SEED-Bench-2
Multimodal models answer multiple-choice questions that cover comprehension of interleaved image and text inputs and image generation, in hierarchical capability levels.
Adds interleaved and generation tasks, so scores do not compare with SEED-Bench.
- Made by
- Tencent AI Lab (ARC Lab)
- Released
- November 2023
- Kind
- General visual questions
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude 3 Opus #172 on the capability index
- Last model added
- February 2024
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs), building upon the foundation of powerful large language models (LLMs), have recently demonstrated exceptional capabilities in generating not only texts but also images given interleaved multimodal inputs (acting like a combination of GPT-4V and DALL-E 3). However, existing MLLM benchmarks remain limited to assessing only models' comprehension ability of single image-text inputs, failing to keep up with the strides made in MLLMs. A comprehensive benchmark is imperative for investigating the progress and uncovering the limitations of current MLLMs. In this work, we categorize the capabilities of MLLMs into hierarchical levels from L₀ to L₄ based on the modalities they can accept and generate, and propose SEED-Bench-2, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates the hierarchical capabilities of MLLMs. Specifically, SEED-Bench-2 comprises 24K multiple-choice questions with accurate human annotations, which spans 27 dimensions, including the evaluation of both text and image generation. Multiple-choice questions with groundtruth options derived from human annotation enables an objective and efficient assessment of model performance, eliminating the need for human or GPT intervention during evaluation. We further evaluate the performance of 23 prominent open-source MLLMs and summarize valuable observations. By revealing the limitations of existing MLLMs through extensive evaluations, we aim for SEED-Bench-2 to provide insights that will motivate future research towards the goal of General Artificial Intelligence. Dataset and evaluation code are available at https://github.com/AILab-CVC/SEED-Bench
MindAD tops the leaderboard with 72.4%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Qwen-VL-Plus, at 71.9%.
The newest model with a score here came out in February 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 72.4 MindAD
- 72.1 SPHINXv2-1k
- 71.9
Qwen-VL-Plus
- 69.8 GPT-4V [snapshot unspecified]
- 68.5 SPHINXv1-1k
- 66.5 InternLM-XComposer-VL
- 66.1 VisionLLaMA
- 62.9 Gemini-Pro-Vision [snapshot unspecified]
- 58.3 LLaVA-1.5
- 52.4 InstructBLIP
- 52.4
Kosmos-2
- 50.3 Qwen-VL-Chat
- 49.9 SEED-LLaMA
- 47.5 InstructBLIP-Vicuna
- 46.8 BLIP-2
- 46.4 Emu
- 45.0 MiniGPT-4
- 42.4 LLaVA
- 42.0 Claude 3 Opus
- 38.8
IDEFICS-9B-Instruct
- 38.6 mPLUG-Owl
- 38.3 Video-ChatGPT
- 36.7 MultiModal-GPT
- 36.7 VideoChat
- 36.6 OpenFlamingo
- 36.6 VPGTrans
- 36.0 LLaMA-AdapterV2
- 36.0 Otter
- 35.3 Valley
- 34.9 GVT
- 31.0 Next-GPT
- 1 MindAD Generate 72.4%
- 2 SPHINXv2-1k Generate 72.1%
- 3
Qwen-VL-Plus PPL for A/B/C/D 71.9%
- 4 GPT-4V [snapshot unspecified] Generate 69.8%
- 5 SPHINXv1-1k Generate 68.5%
- 6 InternLM-XComposer-VL PPL for A/B/C/D 66.5%
- 7 VisionLLaMA Generate 66.1%
- 8 Gemini-Pro-Vision [snapshot unspecified] Generate 62.9%
- 9 LLaVA-1.5 PPL 58.3%
- 10 InstructBLIP PPL 52.4%
- 11
Kosmos-2 PPL 52.4%
- 12 Qwen-VL-Chat PPL 50.3%
- 13 SEED-LLaMA PPL 49.9%
- 14 InstructBLIP-Vicuna PPL 47.5%
- 15 BLIP-2 PPL 46.8%
- 16 Emu PPL 46.4%
- 17 MiniGPT-4 PPL 45%
- 18 LLaVA PPL 42.4%
- 19 Claude 3 Opus Generate 42%
- 20
IDEFICS-9B-Instruct PPL 38.8%
- 21 mPLUG-Owl PPL 38.6%
- 22 Video-ChatGPT PPL 38.3%
- 23 MultiModal-GPT PPL 36.7%
- 24 VideoChat PPL 36.7%
- 25 OpenFlamingo PPL 36.6%
- 26 VPGTrans PPL 36.6%
- 27 LLaMA-AdapterV2 PPL 36%
- 28 Otter PPL 36%
- 29 Valley PPL 35.3%
- 30 GVT PPL 34.9%
- 31 Next-GPT PPL 31%
Source: Official SEED-Bench-2 leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MindAD | 72.4% | Generate | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | SPHINXv2-1k | 72.1% | Generate | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 71.9% | PPL for A/B/C/D | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GPT-4V [snapshot unspecified] | 69.8% | Generate | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | SPHINXv1-1k | 68.5% | Generate | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | InternLM-XComposer-VL | 66.5% | PPL for A/B/C/D | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | VisionLLaMA | 66.1% | Generate | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Gemini-Pro-Vision [snapshot unspecified] | 62.9% | Generate | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | LLaVA-1.5 | 58.3% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | InstructBLIP | 52.4% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 52.4% | PPL | Jun 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | Qwen-VL-Chat | 50.3% | PPL | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | SEED-LLaMA | 49.9% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | InstructBLIP-Vicuna | 47.5% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | BLIP-2 | 46.8% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Emu | 46.4% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | MiniGPT-4 | 45% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | LLaVA | 42.4% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Claude 3 Opus | 42% | Generate | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 38.8% | PPL | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | mPLUG-Owl | 38.6% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Video-ChatGPT | 38.3% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | MultiModal-GPT | 36.7% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | VideoChat | 36.7% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | OpenFlamingo | 36.6% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | VPGTrans | 36.6% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | LLaMA-AdapterV2 | 36% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | Otter | 36% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | Valley | 35.3% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | GVT | 34.9% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | Next-GPT | 31% | PPL | Official leaderboard |
2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in November 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official SEED-Bench-2 leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official SEED-Bench-2 leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
Source: Official leaderboards
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%