Benchmark Almanac

ARC-AGI-3

GPT-6 Astra 99.95% leads since September 2026
GPT-6 Astra 99.95% leads since September 2026
In use

Interactive game environments where agents must explore, infer goals and rules, and act efficiently without instructions.

Scores depend on the harness. ARC Prize reports GPT-6 Astra at 62.7 percent with its Standard harness and 99.9 percent with a Provider Adapter harness. A six-game preview ran from July 2025.

Released
March 2026
Kind
Puzzles and chess
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
Public, plus a private test set
Strongest model tested
Claude Fable 5.2 #1 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
September 2026
Last model added
November 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We introduce ARC-AGI-3, an interactive benchmark for studying agentic intelligence through novel, abstract, turn-based environments in which agents must explore, infer goals, build internal models of environment dynamics, and plan effective action sequences without explicit instructions. Like its predecessors ARC-AGI-1 and 2, ARC-AGI-3 focuses entirely on evaluating fluid adaptive efficiency on novel tasks, while avoiding language and external knowledge. ARC-AGI-3 environments only leverage Core Knowledge priors and are difficulty-calibrated via extensive testing with human test-takers. Our testing shows humans can solve 100% of the environments, in contrast to frontier AI systems which, as of March 2026, score below 1%. In this paper, we present the benchmark design, its efficiency-based scoring framework grounded in human action baselines, and the methodology used to construct, validate, and calibrate the environments.

Abstract of ARC-AGI-3: A New Challenge for Frontier Agentic Intelligence (arXiv:2603.24621, CC0)
27
Models scored on its own leaderboard
5
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

GPT-6 Astra leads with 99.95%

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.

GPT-6 Astra leads with 99.95%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 GPT-6 Astra high 99.95%
  2. 2 Gemini 4 Carbon medium 99.1%
  3. 3 Claude Fable 5.2 high 97.7%
  4. 4 Gemini 4 Argon low 97.5%
  5. 5 GPT-6.1 Sol xhigh 96.4%
  6. 6 Claude Sonnet 5.5 xhigh 72.4%
  7. 7 Gemini 3.8 Flash high 35%
  8. 8 Claude Opus 5 high 30.2%
  9. 9 GPT-6 Sol max 23%
  10. 10 Grok 4.7 high 10.1%
  11. 11 GPT-5.6 Sol max 7.78%
  12. 12 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 max 5.81%
  13. 13 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash low 3.26%
  14. 14 Claude Haiku 5.5 max 2.82%
  15. 15 Grok 4.6 xhigh 2.11%
  16. 16 Claude Opus 4.8 high 1.52%
  17. 17 GPT-5.6 Terra max 0.80%
  18. 18 GPT-6 Luna max 0.59%
  19. 19 Claude Opus 4.6 max 0.51%
  20. 20 GPT-5.5 high 0.43%
  21. 21 Gemini 3.1 Pro 0.42%
  22. 22 Muse Spark Open xhigh 0.42%
  23. 23 Grok 4.5 medium 0.32%
  24. 24 GPT-5.4 high 0.21%
  25. 25 Claude Opus 4.7 high 0.18%
  26. 26 GPT-5.6 Luna max 0.18%
  27. 27 Grok 4.20 beta 0.09%

Source: Official ARC-AGI-3 leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-6 Astra 99.95% high, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 4 Carbon 99.1% medium, Provider Adapter Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Fable 5.2 97.7% high, Provider Adapter Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 4 Argon 97.5% low, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-6.1 Sol 96.4% xhigh, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Sonnet 5.5 72.4% xhigh, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Gemini 3.8 Flash 35% high, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Claude Opus 5 30.2% high, standard Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-6 Sol 23% max, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Grok 4.7 10.1% high, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
11 GPT-5.6 Sol 7.78% max, standard Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
12 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 5.81% max, Provider Adapter Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
13 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3.26% low, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
14 Claude Haiku 5.5 2.82% max, Provider Adapter Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Grok 4.6 2.11% xhigh, standard Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Claude Opus 4.8 1.52% high, standard May 2026 Official leaderboard
17 GPT-5.6 Terra 0.80% max, standard Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
18 GPT-6 Luna 0.59% max, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
19 Claude Opus 4.6 0.51% max, standard Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
20 GPT-5.5 0.43% high, standard Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
21 Gemini 3.1 Pro 0.42% standard Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
22 Muse Spark Open 0.42% xhigh, Provider Adapter Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
23 Grok 4.5 0.32% medium, standard Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
24 GPT-5.4 0.21% high, standard Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
25 Claude Opus 4.7 0.18% high, standard Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
26 GPT-5.6 Luna 0.18% max, standard Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
27 Grok 4.20 0.09% beta, standard Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-6 Astra 99.95% high, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 4 Carbon 99.1% medium, Provider Adapter Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Fable 5.2 97.7% high, Provider Adapter Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 4 Argon 97.5% low, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-6.1 Sol 96.4% xhigh, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Sonnet 5.5 72.4% xhigh, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Gemini 3.8 Flash 35% high, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Claude Opus 5 30.2% Jul 2026 Lab model card
9 GPT-6 Sol 23% max, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Grok 4.7 10.1% high, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
11 GPT-5.6 Sol 7.78% max, standard Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
12 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 5.81% max, Provider Adapter Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
13 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3.26% low, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
14 Claude Haiku 5.5 2.82% max, Provider Adapter Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Grok 4.6 2.11% xhigh, standard Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Claude Opus 4.8 1.52% high, standard May 2026 Official leaderboard
17 GPT-5.6 Terra 0.80% max, standard Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
18 GPT-6 Luna 0.59% max, Provider Adapter Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
19 Claude Opus 4.6 0.51% max, standard Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
20 GPT-5.5 0.43% high, standard Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
21 Gemini 3.1 Pro 0.42% standard Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
22 Muse Spark Open 0.42% xhigh, Provider Adapter Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
23 Grok 4.5 0.32% medium, standard Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
24 GPT-5.4 0.21% high, standard Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
25 Claude Opus 4.7 0.18% high, standard Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
26 GPT-5.6 Luna 0.18% max, standard Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
27 Grok 4.20 0.09% beta, standard Feb 2026 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 6 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

The best score, 99.95%, costs $18,820 for the full run

Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. GPT-6.1 Sol at max comes within 3.8 points of the best for $3,817 for the full run, 5 times cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.

Google DeepMind OpenAI DeepSeek Anthropic Cost frontier One model at each effort level
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% $100 $1,000 $10,000 $100,000 Cost of the full run, log scale GPT-6 Astra, high Gemini 4 Carbon, medium Gemini 3.8 Flash, low Gemini 3.8 Flash, low DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, low GPT-6 Luna, max 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% $100 $1,000 $10,000 $100,000 Cost of the full run, log scale GPT-6 Astra, high Gemini 3.8 Flash, low

Source: Official ARC-AGI-3 leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost of the full runOutput tokens
GPT-6 Astra high Provider Adapter 99.95% $18,820
Gemini 4 Carbon medium Provider Adapter 99.1% $4,560
GPT-6 Astra max Provider Adapter 98.5% $17,330
GPT-6 Astra xhigh Provider Adapter 98.4% $18,150
GPT-6 Astra medium Provider Adapter 98.4% $19,280
GPT-6 Astra low Provider Adapter 98% $21,300
Claude Fable 5.2 high Provider Adapter 97.7% $18,620
Gemini 4 Carbon low Provider Adapter 97.7% $4,351
Gemini 4 Argon low Provider Adapter 97.5% $4,770
Gemini 4 Argon medium Provider Adapter 97.3% $4,981
Gemini 4 Argon high Provider Adapter 97.3% $4,626
Claude Fable 5.2 xhigh Provider Adapter 97.3% $18,250
Gemini 4 Carbon high Provider Adapter 96.8% $4,350
Claude Fable 5.2 medium Provider Adapter 96.8% $21,660
GPT-6 Astra none Provider Adapter 96.7% $23,460
GPT-6.1 Sol xhigh Provider Adapter 96.4% $4,360
GPT-6.1 Sol max Provider Adapter 96.2% $3,817
GPT-6.1 Sol high Provider Adapter 95% $5,404
Claude Fable 5.2 max Provider Adapter 94.9% $17,880
Claude Fable 5.2 low Provider Adapter 92.3% $27,380
GPT-6.1 Sol medium Provider Adapter 91% $5,835
GPT-6.1 Sol low Provider Adapter 82.8% $6,622
Claude Fable 5.2 xhigh standard 81.2% $21,950
Claude Fable 5.2 high standard 79.3% $25,170
Claude Fable 5.2 medium standard 73.3% $29,030
Claude Sonnet 5.5 xhigh Provider Adapter 72.4% $8,170
Claude Fable 5.2 max standard 65.7% $17,140
Gemini 4 Carbon low standard 65.1% $7,244
Gemini 4 Carbon medium standard 63.9% $7,180
GPT-6 Astra max standard 62.7% $26,100
GPT-6 Astra xhigh standard 59.3% $37,320
GPT-6 Astra high standard 54.8% $40,700
GPT-6.1 Sol max standard 52.7% $7,632
Claude Fable 5.2 low standard 52% $34,910
Gemini 4 Argon low standard 49.8% $5,821
Gemini 4 Argon medium standard 46.3% $6,179
GPT-6.1 Sol xhigh standard 39.9% $9,104
GPT-6 Astra medium standard 38.6% $48,090
Claude Sonnet 5.5 high Provider Adapter 35.5% $10,240
GPT-6 Astra none standard 35.2% $49,790
Gemini 3.8 Flash high Provider Adapter 35% $4,522
Claude Opus 5 high standard 30.2% $20,660
GPT-6.1 Sol high standard 26.7% $9,758
Claude Sonnet 5.5 xhigh standard 24.3% $7,394
Gemini 3.8 Flash medium Provider Adapter 24.2% $3,826
GPT-6 Sol max Provider Adapter 23% $8,722
GPT-6 Astra low standard 17.4% $38,170
Gemini 3.8 Flash low Provider Adapter 15.1% $3,158
GPT-6.1 Sol medium standard 10.6% $7,370
Gemini 3.8 Flash high standard 10.4% $4,398
Grok 4.7 high Provider Adapter 10.1% $4,774
GPT-6 Sol xhigh Provider Adapter 9.45% $6,907
Grok 4.7 medium Provider Adapter 8.37% $5,060
GPT-5.6 Sol max standard 7.78% $25,060
Grok 4.7 xhigh Provider Adapter 7.02% $4,576
GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh standard 6.99% $19,220
Gemini 3.8 Flash low standard 5.99% $2,669
GPT-6 Sol high Provider Adapter 5.86% $5,908
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 max Provider Adapter 5.81% $1,179
GPT-6 Sol medium Provider Adapter 4.93% $5,889
Claude Sonnet 5.5 medium Provider Adapter 4.89% $5,250
GPT-6 Sol max standard 4.62% $5,554
Gemini 3.8 Flash medium standard 3.99% $2,728
GPT-6.1 Sol low standard 3.92% $7,111
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash low Provider Adapter 3.26% $878
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash high Provider Adapter 3.15% $1,022
Claude Haiku 5.5 max Provider Adapter 2.82% $437
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max Provider Adapter 2.68% $1,309
GPT-5.6 Sol high standard 2.15% $15,180
Grok 4.6 xhigh standard 2.11% $5,612
Grok 4.7 xhigh standard 1.82% $2,732
GPT-6 Sol xhigh standard 1.80% $5,106
GPT-6 Sol low Provider Adapter 1.76% $4,745
Grok 4.7 high standard 1.73% $3,742
Grok 4.7 medium standard 1.71% $3,795
Claude Opus 4.8 high standard 1.52% $10,000
GPT-6 Sol none Provider Adapter 1.21% $4,234
Claude Sonnet 5.5 high standard 1.20% $5,487
GPT-5.6 Sol medium standard 1.07% $12,970
GPT-6 Sol high standard 0.90% $5,072
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max standard 0.85% $1,165
GPT-5.6 Terra max standard 0.80% $7,918
Grok 4.7 low Provider Adapter 0.77% $5,754
GPT-5.6 Terra xhigh standard 0.65% $6,804
Claude Sonnet 5.5 low Provider Adapter 0.62% $4,797
GPT-6 Luna max Provider Adapter 0.59% $237
Claude Opus 4.6 max standard 0.51% $8,866
GPT-6 Luna xhigh Provider Adapter 0.51% $223
GPT-5.6 Terra high standard 0.49% $5,881
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash high standard 0.48% $1,006
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash none Provider Adapter 0.48% $648
Claude Haiku 5.5 max standard 0.45% $388
GPT-5.5 high standard 0.43% $10,000
Gemini 3.1 Pro standard 0.42% $2,214
GPT-6 Sol medium standard 0.42% $4,864
Muse Spark Open xhigh Provider Adapter 0.42% $2,996
Claude Sonnet 5.5 low standard 0.40% $4,757
Claude Sonnet 5.5 medium standard 0.40% $4,840
GPT-6 Luna high Provider Adapter 0.38% $224
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash low standard 0.35% $821
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash none standard 0.34% $735
GPT-5.6 Sol low standard 0.33% $12,810
Grok 4.5 medium standard 0.32% $8,458
GPT-6 Luna medium Provider Adapter 0.32% $214
Grok 4.5 high standard 0.30% $6,893
GPT-6 Sol none standard 0.28% $4,656
Grok 4.5 low standard 0.26% $8,718
Grok 4.7 low standard 0.25% $4,815
GPT-6 Luna low Provider Adapter 0.24% $214
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 max standard 0.22% $1,004
GPT-5.4 high standard 0.21% $5,187
GPT-6 Luna medium standard 0.19% $241
GPT-6 Luna high standard 0.18% $256
Claude Opus 4.7 high standard 0.18% $10,000
GPT-5.6 Luna max standard 0.18% $3,189
GPT-5.6 Luna low standard 0.17% $2,307
GPT-5.6 Luna medium standard 0.17% $2,379
GPT-6 Luna xhigh standard 0.16% $263
Muse Spark Open xhigh standard 0.14% $3,908
GPT-6 Sol low standard 0.13% $4,752
GPT-6 Luna max standard 0.10% $262
GPT-5.6 Luna high standard 0.10% $2,482
Grok 4.20 beta standard 0.09% $3,775
GPT-5.6 Terra medium standard 0.08% $5,895
GPT-6 Luna none Provider Adapter 0.05% $205
GPT-6 Luna low standard 0.03% $229
GPT-6 Luna none standard 0.03% $230
GPT-5.6 Luna xhigh standard 0.02% $2,802
GPT-5.6 Terra low standard 0.01% $5,068

6 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in March 2026 6 models have held number one with claims included since its release in March 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Anthropic OpenAI Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in Sep 2026, by GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra 99.95%
Lab claims Passed 85% in Sep 2026, by GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra 99.9%

Sources: Official ARC-AGI-3 leaderboard and labs’ model cards

GPT-6 Astra on the official leaderboard passed 85% in September 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6 Astra Gemini 3.8 Flash Claude Opus 5 GPT-5.6 Sol Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.6 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6 Astra Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sources: Official ARC-AGI-3 leaderboard and labs’ model cards

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

OpenAI
Anthropic
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 3, 2026 GPT-6 Astra 99.9 ARC-AGI-3 (responses API harness)
Jul 24, 2026 Claude Opus 5 30.2 Novel problem-solving ARC-AGI-3 (high)
Jul 9, 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna 0.18 ARC-AGI-3
Jul 9, 2026 GPT-5.6 Terra 0.8 ARC-AGI-3
Jul 9, 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol 7.78 ARC-AGI-3

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Nov 9, 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 system card 79.3 ARC-AGI-3, verified headline Standard harness score, High effort. Provider Adapter 97.72% at High. At Max: Standard 65.66%, Provider Adapter 94.90% (Section 8.15) Capabilities
Jul 24, 2026 Claude Opus 5 system card 30.2 ARC-AGI-3 semi-private set, RHAE score 30.16% at high effort, max effort not available at release, verified by ARC Prize Foundation (Table 8.1.A, 8.14.2) Capabilities

6 lab claims next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 5 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Claude Fable 5.2 79.3% ARC-AGI-3, verified headline Standard harness score, High effort. Provider Adapter 97.72% at High. At Max: Standard 65.66%, Provider Adapter 94.90% (Section 8.15) 97.7% Leaderboard, high, Provider Adapter −18 pts
GPT-6 Astra 99.9% ARC-AGI-3 (responses API harness) 99.95% Leaderboard, high, Provider Adapter Same
Claude Opus 5 30.2% Novel problem-solving ARC-AGI-3 (high) 30.2% Leaderboard, high, standard Same
GPT-5.6 Sol 7.78% ARC-AGI-3 7.78% Leaderboard, max, standard Same
GPT-5.6 Terra 0.80% ARC-AGI-3 0.80% Leaderboard, max, standard Same
GPT-5.6 Luna 0.18% ARC-AGI-3 0.18% Leaderboard, max, standard Same

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

OpenAI DeepSeek xAI Google DeepMind Anthropic
ARC-AGI-3 Passed 85% in Sep 2026, by GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra 99.95%
ARC-AGI Passed 85% in Dec 2025, by GPT-5.2 Pro
ARC-AGI-2 Passed 85% in Apr 2026, by GPT-5.5
ARC-AGI-3 Passed 85% in Sep 2026, by GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra 99.95%

Source: Official leaderboards

More in Games and long tasks

All 82 in Games and long tasks
  • Orak Fading LLM agents play 12 popular video games across most genres through an MCP interface. Each game scores in-game progress or outcomes, and the board ranks models by their average rank across the games. Gemini 2.5 Pro 3.90
  • MineDojo Fading Agents complete open-ended tasks in Minecraft, such as mining blocks and fighting mobs, from a large simulation suite. Programmatic checks score many tasks. Seed2.0 Pro 49%
  • TextQuests Only in system cards Agents play 25 classic interactive fiction games. The score is harmful actions per 100 steps, where lower is better. The board also reports game progress. Llama 4 Scout 7.00
  • GameWorld Only in system cards Multimodal game agents play 34 browser games across 170 tasks. Outcomes are checked from the game state. GPT-6.1 Terra 76.8%
  • Swarm Bench Only in system cards Models orchestrate agent swarms on complex tasks that benefit from coordinated decomposition and parallel execution. Kimi K3 76.3%
  • Anthropic large agent teams tasks Only in system cards Internal 24-hour tasks for teams of 1-100 agents: build a company knowledge base, or formalize a theorem in Lean.