Benchmark Almanac

WorldArena 2.0

WorldIncept 72.3% tops its leaderboard Code World Model (CWM) 69.5% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Extends WorldArena to visuotactile prediction, world models as RL environments, and simulated plus real multi-embodiment robot platforms.

Released
May 2026
Kind
Interactive world models
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last model added
September 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

World models have emerged as a central paradigm for embodied intelligence, enabling agents to predict action-conditioned future and reason about environmental dynamics. However, existing embodied world model benchmarks are still largely confined to vision-only prediction, offline embodied applications, and simulator-based evaluation, making them insufficient for assessing increasingly comprehensive world models. In this work, we introduce WorldArena 2.0, an expanded benchmark that systematically broadens embodied world model evaluation along three dimensions: modality, functionality, and platform. Along the modality dimension, WorldArena 2.0 extends evaluation from vision-only to visuotactile modalities, enabling assessment of multimodal perception and prediction. Along the functionality dimension, it extends beyond policy evaluation and planning to assess world models as interactive RL environments for policy optimization. Along the platform dimension, it moves beyond simulator-only evaluation to a diverse suite of simulated and real-world robotic settings across multiple embodiments. Under a standardized protocol, WorldArena 2.0 comprehensively evaluates perceptual quality, interactive utility, and cross-platform performance, providing a comprehensive testbed for tracking progress toward embodied world models. The project page including codes and demos is available at: https://world-arena.ai/.

Abstract of WorldArena 2.0: Extending Embodied World Model Benchmarking on Modality, Functionality and Platform (arXiv:2605.17912, CC0)
81
Entries on its own leaderboard, 1 model we track

WorldIncept tops the leaderboard with 72.3%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Code World Model (CWM), at 69.5%.

  1. 1 WorldIncept 72.3%
  2. 2 BWM-Turbo 71.5%
  3. 3 DWM 71.2%
  4. 4 Waterloo 71%
  5. 5 ActiFlow 70.8%
  6. 6 PrismWorld 70.7%
  7. 7 sonata-wm 70.6%
  8. 8 Concerto-AWM 70.6%
  9. 9 Snowl-WM 70.5%
  10. 10 K1-World 70.5%
  11. 11 Nora-WM 70.5%
  12. 12 Kairo-WM 70.4%
  13. 13 Scope-WM 70.4%
  14. 14 Hera-WM 70.3%
  15. 15 NexWorld 70.3%
  16. 16 Leto-WM 70.2%
  17. 17 Supervision_WM 70.2%
  18. 18 CAI-WM 70.1%
  19. 19 CR-World 70%
  20. 20 WMDLC 70%
  21. 21 Fant-WM 69.9%
  22. 22 Causal-AI 69.8%
  23. 23 SRKP 69.7%
  24. 24 WM-4600-cas 69.6%
  25. 25 Neoverse-Abot 69.5%
  26. 26 Code World Model (CWM) 69.5%
  27. 27 Watermelon_pp 69.4%
  28. 28 DXP-AR 69.4%
  29. 29 CCWM 69.4%
  30. 30 EmboVo 69.4%
  31. 31 FlowWAM_FiveAges 69.3%
  32. 32 Sleepy-Robot 69.3%
  33. 33 LepWM 69.2%
  34. 34 ME-world 69.2%
  35. 35 LPBot 69.1%
  36. 36 XIRRA-WM 69.1%
  37. 37 Heron-OpenWM 69.1%
  38. 38 GeWu 69%
  39. 39 T-Me 69%
  40. 40 TeleWM 69%
  41. 41 Eidomere 68.9%
  42. 42 KineWorld 68.9%
  43. 43 VegaWM 68.9%
  44. 44 Xp-0 68.8%
  45. 45 Pearl_wm 68.8%
  46. 46 DXP-Base 68.7%
  47. 47 Xperience-0 68.7%
  48. 48 DXP-Nano 68.7%
  49. 49 PolarisWM 68.7%
  50. 50 RiXin 68.7%
  51. 51 MotionForge 68.6%
  52. 52 X-WM-Open 68.6%
  53. 53 Kaiwu-WM 68.3%
  54. 54 polaris 68.2%
  55. 55 inception 68.1%
  56. 56 PAIWorld 68%
  57. 57 NiconicoNi 67.8%
  58. 58 World Native 67.8%
  59. 59 SimpleWM 67.7%
  60. 60 NEXUS 67.6%
  61. 61 DBYWAM 67%
  62. 62 HZ-World 66.5%
  63. 63 novasim 66.4%
  64. 64 pg-0 66.2%
  65. 65 actionwam 66%
  66. 66 FiveOneWorld 65.6%
  67. 67 Double-robot-model 65.6%
  68. 68 HappyWM 65.4%
  69. 69 Cogito 65.3%
  70. 70 MBot 65.2%
  71. 71 kl team 65.2%
  72. 72 flexible_wam 65.1%
  73. 73 robo-hug 65%
  74. 74 Vis-World 64%
  75. 75 AuroraWorld 62.9%
  76. 76 EvloutionWAM 62.8%
  77. 77 PKU-ZRJ 62.6%
  78. 78 GILWM 62.4%
  79. 79 InvsWorld 62.2%
  80. 80 Terra 61.3%
  81. 81 DB_World 54.8%

Source: Official WorldArena 2.0 leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 WorldIncept 72.3% Official leaderboard
2 BWM-Turbo 71.5% Official leaderboard
3 DWM 71.2% Official leaderboard
4 Waterloo 71% Official leaderboard
5 ActiFlow 70.8% Official leaderboard
6 PrismWorld 70.7% Official leaderboard
7 sonata-wm 70.6% Official leaderboard
8 Concerto-AWM 70.6% Official leaderboard
9 Snowl-WM 70.5% Official leaderboard
10 K1-World 70.5% Official leaderboard
11 Nora-WM 70.5% Official leaderboard
12 Kairo-WM 70.4% Official leaderboard
13 Scope-WM 70.4% Official leaderboard
14 Hera-WM 70.3% Official leaderboard
15 NexWorld 70.3% Official leaderboard
16 Leto-WM 70.2% Official leaderboard
17 Supervision_WM 70.2% Official leaderboard
18 CAI-WM 70.1% Official leaderboard
19 CR-World 70% Official leaderboard
20 WMDLC 70% Official leaderboard
21 Fant-WM 69.9% Official leaderboard
22 Causal-AI 69.8% Official leaderboard
23 SRKP 69.7% Official leaderboard
24 WM-4600-cas 69.6% Official leaderboard
25 Neoverse-Abot 69.5% Official leaderboard
26 Code World Model (CWM) 69.5% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
27 Watermelon_pp 69.4% Official leaderboard
28 DXP-AR 69.4% Official leaderboard
29 CCWM 69.4% Official leaderboard
30 EmboVo 69.4% Official leaderboard
31 FlowWAM_FiveAges 69.3% Official leaderboard
32 Sleepy-Robot 69.3% Official leaderboard
33 LepWM 69.2% Official leaderboard
34 ME-world 69.2% Official leaderboard
35 LPBot 69.1% Official leaderboard
36 XIRRA-WM 69.1% Official leaderboard
37 Heron-OpenWM 69.1% Official leaderboard
38 GeWu 69% Official leaderboard
39 T-Me 69% Official leaderboard
40 TeleWM 69% Official leaderboard
41 Eidomere 68.9% Official leaderboard
42 KineWorld 68.9% Official leaderboard
43 VegaWM 68.9% Official leaderboard
44 Xp-0 68.8% Official leaderboard
45 Pearl_wm 68.8% Official leaderboard
46 DXP-Base 68.7% Official leaderboard
47 Xperience-0 68.7% Official leaderboard
48 DXP-Nano 68.7% Official leaderboard
49 PolarisWM 68.7% Official leaderboard
50 RiXin 68.7% Official leaderboard
51 MotionForge 68.6% Official leaderboard
52 X-WM-Open 68.6% Official leaderboard
53 Kaiwu-WM 68.3% Official leaderboard
54 polaris 68.2% Official leaderboard
55 inception 68.1% Official leaderboard
56 PAIWorld 68% Official leaderboard
57 NiconicoNi 67.8% Official leaderboard
58 World Native 67.8% Official leaderboard
59 SimpleWM 67.7% Official leaderboard
60 NEXUS 67.6% Official leaderboard
61 DBYWAM 67% Official leaderboard
62 HZ-World 66.5% Official leaderboard
63 novasim 66.4% Official leaderboard
64 pg-0 66.2% Official leaderboard
65 actionwam 66% Official leaderboard
66 FiveOneWorld 65.6% Official leaderboard
67 Double-robot-model 65.6% Official leaderboard
68 HappyWM 65.4% Official leaderboard
69 Cogito 65.3% Official leaderboard
70 MBot 65.2% Official leaderboard
71 kl team 65.2% Official leaderboard
72 flexible_wam 65.1% Official leaderboard
73 robo-hug 65% Official leaderboard
74 Vis-World 64% Official leaderboard
75 AuroraWorld 62.9% Official leaderboard
76 EvloutionWAM 62.8% Official leaderboard
77 PKU-ZRJ 62.6% Official leaderboard
78 GILWM 62.4% Official leaderboard
79 InvsWorld 62.2% Official leaderboard
80 Terra 61.3% Official leaderboard
81 DB_World 54.8% Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Code World Model (CWM) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Code World Model (CWM)

Source: Official WorldArena 2.0 leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

Versions

More in World models

All 39 in World models
  • AgentWorldBench In use Language world models predict the next environment observation after an agent action, in 7 domains from MCP and search to Android and desktop OS. A judge model scores each prediction against the real observation on five dimensions. GPT-5.4 58.3
  • IntPhys 2 In use Models watch simulated videos and judge whether each event is physically possible, testing object permanence, immutability, continuity and solidity. Scored by accuracy. Muse Spark Open 68.3%
  • QwenWorldBench Fading Models act as world models that simulate agent environments in 7 domains, such as terminal, web, and Android. A rubric judge scores five dimensions. Qwen3.7-Plus 62.1%
  • VPCT Fading Models view an image of a ball, ramps, and three buckets and predict which bucket the ball falls into. Scored by accuracy on 100 problems. Gemini 3 Pro 91%
  • ContPhy Fading Models infer physical properties such as mass and density of fluids and soft bodies from videos and predict their dynamics. Seed2.0 Pro 67.4%
  • RBench Only in system cards 650 image+text prompts for robot video generation (tasks and embodiments). MLLM judge scores task completion, physical plausibility, stability. Wan 2.6 60.7%