PhysicianBench
100 physician tasks performed by an agent inside an EHR environment. Scored by pass rate per attempt.
- Made by
- HealthRex Lab (Stanford)
- Released
- May 2026
- Kind
- Medicine
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Fable 5.2 #1 on the capability index
- Last in a system card
- November 2026
- Last model added
- November 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We introduce PhysicianBench, a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on physician tasks grounded in real clinical setting within electronic health record (EHR) environments. Existing medical agent benchmarks primarily focus on static knowledge recall, single-step atomic actions, or action intent without verifiable execution against the environment. As a result, they fail to capture the long-horizon, composite workflows that characterize real clinical systems. PhysicianBench comprises 100 long-horizon tasks adapted from real consultation cases between primary care and subspecialty physicians, with each task independently reviewed by a separate panel of physicians. Tasks are instantiated in an EHR environment with real patient records and accessed through the same standard APIs used by commercial EHR vendors. Tasks span 21 specialties (e.g., cardiology, endocrinology, oncology, psychiatry) and diverse workflow types (e.g., diagnosis interpretation, medication prescribing, treatment planning), requiring an average of 27 tool calls per task. Solving each task requires retrieving data across encounters, reasoning over heterogeneous clinical information, executing consequential clinical actions, and producing clinical documentation. Each task is decomposed into structured checkpoints (670 in total across the benchmark) capturing distinct stages of completion graded by task-specific scripts with execution-grounded verification. Across 13 proprietary and open-source LLM agents, the best-performing model achieves only 46% success rate (pass@1), while open-source models reach at most 19%, revealing a substantial gap between current agent capabilities and the demands of real-world clinical workflows. PhysicianBench provides a realistic and execution-grounded benchmark for measuring progress toward autonomous clinical agents.
GPT-5.6 Sol leads with 50% among models released by July 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
Claude Fable 5.2 leads with 64.4%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 14 more
- 1 GPT-5.6 Sol 50%
- 2 GPT-5.5 46.3%
- 3 Claude Opus 4.6 31.7%
- 4 Claude Opus 4.7 29.3%
- 5 GPT-5.4 27.7%
- 6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 23%
- 7
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 18.7%
- 8 Kimi K2.6 17%
- 9 MiMo-V2.5-Pro 16.7%
- 10
Qwen 3.6 Plus 13.7%
- 11
MiniMax-M2.7 8.70%
- 12
Gemini 3.1 Pro 6.00%
- 13 Grok 4.20 5.30%
Source: Official PhysicianBench leaderboard
- 64.4 Claude Fable 5.2
- 63.2 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 50.0 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 46.3 GPT-5.5
- 43.0 Claude Haiku 5.5
- 31.7 Claude Opus 4.6
- 29.3 Claude Opus 4.7
- 27.7 GPT-5.4
- 23.0 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 18.7
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 17.0 Kimi K2.6
- 16.7 MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- 13.7
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 8.70
MiniMax-M2.7
- 6.00
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 5.30 Grok 4.20
- 1 Claude Fable 5.2 64.4%
- 2 Claude Sonnet 5.5 63.2%
- 3 GPT-5.6 Sol 50%
- 4 GPT-5.5 46.3%
- 5 Claude Haiku 5.5 43%
- 6 Claude Opus 4.6 31.7%
- 7 Claude Opus 4.7 29.3%
- 8 GPT-5.4 27.7%
- 9 Claude Sonnet 4.6 23%
- 10
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 18.7%
- 11 Kimi K2.6 17%
- 12 MiMo-V2.5-Pro 16.7%
- 13
Qwen 3.6 Plus 13.7%
- 14
MiniMax-M2.7 8.70%
- 15
Gemini 3.1 Pro 6.00%
- 16 Grok 4.20 5.30%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official PhysicianBench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 50% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-5.5 | 46.3% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 31.7% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 29.3% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GPT-5.4 | 27.7% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 23% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 18.7% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Kimi K2.6 | 17% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 16.7% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 13.7% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 8.70% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 6.00% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | Grok 4.20 | 5.30% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5.2 | 64.4% | Nov 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 63.2% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 50% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | GPT-5.5 | 46.3% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 43% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 31.7% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 29.3% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | GPT-5.4 | 27.7% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 23% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 18.7% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Kimi K2.6 | 17% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 16.7% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 13.7% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 8.70% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 6.00% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Grok 4.20 | 5.30% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in May 2026 4 models have held number one with claims included since its release in May 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official PhysicianBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official PhysicianBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
3 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2026 | Claude Fable 5.2 system card | 64.4 | PhysicianBench, attempt pass rate at max effort over 100 tasks and five attempts each, Claude Opus 5 grader, fallbacks enabled (Section 8.16.3) | Health |
| Oct 7, 2026 | Claude Haiku 5.5 system card | 43 | PhysicianBench, share of attempts passed, max effort (Figure 8.11.2.A) | Health |
| Sep 28, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card | 63.2 | PhysicianBench pass@1 at max effort (8.15.3, Figure 8.15.B) | Health |
More in Law, finance and medicine
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy.
Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%