SpaCE-10
Models answer more than 5,000 questions about indoor 3D scenes that test 10 atomic and 8 compositional spatial abilities.
- Released
- June 2025
- Kind
- Spatial reasoning and counting
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2025, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- September 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in various multimodal tasks. To pursue higher intelligence in space, MLLMs require integrating multiple spatial capabilities, even for handling simple and normal tasks. However, existing benchmarks struggle to comprehensively evaluate the spatial intelligence of common MLLMs from the atomic level to the compositional level. To fill this gap, we present SpaCE-10, a comprehensive benchmark for compositional spatial evaluations. In SpaCE-10, we define 10 atomic spatial capabilities, which are combined to form 8 compositional capabilities. Based on these definitions, we propose a novel hierarchical annotation pipeline to generate high-quality and diverse question-answer (QA) pairs. With over 150+ hours of human expert effort, we obtain over 5k QA pairs for 811 real indoor scenes in SpaCE-10, which covers various evaluation settings like point cloud input and multi-choice QA. We conduct an extensive evaluation of common MLLMs on SpaCE-10 and find that even the most advanced MLLM still lags behind humans by large margins. Through our careful study, we also draw several significant findings that benefit the MLLM community. For example, we reveal that the shortcoming of counting capability greatly limits the compositional spatial capabilities of existing MLLMs.
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B leads with 55% among models released by September 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in September 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 55.0
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 53.4 GPT-5
- 53.1
InternVL3-38B
- 52.8 LLaVA-OneVision 72B
- 52.5
InternVL3-78B
- 51.6 InternVL3.5-20B-A4B
- 51.6 GLM-4.5V
- 49.0 GPT-4o
- 48.8
InternVL3.5-14B
- 47.9
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct
- 47.3
InternVL3-14B
- 47.1
InternVL2_5-78B
- 46.2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 45.2
LLaVA-OneVision 7B
- 45.1
InternVL2.5-38B
- 44.2
InternVL3-2B
- 43.9
InternVL3.5-38B
- 43.3
InternVL2.5-26B
- 42.2
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
- 41.8
InternVL2.5-8B
- 41.5
Gemma 3 27B
- 41.5
Gemma 3 12B
- 41.4
InternVL3-1B
- 40.0
InternVL3-8B
- 39.5
InternVL3.5-8B
- 39.0 MiniCPM-v4-4B
- 38.7
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 35.9
InternVL2.5-4B
- 35.5 MiMo-VL-RL-8B
- 35.5
InternVL3.5-4B
- 35.4 SpaceQwen
- 35.3
InternVL2.5-1B
- 34.8
Qwen2.5-VL-3B
- 34.6 InternVL3.5-2B
- 34.5 GPT4Scene-7B
- 34.1 SpaceThinker
- 33.5 InternVL3.5-1B
- 33.3
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 33.2 SpaceOm
- 32.6
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
- 31.4
InternVL2.5-2B
- 30.7 llava-v1.5-7b
- 29.5
Cambrian-1-8B
- 26.1
VILA1.5-3B
- 20.9
Llama-3-VILA1.5-8B
- 11.1 LEO-7B
- 1
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 55%
- 2 GPT-5 53.4%
- 3
InternVL3-38B 53.1%
- 4 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 52.8%
- 5
InternVL3-78B 52.5%
- 6 InternVL3.5-20B-A4B 51.6%
- 7 GLM-4.5V 51.6%
- 8 GPT-4o Nov 2024 49%
- 9
InternVL3.5-14B 48.8%
- 10
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct 47.9%
- 11
InternVL3-14B 47.3%
- 12
InternVL2_5-78B 47.1%
- 13 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 46.2%
- 14
LLaVA-OneVision 7B 45.2%
- 15
InternVL2.5-38B 45.1%
- 16
InternVL3-2B 44.2%
- 17
InternVL3.5-38B 43.9%
- 18
InternVL2.5-26B 43.3%
- 19
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Jan 2025 42.2%
- 20
InternVL2.5-8B 41.8%
- 21
Gemma 3 27B 41.5%
- 22
Gemma 3 12B 41.5%
- 23
InternVL3-1B 41.4%
- 24
InternVL3-8B 40%
- 25
InternVL3.5-8B 39.5%
- 26 MiniCPM-v4-4B 39%
- 27
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 38.7%
- 28
InternVL2.5-4B 35.9%
- 29 MiMo-VL-RL-8B 35.5%
- 30
InternVL3.5-4B 35.5%
- 31 SpaceQwen 35.4%
- 32
InternVL2.5-1B 35.3%
- 33
Qwen2.5-VL-3B 34.8%
- 34 InternVL3.5-2B 34.6%
- 35 GPT4Scene-7B 34.5%
- 36 SpaceThinker 34.1%
- 37 InternVL3.5-1B 33.5%
- 38
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 33.3%
- 39 SpaceOm 33.2%
- 40
Qwen2.5-VL-32B 32.6%
- 41
InternVL2.5-2B 31.4%
- 42 llava-v1.5-7b 30.7%
- 43
Cambrian-1-8B 29.5%
- 44
VILA1.5-3B 26.1%
- 45
Llama-3-VILA1.5-8B 20.9%
- 46 LEO-7B 11.1%
Source: Official SpaCE-10 leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 55% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-5 | 53.4% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 53.1% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | LLaVA-OneVision 72B | 52.8% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 52.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | InternVL3.5-20B-A4B | 51.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | GLM-4.5V | 51.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 49% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 48.8% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 47.9% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 47.3% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 47.1% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 46.2% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 45.2% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 45.1% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 44.2% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 43.9% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 43.3% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 42.2% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 41.8% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | 41.5% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 41.5% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 41.4% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | | 40% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | | 39.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | MiniCPM-v4-4B | 39% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 27 | | 38.7% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | | 35.9% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | MiMo-VL-RL-8B | 35.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 30 | | 35.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | SpaceQwen | 35.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 32 | | 35.3% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | | 34.8% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | InternVL3.5-2B | 34.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 35 | GPT4Scene-7B | 34.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 36 | SpaceThinker | 34.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 37 | InternVL3.5-1B | 33.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 38 | | 33.3% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | SpaceOm | 33.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 40 | | 32.6% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | | 31.4% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | llava-v1.5-7b | 30.7% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | | 29.5% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | | 26.1% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | | 20.9% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | LEO-7B | 11.1% | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in June 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official SpaCE-10 leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official SpaCE-10 leaderboard and labs’ model cards
No launch post has listed it since August 2025
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2025 | 55 | SpaCE-10 |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2025 | | 55 | SpaCE-10, single-choice (Table 2, Table 11) | Capabilities |
One lab claim next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 55% SpaCE-10 | 55% Leaderboard | Same |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%