WorldArena 2.0
Extends WorldArena to visuotactile prediction, world models as RL environments, and simulated plus real multi-embodiment robot platforms.
- Released
- May 2026
- Kind
- Interactive world models
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Last model added
- September 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
World models have emerged as a central paradigm for embodied intelligence, enabling agents to predict action-conditioned future and reason about environmental dynamics. However, existing embodied world model benchmarks are still largely confined to vision-only prediction, offline embodied applications, and simulator-based evaluation, making them insufficient for assessing increasingly comprehensive world models. In this work, we introduce WorldArena 2.0, an expanded benchmark that systematically broadens embodied world model evaluation along three dimensions: modality, functionality, and platform. Along the modality dimension, WorldArena 2.0 extends evaluation from vision-only to visuotactile modalities, enabling assessment of multimodal perception and prediction. Along the functionality dimension, it extends beyond policy evaluation and planning to assess world models as interactive RL environments for policy optimization. Along the platform dimension, it moves beyond simulator-only evaluation to a diverse suite of simulated and real-world robotic settings across multiple embodiments. Under a standardized protocol, WorldArena 2.0 comprehensively evaluates perceptual quality, interactive utility, and cross-platform performance, providing a comprehensive testbed for tracking progress toward embodied world models. The project page including codes and demos is available at: https://world-arena.ai/.
WorldIncept tops the leaderboard with 72.3%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Code World Model (CWM), at 69.5%.
- 72.3 WorldIncept
- 71.5 BWM-Turbo
- 71.2 DWM
- 71.0 Waterloo
- 70.8 ActiFlow
- 70.7 PrismWorld
- 70.6 sonata-wm
- 70.6 Concerto-AWM
- 70.5 Snowl-WM
- 70.5 K1-World
- 70.5 Nora-WM
- 70.4 Kairo-WM
- 70.4 Scope-WM
- 70.3 Hera-WM
- 70.3 NexWorld
- 70.2 Leto-WM
- 70.2 Supervision_WM
- 70.1 CAI-WM
- 70.0 CR-World
- 70.0 WMDLC
- 69.9 Fant-WM
- 69.8 Causal-AI
- 69.7 SRKP
- 69.6 WM-4600-cas
- 69.5 Neoverse-Abot
- 69.5
Code World Model (CWM)
- 69.4 Watermelon_pp
- 69.4 DXP-AR
- 69.4 CCWM
- 69.4 EmboVo
- 69.3 FlowWAM_FiveAges
- 69.3 Sleepy-Robot
- 69.2 LepWM
- 69.2 ME-world
- 69.1 LPBot
- 69.1 XIRRA-WM
- 69.1 Heron-OpenWM
- 69.0 GeWu
- 69.0 T-Me
- 69.0 TeleWM
- 68.9 Eidomere
- 68.9 KineWorld
- 68.9 VegaWM
- 68.8 Xp-0
- 68.8 Pearl_wm
- 68.7 DXP-Base
- 68.7 Xperience-0
- 68.7 DXP-Nano
- 68.7 PolarisWM
- 68.7 RiXin
- 68.6 MotionForge
- 68.6 X-WM-Open
- 68.3 Kaiwu-WM
- 68.2 polaris
- 68.1 inception
- 68.0 PAIWorld
- 67.8 NiconicoNi
- 67.8 World Native
- 67.7 SimpleWM
- 67.6 NEXUS
- 67.0 DBYWAM
- 66.5 HZ-World
- 66.4 novasim
- 66.2 pg-0
- 66.0 actionwam
- 65.6 FiveOneWorld
- 65.6 Double-robot-model
- 65.4 HappyWM
- 65.3 Cogito
- 65.2 MBot
- 65.2 kl team
- 65.1 flexible_wam
- 65.0 robo-hug
- 64.0 Vis-World
- 62.9 AuroraWorld
- 62.8 EvloutionWAM
- 62.6 PKU-ZRJ
- 62.4 GILWM
- 62.2 InvsWorld
- 61.3 Terra
- 54.8 DB_World
- 1 WorldIncept 72.3%
- 2 BWM-Turbo 71.5%
- 3 DWM 71.2%
- 4 Waterloo 71%
- 5 ActiFlow 70.8%
- 6 PrismWorld 70.7%
- 7 sonata-wm 70.6%
- 8 Concerto-AWM 70.6%
- 9 Snowl-WM 70.5%
- 10 K1-World 70.5%
- 11 Nora-WM 70.5%
- 12 Kairo-WM 70.4%
- 13 Scope-WM 70.4%
- 14 Hera-WM 70.3%
- 15 NexWorld 70.3%
- 16 Leto-WM 70.2%
- 17 Supervision_WM 70.2%
- 18 CAI-WM 70.1%
- 19 CR-World 70%
- 20 WMDLC 70%
- 21 Fant-WM 69.9%
- 22 Causal-AI 69.8%
- 23 SRKP 69.7%
- 24 WM-4600-cas 69.6%
- 25 Neoverse-Abot 69.5%
- 26
Code World Model (CWM) 69.5%
- 27 Watermelon_pp 69.4%
- 28 DXP-AR 69.4%
- 29 CCWM 69.4%
- 30 EmboVo 69.4%
- 31 FlowWAM_FiveAges 69.3%
- 32 Sleepy-Robot 69.3%
- 33 LepWM 69.2%
- 34 ME-world 69.2%
- 35 LPBot 69.1%
- 36 XIRRA-WM 69.1%
- 37 Heron-OpenWM 69.1%
- 38 GeWu 69%
- 39 T-Me 69%
- 40 TeleWM 69%
- 41 Eidomere 68.9%
- 42 KineWorld 68.9%
- 43 VegaWM 68.9%
- 44 Xp-0 68.8%
- 45 Pearl_wm 68.8%
- 46 DXP-Base 68.7%
- 47 Xperience-0 68.7%
- 48 DXP-Nano 68.7%
- 49 PolarisWM 68.7%
- 50 RiXin 68.7%
- 51 MotionForge 68.6%
- 52 X-WM-Open 68.6%
- 53 Kaiwu-WM 68.3%
- 54 polaris 68.2%
- 55 inception 68.1%
- 56 PAIWorld 68%
- 57 NiconicoNi 67.8%
- 58 World Native 67.8%
- 59 SimpleWM 67.7%
- 60 NEXUS 67.6%
- 61 DBYWAM 67%
- 62 HZ-World 66.5%
- 63 novasim 66.4%
- 64 pg-0 66.2%
- 65 actionwam 66%
- 66 FiveOneWorld 65.6%
- 67 Double-robot-model 65.6%
- 68 HappyWM 65.4%
- 69 Cogito 65.3%
- 70 MBot 65.2%
- 71 kl team 65.2%
- 72 flexible_wam 65.1%
- 73 robo-hug 65%
- 74 Vis-World 64%
- 75 AuroraWorld 62.9%
- 76 EvloutionWAM 62.8%
- 77 PKU-ZRJ 62.6%
- 78 GILWM 62.4%
- 79 InvsWorld 62.2%
- 80 Terra 61.3%
- 81 DB_World 54.8%
Source: Official WorldArena 2.0 leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WorldIncept | 72.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | BWM-Turbo | 71.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | DWM | 71.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | Waterloo | 71% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | ActiFlow | 70.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | PrismWorld | 70.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | sonata-wm | 70.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | Concerto-AWM | 70.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | Snowl-WM | 70.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | K1-World | 70.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | Nora-WM | 70.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | Kairo-WM | 70.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | Scope-WM | 70.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | Hera-WM | 70.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | NexWorld | 70.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | Leto-WM | 70.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | Supervision_WM | 70.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | CAI-WM | 70.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 19 | CR-World | 70% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 20 | WMDLC | 70% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 21 | Fant-WM | 69.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 22 | Causal-AI | 69.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 23 | SRKP | 69.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 24 | WM-4600-cas | 69.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 25 | Neoverse-Abot | 69.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 26 | | 69.5% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | Watermelon_pp | 69.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 28 | DXP-AR | 69.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 29 | CCWM | 69.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 30 | EmboVo | 69.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 31 | FlowWAM_FiveAges | 69.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 32 | Sleepy-Robot | 69.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 33 | LepWM | 69.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 34 | ME-world | 69.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 35 | LPBot | 69.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 36 | XIRRA-WM | 69.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 37 | Heron-OpenWM | 69.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 38 | GeWu | 69% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 39 | T-Me | 69% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 40 | TeleWM | 69% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 41 | Eidomere | 68.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 42 | KineWorld | 68.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 43 | VegaWM | 68.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 44 | Xp-0 | 68.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 45 | Pearl_wm | 68.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 46 | DXP-Base | 68.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 47 | Xperience-0 | 68.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 48 | DXP-Nano | 68.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 49 | PolarisWM | 68.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 50 | RiXin | 68.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 51 | MotionForge | 68.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 52 | X-WM-Open | 68.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 53 | Kaiwu-WM | 68.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 54 | polaris | 68.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 55 | inception | 68.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 56 | PAIWorld | 68% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 57 | NiconicoNi | 67.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 58 | World Native | 67.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 59 | SimpleWM | 67.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 60 | NEXUS | 67.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 61 | DBYWAM | 67% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 62 | HZ-World | 66.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 63 | novasim | 66.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 64 | pg-0 | 66.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 65 | actionwam | 66% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 66 | FiveOneWorld | 65.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 67 | Double-robot-model | 65.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 68 | HappyWM | 65.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 69 | Cogito | 65.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 70 | MBot | 65.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 71 | kl team | 65.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 72 | flexible_wam | 65.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 73 | robo-hug | 65% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 74 | Vis-World | 64% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 75 | AuroraWorld | 62.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 76 | EvloutionWAM | 62.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 77 | PKU-ZRJ | 62.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 78 | GILWM | 62.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 79 | InvsWorld | 62.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 80 | Terra | 61.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 81 | DB_World | 54.8% | Official leaderboard |
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official WorldArena 2.0 leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
Versions
More in World models
- AgentWorldBench In use Language world models predict the next environment observation after an agent action, in 7 domains from MCP and search to Android and desktop OS. A judge model scores each prediction against the real observation on five dimensions. GPT-5.4 58.3
- IntPhys 2 In use Models watch simulated videos and judge whether each event is physically possible, testing object permanence, immutability, continuity and solidity. Scored by accuracy.
Muse Spark Open 68.3%
- QwenWorldBench Fading Models act as world models that simulate agent environments in 7 domains, such as terminal, web, and Android. A rubric judge scores five dimensions.
Qwen3.7-Plus 62.1%
- VPCT Fading Models view an image of a ball, ramps, and three buckets and predict which bucket the ball falls into. Scored by accuracy on 100 problems.
Gemini 3 Pro 91%
- ContPhy Fading Models infer physical properties such as mass and density of fluids and soft bodies from videos and predict their dynamics.
Seed2.0 Pro 67.4%
- RBench Only in system cards 650 image+text prompts for robot video generation (tasks and embodiments). MLLM judge scores task completion, physical plausibility, stability.
Wan 2.6 60.7%