Benchmark Almanac

Orak

Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 3.90 leads since June 2025
Fading

LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Each game scores in-game progress or outcomes, and the board ranks models by their average rank across the games.

The name is the Korean word for game. The repo also releases gameplay data for fine-tuning.

Released
June 2025
Kind
Video games
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 #96 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
March 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
March 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Large Language Model (LLM) agents are reshaping the game industry, by enabling more intelligent and human-preferable characters. Yet, current game benchmarks fall short of practical needs: they lack evaluations of diverse LLM capabilities across various game genres, studies of agentic modules crucial for complex gameplay, and fine-tuning datasets to adapt pre-trained LLMs into gaming agents. To fill these gaps, we present Orak, a benchmark for training and evaluating LLM agents across 12 popular video games spanning all major genres. Using a plug-and-play interface built on Model Context Protocol (MCP), Orak supports systematic and reproducible studies of agentic modules in varied game scenarios. We further release a fine-tuning dataset of expert LLM gameplay trajectories covering multiple genres, turning general LLMs into effective game agents. Orak offers a united evaluation framework, including game leaderboards, LLM battle arenas, and \fixablation studies of input modality, agentic strategies, and fine-tuning effects, establishing a foundation towards versatile gaming agents. Code and datasets are available at https://github.com/krafton-ai/Orak and https://huggingface.co/datasets/KRAFTON/Orak.

Abstract of Orak: A Foundational Benchmark for Training and Evaluating LLM Agents on Diverse Video Games (arXiv:2506.03610, CC0)
12
Entries on its own leaderboard, 6 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 3.90 among models released by June 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in June 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 3.90
  2. 2 GPT-4o Aug 2024 4.30
  3. 3 o3-mini 4.60
  4. 4 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 6.30
  5. 5 DeepSeek-R1 6.40
  6. 6 GPT-4o mini 11.2
  7. 7 Minitron-8B-it 12.5
  8. 8 Qwen-2.5-7B-it 12.9
  9. 9 Llama-3.2-3B-it 13.6
  10. 10 Minitron-4B-it 14.9
  11. 11 Qwen-2.5-3B-it 15.8
  12. 12 Llama-3.2-1B-it 17.8

Source: Official Orak leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 3.90 default Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4o Aug 2024 4.30 default Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
3 o3-mini 4.60 default Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 6.30 default Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
5 DeepSeek-R1 6.40 default Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
6 GPT-4o mini 11.2 default Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
7 Minitron-8B-it 12.5 default Official leaderboard
8 Qwen-2.5-7B-it 12.9 default Official leaderboard
9 Llama-3.2-3B-it 13.6 reflection Official leaderboard
10 Minitron-4B-it 14.9 default Official leaderboard
11 Qwen-2.5-3B-it 15.8 default Official leaderboard
12 Llama-3.2-1B-it 17.8 default Official leaderboard

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in June 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2025

Source: Official Orak leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.0 12.0 2025 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.0 12.0 2025

Source: Official Orak leaderboard

Labs headline it less often now, last in March 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

NVIDIA
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Mar 16, 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano 4B Orak (reasoning off)

More in Games and long tasks

All 82 in Games and long tasks
  • ARC-AGI-3 In use Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions. GPT-6 Astra 99.95%
  • MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks. Seed2.0 Pro 49%
  • TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. The score is harmful actions per 100 steps, where lower is better. The board also reports game progress. Llama 4 Scout 7.00
  • GameWorld Only in system cards Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state. GPT-6.1 Terra 76.8%
  • Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%
  • Anthropic large agent teams tasks Only in system cards Internal 24-hour tasks for teams of 1-100 agents: build a company knowledge base, or formalize a theorem in Lean.