Benchmark Almanac

Physics-IQ

Magi-1 64.5% tops its leaderboard Cosmos3-Nano 57.7% leads the models we track
Only in system cards

Video models continue 396 filmed physical events from a frame or 3 s clip. Motion compared with the real continuation.

Some rows are supplied by model makers through GitHub pull requests. Physics-IQ Verified (2026-06) has its own record and leaderboard.

Made by
Google DeepMind
Released
January 2025
Kind
Physical prediction
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last in a system card
May 2026
Last model added
July 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

AI video generation is undergoing a revolution, with quality and realism advancing rapidly. These advances have led to a passionate scientific debate: Do video models learn "world models" that discover laws of physics – or, alternatively, are they merely sophisticated pixel predictors that achieve visual realism without understanding the physical principles of reality? We address this question by developing Physics-IQ, a comprehensive benchmark dataset that can only be solved by acquiring a deep understanding of various physical principles, like fluid dynamics, optics, solid mechanics, magnetism and thermodynamics. We find that across a range of current models (Sora, Runway, Pika, Lumiere, Stable Video Diffusion, and VideoPoet), physical understanding is severely limited, and unrelated to visual realism. At the same time, some test cases can already be successfully solved. This indicates that acquiring certain physical principles from observation alone may be possible, but significant challenges remain. While we expect rapid advances ahead, our work demonstrates that visual realism does not imply physical understanding. Our project page is at https://physics-iq.github.io; code at https://github.com/google-deepmind/physics-IQ-benchmark.

Abstract of Do generative video models understand physical principles? (arXiv:2501.09038, CC0)
17
Entries on its own leaderboard, 4 models we track
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Magi-1 tops the leaderboard with 64.5%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Cosmos3-Nano, at 57.7%.

The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Magi-1 multiframe (v2v) 64.5%
  2. 2 Cosmos3-Super multiframe (v2v) 63.4%
  3. 3 Cosmos3-Nano multiframe (v2v) 57.7%
  4. 4 Sora 2 i2v 46.4%
  5. 5 Wan2.2 i2v 44.4%
  6. 6 Video-GPT multiframe (v2v) 35%
  7. 7 CogVideoX-5B i2v 34.1%
  8. 8 Cosmos3-Edge i2v 34.1%
  9. 9 Magi-1 4.5B i2v 34%
  10. 10 Wan2.1 14B i2v 34%
  11. 11 CogVideoX-5b i2v 32.3%
  12. 12 VideoPoet multiframe (v2v) 29.5%
  13. 13 Lumiere multiframe (v2v) 23%
  14. 14 Runway Gen 3 i2v 22.8%
  15. 15 Stable Video Diffusion i2v 14.8%
  16. 16 Pika i2v 13%
  17. 17 Sora i2v 10%

Source: Official Physics-IQ leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Magi-1 64.5% multiframe (v2v), GeoPhys (BoN) Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Cosmos3-Super 63.4% multiframe (v2v), WMReward (BoN) May 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Cosmos3-Nano 57.7% multiframe (v2v), WMReward (BoN) May 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Sora 2 46.4% i2v, WMReward (BoN) Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Wan2.2 44.4% i2v, WMReward (BoN) Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Video-GPT 35% multiframe (v2v) May 2025 Official leaderboard
7 CogVideoX-5B 34.1% i2v, GeoPhys (BoN) Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Cosmos3-Edge 34.1% i2v Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Magi-1 4.5B 34% i2v, GeoPhys (BoN) Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Wan2.1 14B 34% i2v, GeoPhys (BoN) Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
11 CogVideoX-5b 32.3% i2v Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
12 VideoPoet 29.5% multiframe (v2v) Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Lumiere 23% multiframe (v2v) Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Runway Gen 3 22.8% i2v Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
15 Stable Video Diffusion 14.8% i2v Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Pika 13% i2v Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
17 Sora 10% i2v Feb 2025 Official leaderboard

3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in January 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI NVIDIA
Own leaderboard Replaced by Verified, Jul 2026
Cosmos3-Nano 57.7%

Source: Official Physics-IQ leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Cosmos3-Nano Sora 2 Sora 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Cosmos3-Nano Sora 2

Source: Official Physics-IQ leaderboard

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
May 31, 2026 Cosmos3-Nano technical report 40.2 Cosmos3-Nano image-to-video Physics-IQ direct, Table 13. Also Cosmos3-Nano image-to-video Physics-IQ with WMReward best-of-N, Table 13 43.8. Also Cosmos3-Nano video-to-video Physics-IQ direct, Table 13 50.2. Also Cosmos3-Nano video-to-video Physics-IQ with WMReward best-of-N, Table 13 57.7 Capabilities

Versions

More in World models

All 39 in World models
  • AgentWorldBench In use Language world models predict the next environment observation after an agent action, in 7 domains from MCP and search to Android and desktop OS. A judge model scores each prediction against the real observation on five dimensions. GPT-5.4 58.3
  • IntPhys 2 In use Models watch simulated videos and judge whether each event is physically possible, testing object permanence, immutability, continuity and solidity. Scored by accuracy. Muse Spark Open 68.3%
  • QwenWorldBench Fading Models act as world models that simulate agent environments in 7 domains, such as terminal, web, and Android. A rubric judge scores five dimensions. Qwen3.7-Plus 62.1%
  • VPCT Fading Models view an image of a ball, ramps, and three buckets and predict which bucket the ball falls into. Scored by accuracy on 100 problems. Gemini 3 Pro 91%
  • ContPhy Fading Models infer physical properties such as mass and density of fluids and soft bodies from videos and predict their dynamics. Seed2.0 Pro 67.4%
  • RBench Only in system cards 650 image+text prompts for robot video generation (tasks and embodiments). MLLM judge scores task completion, physical plausibility, stability. Wan 2.6 60.7%