V*
Models answer 191 multiple choice questions about small details in high-resolution images, such as an object's color or relative position.
Some model cards report runs with Python image tools, which are not comparable with plain runs.
- Made by
- Penghao Wu and Saining Xie
- Released
- December 2023
- Kind
- General visual questions
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Kimi K2.6 #62 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- October 2026, dropped after it saturated
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
When we look around and perform complex tasks, how we see and selectively process what we see is crucial. However, the lack of this visual search mechanism in current multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) hinders their ability to focus on important visual details, especially when handling high-resolution and visually crowded images. To address this, we introduce V*, an LLM-guided visual search mechanism that employs the world knowledge in LLMs for efficient visual querying. When combined with an MLLM, this mechanism enhances collaborative reasoning, contextual understanding, and precise targeting of specific visual elements. This integration results in a new MLLM meta-architecture, named Show, sEArch, and TelL (SEAL). We further create V*Bench, a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate MLLMs in their ability to process high-resolution images and focus on visual details. Our study highlights the necessity of incorporating visual search capabilities into multimodal systems. The code is available https://github.com/penghao-wu/vstar.
2 models share the top score of 96.9%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
GPT-4V leads with 55% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Qwen 3.6 Plus leads with 96.9%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
- 96.9
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 96.9 Kimi K2.6
- 95.8
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 95.3
Step 3.7 Flash
- 94.7
Qwen3.6 27B
- 93.7
Qwen3.5-27B
- 93.2
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 92.7
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 90.1
Qwen3.5-9B
- 89.0
Seed1.5-VL
- 89.0 GLM-5V-Turbo
- 85.9
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 85.6
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- 84.3
Qwen3.5-4B
- 83.2 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506
- 82.8
STEP3-VL-10B
- 71.7
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 1
Qwen 3.6 Plus 96.9%
- 2 Kimi K2.6 96.9%
- 3
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 95.8%
- 4
Step 3.7 Flash 95.3%
- 5
Qwen3.6 27B 94.7%
- 6
Qwen3.5-27B 93.7%
- 7
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 93.2%
- 8
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 92.7%
- 9
Qwen3.5-9B 90.1%
- 10
Seed1.5-VL 89%
- 11 GLM-5V-Turbo 89%
- 12
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 85.9%
- 13
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 85.6%
- 14
Qwen3.5-4B 84.3%
- 15 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 83.2%
- 16
STEP3-VL-10B 82.8%
- 17
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 71.7%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 GPT-4V 55%
- 2
Gemini 1.0 Pro 48.2%
Source: Official V* leaderboard
- 96.9
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 96.9 Kimi K2.6
- 95.8
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 95.3
Step 3.7 Flash
- 94.7
Qwen3.6 27B
- 93.7
Qwen3.5-27B
- 93.2
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 92.7
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 90.1
Qwen3.5-9B
- 89.0
Seed1.5-VL
- 89.0 GLM-5V-Turbo
- 85.9
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 85.6
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- 84.3
Qwen3.5-4B
- 83.2 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506
- 82.8
STEP3-VL-10B
- 71.7
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 55.0 GPT-4V
- 48.2
Gemini 1.0 Pro
- 1
Qwen 3.6 Plus 96.9%
- 2 Kimi K2.6 96.9%
- 3
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 95.8%
- 4
Step 3.7 Flash 95.3%
- 5
Qwen3.6 27B 94.7%
- 6
Qwen3.5-27B 93.7%
- 7
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 93.2%
- 8
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 92.7%
- 9
Qwen3.5-9B 90.1%
- 10
Seed1.5-VL 89%
- 11 GLM-5V-Turbo 89%
- 12
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 85.9%
- 13
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 85.6%
- 14
Qwen3.5-4B 84.3%
- 15 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 83.2%
- 16
STEP3-VL-10B 82.8%
- 17
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 71.7%
- 18 GPT-4V 55%
- 19
Gemini 1.0 Pro 48.2%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official V* leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 96.9% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Kimi K2.6 | 96.9% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 95.8% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 95.3% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 94.7% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 93.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 93.2% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 92.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 90.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 89% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | GLM-5V-Turbo | 89% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 85.9% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 85.6% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 84.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 | 83.2% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 82.8% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 71.7% | May 2024 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4V | 55% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 48.2% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 96.9% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Kimi K2.6 | 96.9% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 95.8% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 95.3% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 94.7% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 93.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 93.2% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 92.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 90.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 89% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | GLM-5V-Turbo | 89% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 85.9% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 85.6% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 84.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 | 83.2% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 82.8% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 71.7% | May 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | GPT-4V | 55% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 48.2% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 13 entries, 2 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
4 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in December 2023 Number one over time 5 models have held number one with claims included since its release in December 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
ByteDance Seed’s own number for Seed1.5-VL passed 85% in May 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official V* leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in October 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | 85.6 | V* | |
| May 29, 2026 | 95.3 | V* (with Python) | |
| Apr 22, 2026 | 94.7 | V* | |
| Apr 20, 2026 | Kimi K2.6 | 96.9 | V* (w/ python) |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 96.9 | V* (96.9 / 90.5) | |
| Apr 1, 2026 | GLM-5V-Turbo | 89 | V* 89.0 |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 84.3 | V* 84.3/86.4 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 90.1 | V* 90.1/88.5 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 92.7 | V* 92.7 / 89.5 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 93.7 | V* 93.7 / 89.0 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 93.2 | V* 93.2 / 90.1 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 95.8 | V* (95.8/91.1) | |
| Jun 21, 2025 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 | 83.2 | V* Benchmark (without extra tools) |
| May 12, 2025 | 89 | V* | |
| May 14, 2024 | 71.7 | V* bench (test), 0-shot |
5 system cards report it, from 5 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | | 85.6 | V*, static multiple choice without a visual search tool (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| Jan 14, 2026 | | 82.8 | V*, SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 84.29 | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 85.9 | V*, no tool (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jun 23, 2025 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 technical report | 83.2 | V* Benchmark, without external tools (Abstract, section 4.3) | Capabilities |
| May 11, 2025 | | 89 | V*, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 89.5 | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%