Benchmark Almanac

SEED-Bench

InternVL-Chat-V1-2-Plus 70.4% leads since February 2024
LFM2.5-VL-3B 77.7% leads since August 2026
Fading

Models answer 19,000 human-annotated multiple-choice questions over 12 dimensions of image and video understanding. Scored by accuracy against the answer key.

Many papers report only the image dimensions. Later SEED-Bench-2 and SEED-Bench-2-Plus are separate tests.

Released
July 2023
Kind
General visual questions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3 Opus #172 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
August 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Based on powerful Large Language Models (LLMs), recent generative Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have gained prominence as a pivotal research area, exhibiting remarkable capability for both comprehension and generation. In this work, we address the evaluation of generative comprehension in MLLMs as a preliminary step towards a comprehensive assessment of generative models, by introducing a benchmark named SEED-Bench. SEED-Bench consists of 19K multiple choice questions with accurate human annotations (x 6 larger than existing benchmarks), which spans 12 evaluation dimensions including the comprehension of both the image and video modality. We develop an advanced pipeline for generating multiple-choice questions that target specific evaluation dimensions, integrating both automatic filtering and manual verification processes. Multiple-choice questions with groundtruth options derived from human annotation enables an objective and efficient assessment of model performance, eliminating the need for human or GPT intervention during evaluation. We further evaluate the performance of 18 models across all 12 dimensions, covering both the spatial and temporal understanding. By revealing the limitations of existing MLLMs through evaluation results, we aim for SEED-Bench to provide insights for motivating future research. We will launch and consistently maintain a leaderboard to provide a platform for the community to assess and investigate model capability.

Abstract of SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehension (arXiv:2307.16125, CC0)
47
Entries on its own leaderboard, 9 models we track
3
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
2
System cards report it, from 2 labs

InternVL-Chat-V1-2-Plus leads with 70.4% among models released by February 2024

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

LFM2.5-VL-3B leads with 77.7%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in February 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 InternVL-Chat-V1-2-Plus Generate 70.4%
  2. 2 Weitu-VL-1.0 Generate 69.2%
  3. 3 SPHINXv2-1k Generate 67.5%
  4. 4 GPT-4V Generate 67.3%
  5. 5 Qwen-VL-Plus PPL for A/B/C/D 66.8%
  6. 6 SPHINXv1-1k Generate 63.9%
  7. 7 llava-v1.5-7b-finetune PPL 62.8%
  8. 8 LLaVA-v1.5-LoRA PPL for A/B/C/D 62.8%
  9. 9 LLaVA-v1.5-13B-LoRA PPL 62.4%
  10. 10 InfMLLM-13B Generate 62.3%
  11. 11 LLaVA-v1.5-13B Generate 61.6%
  12. 12 llava-v1.5-7b-dsn-ft PPL 61.5%
  13. 13 llava-v1.5-7b-910b PPL 61%
  14. 14 Unified-IO-2 7B (2.5M) PPL 60.5%
  15. 15 Unified-IO-2 7B PPL 60.4%
  16. 16 Unified-IO-2 3B (3M) PPL 60.2%
  17. 17 LLaMA-VID-7B Generate 59.9%
  18. 18 Unified-IO-2 3B PPL 58.7%
  19. 19 Qwen-VL-Chat PPL for A/B/C/D 58.2%
  20. 20 mPLUG-Owl2 NG 57.8%
  21. 21 hh_resampler_v2-dsn PPL 57.3%
  22. 22 hh_v3_dsn PPL 57%
  23. 23 hh_resampler_llava PPL 56.6%
  24. 24 Qwen-VL PPL for A/B/C/D 56.3%
  25. 25 InstructBLIP-Vicuna PPL 53.4%
  26. 26 InstructBLIP PPL 52.7%
  27. 27 Kosmos-2 PPL 50%
  28. 28 Unified-IO-2 1B PPL 49.6%
  29. 29 SEED-LLaMA PPL 48.9%
  30. 30 BLIP-2 PPL 46.4%
  31. 31 MiniGPT-4-7B PPL 42.8%
  32. 32 OpenFlamingo (MPT-7B) PPL 40.9%
  33. 33 Claude 3 Opus Generate 40.9%
  34. 34 Otter (MPT-7B) PPL 39.7%
  35. 35 VPGTrans PPL 39.1%
  36. 36 VideoChat PPL 37.6%
  37. 37 mPLUG-Owl PPL 34%
  38. 38 Otter (LLaMA-7B) PPL 33.9%
  39. 39 GVT PPL 33.5%
  40. 40 MultiModal-GPT PPL 33.2%
  41. 41 OpenFlamingo (LLaMA-7B) PPL 33.1%
  42. 42 LLaMA-AdapterV2 PPL 32.7%
  43. 43 Video-ChatGPT PPL 31.2%
  44. 44 Valley PPL 30.3%
  45. 45 Vicuna-7B PPL 28.5%
  46. 46 Flan-T5-3B PPL 27.7%
  47. 47 LLaMA-7B PPL 26.8%

Source: Official SEED-Bench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 InternVL-Chat-V1-2-Plus 70.4% Generate Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
2 Weitu-VL-1.0 69.2% Generate Official leaderboard
3 SPHINXv2-1k 67.5% Generate Official leaderboard
4 GPT-4V 67.3% Generate Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen-VL-Plus 66.8% PPL for A/B/C/D Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
6 SPHINXv1-1k 63.9% Generate Official leaderboard
7 llava-v1.5-7b-finetune 62.8% PPL Official leaderboard
8 LLaVA-v1.5-LoRA 62.8% PPL for A/B/C/D Official leaderboard
9 LLaVA-v1.5-13B-LoRA 62.4% PPL Official leaderboard
10 InfMLLM-13B 62.3% Generate Official leaderboard
11 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 61.6% Generate Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
12 llava-v1.5-7b-dsn-ft 61.5% PPL Official leaderboard
13 llava-v1.5-7b-910b 61% PPL Official leaderboard
14 Unified-IO-2 7B (2.5M) 60.5% PPL Official leaderboard
15 Unified-IO-2 7B 60.4% PPL Official leaderboard
16 Unified-IO-2 3B (3M) 60.2% PPL Official leaderboard
17 LLaMA-VID-7B 59.9% Generate Official leaderboard
18 Unified-IO-2 3B 58.7% PPL Official leaderboard
19 Qwen-VL-Chat 58.2% PPL for A/B/C/D Aug 2023 Official leaderboard
20 mPLUG-Owl2 57.8% NG Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
21 hh_resampler_v2-dsn 57.3% PPL Official leaderboard
22 hh_v3_dsn 57% PPL Official leaderboard
23 hh_resampler_llava 56.6% PPL Official leaderboard
24 Qwen-VL 56.3% PPL for A/B/C/D Official leaderboard
25 InstructBLIP-Vicuna 53.4% PPL Official leaderboard
26 InstructBLIP 52.7% PPL Official leaderboard
27 Kosmos-2 50% PPL Jun 2023 Official leaderboard
28 Unified-IO-2 1B 49.6% PPL Official leaderboard
29 SEED-LLaMA 48.9% PPL Official leaderboard
30 BLIP-2 46.4% PPL Official leaderboard
31 MiniGPT-4-7B 42.8% PPL Official leaderboard
32 OpenFlamingo (MPT-7B) 40.9% PPL Official leaderboard
33 Claude 3 Opus 40.9% Generate Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
34 Otter (MPT-7B) 39.7% PPL Official leaderboard
35 VPGTrans 39.1% PPL Official leaderboard
36 VideoChat 37.6% PPL Official leaderboard
37 mPLUG-Owl 34% PPL Official leaderboard
38 Otter (LLaMA-7B) 33.9% PPL Official leaderboard
39 GVT 33.5% PPL Official leaderboard
40 MultiModal-GPT 33.2% PPL Official leaderboard
41 OpenFlamingo (LLaMA-7B) 33.1% PPL Official leaderboard
42 LLaMA-AdapterV2 32.7% PPL Official leaderboard
43 Video-ChatGPT 31.2% PPL Official leaderboard
44 Valley 30.3% PPL Official leaderboard
45 Vicuna-7B 28.5% PPL Official leaderboard
46 Flan-T5-3B 27.7% PPL Official leaderboard
47 LLaMA-7B 26.8% PPL Feb 2023 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 LFM2.5-VL-3B 77.7% Aug 2026 Lab model card
2 Janus-Pro-7B 72.1% Jan 2025 Lab model card
3 LFM2-VL-1.6B 72% Nov 2025 Lab model card
4 InternVL-Chat-V1-2-Plus 70.4% Generate Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-4V 67.3% Generate Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen-VL-Plus 66.8% PPL for A/B/C/D Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
7 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 61.6% Generate Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen-VL-Chat 58.2% PPL for A/B/C/D Aug 2023 Official leaderboard
9 mPLUG-Owl2 57.8% NG Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
10 Kosmos-2 50% PPL Jun 2023 Official leaderboard
11 Claude 3 Opus 40.9% Generate Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
12 LLaMA-7B 26.8% PPL Feb 2023 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

5 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in July 2023 7 models have held number one with claims included since its release in July 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Microsoft Other labs University of Wisconsin-Madison OpenAI Shanghai AI Lab DeepSeek Liquid AI
Own leaderboard Replaced by 2, Feb 2024
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2026
LFM2.5-VL-3B 77.7%

Sources: Official SEED-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) LFM2.5-VL-3B Janus-Pro-7B InternVL-Chat-V1-2-Plus LLaVA-v1.5-13B Kosmos-2 LLaMA-7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) LFM2.5-VL-3B InternVL-Chat-V1-2-Plus

Sources: Official SEED-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in August 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

DeepSeek
Liquid AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 12, 2026 LFM2.5-VL-3B 77.7 SEED-Bench (image)
Aug 12, 2025 LFM2-VL-1.6B 72 SEEDBench_IMG
Jan 27, 2025 Janus-Pro-7B 72.1 SEED

2 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Nov 28, 2025 LFM2-VL-1.6B technical report 72 SEEDBench, LFM2-VL-1.6B (Table 8) Capabilities
Jan 27, 2025 Janus-Pro-7B technical report 72.1 SEED (Table 3) Capabilities

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

Microsoft Other labs University of Wisconsin-Madison OpenAI Shanghai AI Lab Qwen
SEED-Bench-2 Not tested since Feb 2024
Qwen-VL-Plus 71.9%
SEED-Bench Replaced by 2, Feb 2024
SEED-Bench-2 Not tested since Feb 2024
Qwen-VL-Plus 71.9%

Source: Official leaderboards

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%