WebLINX
Agents follow a user's multi-turn chat instructions to navigate real websites. 100,000 interactions from 2,300 expert demonstrations give turn-level metrics.
ICML 2024. 39 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.
- Made by
- McGill University and Mila
- Released
- February 2024
- Kind
- Web browsing
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Llama 2-13B #221 on the capability index
- Last model added
- November 2023
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We propose the problem of conversational web navigation, where a digital agent controls a web browser and follows user instructions to solve real-world tasks in a multi-turn dialogue fashion. To support this problem, we introduce WEBLINX - a large-scale benchmark of 100K interactions across 2300 expert demonstrations of conversational web navigation. Our benchmark covers a broad range of patterns on over 150 real-world websites and can be used to train and evaluate agents in diverse scenarios. Due to the magnitude of information present, Large Language Models (LLMs) cannot process entire web pages in real-time. To solve this bottleneck, we design a retrieval-inspired model that efficiently prunes HTML pages by ranking relevant elements. We use the selected elements, along with screenshots and action history, to assess a variety of models for their ability to replicate human behavior when navigating the web. Our experiments span from small text-only to proprietary multimodal LLMs. We find that smaller finetuned decoders surpass the best zero-shot LLMs (including GPT-4V), but also larger finetuned multimodal models which were explicitly pretrained on screenshots. However, all finetuned models struggle to generalize to unseen websites. Our findings highlight the need for large multimodal models that can generalize to novel settings. Our code, data and models are available for research: https://mcgill-nlp.github.io/weblinx
Llama-3-8B-Web (WebLINX fine-tuned) tops the leaderboard with 28.9
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-4V, at 10.4.
The newest model with a score here came out in November 2023, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 28.9 Llama-3-8B-Web (WebLINX fine-tuned)
- 25.2 Llama-2-13B (WebLINX fine-tuned)
- 25.0 S-LLaMA-2.7B (WebLINX fine-tuned)
- 24.6 Llama-2-7B (WebLINX fine-tuned)
- 23.8 Flan-T5-3B (WebLINX fine-tuned)
- 23.7 S-LLaMA-1.3B (WebLINX fine-tuned)
- 21.2 GPT-3.5F (WebLINX fine-tuned)
- 20.9 MindAct-3B (WebLINX fine-tuned)
- 20.0 Fuyu-8B (WebLINX fine-tuned)
- 17.3 Flan-T5-780M (WebLINX fine-tuned)
- 16.9 Pix2Act-1.3B (WebLINX fine-tuned)
- 15.1 MindAct-780M (WebLINX fine-tuned)
- 15.0 Flan-T5-250M (WebLINX fine-tuned)
- 12.6 MindAct-250M (WebLINX fine-tuned)
- 12.5 Pix2Act-282M (WebLINX fine-tuned)
- 10.7 GPT-4T
- 10.4 GPT-4V
- 8.51 GPT-3.5T
- 5.16
Llama 2-13B
- 4.04
Llama 2-7B
- 1 Llama-3-8B-Web (WebLINX fine-tuned) 28.9
- 2 Llama-2-13B (WebLINX fine-tuned) 25.2
- 3 S-LLaMA-2.7B (WebLINX fine-tuned) 25.0
- 4 Llama-2-7B (WebLINX fine-tuned) 24.6
- 5 Flan-T5-3B (WebLINX fine-tuned) 23.8
- 6 S-LLaMA-1.3B (WebLINX fine-tuned) 23.7
- 7 GPT-3.5F (WebLINX fine-tuned) 21.2
- 8 MindAct-3B (WebLINX fine-tuned) 20.9
- 9 Fuyu-8B (WebLINX fine-tuned) 20.0
- 10 Flan-T5-780M (WebLINX fine-tuned) 17.3
- 11 Pix2Act-1.3B (WebLINX fine-tuned) 16.9
- 12 MindAct-780M (WebLINX fine-tuned) 15.1
- 13 Flan-T5-250M (WebLINX fine-tuned) 15.0
- 14 MindAct-250M (WebLINX fine-tuned) 12.6
- 15 Pix2Act-282M (WebLINX fine-tuned) 12.5
- 16 GPT-4T 10.7
- 17 GPT-4V 10.4
- 18 GPT-3.5T 8.51
- 19
Llama 2-13B 5.16
- 20
Llama 2-7B 4.04
Source: Official WebLINX leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Llama-3-8B-Web (WebLINX fine-tuned) | 28.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | Llama-2-13B (WebLINX fine-tuned) | 25.2 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | S-LLaMA-2.7B (WebLINX fine-tuned) | 25.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | Llama-2-7B (WebLINX fine-tuned) | 24.6 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | Flan-T5-3B (WebLINX fine-tuned) | 23.8 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | S-LLaMA-1.3B (WebLINX fine-tuned) | 23.7 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | GPT-3.5F (WebLINX fine-tuned) | 21.2 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | MindAct-3B (WebLINX fine-tuned) | 20.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | Fuyu-8B (WebLINX fine-tuned) | 20.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | Flan-T5-780M (WebLINX fine-tuned) | 17.3 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | Pix2Act-1.3B (WebLINX fine-tuned) | 16.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | MindAct-780M (WebLINX fine-tuned) | 15.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | Flan-T5-250M (WebLINX fine-tuned) | 15.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | MindAct-250M (WebLINX fine-tuned) | 12.6 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | Pix2Act-282M (WebLINX fine-tuned) | 12.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | GPT-4T | 10.7 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | GPT-4V | 10.4 | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | GPT-3.5T | 8.51 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 19 | | 5.16 | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 4.04 | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official WebLINX leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official WebLINX leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Computer and browser use
- BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
- ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
- AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
- WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces.
Muse Spark 1.1 69%
- MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%