Benchmark Almanac

SWE-Marathon v1.1

Gemini 4 Carbon 53.8% leads since October 2026
In use

Agents complete 20 multi-hour software tasks such as library rebuilds, product clones and ML work. Hidden tests, parity checks and integrity checks grade each run, scored over 8 trials.

The maker keeps v1.0 scores on an archive board. v1.1 moved the post-training task to H100 GPUs and raised trials from 5 to 8.

Made by
Abundant AI
Released
July 2026
Kind
Building whole projects
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Code
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemini 4 Carbon #2 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
November 2026
Last model added
November 2026
Scores refreshed
November 13th, 2026

In the authors’ words

AI agents are increasingly expected to complete long-horizon workflows that require sustained progress over hours, millions of tokens, and complex environments. Yet current agent benchmarks largely evaluate short-form tasks, such as single pull requests, small tickets, or 5-10 minute exercises, limiting our ability to measure agents' capabilities in planning, long-context understanding, and memory use. We introduce SWE-Marathon, a benchmark of 20 long-horizon tasks spanning software engineering and adjacent technical domains. Each task consists of a unique executable environment, a human-written reference solution, and a multi-layer verification suite. Logged agent attempts average 27.2M total tokens, making SWE-Marathon substantially longer-horizon than existing SWE and command-line agent benchmarks. Current frontier coding agents solve fewer than 30% of tasks. Failures often arise from poor self-verification, self-reported infeasibility, and premature termination. We also observe reward-hacking behavior in 13.8% of rollouts, where agents attempt to exploit the environment or verifier to bypass the intended workflow. SWE-Marathon includes adversarial review of test suites and execution environments, as well as multi-layer checks designed to prevent shortcut solutions. We release SWE-Marathon, evaluation code, and agent trajectories at https://swe-marathon.org/.

Abstract of SWE-Marathon: Can Agents Autonomously Complete Ultra-Long-Horizon Software Work? (arXiv:2606.07682, CC0)
20
Models scored on its own leaderboard
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

Gemini 4 Carbon leads with 53.8%

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 13th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.

  1. 1 Gemini 4 Carbon high 53.8%
  2. 2 Muse Wonder Full max 53.1%
  3. 3 Muse Wonder max 52.5%
  4. 4 Claude Sonnet 5.5 max 51.3%
  5. 5 Claude Haiku 5.5 max 50%
  6. 6 Gemini 4 Hydrogen xhigh 49.4%
  7. 7 Kimi K3 48.1%
  8. 8 Muse Spark 1.3 max 46.3%
  9. 9 Claude Opus 5.5 max 46.3%
  10. 10 Claude Fable 5.1 max 45.6%
  11. 11 Grok 4.7 high 45.6%
  12. 12 Gemini 4 Argon high 43.8%
  13. 13 GLM-5.3 max 42.5%
  14. 14 GPT-6 Astra max 42.5%
  15. 15 GPT-6.1 Sol max 42.5%
  16. 16 GLM-5.3-Flash max 38.8%
  17. 17 Inkling 2 Small xhigh 38.8%
  18. 18 GPT-6 Luna max 28.1%
  19. 19 Gemini 3.7 Flash 22.5%
  20. 20 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 10.6%

Source: Official SWE-Marathon v1.1 leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 4 Carbon 53.8% high, Antigravity CLI Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Muse Wonder Full 53.1% max, Muse Code Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Muse Wonder 52.5% max, Muse Code Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Sonnet 5.5 51.3% max, Claude Code Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Haiku 5.5 50% max, Claude Code Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini 4 Hydrogen 49.4% xhigh, Antigravity CLI Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Kimi K3 48.1% Claude Code Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Muse Spark 1.3 46.3% max, Muse Code Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Claude Opus 5.5 46.3% max, Claude Code Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Claude Fable 5.1 45.6% max, Claude Code Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
11 Grok 4.7 45.6% high, Grok Build Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Gemini 4 Argon 43.8% high, Gemini CLI Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
13 GLM-5.3 42.5% max, Claude Code Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
14 GPT-6 Astra 42.5% max, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
15 GPT-6.1 Sol 42.5% max, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
16 GLM-5.3-Flash 38.8% max, Claude Code Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
17 Inkling 2 Small 38.8% xhigh, Claude Code Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
18 GPT-6 Luna 28.1% max, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
19 Gemini 3.7 Flash 22.5% OpenCode Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
20 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 10.6% Mini-SWE-Agent Apr 2026 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

Of runs with a cost, the best scores 51.3% for $169 a task

Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. Muse Spark 1.3 at max comes within 5 points of the best for $14 a task, 12 times cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.

Z.ai Meta OpenAI Anthropic Google DeepMind Cost frontier One model at each effort level
0% 20% 40% 60% $0.10 $1.00 $10 $100 $1,000 Cost per task, log scale Claude Sonnet 5.5, max Claude Haiku 5.5, max Muse Spark 1.3, max Gemini 4 Argon, high GLM-5.3-Flash, max GPT-6 Luna, max 0% 20% 40% 60% $0.10 $1.00 $10 $100 $1,000 Cost per task, log scale Claude Sonnet 5.5, max Muse Spark 1.3, max

Source: Official SWE-Marathon v1.1 leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
Gemini 4 Carbon high Antigravity CLI 53.8%
Muse Wonder Full max Muse Code 53.1%
Muse Wonder max Muse Code 52.5%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 max Claude Code 51.3% $169
Claude Haiku 5.5 max Claude Code 50% $22
Gemini 4 Hydrogen xhigh Antigravity CLI 49.4%
Kimi K3 Claude Code 48.1% $661
Muse Spark 1.3 max Muse Code 46.3% $14
Claude Opus 5.5 max Claude Code 46.3% $164
Claude Fable 5.1 max Claude Code 45.6% $63
Grok 4.7 high Grok Build 45.6%
Gemini 4 Argon high Gemini CLI 43.8% $10
GLM-5.3 max Claude Code 42.5% $59
GPT-6 Astra max Codex 42.5% $52
GPT-6.1 Sol max Codex 42.5% $7.90
GLM-5.3-Flash max Claude Code 38.8% $2.46
Inkling 2 Small xhigh Claude Code 38.8% $424
GPT-6 Luna max Codex 28.1% $0.84
Gemini 3.7 Flash OpenCode 22.5% $11
DeepSeek-V4-Pro Mini-SWE-Agent 10.6%

5 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in July 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

DeepSeek Moonshot AI Anthropic Meta Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard 5 leaders

Source: Official SWE-Marathon v1.1 leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 4 Carbon Kimi K3 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 4 Carbon DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Sources: Official SWE-Marathon v1.1 leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Thinking Machines
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Nov 5, 2026 Inkling 2 Small 38.8 SWE-Marathon v1.1, 38.8%

One lab claim next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Inkling 2 Small 38.8% SWE-Marathon v1.1, 38.8% 38.8% Leaderboard, xhigh, Claude Code Same

Versions

We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.

Anthropic xAI DeepSeek Moonshot AI Meta Google DeepMind
SWE-Marathon v1.1 7 leaders
SWE-Marathon Replaced by v1.1, Jul 2026
Grok 4.5 29%
SWE-Marathon v1.1 5 leaders

Source: Official leaderboards

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471