81
- MMLU-Pro 77.3
- MMAU 74.6
- IFBench 74.2
- Video-MME 72.2
- GPQA Diamond 72.2
- MMMU 70.8
- OCRBench v2 67
- CharXiv 63.6
- LiveCodeBench v5 63.2
- ScreenSpot-Pro 57.8
- MMLongBench-Doc 57.5
- OSWorld-Verified 47.4
- AA-LCR (Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning) 41
- SciCode 32
Its lab's numbers next to 5 leaderboards
Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.
| Benchmark | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCRBench v2 | 67% OCRBenchV2 (EN) | 65.8% Leaderboard | +1.2 pts |
| MMLongBench-Doc | 57.5% MMlongBench Doc | 57.6% Leaderboard, Omni; 3B activated (30B total) | Same |
| VoiceBench | 89.4% VoiceBench Avg, reasoning on (Table 8). Nine spoken subsets from 71.4 (SD-QA) to 100 (AdvBench) | 89.4% Leaderboard | Same |
| Daily-Omni | 74.5% Daily Omni | 74.5% Leaderboard, Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) | Same |
| WorldSense (omnimodal) | 55.4% World Sense (Video + Audio Q/A) | 55.4% Leaderboard, modality A+V | Same |
Its launch post
The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.
Its system card
Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 22 of them aren't in the launch post.
Capabilities
- MMMU 70.8
- MathVista 82.8
- MMLongBench-Doc 57.5
- OCRBench 86.6
- OCRBench v2 67
- ChartQA 90.3
- DocVQA 95.6
- AI2D 88.5
- TextVQA 81
- InfographicVQA 86.8
- OCR-Reasoning 54.1
- CharXiv 63.6
- CharXiv (DQ) 88.9
- TreeBench 51.6
- CVBench 84
- RefCOCO / RefCOCO+ / RefCOCOg 90.5
- ScreenSpot 89.3
- ScreenSpot-v2 92.8
- ScreenSpot-Pro 57.8
- OSWorld-Verified 47.4
- Video-MME 72.2
- Open ASR Leaderboard 5.95
- MMAU 74.6
- VoiceBench 89.4
- Daily-Omni 74.1
- WorldSense (omnimodal) 55.4
- MMLU-Pro 77.3
- GPQA Diamond 72.2
- LiveCodeBench v5 63.2
- AIME 2025 82.1
- IFBench 74.2
- AA-LCR (Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning) 41
- tau2-bench
- SciCode 32