Benchmark Almanac

Spider 2.0

Genloop's Sentinel Agent v2 Pro 96.7% tops its leaderboard Gemini 3 Pro 94.2% leads the models we track
Gemini 3 Pro 94.2% leads since November 2025
Dropped

Models and agents write SQL for real enterprise databases with large schemas, across BigQuery, Snowflake, SQLite and dbt projects. Answers are checked by executing them.

Three settings: Spider 2.0-Snow, Spider 2.0-Lite and Spider 2.0-DBT, which replaced the original agent setting in 2025-05. The maker updates examples over time, so scores can drift.

Released
November 2024
Kind
Data science and SQL
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude Opus 4.6 #37 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
July 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
March 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Real-world enterprise text-to-SQL workflows often involve complex cloud or local data across various database systems, multiple SQL queries in various dialects, and diverse operations from data transformation to analytics. We introduce Spider 2.0, an evaluation framework comprising 632 real-world text-to-SQL workflow problems derived from enterprise-level database use cases. The databases in Spider 2.0 are sourced from real data applications, often containing over 1,000 columns and stored in local or cloud database systems such as BigQuery and Snowflake. We show that solving problems in Spider 2.0 frequently requires understanding and searching through database metadata, dialect documentation, and even project-level codebases. This challenge calls for models to interact with complex SQL workflow environments, process extremely long contexts, perform intricate reasoning, and generate multiple SQL queries with diverse operations, often exceeding 100 lines, which goes far beyond traditional text-to-SQL challenges. Our evaluations indicate that based on o1-preview, our code agent framework successfully solves only 21.3% of the tasks, compared with 91.2% on Spider 1.0 and 73.0% on BIRD. Our results on Spider 2.0 show that while language models have demonstrated remarkable performance in code generation – especially in prior text-to-SQL benchmarks – they require significant improvement in order to achieve adequate performance for real-world enterprise usage. Progress on Spider 2.0 represents crucial steps towards developing intelligent, autonomous, code agents for real-world enterprise settings. Our code, baseline models, and data are available at https://spider2-sql.github.io

Abstract of Spider 2.0: Evaluating Language Models on Real-World Enterprise Text-to-SQL Workflows (arXiv:2411.07763, CC0)
51
Entries on its own leaderboard, 23 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

Genloop's Sentinel Agent v2 Pro tops the leaderboard with 96.7%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Gemini 3 Pro, at 94.2%.

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 94.2%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in March 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Genloop's Sentinel Agent v2 Pro 96.7%
  2. 2 Native mini 96.5%
  3. 3 Gemini 3 Pro 94.2%
  4. 4 TCDataAgent-SQL with Contextual Scaling Engine 94%
  5. 5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 90.5%
  6. 6 Genloop's Sentinel Agent v2 88.5%
  7. 7 Ask Data with Relational Knowledge Graph 86.3%
  8. 8 Claude Opus 4.6 86.3%
  9. 9 ByteBrain-Agent 84.1%
  10. 10 MAESTRO — Multi-Agent Engine for Semantic T2S Reasoning & Orchestration 83.7%
  11. 11 Genloop's Sentinel Agent v1.5 83.4%
  12. 12 Deepinsight Agent 83%
  13. 13 AiCheng Agent 82.8%
  14. 14 Omni 2.0 82.8%
  15. 15 Arctic-FLEX 75.1%
  16. 16 Sophon-Agent 74%
  17. 17 APEX-SQL 73.1%
  18. 18 Deepseek3.2 70.4%
  19. 19 PExA 70.2%
  20. 20 DIA (Data Intelligence Agents) 69.5%
  21. 21 Opus 4.5 Judge 67.3%
  22. 22 Omni 1.0 66.4%
  23. 23 GPT-5 65.6%
  24. 24 gpt-oss-120b 65.5%
  25. 25 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) 63.8%
  26. 26 o3 62.9%
  27. 27 Claude-4-Sonnet 61.4%
  28. 28 PAI-DataSurfer Agent 60.3%
  29. 29 Kimi K2.5 55.9%
  30. 30 GPT-5.4 Mini 50.5%
  31. 31 GLM-5 50.3%
  32. 32 Meituan-agent 45.3%
  33. 33 Qwen3-Max 45.1%
  34. 34 GPT-5 mini 41%
  35. 35 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) 38%
  36. 36 Qwen3-Coder-Plus 37.8%
  37. 37 o1-preview 31.3%
  38. 38 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 31.1%
  39. 39 Claude-4-Sonnet-20250514 25.8%
  40. 40 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 24.5%
  41. 41 Claude-3.7-Sonnet-20250219-Thinking 24.3%
  42. 42 o1 23.2%
  43. 43 o3-mini 19.2%
  44. 44 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 19%
  45. 45 Gemini 2.0 Pro 13.9%
  46. 46 GPT-4o Nov 2024 13%
  47. 47 GPT-4o Aug 2024 10.8%
  48. 48 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 9.68%
  49. 49 QwQ-32B 8.96%
  50. 50 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 5.48%
  51. 51 SFT CodeS-15B 0%

Source: Official Spider 2.0 leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Genloop's Sentinel Agent v2 Pro 96.7% Official leaderboard
2 Native mini 96.5% Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3 Pro 94.2% QUVI-3 Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
4 TCDataAgent-SQL with Contextual Scaling Engine 94% Official leaderboard
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 90.5% Prism Swarm with Deepthink Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Genloop's Sentinel Agent v2 88.5% Official leaderboard
7 Ask Data with Relational Knowledge Graph 86.3% Official leaderboard
8 Claude Opus 4.6 86.3% QUVI-3 Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
9 ByteBrain-Agent 84.1% Official leaderboard
10 MAESTRO — Multi-Agent Engine for Semantic T2S Reasoning & Orchestration 83.7% Official leaderboard
11 Genloop's Sentinel Agent v1.5 83.4% Official leaderboard
12 Deepinsight Agent 83% Official leaderboard
13 AiCheng Agent 82.8% Official leaderboard
14 Omni 2.0 82.8% Official leaderboard
15 Arctic-FLEX 75.1% Official leaderboard
16 Sophon-Agent 74% Official leaderboard
17 APEX-SQL 73.1% Official leaderboard
18 Deepseek3.2 70.4% QiSi-SQL Official leaderboard
19 PExA 70.2% Official leaderboard
20 DIA (Data Intelligence Agents) 69.5% Official leaderboard
21 Opus 4.5 Judge 67.3% Chicory AI Agent + Claude Sonnet 4.5 Official leaderboard
22 Omni 1.0 66.4% Official leaderboard
23 GPT-5 65.6% SSDAT Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
24 gpt-oss-120b 65.5% FlexSQL Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
25 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) 63.8% DSR-SQL Official leaderboard
26 o3 62.9% ReFoRCE Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
27 Claude-4-Sonnet 61.4% WindAgent Official leaderboard
28 PAI-DataSurfer Agent 60.3% Official leaderboard
29 Kimi K2.5 55.9% DSR-SQL (w/o voting) Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
30 GPT-5.4 Mini 50.5% GD-TTS Agent Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
31 GLM-5 50.3% PGV-Agent Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
32 Meituan-agent 45.3% Official leaderboard
33 Qwen3-Max 45.1% KDGCCloud-KCILab Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
34 GPT-5 mini 41% AgenticView Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
35 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) 38% ReFoRCE Official leaderboard
36 Qwen3-Coder-Plus 37.8% Spider-Agent Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
37 o1-preview 31.3% ReFoRCE Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
38 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 31.1% Spider-Agent Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
39 Claude-4-Sonnet-20250514 25.8% Spider-Agent Official leaderboard
40 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 24.5% Spider-Agent Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
41 Claude-3.7-Sonnet-20250219-Thinking 24.3% Spider-Agent Official leaderboard
42 o1 23.2% Spider-Agent Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
43 o3-mini 19.2% Spider-Agent Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
44 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 19% Spider-Agent Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
45 Gemini 2.0 Pro 13.9% Spider-Agent Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
46 GPT-4o Nov 2024 13% Spider-Agent Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
47 GPT-4o Aug 2024 10.8% Spider-Agent Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
48 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 9.68% CollideNL2SQL Official leaderboard
49 QwQ-32B 8.96% Spider-Agent Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
50 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 5.48% Spider-Agent Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
51 SFT CodeS-15B 0% Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 94.2% QUVI-3 Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Sonnet 4.5 90.5% Prism Swarm with Deepthink Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.6 86.3% QUVI-3 Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5 65.6% SSDAT Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
5 gpt-oss-120b 65.5% FlexSQL Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
6 o3 62.9% ReFoRCE Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Kimi K2.5 55.9% DSR-SQL (w/o voting) Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-5.4 Mini 50.5% GD-TTS Agent Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
9 GLM-5 50.3% PGV-Agent Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen3-Max 45.1% KDGCCloud-KCILab Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
11 GPT-5 mini 41% AgenticView Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen3-Coder-Plus 37.8% Spider-Agent Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
13 o1-preview 31.3% ReFoRCE Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
14 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 31.1% Jul 2025 Lab model card
15 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 24.5% Spider-Agent Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
16 o1 23.2% Spider-Agent Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
17 o3-mini 19.2% Spider-Agent Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 19% Spider-Agent Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
19 Gemini 2.0 Pro 13.9% Spider-Agent Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
20 GPT-4o Nov 2024 13% Spider-Agent Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
21 GPT-4o Aug 2024 10.8% Spider-Agent Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
22 QwQ-32B 8.96% Spider-Agent Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
23 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 5.48% Spider-Agent Nov 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

6 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in November 2024 6 models have held number one with claims included since its release in November 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Anthropic Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in Sep 2025, by Claude Sonnet 4.5
Gemini 3 Pro 94.2%

Source: Official Spider 2.0 leaderboard

Claude Sonnet 4.5 on the official leaderboard passed 85% in September 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro GPT-5 o1-preview Claude 3.5 Sonnet 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro GPT-5

Sources: Official Spider 2.0 leaderboard and labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since July 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Jul 22, 2025 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 31.1 Spider2

One lab claim next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 31.1% Spider2 31.1% Leaderboard, Spider-Agent Same

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

Mistral AI Cohere Qwen OpenAI Anthropic Google DeepMind
Spider 2.0 Passed 85% in Sep 2025, by Claude Sonnet 4.5
Gemini 3 Pro 94.2%
Spider Not tested since Feb 2026
Spider 2.0 Passed 85% in Sep 2025, by Claude Sonnet 4.5
Gemini 3 Pro 94.2%

Sources: Official leaderboards and labs’ model cards

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471