Benchmark Almanac

SpaCE-10

InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 55% leads since August 2025
Dropped

Models answer more than 5,000 questions about indoor 3D scenes that test 10 atomic and 8 compositional spatial abilities.

Released
June 2025
Kind
Spatial reasoning and counting
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
September 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in various multimodal tasks. To pursue higher intelligence in space, MLLMs require integrating multiple spatial capabilities, even for handling simple and normal tasks. However, existing benchmarks struggle to comprehensively evaluate the spatial intelligence of common MLLMs from the atomic level to the compositional level. To fill this gap, we present SpaCE-10, a comprehensive benchmark for compositional spatial evaluations. In SpaCE-10, we define 10 atomic spatial capabilities, which are combined to form 8 compositional capabilities. Based on these definitions, we propose a novel hierarchical annotation pipeline to generate high-quality and diverse question-answer (QA) pairs. With over 150+ hours of human expert effort, we obtain over 5k QA pairs for 811 real indoor scenes in SpaCE-10, which covers various evaluation settings like point cloud input and multi-choice QA. We conduct an extensive evaluation of common MLLMs on SpaCE-10 and find that even the most advanced MLLM still lags behind humans by large margins. Through our careful study, we also draw several significant findings that benefit the MLLM community. For example, we reveal that the shortcoming of counting capability greatly limits the compositional spatial capabilities of existing MLLMs.

Abstract of SpaCE-10: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models in Compositional Spatial Intelligence (arXiv:2506.07966, CC0)
46
Entries on its own leaderboard, 36 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

InternVL3.5-241B-A28B leads with 55% among models released by September 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 55%
  2. 2 GPT-5 53.4%
  3. 3 InternVL3-38B 53.1%
  4. 4 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 52.8%
  5. 5 InternVL3-78B 52.5%
  6. 6 InternVL3.5-20B-A4B 51.6%
  7. 7 GLM-4.5V 51.6%
  8. 8 GPT-4o Nov 2024 49%
  9. 9 InternVL3.5-14B 48.8%
  10. 10 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct 47.9%
  11. 11 InternVL3-14B 47.3%
  12. 12 InternVL2_5-78B 47.1%
  13. 13 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 46.2%
  14. 14 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 45.2%
  15. 15 InternVL2.5-38B 45.1%
  16. 16 InternVL3-2B 44.2%
  17. 17 InternVL3.5-38B 43.9%
  18. 18 InternVL2.5-26B 43.3%
  19. 19 Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Jan 2025 42.2%
  20. 20 InternVL2.5-8B 41.8%
  21. 21 Gemma 3 27B 41.5%
  22. 22 Gemma 3 12B 41.5%
  23. 23 InternVL3-1B 41.4%
  24. 24 InternVL3-8B 40%
  25. 25 InternVL3.5-8B 39.5%
  26. 26 MiniCPM-v4-4B 39%
  27. 27 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 38.7%
  28. 28 InternVL2.5-4B 35.9%
  29. 29 MiMo-VL-RL-8B 35.5%
  30. 30 InternVL3.5-4B 35.5%
  31. 31 SpaceQwen 35.4%
  32. 32 InternVL2.5-1B 35.3%
  33. 33 Qwen2.5-VL-3B 34.8%
  34. 34 InternVL3.5-2B 34.6%
  35. 35 GPT4Scene-7B 34.5%
  36. 36 SpaceThinker 34.1%
  37. 37 InternVL3.5-1B 33.5%
  38. 38 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 33.3%
  39. 39 SpaceOm 33.2%
  40. 40 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 32.6%
  41. 41 InternVL2.5-2B 31.4%
  42. 42 llava-v1.5-7b 30.7%
  43. 43 Cambrian-1-8B 29.5%
  44. 44 VILA1.5-3B 26.1%
  45. 45 Llama-3-VILA1.5-8B 20.9%
  46. 46 LEO-7B 11.1%

Source: Official SpaCE-10 leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 55% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5 53.4% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
3 InternVL3-38B 53.1% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
4 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 52.8% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
5 InternVL3-78B 52.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
6 InternVL3.5-20B-A4B 51.6% Official leaderboard
7 GLM-4.5V 51.6% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-4o Nov 2024 49% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
9 InternVL3.5-14B 48.8% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct 47.9% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
11 InternVL3-14B 47.3% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
12 InternVL2_5-78B 47.1% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 46.2% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
14 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 45.2% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
15 InternVL2.5-38B 45.1% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
16 InternVL3-2B 44.2% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
17 InternVL3.5-38B 43.9% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
18 InternVL2.5-26B 43.3% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
19 Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Jan 2025 42.2% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
20 InternVL2.5-8B 41.8% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
21 Gemma 3 27B 41.5% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Gemma 3 12B 41.5% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
23 InternVL3-1B 41.4% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
24 InternVL3-8B 40% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
25 InternVL3.5-8B 39.5% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
26 MiniCPM-v4-4B 39% Official leaderboard
27 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 38.7% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
28 InternVL2.5-4B 35.9% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
29 MiMo-VL-RL-8B 35.5% Official leaderboard
30 InternVL3.5-4B 35.5% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
31 SpaceQwen 35.4% Official leaderboard
32 InternVL2.5-1B 35.3% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
33 Qwen2.5-VL-3B 34.8% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
34 InternVL3.5-2B 34.6% Official leaderboard
35 GPT4Scene-7B 34.5% Official leaderboard
36 SpaceThinker 34.1% Official leaderboard
37 InternVL3.5-1B 33.5% Official leaderboard
38 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 33.3% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
39 SpaceOm 33.2% Official leaderboard
40 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 32.6% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
41 InternVL2.5-2B 31.4% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
42 llava-v1.5-7b 30.7% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
43 Cambrian-1-8B 29.5% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
44 VILA1.5-3B 26.1% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
45 Llama-3-VILA1.5-8B 20.9% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
46 LEO-7B 11.1% Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in June 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Shanghai AI Lab OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Sep 2025

Source: Official SpaCE-10 leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B InternVL3-38B LLaVA-OneVision 72B llava-v1.5-7b 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B llava-v1.5-7b

Sources: Official SpaCE-10 leaderboard and labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since August 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Shanghai AI Lab
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 55 SpaCE-10

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 55 SpaCE-10, single-choice (Table 2, Table 11) Capabilities

One lab claim next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 55% SpaCE-10 55% Leaderboard Same

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%