Benchmark Almanac

V*

Qwen 3.6 Plus 96.9% leads since April 2026
GPT-4V 55% leads
Qwen 3.6 Plus 96.9% leads since April 2026
Fading

Models answer 191 multiple choice questions about small details in high-resolution images, such as an object's color or relative position.

Some model cards report runs with Python image tools, which are not comparable with plain runs.

Made by
Penghao Wu and Saining Xie
Released
December 2023
Kind
General visual questions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Kimi K2.6 #62 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
October 2026, dropped after it saturated
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

When we look around and perform complex tasks, how we see and selectively process what we see is crucial. However, the lack of this visual search mechanism in current multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) hinders their ability to focus on important visual details, especially when handling high-resolution and visually crowded images. To address this, we introduce V*, an LLM-guided visual search mechanism that employs the world knowledge in LLMs for efficient visual querying. When combined with an MLLM, this mechanism enhances collaborative reasoning, contextual understanding, and precise targeting of specific visual elements. This integration results in a new MLLM meta-architecture, named Show, sEArch, and TelL (SEAL). We further create V*Bench, a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate MLLMs in their ability to process high-resolution images and focus on visual details. Our study highlights the necessity of incorporating visual search capabilities into multimodal systems. The code is available https://github.com/penghao-wu/vstar.

Abstract of V*: Guided Visual Search as a Core Mechanism in Multimodal LLMs (arXiv:2312.14135, CC0)
17
Models scored in lab cards
15
Launch posts list it, from 7 labs
5
System cards report it, from 5 labs

2 models share the top score of 96.9%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

GPT-4V leads with 55% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Qwen 3.6 Plus leads with 96.9%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 Qwen 3.6 Plus 96.9%
  2. 2 Kimi K2.6 96.9%
  3. 3 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 95.8%
  4. 4 Step 3.7 Flash 95.3%
  5. 5 Qwen3.6 27B 94.7%
  6. 6 Qwen3.5-27B 93.7%
  7. 7 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 93.2%
  8. 8 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 92.7%
  9. 9 Qwen3.5-9B 90.1%
  10. 10 Seed1.5-VL 89%
  11. 11 GLM-5V-Turbo 89%
  12. 12 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 85.9%
  13. 13 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 85.6%
  14. 14 Qwen3.5-4B 84.3%
  15. 15 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 83.2%
  16. 16 STEP3-VL-10B 82.8%
  17. 17 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 71.7%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Source: Official V* leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.6 Plus 96.9% Apr 2026 Lab model card
2 Kimi K2.6 96.9% Apr 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 95.8% Feb 2026 Lab model card
4 Step 3.7 Flash 95.3% May 2026 Lab model card
5 Qwen3.6 27B 94.7% Apr 2026 Lab model card
6 Qwen3.5-27B 93.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
7 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 93.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
8 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 92.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
9 Qwen3.5-9B 90.1% Mar 2026 Lab model card
10 Seed1.5-VL 89% May 2025 Lab model card
11 GLM-5V-Turbo 89% Apr 2026 Lab model card
12 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 85.9% Nov 2025 Lab model card
13 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 85.6% Oct 2026 Lab model card
14 Qwen3.5-4B 84.3% Mar 2026 Lab model card
15 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 83.2% Jun 2025 Lab model card
16 STEP3-VL-10B 82.8% Jan 2026 Lab model card
17 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 71.7% May 2024 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4V 55% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 1.0 Pro 48.2% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.6 Plus 96.9% Apr 2026 Lab model card
2 Kimi K2.6 96.9% Apr 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 95.8% Feb 2026 Lab model card
4 Step 3.7 Flash 95.3% May 2026 Lab model card
5 Qwen3.6 27B 94.7% Apr 2026 Lab model card
6 Qwen3.5-27B 93.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
7 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 93.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
8 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 92.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
9 Qwen3.5-9B 90.1% Mar 2026 Lab model card
10 Seed1.5-VL 89% May 2025 Lab model card
11 GLM-5V-Turbo 89% Apr 2026 Lab model card
12 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 85.9% Nov 2025 Lab model card
13 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 85.6% Oct 2026 Lab model card
14 Qwen3.5-4B 84.3% Mar 2026 Lab model card
15 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 83.2% Jun 2025 Lab model card
16 STEP3-VL-10B 82.8% Jan 2026 Lab model card
17 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 71.7% May 2024 Lab model card
18 GPT-4V 55% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
19 Gemini 1.0 Pro 48.2% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 13 entries, 2 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

4 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in December 2023 Number one over time 5 models have held number one with claims included since its release in December 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind ByteDance Seed Qwen
Lab claims Passed 85% in May 2025, by Seed1.5-VL

Source: Labs’ model cards

ByteDance Seed’s own number for Seed1.5-VL passed 85% in May 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.6 Plus Seed1.5-VL Gemini 1.5 Pro GPT-4V 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.6 Plus Seed1.5-VL

Sources: Official V* leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in October 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
ByteDance Seed
Moonshot AI
Qwen
Z.ai
StepFun
NVIDIA
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 85.6 V*
May 29, 2026 Step 3.7 Flash 95.3 V* (with Python)
Apr 22, 2026 Qwen3.6 27B 94.7 V*
Apr 20, 2026 Kimi K2.6 96.9 V* (w/ python)
Apr 2, 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 96.9 V* (96.9 / 90.5)
Apr 1, 2026 GLM-5V-Turbo 89 V* 89.0
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-4B 84.3 V* 84.3/86.4 (with CI / without CI)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-9B 90.1 V* 90.1/88.5 (with CI / without CI)
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 92.7 V* 92.7 / 89.5 (with CI / without CI)
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-27B 93.7 V* 93.7 / 89.0 (with CI / without CI)
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 93.2 V* 93.2 / 90.1 (with CI / without CI)
Feb 16, 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 95.8 V* (95.8/91.1)
Jun 21, 2025 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 83.2 V* Benchmark (without extra tools)
May 12, 2025 Seed1.5-VL 89 V*
May 14, 2024 Gemini 1.5 Pro 71.7 V* bench (test), 0-shot

5 system cards report it, from 5 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL technical report 85.6 V*, static multiple choice without a visual search tool (Table 10) Capabilities
Jan 14, 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 82.8 V*, SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 84.29 Capabilities
Nov 26, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 85.9 V*, no tool (Table 2) Capabilities
Jun 23, 2025 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 technical report 83.2 V* Benchmark, without external tools (Abstract, section 4.3) Capabilities
May 11, 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 89 V*, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 89.5 Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%