SEED-Bench
Models answer 19,000 human-annotated multiple-choice questions over 12 dimensions of image and video understanding. Scored by accuracy against the answer key.
Many papers report only the image dimensions. Later SEED-Bench-2 and SEED-Bench-2-Plus are separate tests.
- Made by
- Tencent AI Lab and ARC Lab (Li et al.)
- Released
- July 2023
- Kind
- General visual questions
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude 3 Opus #172 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- August 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Based on powerful Large Language Models (LLMs), recent generative Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have gained prominence as a pivotal research area, exhibiting remarkable capability for both comprehension and generation. In this work, we address the evaluation of generative comprehension in MLLMs as a preliminary step towards a comprehensive assessment of generative models, by introducing a benchmark named SEED-Bench. SEED-Bench consists of 19K multiple choice questions with accurate human annotations (x 6 larger than existing benchmarks), which spans 12 evaluation dimensions including the comprehension of both the image and video modality. We develop an advanced pipeline for generating multiple-choice questions that target specific evaluation dimensions, integrating both automatic filtering and manual verification processes. Multiple-choice questions with groundtruth options derived from human annotation enables an objective and efficient assessment of model performance, eliminating the need for human or GPT intervention during evaluation. We further evaluate the performance of 18 models across all 12 dimensions, covering both the spatial and temporal understanding. By revealing the limitations of existing MLLMs through evaluation results, we aim for SEED-Bench to provide insights for motivating future research. We will launch and consistently maintain a leaderboard to provide a platform for the community to assess and investigate model capability.
InternVL-Chat-V1-2-Plus leads with 70.4% among models released by February 2024
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
LFM2.5-VL-3B leads with 77.7%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in February 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 70.4
InternVL-Chat-V1-2-Plus
- 69.2 Weitu-VL-1.0
- 67.5 SPHINXv2-1k
- 67.3 GPT-4V
- 66.8
Qwen-VL-Plus
- 63.9 SPHINXv1-1k
- 62.8 llava-v1.5-7b-finetune
- 62.8 LLaVA-v1.5-LoRA
- 62.4 LLaVA-v1.5-13B-LoRA
- 62.3 InfMLLM-13B
- 61.6
LLaVA-v1.5-13B
- 61.5 llava-v1.5-7b-dsn-ft
- 61.0 llava-v1.5-7b-910b
- 60.5 Unified-IO-2 7B (2.5M)
- 60.4 Unified-IO-2 7B
- 60.2 Unified-IO-2 3B (3M)
- 59.9 LLaMA-VID-7B
- 58.7 Unified-IO-2 3B
- 58.2 Qwen-VL-Chat
- 57.8
mPLUG-Owl2
- 57.3 hh_resampler_v2-dsn
- 57.0 hh_v3_dsn
- 56.6 hh_resampler_llava
- 56.3 Qwen-VL
- 53.4 InstructBLIP-Vicuna
- 52.7 InstructBLIP
- 50.0
Kosmos-2
- 49.6 Unified-IO-2 1B
- 48.9 SEED-LLaMA
- 46.4 BLIP-2
- 42.8 MiniGPT-4-7B
- 40.9 OpenFlamingo (MPT-7B)
- 40.9 Claude 3 Opus
- 39.7 Otter (MPT-7B)
- 39.1 VPGTrans
- 37.6 VideoChat
- 34.0 mPLUG-Owl
- 33.9 Otter (LLaMA-7B)
- 33.5 GVT
- 33.2 MultiModal-GPT
- 33.1 OpenFlamingo (LLaMA-7B)
- 32.7 LLaMA-AdapterV2
- 31.2 Video-ChatGPT
- 30.3 Valley
- 28.5 Vicuna-7B
- 27.7 Flan-T5-3B
- 26.8
LLaMA-7B
- 1
InternVL-Chat-V1-2-Plus Generate 70.4%
- 2 Weitu-VL-1.0 Generate 69.2%
- 3 SPHINXv2-1k Generate 67.5%
- 4 GPT-4V Generate 67.3%
- 5
Qwen-VL-Plus PPL for A/B/C/D 66.8%
- 6 SPHINXv1-1k Generate 63.9%
- 7 llava-v1.5-7b-finetune PPL 62.8%
- 8 LLaVA-v1.5-LoRA PPL for A/B/C/D 62.8%
- 9 LLaVA-v1.5-13B-LoRA PPL 62.4%
- 10 InfMLLM-13B Generate 62.3%
- 11
LLaVA-v1.5-13B Generate 61.6%
- 12 llava-v1.5-7b-dsn-ft PPL 61.5%
- 13 llava-v1.5-7b-910b PPL 61%
- 14 Unified-IO-2 7B (2.5M) PPL 60.5%
- 15 Unified-IO-2 7B PPL 60.4%
- 16 Unified-IO-2 3B (3M) PPL 60.2%
- 17 LLaMA-VID-7B Generate 59.9%
- 18 Unified-IO-2 3B PPL 58.7%
- 19 Qwen-VL-Chat PPL for A/B/C/D 58.2%
- 20
mPLUG-Owl2 NG 57.8%
- 21 hh_resampler_v2-dsn PPL 57.3%
- 22 hh_v3_dsn PPL 57%
- 23 hh_resampler_llava PPL 56.6%
- 24 Qwen-VL PPL for A/B/C/D 56.3%
- 25 InstructBLIP-Vicuna PPL 53.4%
- 26 InstructBLIP PPL 52.7%
- 27
Kosmos-2 PPL 50%
- 28 Unified-IO-2 1B PPL 49.6%
- 29 SEED-LLaMA PPL 48.9%
- 30 BLIP-2 PPL 46.4%
- 31 MiniGPT-4-7B PPL 42.8%
- 32 OpenFlamingo (MPT-7B) PPL 40.9%
- 33 Claude 3 Opus Generate 40.9%
- 34 Otter (MPT-7B) PPL 39.7%
- 35 VPGTrans PPL 39.1%
- 36 VideoChat PPL 37.6%
- 37 mPLUG-Owl PPL 34%
- 38 Otter (LLaMA-7B) PPL 33.9%
- 39 GVT PPL 33.5%
- 40 MultiModal-GPT PPL 33.2%
- 41 OpenFlamingo (LLaMA-7B) PPL 33.1%
- 42 LLaMA-AdapterV2 PPL 32.7%
- 43 Video-ChatGPT PPL 31.2%
- 44 Valley PPL 30.3%
- 45 Vicuna-7B PPL 28.5%
- 46 Flan-T5-3B PPL 27.7%
- 47
LLaMA-7B PPL 26.8%
Source: Official SEED-Bench leaderboard
- 1 LFM2.5-VL-3B 77.7%
- 2
Janus-Pro-7B 72.1%
- 3 LFM2-VL-1.6B 72%
- 4
InternVL-Chat-V1-2-Plus Generate 70.4%
- 5 GPT-4V Generate 67.3%
- 6
Qwen-VL-Plus PPL for A/B/C/D 66.8%
- 7
LLaVA-v1.5-13B Generate 61.6%
- 8 Qwen-VL-Chat PPL for A/B/C/D 58.2%
- 9
mPLUG-Owl2 NG 57.8%
- 10
Kosmos-2 PPL 50%
- 11 Claude 3 Opus Generate 40.9%
- 12
LLaMA-7B PPL 26.8%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official SEED-Bench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 70.4% | Generate | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Weitu-VL-1.0 | 69.2% | Generate | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | SPHINXv2-1k | 67.5% | Generate | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | GPT-4V | 67.3% | Generate | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 66.8% | PPL for A/B/C/D | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | SPHINXv1-1k | 63.9% | Generate | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | llava-v1.5-7b-finetune | 62.8% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | LLaVA-v1.5-LoRA | 62.8% | PPL for A/B/C/D | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | LLaVA-v1.5-13B-LoRA | 62.4% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | InfMLLM-13B | 62.3% | Generate | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 61.6% | Generate | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | llava-v1.5-7b-dsn-ft | 61.5% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | llava-v1.5-7b-910b | 61% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | Unified-IO-2 7B (2.5M) | 60.5% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | Unified-IO-2 7B | 60.4% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Unified-IO-2 3B (3M) | 60.2% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | LLaMA-VID-7B | 59.9% | Generate | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Unified-IO-2 3B | 58.7% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Qwen-VL-Chat | 58.2% | PPL for A/B/C/D | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 57.8% | NG | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | hh_resampler_v2-dsn | 57.3% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | hh_v3_dsn | 57% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | hh_resampler_llava | 56.6% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | Qwen-VL | 56.3% | PPL for A/B/C/D | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | InstructBLIP-Vicuna | 53.4% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | InstructBLIP | 52.7% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 50% | PPL | Jun 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | Unified-IO-2 1B | 49.6% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | SEED-LLaMA | 48.9% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | BLIP-2 | 46.4% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | MiniGPT-4-7B | 42.8% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | OpenFlamingo (MPT-7B) | 40.9% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | Claude 3 Opus | 40.9% | Generate | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 34 | Otter (MPT-7B) | 39.7% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | VPGTrans | 39.1% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | VideoChat | 37.6% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | mPLUG-Owl | 34% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | Otter (LLaMA-7B) | 33.9% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | GVT | 33.5% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | MultiModal-GPT | 33.2% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | OpenFlamingo (LLaMA-7B) | 33.1% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | LLaMA-AdapterV2 | 32.7% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | Video-ChatGPT | 31.2% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | Valley | 30.3% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | Vicuna-7B | 28.5% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | Flan-T5-3B | 27.7% | PPL | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | | 26.8% | PPL | Feb 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 77.7% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 72.1% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | LFM2-VL-1.6B | 72% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 70.4% | Generate | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GPT-4V | 67.3% | Generate | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 66.8% | PPL for A/B/C/D | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 61.6% | Generate | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Qwen-VL-Chat | 58.2% | PPL for A/B/C/D | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 57.8% | NG | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 50% | PPL | Jun 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Claude 3 Opus | 40.9% | Generate | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 26.8% | PPL | Feb 2023 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
5 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in July 2023 7 models have held number one with claims included since its release in July 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official SEED-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official SEED-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in August 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 77.7 | SEED-Bench (image) |
| Aug 12, 2025 | LFM2-VL-1.6B | 72 | SEEDBench_IMG |
| Jan 27, 2025 | 72.1 | SEED |
2 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2025 | LFM2-VL-1.6B technical report | 72 | SEEDBench, LFM2-VL-1.6B (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| Jan 27, 2025 | | 72.1 | SEED (Table 3) | Capabilities |
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
Source: Official leaderboards
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%