Benchmark Almanac

GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7 places in the top three on 5 benchmarks.

Z.ai Released December 22nd, 2025 Family GLM-4 The lab's model card Compare with others
97
Benchmarks with a score
0
Ranked first, out of five or more models
5
In the top three
Z.ai Dec 2025

GLM-4.7

Open weights Flagship

143.3 #106 of 256
Epoch Capabilities Index
Self-Reported Index 148.0 #106 of 404
  • Terminal-Bench 2.0 33.4% #30 /43
  • Toolathlon 23.8% #37 /50
  • GPQA Diamond 83.3% #87 /229

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
LMArena (Elo) 1,441 #77 of 335 Official leaderboard
MMLU-Pro 84.3% #40 of 167 Lab model card
AMemGym 47.8% #3 of 11 Official leaderboard
Structured Output Benchmark 86.1% #6 of 19 Official leaderboard
EQ-Bench 3 1,463 #26 of 78 Official leaderboard
Humanity's Last Exam 42.8% #60 of 154 Lab model card
Judgemark v2.1 77.5 #17 of 42 Official leaderboard
SEA-HELM 71.5 #30 of 71 Official leaderboard
Longform Creative Writing (EQ-Bench) 66.0 #52 of 119 Official leaderboard
HUMAINE 29 #22 of 50 Official leaderboard
Creative Writing v3 70.2 #54 of 120 Official leaderboard
DesignArena ASCII Art 1,160 #40 of 77 Official leaderboard
StudyArena Text 1,221 #54 of 85 Official leaderboard
LOCA-Bench 5.30% #6 of 9 Official leaderboard
CL-bench 15.9% #17 of 24 Official leaderboard
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (2025 dataset) 11.7% #75 of 104 Official leaderboard
SimpleQA Verified 32.2% #68 of 94 Epoch AI run
CL-bench Life 10.9% #12 of 16 Official leaderboard

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
AIME 2025 95.7% #22 of 143 Lab model card
HMMT 2025 97.1% #9 of 54 Lab model card
HMMT Nov 2025 93.5% #9 of 28 Lab model card
General365 57.4% #8 of 23 Official leaderboard
GPQA Diamond 83.3% #87 of 229 Epoch AI run
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 83.3% #92 of 212 Epoch AI run
IMO-AnswerBench 82% #20 of 37 Lab model card
SimpleBench 47.7% #62 of 106 Official leaderboard
ProofBench 6.00% #49 of 59 Official leaderboard
FrontierMath 2.44% #47 of 55 Official leaderboard
FrontierMath Tier 4 0% #53 of 55 Epoch AI run

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
LiveCodeBench v6 84.9% #21 of 90 Lab model card
SWE-bench Verified 73.8% #54 of 155 Lab model card
DataPrep-Bench Math 25.3 #2 of 5 Official leaderboard
Bird-SQL 62.9% #6 of 13 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Website 1,219 #72 of 151 Official leaderboard
CF-Div2-Stepfun 74.1% #4 of 8 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Code 1,207 #72 of 143 Official leaderboard
DesignArena 3D Design 1,173 #69 of 136 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Game Dev 1,178 #75 of 143 Official leaderboard
DesignArena UI Component 1,190 #75 of 139 Official leaderboard
WebDev Arena 1,435 #60 of 105 arena.ai, via Epoch AI
OTelBench 13% #8 of 14 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Data Visualization 1,193 #70 of 118 Official leaderboard
DataPrep-Bench Finance 53.3 #3 of 5 Official leaderboard
DataPrep-Bench Science 23.5 #3 of 5 Official leaderboard
Code Arena 1,435 #77 of 128 Official leaderboard
DesignArena SVG 1,133 #64 of 103 Official leaderboard
IOI (Vals) 7.58% #35 of 55 Official leaderboard
LiveSQLBench 20.3% #25 of 36 Official leaderboard
SWE-bench Multilingual 66.7% #51 of 73 Lab model card
ABC-Bench 40.1% #5 of 7 Official leaderboard
PRDBench 38.4% #3 of 4 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Android (Kotlin) 1,097 #36 of 46 Official leaderboard
DesignArena React Native 1,099 #44 of 56 Official leaderboard
OpenHands Index 42.3% #26 of 33 Official leaderboard
DataPrep-Bench Medical 34.2 #4 of 5 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Agentic Overall 1,055 #60 of 74 Official leaderboard
FeatureBench 41.2% #13 of 16 Official leaderboard
FeatureBench Lite 41.2% #13 of 16 Official leaderboard
ALE-Bench 1,011 #107 of 126 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Full Stack 1,028 #42 of 49 Official leaderboard
OJBench 50.8% #7 of 8 Official leaderboard
PostTrainBench 7.48% #21 of 23 Official leaderboard
DataPrep-Bench General 77.3 #5 of 5 Official leaderboard
DataPrep-Bench Law 73.1 #5 of 5 Official leaderboard
CC-Bench-V2 Backend 19.6% #3 of 3 Official leaderboard
CC-Bench-V2 Large Repo Exploration 47.8% #3 of 3 Official leaderboard

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Terminal-Bench Hard 33.3% #2 of 13 Lab model card
tau2-bench 87.4% #20 of 79 Lab model card
SnakeBench 26 #70 of 188 Official leaderboard
BrowseComp-ZH 66.6% #9 of 19 Lab model card
OpenThoughts-TBLite 67.7% #2 of 4 Official leaderboard
BrowseComp 67.5% #50 of 81 Lab model card
VITA-Bench 18.3% #12 of 18 Official leaderboard
LisanBench 197.0 #90 of 133 Official leaderboard
Chess Puzzles 21% #64 of 93 Epoch AI run
Terminal-Bench 2.0 33.4% #30 of 43 Official leaderboard
Toolathlon 23.8% #37 of 50 Official leaderboard
ClawProBench 54.6% #38 of 49 Official leaderboard
Pencil Puzzle Bench 0% #44 of 53 Official leaderboard
RWSearch 69% #6 of 7 Official leaderboard
MCP Atlas 58.1% #32 of 37 Official leaderboard
BalatroBench 3.07 #15 of 16 Official leaderboard

Professional work

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Vals Finance Agent v1 41.9% #17 of 47 Official leaderboard
LegalBench 83.4% #55 of 138 Official leaderboard
ProfBench 46.6% #39 of 72 Official leaderboard
CaseLaw v2 54.9% #37 of 53 Official leaderboard
TaxEval v2 68.8% #91 of 129 Official leaderboard
Vending-Bench 2 $2,377 #49 of 67 Official leaderboard
Vals Finance Agent 46% #36 of 49 Official leaderboard
MedCode 32.8% #80 of 96 Official leaderboard
CorpFin v2 46.4% #101 of 119 Official leaderboard
MedScribe 68.6% #87 of 97 Official leaderboard

Vision, audio and robotics

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MineBench 1,100 #62 of 75 Official leaderboard

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
BinaryAudit 24.6% #9 of 20 Official leaderboard
nocot-bench (NCRI) 71.3 #91 of 185 Official leaderboard
KORA 25.2% #30 of 42 Official leaderboard
CyberGym 23.5% #25 of 34 Official leaderboard

Its lab's numbers put it at 148.0, 4.8 points above its ECI

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 15 capability results Z.ai reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 146.1 to 150.0. How we compute it.

Its lab's numbers next to 2 leaderboards

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
Terminal-Bench 2.0 41% Terminal Bench 2.0 33.4% Leaderboard, Terminus 2 +7.6 pts
GPQA Diamond 85.7% GPQA-Diamond 83.3% Epoch AI run +2.4 pts

Z.ai's models over time

Z.ai's models in color, against every other model on the Epoch Capabilities Index, by release date.

50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 GLM-5.3-Flash GLM-5 50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 GLM-5.3-Flash GLM-4.7

Source: Epoch Capabilities Index, Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.