SWE-Marathon
20 realistic multi-hour software tasks (library reproductions, product clones, ML work). Verifiers combine hidden tests, parity and integrity checks.
No configuration exceeds 30% pass@1. Reward hacking seen in 13.8% of rollouts. Labs ran H20-recalibrated branches. v1.0 scores (k=5) sit on an archive board pinned to v1.0-official, and v1.1 replaced it in July 2026.
- Made by
- Abundant AI
- Released
- June 2026
- Kind
- Building whole projects
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Code
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Fable 5 #11 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- October 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
AI agents are increasingly expected to complete long-horizon workflows that require sustained progress over hours, millions of tokens, and complex environments. Yet current agent benchmarks largely evaluate short-form tasks, such as single pull requests, small tickets, or 5-10 minute exercises, limiting our ability to measure agents' capabilities in planning, long-context understanding, and memory use. We introduce SWE-Marathon, a benchmark of 20 long-horizon tasks spanning software engineering and adjacent technical domains. Each task consists of a unique executable environment, a human-written reference solution, and a multi-layer verification suite. Logged agent attempts average 27.2M total tokens, making SWE-Marathon substantially longer-horizon than existing SWE and command-line agent benchmarks. Current frontier coding agents solve fewer than 30% of tasks. Failures often arise from poor self-verification, self-reported infeasibility, and premature termination. We also observe reward-hacking behavior in 13.8% of rollouts, where agents attempt to exploit the environment or verifier to bypass the intended workflow. SWE-Marathon includes adversarial review of test suites and execution environments, as well as multi-layer checks designed to prevent shortcut solutions. We release SWE-Marathon, evaluation code, and agent trajectories at https://swe-marathon.org/.
Grok 4.5 leads with 29% among models released by July 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.
Step 5 Preview leads with 72.7%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 14 more
- 1 Grok 4.5 29%
- 2 Claude Opus 4.8 26%
- 3 Claude Fable 5 24%
- 4 Claude Opus 4.7 16%
- 5 GLM-5.2 13%
- 6 GPT-5.5 12%
- 7
Gemini 3.5 Flash 7.00%
- 8
Gemini 3.1 Pro 4.00%
- 9
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 4.00%
- 10 GLM-5.1 1.00%
- 11
MiniMax-M2.7 0%
- 12 Kimi K2.6 0%
Source: Official SWE-Marathon leaderboard
- 72.7
Step 5 Preview
- 57.5
Muse Wonder Full
- 53.1
Muse Wonder
- 51.7 Kimi K3.1 Pro
- 46.0 Grok 4.7
- 42.5 GLM-5.3
- 42.0 Kimi K3
- 31.9 Grok 4.6
- 31.9
Tencent Hy4 preview
- 29.0 Grok 4.5
- 26.0 Claude Opus 4.8
- 24.0 Claude Fable 5
- 16.0 Claude Opus 4.7
- 13.0 GLM-5.2
- 12.0 GPT-5.5
- 7.00
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 4.00
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 4.00
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 1.00 GLM-5.1
- 0.0
MiniMax-M2.7
- 0.0 Kimi K2.6
- 1
Step 5 Preview 72.7%
- 2
Muse Wonder Full 57.5%
- 3
Muse Wonder 53.1%
- 4 Kimi K3.1 Pro 51.7%
- 5 Grok 4.7 46%
- 6 GLM-5.3 42.5%
- 7 Kimi K3 42%
- 8 Grok 4.6 31.9%
- 9
Tencent Hy4 preview 31.9%
- 10 Grok 4.5 29%
- 11 Claude Opus 4.8 26%
- 12 Claude Fable 5 24%
- 13 Claude Opus 4.7 16%
- 14 GLM-5.2 13%
- 15 GPT-5.5 12%
- 16
Gemini 3.5 Flash 7.00%
- 17
Gemini 3.1 Pro 4.00%
- 18
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 4.00%
- 19 GLM-5.1 1.00%
- 20
MiniMax-M2.7 0%
- 21 Kimi K2.6 0%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official SWE-Marathon leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grok 4.5 | 29% | Grok Build | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 26% | Claude Code | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5 | 24% | Claude Code | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 16% | Claude Code | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GLM-5.2 | 13% | Claude Code | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | GPT-5.5 | 12% | Codex CLI | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 7.00% | Gemini CLI | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 4.00% | Terminus 2 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 4.00% | Terminus 2 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | GLM-5.1 | 1.00% | Terminus 2 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 0% | Terminus 2 | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | Kimi K2.6 | 0% | Kimi Code CLI | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 72.7% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 57.5% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 53.1% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 51.7% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | Grok 4.7 | 46% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | GLM-5.3 | 42.5% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | Kimi K3 | 42% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | Grok 4.6 | 31.9% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 31.9% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | Grok 4.5 | 29% | Grok Build | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 26% | Claude Code | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | Claude Fable 5 | 24% | Claude Code | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 16% | Claude Code | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | GLM-5.2 | 13% | Claude Code | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | GPT-5.5 | 12% | Codex CLI | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | | 7.00% | Gemini CLI | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 4.00% | Terminus 2 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | | 4.00% | Terminus 2 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | GLM-5.1 | 1.00% | Terminus 2 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 0% | Terminus 2 | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | Kimi K2.6 | 0% | Kimi Code CLI | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 11 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Of runs with a cost, the best scores 26% for $42 a task
Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.
Source: Official SWE-Marathon leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grok 4.5 | Grok Build | 29% | |||
| Claude Opus 4.8 | Claude Code | 26% | $42 | ||
| Claude Fable 5 | Claude Code | 24% | $29 | ||
| Claude Opus 4.7 | Claude Code | 16% | $37 | ||
| GLM-5.2 | Claude Code | 13% | $50 | ||
| GPT-5.5 | Codex CLI | 12% | $11 | ||
| Claude Opus 4.7 | Terminus 2 | 11% | $19 | ||
| | Gemini CLI | 7.00% | $6.65 | ||
| GPT-5.5 | Terminus 2 | 6.00% | $43 | ||
| | Terminus 2 | 4.00% | $3.65 | ||
| | Terminus 2 | 4.00% | $11 | ||
| | Gemini CLI | 2.00% | $5.40 | ||
| GLM-5.1 | Terminus 2 | 1.00% | $43 | ||
| | Terminus 2 | 0% | $1.63 | ||
| Kimi K2.6 | Kimi Code CLI | 0% | $5.31 | ||
| Kimi K2.6 | Terminus 2 | 0% | $5.76 |
2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in June 2026 5 models have held number one with claims included since its release in June 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official SWE-Marathon leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official SWE-Marathon leaderboard and labs’ model cards
6 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2026 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 51.7 | SWE Marathon v1.1 (Claude Code) |
| Oct 12, 2026 | 53.1 | SWE-Marathon (version not stated) | |
| Oct 12, 2026 | 57.5 | SWE-Marathon (xhigh) (version not stated) | |
| Sep 20, 2026 | 72.7 | SWE-Marathon v1.1 (Partial Score) | |
| Aug 28, 2026 | 31.9 | SWE-Marathon | |
| Aug 14, 2026 | GLM-5.3 | 42.5 | SWE-Marathon (v1.1) |
| Jul 16, 2026 | Kimi K3 | 42 | SWE-Marathon |
| Jul 16, 2026 | Grok 4.5 | 29 | SWE Marathon resolution rate (pass@1) |
| Jun 16, 2026 | GLM-5.2 | 13 | SWE-Marathon |
6 system cards report it, from 3 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2026 | | 53.1 | SWE-Marathon pass@1 from Abundant AI, Muse Wonder (max) (capabilities table image, page 3) | Capabilities |
| Oct 12, 2026 | | 57.5 | SWE-Marathon pass@1 from Abundant AI, Muse Wonder Full (max) (capabilities table image, page 3). Reported at xhigh effort | Capabilities |
| Sep 21, 2026 | Grok 4.7 model card | 46 | SWE-Marathon v1.1, resolution rate, high, run by Abundant AI (2.5) | Capabilities |
| Aug 12, 2026 | Grok 4.6 model card | 31.9 | SWE-Marathon v1.1, resolution rate, high, Grok Build harness, run by Abundant AI (2.5) | Capabilities |
| Jul 27, 2026 | Kimi K3 technical report | 42 | SWE-Marathon, H20-calibrated branch of the official tasks as of 2026-07-09 (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jul 14, 2026 | Grok 4.5 model card | 29 | SWE-Marathon, full task set, resolution rate, high (2.6) | Capabilities |
2 lab claims next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 2 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
Source: Official leaderboards
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471