Benchmark Almanac

TreeBench

Seed2.1 Pro 71.1% leads since June 2026
Fading

Models answer 405 visual questions about small targets in dense SA-1B images and give bounding boxes as evidence. Scored by answer accuracy, with box overlap as a second measure.

At release no model reached 60% accuracy, and OpenAI o3 scored 54.87.

Released
July 2025
Kind
Detection and captioning
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
December 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
June 2026

In the authors’ words

Models like OpenAI-o3 pioneer visual grounded reasoning by dynamically referencing visual regions, just like human "thinking with images". However, no benchmark exists to evaluate these capabilities holistically. To bridge this gap, we propose TreeBench (Traceable Evidence Evaluation Benchmark), a diagnostic benchmark built on three principles: (1) focused visual perception of subtle targets in complex scenes, (2) traceable evidence via bounding box evaluation, and (3) second-order reasoning to test object interactions and spatial hierarchies beyond simple object localization. Prioritizing images with dense objects, we initially sample 1K high-quality images from SA-1B, and incorporate eight LMM experts to manually annotate questions, candidate options, and answers for each image. After three stages of quality control, TreeBench consists of 405 challenging visual question-answering pairs, even the most advanced models struggle with this benchmark, where none of them reach 60% accuracy, e.g., OpenAI-o3 scores only 54.87. Furthermore, we introduce TreeVGR (Traceable Evidence Enhanced Visual Grounded Reasoning), a training paradigm to supervise localization and reasoning jointly with reinforcement learning, enabling accurate localizations and explainable reasoning pathways. Initialized from Qwen2.5-VL-7B, it improves V* Bench (+16.8), MME-RealWorld (+12.6), and TreeBench (+13.4), proving traceability is key to advancing vision-grounded reasoning. The code is available at https://github.com/Haochen-Wang409/TreeVGR.

Abstract of Traceable Evidence Enhanced Visual Grounded Reasoning: Evaluation and Methodology (arXiv:2507.07999, CC0)
7
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
7
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Seed2.1 Pro leads with 71.1% among models released by June 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in June 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Seed2.1 Pro 71.1%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Pro 64.7%
  3. 3 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 51.6%
  4. 4 GLM-4.6V 51.4%
  5. 5 GLM-4.5V 50.1%
  6. 6 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 42.5%
  7. 7 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 37.5%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.1 Pro 71.1% Jun 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed2.0 Pro 64.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
3 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 51.6% Apr 2026 Lab model card
4 GLM-4.6V 51.4% Dec 2025 Lab model card
5 GLM-4.5V 50.1% Aug 2025 Lab model card
6 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 42.5% Nov 2025 Lab model card
7 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 37.5% Jul 2025 Lab model card

5 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in July 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Z.ai ByteDance Seed
Lab claims Not tested since Jun 2026
Seed2.1 Pro 71.1%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Seed2.0 Pro GLM-4.6V GLM-4.5V GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Seed2.0 Pro

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in December 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Z.ai
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Dec 8, 2025 GLM-4.6V 51.4 TreeBench
Aug 11, 2025 GLM-4.5V 50.1 TreeBench

7 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 23, 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 71.1 TreeBench (Table 9) Capabilities
Apr 27, 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B technical report 51.6 TreeBench, reasoning on, 43.7 reasoning off (Table 7) Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 64.7 TreeBench (Table 8) Capabilities
Jan 1, 2026 GLM-4.6V technical report 51.4 TreeBench, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Nov 6, 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL technical report 42.5 TreeBench, reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 38.5 Capabilities
Aug 13, 2025 GLM-4.5V technical report 50.1 TreeBench, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Jul 1, 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report 37.5 TreeBench, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%