Benchmark Almanac

GameWorld

GPT-6.1 Terra 76.8% leads since October 2026
GPT-6.1 Terra 76.8% leads since October 2026
Only in system cards

Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state.

63 HF paper upvotes. A Fine-Control Protocol release in 2026-08 adds higher-frequency control.

Released
April 2026
Kind
Video games
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-6.1 Terra #6 on the capability index
Last in a system card
June 2026
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Towards an embodied generalist for real-world interaction, Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) agents still suffer from challenging latency, sparse feedback, and irreversible mistakes. Video games offer an ideal testbed with rich visual observations and closed-loop interaction, demanding fine-grained perception, long-horizon planning, and precise control. However, systematically evaluating these capabilities is currently hindered by heterogeneous action interfaces and heuristic verification. To this end, we introduce GameWorld, a benchmark designed for standardized and verifiable evaluation of MLLMs as generalist game agents in browser environments. Two game agent interfaces are studied: (i) computer-use agents that directly emit keyboard and mouse controls, and (ii) generalist multimodal agents that act in a semantic action space via deterministic Semantic Action Parsing. GameWorld contains 34 diverse games and 170 tasks, each paired with state-verifiable metrics for outcome-based evaluation. The results across 18 model-interface pairs suggest that even the best performing agent is far from achieving human capabilities on video games. Extensive experiments of repeated full-benchmark reruns demonstrate the robustness of the benchmark, while further studies on real-time interaction, context-memory sensitivity, and action validity expose more challenges ahead for game agents. Together, by offering a standardized, verifiable, and reproducible evaluation framework, GameWorld lays a robust foundation for advancing research on multimodal game agents and beyond. The project page is at https://gameworld-bench.github.io.

Abstract of GameWorld: Towards Standardized and Verifiable Evaluation of Multimodal Game Agents (arXiv:2604.07429, CC0)
23
Entries on its own leaderboard, 22 models we track
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

GPT-6.1 Terra leads with 76.8%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

GPT-6.1 Terra leads with 76.8%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 GPT-6.1 Terra Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 76.8%
  2. 2 Gemini 3.8 Flash Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 63.5%
  3. 3 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 61.5%
  4. 4 Qwen 3.8 27B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 54.6%
  5. 5 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 45.2%
  6. 6 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 43.8%
  7. 7 Qwen3.6 27B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 43.6%
  8. 8 Gemini 3 Flash 41.9%
  9. 9 Qwen3.5-27B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 41.8%
  10. 10 GPT-5.2 40.6%
  11. 11 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 40.6%
  12. 12 Seed1.8 39.8%
  13. 13 Qwen3.5-9B Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit 39.3%
  14. 14 Claude Sonnet 4.6 39.3%
  15. 15 Kimi K2.5 37.4%
  16. 16 Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 36.1%
  17. 17 Grok 4.1 Fast reasoning 36%
  18. 18 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 35.8%
  19. 19 Qwen3-VL-Plus 35.4%
  20. 20 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 31.4%
  21. 21 UI-TARS-1.5 31.1%
  22. 22 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B 30.8%
  23. 23 GLM-4.6V 30.8%

Source: Official GameWorld leaderboard

Sources: Official GameWorld leaderboard and labs’ model cards

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-6.1 Terra 76.8% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Generalist interface Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3.8 Flash 63.5% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Generalist interface Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 61.5% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen 3.8 27B 54.6% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 45.2% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 43.8% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen3.6 27B 43.6% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Gemini 3 Flash 41.9% Generalist interface Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen3.5-27B 41.8% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
10 GPT-5.2 40.6% Generalist interface Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 40.6% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Seed1.8 39.8% Computer-use interface Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Qwen3.5-9B 39.3% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Generalist interface Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
14 Claude Sonnet 4.6 39.3% Generalist interface Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Kimi K2.5 37.4% Generalist interface Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 36.1% Computer-use interface Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
17 Grok 4.1 Fast 36% reasoning, Generalist interface Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
18 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 35.8% Computer-use interface Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Qwen3-VL-Plus 35.4% Generalist interface Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 31.4% Computer-use interface Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
21 UI-TARS-1.5 31.1% Computer-use interface Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B 30.8% Computer-use interface Official leaderboard
23 GLM-4.6V 30.8% Generalist interface Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-6.1 Terra 76.8% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Generalist interface Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3.8 Flash 63.5% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Generalist interface Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 61.5% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen 3.8 27B 54.6% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 45.2% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 43.8% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen3.6 27B 43.6% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Gemini 3 Flash 41.9% Generalist interface Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen3.5-27B 41.8% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
10 GPT-5.2 40.6% Generalist interface Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 40.6% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Computer-use interface Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Seed1.8 39.8% Computer-use interface Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Qwen3.5-9B 39.3% Fine-Control Protocol; 400-step limit, Generalist interface Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
14 Claude Sonnet 4.6 39.3% Generalist interface Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Kimi K2.5 37.4% Generalist interface Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 36.1% Computer-use interface Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
17 Grok 4.1 Fast 36% reasoning, Generalist interface Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
18 computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 35.8% Computer-use interface Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Qwen3-VL-Plus 35.4% Generalist interface Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 31.4% Computer-use interface Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
21 Seed2.1 Pro 31.2% Jun 2026 Lab model card
22 UI-TARS-1.5 31.1% Computer-use interface Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
23 GLM-4.6V 30.8% Generalist interface Dec 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

5 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in April 2026 5 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen Google DeepMind OpenAI
Own leaderboard 5 leaders

Source: Official GameWorld leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6.1 Terra Gemini 3.8 Flash Qwen 3.8 27B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B GPT-5.2 Gemini 2.5 Computer Use computer-use-preview-2025-03-11 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6.1 Terra Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sources: Official GameWorld leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 23, 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 31.2 GameWorld (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Games and long tasks

All 82 in Games and long tasks
  • ARC-AGI-3 In use Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions. GPT-6 Astra 99.95%
  • Orak Fading LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Each game scores in-game progress or outcomes, and the board ranks models by their average rank across the games. Gemini 2.5 Pro 3.90
  • MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks. Seed2.0 Pro 49%
  • TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. The score is harmful actions per 100 steps, where lower is better. The board also reports game progress. Llama 4 Scout 7.00
  • Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%
  • Anthropic large agent teams tasks Only in system cards Internal 24-hour tasks for teams of 1-100 agents: build a company knowledge base, or formalize a theorem in Lean.