Benchmark Almanac

PresentBench

Qwen 3.8 Max 79.6% leads since August 2026
In use

Models generate full slide decks from background materials for 238 real-world cases. A judge scores each deck against about 54 hand-written checklist items.

Released
March 2026
Kind
Documents and spreadsheets
Level
University
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen 3.8 Max #29 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
September 2026
Last model added
September 2026

In the authors’ words

Slides serve as a critical medium for conveying information in presentation-oriented scenarios such as academia, education, and business. Despite their importance, creating high-quality slide decks remains time-consuming and cognitively demanding. Recent advances in generative models, such as Nano Banana Pro, have made automated slide generation increasingly feasible. However, existing evaluations of slide generation are often coarse-grained and rely on holistic judgments, making it difficult to accurately assess model capabilities or track meaningful advances in the field. In practice, the lack of fine-grained, verifiable evaluation criteria poses a critical bottleneck for both research and real-world deployment. In this paper, we propose PresentBench, a fine-grained, rubric-based benchmark for evaluating automated real-world slide generation. It contains 238 evaluation instances, each supplemented with background materials required for slide creation. Moreover, we manually design an average of 54.1 checklist items per instance, each formulated as a binary question, to enable fine-grained, instance-specific evaluation of the generated slide decks. Extensive experiments show that PresentBench provides more reliable evaluation results than existing methods, and exhibits significantly stronger alignment with human preferences. Furthermore, our benchmark reveals that NotebookLM significantly outperforms other slide generation methods, highlighting substantial recent progress in this domain.

Abstract of PresentBench: A Fine-Grained Rubric-Based Benchmark for Slide Generation (arXiv:2603.07244, CC0)
3
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 79.6% among models released by September 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen 3.8 Max 79.6%
  2. 2 Step 5 Preview 76.8%
  3. 3 Seed2.1 Pro 54.6%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.8 Max 79.6% Aug 2026 Lab model card
2 Step 5 Preview 76.8% Sep 2026 Lab model card
3 Seed2.1 Pro 54.6% Jun 2026 Lab model card

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in March 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

ByteDance Seed Qwen
Lab claims Not tested since Sep 2026
Qwen 3.8 Max 79.6%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Seed2.1 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Seed2.1 Pro

Source: Labs’ model cards

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
StepFun
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 20, 2026 Step 5 Preview 76.8 PresentBench
Aug 3, 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 79.6 PresentBench

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 23, 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 54.6 PresentBench (Table 1) Capabilities

More in Economic work

All 97 in Economic work
  • JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
  • GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate. Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
  • GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
  • AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
  • CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Claude Fable 5 75.9%
  • OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%