GameWorld
Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state.
63 HF paper upvotes. A Fine-Control Protocol release in 2026-08 adds higher-frequency control.
- Made by
- GameWorld project
- Released
- April 2026
- Kind
- Video games
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6.1 Terra #6 on the capability index
- Last in a system card
- June 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Towards an embodied generalist for real-world interaction, Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) agents still suffer from challenging latency, sparse feedback, and irreversible mistakes. Video games offer an ideal testbed with rich visual observations and closed-loop interaction, demanding fine-grained perception, long-horizon planning, and precise control. However, systematically evaluating these capabilities is currently hindered by heterogeneous action interfaces and heuristic verification. To this end, we introduce GameWorld, a benchmark designed for standardized and verifiable evaluation of MLLMs as generalist game agents in browser environments. Two game agent interfaces are studied: (i) computer-use agents that directly emit keyboard and mouse controls, and (ii) generalist multimodal agents that act in a semantic action space via deterministic Semantic Action Parsing. GameWorld contains 34 diverse games and 170 tasks, each paired with state-verifiable metrics for outcome-based evaluation. The results across 18 model-interface pairs suggest that even the best performing agent is far from achieving human capabilities on video games. Extensive experiments of repeated full-benchmark reruns demonstrate the robustness of the benchmark, while further studies on real-time interaction, context-memory sensitivity, and action validity expose more challenges ahead for game agents. Together, by offering a standardized, verifiable, and reproducible evaluation framework, GameWorld lays a robust foundation for advancing research on multimodal game agents and beyond. The project page is at https://gameworld-bench.github.io.
GPT-6.1 Terra leads with 76.8%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
GPT-6.1 Terra leads with 76.8%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
- 76.8 GPT-6.1 Terra
- 63.5
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 61.5
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- 54.6
Qwen 3.8 27B
- 45.2
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 43.8
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 43.6
Qwen3.6 27B
- 41.9
Gemini 3 Flash
- 41.8
Qwen3.5-27B
- 40.6 GPT-5.2
- 40.6
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 39.8
Seed1.8
- 39.3
Qwen3.5-9B
- 39.3 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 37.4 Kimi K2.5
- 36.1
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use
- 36.0 Grok 4.1 Fast
- 35.8 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11
- 35.4
Qwen3-VL-Plus
- 31.4
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 31.1
UI-TARS-1.5
- 30.8 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B
- 30.8 GLM-4.6V
- 1 GPT-6.1 Terra Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 76.8%
- 2
Gemini 3.8 Flash Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 63.5%
- 3
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 61.5%
- 4
Qwen 3.8 27B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 54.6%
- 5
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 45.2%
- 6
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 43.8%
- 7
Qwen3.6 27B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 43.6%
- 8
Gemini 3 Flash 41.9%
- 9
Qwen3.5-27B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 41.8%
- 10 GPT-5.2 40.6%
- 11
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 40.6%
- 12
Seed1.8 39.8%
- 13
Qwen3.5-9B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 39.3%
- 14 Claude Sonnet 4.6 39.3%
- 15 Kimi K2.5 37.4%
- 16
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 36.1%
- 17 Grok 4.1 Fast reasoning 36%
- 18 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 35.8%
- 19
Qwen3-VL-Plus 35.4%
- 20
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 31.4%
- 21
UI-TARS-1.5 31.1%
- 22 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B 30.8%
- 23 GLM-4.6V 30.8%
Source: Official GameWorld leaderboard
- 76.8 GPT-6.1 Terra
- 63.5
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 61.5
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- 54.6
Qwen 3.8 27B
- 45.2
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 43.8
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 43.6
Qwen3.6 27B
- 41.9
Gemini 3 Flash
- 41.8
Qwen3.5-27B
- 40.6 GPT-5.2
- 40.6
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 39.8
Seed1.8
- 39.3
Qwen3.5-9B
- 39.3 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 37.4 Kimi K2.5
- 36.1
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use
- 36.0 Grok 4.1 Fast
- 35.8 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11
- 35.4
Qwen3-VL-Plus
- 31.4
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 31.2
Seed2.1 Pro
- 31.1
UI-TARS-1.5
- 30.8 GLM-4.6V
- 1 GPT-6.1 Terra Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 76.8%
- 2
Gemini 3.8 Flash Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 63.5%
- 3
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 61.5%
- 4
Qwen 3.8 27B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 54.6%
- 5
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 45.2%
- 6
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 43.8%
- 7
Qwen3.6 27B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 43.6%
- 8
Gemini 3 Flash 41.9%
- 9
Qwen3.5-27B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 41.8%
- 10 GPT-5.2 40.6%
- 11
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 40.6%
- 12
Seed1.8 39.8%
- 13
Qwen3.5-9B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 39.3%
- 14 Claude Sonnet 4.6 39.3%
- 15 Kimi K2.5 37.4%
- 16
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 36.1%
- 17 Grok 4.1 Fast reasoning 36%
- 18 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 35.8%
- 19
Qwen3-VL-Plus 35.4%
- 20
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 31.4%
- 21
Seed2.1 Pro 31.2%
- 22
UI-TARS-1.5 31.1%
- 23 GLM-4.6V 30.8%
Sources: Official GameWorld leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6.1 Terra | 76.8% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Generalist interface | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 63.5% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Generalist interface | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | | 61.5% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 54.6% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 45.2% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 43.8% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 43.6% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 41.9% | Generalist interface | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 41.8% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | GPT-5.2 | 40.6% | Generalist interface | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 40.6% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 39.8% | Computer-use interface | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 39.3% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Generalist interface | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 39.3% | Generalist interface | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | Kimi K2.5 | 37.4% | Generalist interface | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | | 36.1% | Computer-use interface | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | Grok 4.1 Fast | 36% | reasoning, Generalist interface | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 | 35.8% | Computer-use interface | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | | 35.4% | Generalist interface | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 31.4% | Computer-use interface | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | | 31.1% | Computer-use interface | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B | 30.8% | Computer-use interface | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | GLM-4.6V | 30.8% | Generalist interface | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6.1 Terra | 76.8% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Generalist interface | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 63.5% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Generalist interface | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | | 61.5% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 54.6% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 45.2% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 43.8% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 43.6% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 41.9% | Generalist interface | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 41.8% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | GPT-5.2 | 40.6% | Generalist interface | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 40.6% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 39.8% | Computer-use interface | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 39.3% | Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Generalist interface | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 39.3% | Generalist interface | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | Kimi K2.5 | 37.4% | Generalist interface | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | | 36.1% | Computer-use interface | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | Grok 4.1 Fast | 36% | reasoning, Generalist interface | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 | 35.8% | Computer-use interface | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | | 35.4% | Generalist interface | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 31.4% | Computer-use interface | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | | 31.2% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 31.1% | Computer-use interface | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | GLM-4.6V | 30.8% | Generalist interface | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
5 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in April 2026 5 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official GameWorld leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official GameWorld leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | | 31.2 | GameWorld (Table 4) | Capabilities |
More in Games and long tasks
- ARC-AGI-3 In use Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions. GPT-6 Astra 99.95%
- Orak Fading LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Each game scores in-game progress or outcomes, and the board ranks models by their average rank across the games.
Gemini 2.5 Pro 3.90
- MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks.
Seed2.0 Pro 49%
- TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. The score is harmful actions per 100 steps, where lower is better. The board also reports game progress.
Llama 4 Scout 7.00
- Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%
- Anthropic large agent teams tasks Only in system cards Internal 24-hour tasks for teams of 1-100 agents: build a company knowledge base, or formalize a theorem in Lean.