PMC-VQA
Models answer multiple-choice questions about medical images drawn from PubMed Central figures. Scored by accuracy.
- Made by
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Shanghai AI Laboratory
- Released
- May 2023
- Kind
- Medicine
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Qwen 3.8 Max #29 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- August 2026
In the authors’ words
Medical Visual Question Answering (MedVQA) presents a significant opportunity to enhance diagnostic accuracy and healthcare delivery by leveraging artificial intelligence to interpret and answer questions based on medical images. In this study, we reframe the problem of MedVQA as a generation task that naturally follows the human-machine interaction and propose a generative-based model for medical visual understanding by aligning visual information from a pre-trained vision encoder with a large language model. We establish a scalable pipeline to construct a large-scale medical visual question-answering dataset, named PMC-VQA, which contains 227k VQA pairs of 149k images that cover various modalities or diseases. We train the proposed model on PMC-VQA and then fine-tune it on multiple public benchmarks, e.g., VQA-RAD, SLAKE, and Image-Clef-2019, significantly outperforming existing MedVQA models in generating relevant, accurate free-form answers. In addition, we propose a test set that has undergone manual verification, which is significantly more challenging, serving to better monitor the development of generative MedVQA methods. To facilitate comprehensive evaluation and comparison, we have maintained a leaderboard at https://paperswithcode.com/paper/pmc-vqa-visual-instruction-tuning-for-medical, offering a centralized resource for tracking progress and benchmarking state-of-the-art approaches. The PMC-VQA dataset emerges as a vital resource for the field of research, and the MedVInT presents a significant breakthrough in the area of MedVQA.
Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 66.2% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1
Qwen 3.8 Max 66.2%
- 2
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 64.2%
- 3
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 63.3%
- 4
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 62.7%
- 5
Qwen3.5-27B 62.4%
- 6
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 62%
- 7
Qwen3.5-9B 57.9%
- 8
Qwen3.5-4B 55.5%
- 9
Qwen3.5-2B 48.8%
- 10
Qwen3.5-0.8B 40.4%
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 66.2% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 64.2% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 63.3% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 62.7% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 62.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 62% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 57.9% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 55.5% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 48.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 40.4% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card |
2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in May 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in August 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2026 | 66.2 | PMC-VQA | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 62.7 | PMC-VQA | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 40.4 | PMC-VQA 40.4/45.5 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 48.8 | PMC-VQA 48.8/54.0 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 55.5 | PMC-VQA | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 57.9 | PMC-VQA | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 62 | PMC-VQA | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 62.4 | PMC-VQA | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 63.3 | PMC-VQA | |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 64.2 | PMC-VQA |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2026 | | 62.7 | PMC-VQA (Table 6) | Health |
More in Law, finance and medicine
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy.
Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%