Benchmark Almanac

WebArena

Claude Opus 4.6 68% leads since February 2026
DeepSeek-V3.2 74.3% leads since December 2025
DeepSeek-V3.2 74.3% leads since December 2025
Fading

Agents complete 812 realistic tasks on self-hosted shopping, forum, GitLab, CMS and map websites. Functional graders check the outcome.

WebArena-Verified is a separate audited version with its own id.

Released
July 2023
Kind
Web browsing
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude Opus 4.6 #37 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
October 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

With advances in generative AI, there is now potential for autonomous agents to manage daily tasks via natural language commands. However, current agents are primarily created and tested in simplified synthetic environments, leading to a disconnect with real-world scenarios. In this paper, we build an environment for language-guided agents that is highly realistic and reproducible. Specifically, we focus on agents that perform tasks on the web, and create an environment with fully functional websites from four common domains: e-commerce, social forum discussions, collaborative software development, and content management. Our environment is enriched with tools (e.g., a map) and external knowledge bases (e.g., user manuals) to encourage human-like task-solving. Building upon our environment, we release a set of benchmark tasks focusing on evaluating the functional correctness of task completions. The tasks in our benchmark are diverse, long-horizon, and designed to emulate tasks that humans routinely perform on the internet. We experiment with several baseline agents, integrating recent techniques such as reasoning before acting. The results demonstrate that solving complex tasks is challenging: our best GPT-4-based agent only achieves an end-to-end task success rate of 14.41%, significantly lower than the human performance of 78.24%. These results highlight the need for further development of robust agents, that current state-of-the-art large language models are far from perfect performance in these real-life tasks, and that WebArena can be used to measure such progress.

Abstract of WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents (arXiv:2307.13854, CC0)
8
Models scored in lab cards
4
Launch posts list it, from 3 labs
5
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Claude Opus 4.6 leads with 68%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

DeepSeek-V3.2 leads with 74.3% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

DeepSeek-V3.2 leads with 74.3%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 Claude Opus 4.6 68%
  2. 2 Claude Sonnet 4.6 65.6%
  3. 3 ChatGPT agent 65.4%
  4. 4 Claude Opus 4.5 65.3%
  5. 5 Kimi K2.5 58.9%
  6. 6 OpenAI Computer-Using Agent (CUA) 58.1%
  7. 7 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 50.9%
  8. 8 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 49.9%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 4.6 68% Feb 2026 Lab model card
2 Claude Sonnet 4.6 65.6% Feb 2026 Lab model card
3 ChatGPT agent 65.4% Jul 2025 Lab model card
4 Claude Opus 4.5 65.3% Nov 2025 Lab model card
5 Kimi K2.5 58.9% Jan 2026 Lab model card
6 OpenAI Computer-Using Agent (CUA) 58.1% Jan 2025 Lab model card
7 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 50.9% Oct 2026 Lab model card
8 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 49.9% Jul 2025 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 DeepSeek-V3.2 74.3% WebTactix Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4 Jun 2023 14.9% when "not achievable" hint is not provided, GPT Jun 2023 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-4o May 2024 13.1% when "not achievable" hint is provided, GPT May 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 1.0 Pro 7.12% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 DeepSeek-V3.2 74.3% WebTactix Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Opus 4.6 68% Feb 2026 Lab model card
3 Claude Sonnet 4.6 65.6% Feb 2026 Lab model card
4 ChatGPT agent 65.4% Jul 2025 Lab model card
5 Claude Opus 4.5 65.3% Nov 2025 Lab model card
6 Kimi K2.5 58.9% Jan 2026 Lab model card
7 OpenAI Computer-Using Agent (CUA) 58.1% Jan 2025 Lab model card
8 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 50.9% Oct 2026 Lab model card
9 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 49.9% Jul 2025 Lab model card
10 GPT-4 Jun 2023 14.9% when "not achievable" hint is not provided, GPT Jun 2023 Official leaderboard
11 GPT-4o May 2024 13.1% when "not achievable" hint is provided, GPT May 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Gemini 1.0 Pro 7.12% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 47 entries, 4 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

3 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in July 2023 2 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in July 2023 4 models have held number one with claims included since its release in July 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI DeepSeek Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Dec 2025
Lab claims 3 leaders

Sources: Official WebArena leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) DeepSeek-V3.2 ChatGPT agent OpenAI Computer-Using Agent (CUA) GPT-4 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) DeepSeek-V3.2 ChatGPT agent

Sources: Official WebArena leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in October 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

OpenAI
Qwen
NVIDIA
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 50.9 WebArena (vision)
Jul 22, 2025 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 49.9 WebArena
Jul 17, 2025 ChatGPT agent 65.4 WebArena (Agentic Browser Use)
Jan 23, 2025 OpenAI Computer-Using Agent (CUA) 58.1 WebArena (browser use)

5 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B technical report 50.9 WebArena (vision), 812 public tasks, internal harness, screenshots, released 24GB checkpoint (Table 7 and Section 8). BF16 50.25 Capabilities
Feb 17, 2026 Claude Sonnet 4.6 system card 65.6 WebArena, single policy model, general prompts, Average@5 (Table 2.18.1.A) Capabilities
Feb 5, 2026 Claude Opus 4.6 system card 68 WebArena, single policy model, general prompts, Average@5 (Table 2.20.A); pass@5 74.0 in Table 2.20.B Capabilities
Jan 30, 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 58.9 WebArena, evaluation scripts corrected, GPT-4o fuzzy-match judge (Table 4) Capabilities
Nov 24, 2025 Claude Opus 4.5 system card 65.3 WebArena, single policy model, general prompts, Computer Use API with browser tools, avg of 5 runs (Table 2.22.A; pass@4 72.4% in Table 2.22.B) Capabilities

More in Computer and browser use

All 69 in Computer and browser use
  • BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
  • ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
  • AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
  • WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces. Muse Spark 1.1 69%
  • MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%