BrowseComp-ZH
Agents browse the Chinese web to answer 289 multi-hop questions with short, verifiable answers. Scored by accuracy.
- Released
- April 2025
- Kind
- Deep research
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B #77 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- February 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- March 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
As large language models (LLMs) evolve into tool-using agents, the ability to browse the web in real-time has become a critical yardstick for measuring their reasoning and retrieval competence. Existing benchmarks such as BrowseComp concentrate on English and overlook the linguistic, infrastructural, and censorship-related complexities of other major information ecosystems – most notably Chinese. To address this gap, we introduce BrowseComp-ZH, a high-difficulty benchmark purpose-built to comprehensively evaluate LLM agents on the Chinese web. BrowseComp-ZH consists of 289 multi-hop questions spanning 11 diverse domains. Each question is reverse-engineered from a short, objective, and easily verifiable answer (e.g., a date, number, or proper noun). A two-stage quality control protocol is applied to strive for high question difficulty and answer uniqueness. We benchmark over 20 state-of-the-art language models and agentic search systems on our proposed BrowseComp-ZH. Despite their strong conversational and retrieval capabilities, most models struggle severely: a large number achieve accuracy rates below 10%, and only a handful exceed 20%. Even the best-performing system, OpenAI's DeepResearch, reaches just 42.9%. These results demonstrate the considerable difficulty of BrowseComp-ZH, where success demands not only effective retrieval strategies, but also sophisticated reasoning and information reconciliation – capabilities that current models still struggle to master. Our dataset, construction guidelines, and benchmark results have been publicly released at https://github.com/PALIN2018/BrowseComp-ZH.
Seed2.0 Pro leads with 82.4% among models released by February 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
OpenAI deep research leads with 42.9% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Seed2.0 Pro leads with 82.4%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in February 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 82.4
Seed2.0 Pro
- 81.3
Seed1.8
- 77.7
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
- 73.7
Step 3.5 Flash
- 72.7 GLM-5
- 70.3
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 69.9
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 69.5
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 66.6 GLM-4.7
- 65.0
DeepSeek-V3.2
- 64.7
ERNIE 5.0
- 62.3 Kimi K2 Thinking
- 62.1
Qwen3.5-27B
- 51.2 Grok 4 Fast
- 50.5
UI-TARS-2
- 49.2
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 48.5
MiniMax-M2
- 47.9
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
- 45.0
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
- 1
Seed2.0 Pro 82.4%
- 2
Seed1.8 81.3%
- 3
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 77.7%
- 4
Step 3.5 Flash 73.7%
- 5 GLM-5 72.7%
- 6
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 70.3%
- 7
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 69.9%
- 8
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 69.5%
- 9 GLM-4.7 66.6%
- 10
DeepSeek-V3.2 65%
- 11
ERNIE 5.0 64.7%
- 12 Kimi K2 Thinking 62.3%
- 13
Qwen3.5-27B 62.1%
- 14 Grok 4 Fast 51.2%
- 15
UI-TARS-2 50.5%
- 16
DeepSeek-V3.1 49.2%
- 17
MiniMax-M2 48.5%
- 18
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp 47.9%
- 19
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus 45%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 OpenAI deep research reasoning: -; browsing: Yes 42.9%
- 2 o1 reasoning: Yes; browsing: No 29.1%
- 3 Claude 3.7 Sonnet reasoning: Yes; browsing: No 17.7%
- 4 o4-mini reasoning: Yes; browsing: No 15.2%
- 5
Qwen3-235B-A22B reasoning: Yes; browsing: No 13.2%
- 6
QwQ-32B reasoning: Yes; browsing: No 11.1%
- 7
Qwen2.5-Max reasoning: No; browsing: No 7.60%
- 8
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025, reasoning: No; browsing: No 6.90%
- 9
Qwen2.5-72B reasoning: No; browsing: No 6.60%
Source: Official BrowseComp-ZH leaderboard
- 82.4
Seed2.0 Pro
- 81.3
Seed1.8
- 77.7
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
- 73.7
Step 3.5 Flash
- 72.7 GLM-5
- 70.3
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 69.9
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 69.5
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 66.6 GLM-4.7
- 65.0
DeepSeek-V3.2
- 64.7
ERNIE 5.0
- 62.3 Kimi K2 Thinking
- 62.1
Qwen3.5-27B
- 51.2 Grok 4 Fast
- 50.5
UI-TARS-2
- 49.2
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 48.5
MiniMax-M2
- 47.9
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
- 45.0
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
- 42.9 OpenAI deep research
- 29.1 o1
- 17.7 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 15.2 o4-mini
- 13.2
Qwen3-235B-A22B
- 11.1
QwQ-32B
- 7.60
Qwen2.5-Max
- 6.90
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 6.60
Qwen2.5-72B
- 1
Seed2.0 Pro 82.4%
- 2
Seed1.8 81.3%
- 3
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 77.7%
- 4
Step 3.5 Flash 73.7%
- 5 GLM-5 72.7%
- 6
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 70.3%
- 7
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 69.9%
- 8
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 69.5%
- 9 GLM-4.7 66.6%
- 10
DeepSeek-V3.2 65%
- 11
ERNIE 5.0 64.7%
- 12 Kimi K2 Thinking 62.3%
- 13
Qwen3.5-27B 62.1%
- 14 Grok 4 Fast 51.2%
- 15
UI-TARS-2 50.5%
- 16
DeepSeek-V3.1 49.2%
- 17
MiniMax-M2 48.5%
- 18
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp 47.9%
- 19
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus 45%
- 20 OpenAI deep research reasoning: -; browsing: Yes 42.9%
- 21 o1 reasoning: Yes; browsing: No 29.1%
- 22 Claude 3.7 Sonnet reasoning: Yes; browsing: No 17.7%
- 23 o4-mini reasoning: Yes; browsing: No 15.2%
- 24
Qwen3-235B-A22B reasoning: Yes; browsing: No 13.2%
- 25
QwQ-32B reasoning: Yes; browsing: No 11.1%
- 26
Qwen2.5-Max reasoning: No; browsing: No 7.60%
- 27
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025, reasoning: No; browsing: No 6.90%
- 28
Qwen2.5-72B reasoning: No; browsing: No 6.60%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official BrowseComp-ZH leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 82.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 81.3% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 77.7% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 73.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | GLM-5 | 72.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 70.3% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 69.9% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 69.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | GLM-4.7 | 66.6% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 65% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 64.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | Kimi K2 Thinking | 62.3% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 62.1% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | Grok 4 Fast | 51.2% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 50.5% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 49.2% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 48.5% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 47.9% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 45% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenAI deep research | 42.9% | reasoning: -; browsing: Yes | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | o1 | 29.1% | reasoning: Yes; browsing: No | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 17.7% | reasoning: Yes; browsing: No | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | o4-mini | 15.2% | reasoning: Yes; browsing: No | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 13.2% | reasoning: Yes; browsing: No | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 11.1% | reasoning: Yes; browsing: No | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 7.60% | reasoning: No; browsing: No | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 6.90% | reasoning: No; browsing: No | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 6.60% | reasoning: No; browsing: No | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 82.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 81.3% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 77.7% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 73.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | GLM-5 | 72.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 70.3% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 69.9% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 69.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | GLM-4.7 | 66.6% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 65% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 64.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | Kimi K2 Thinking | 62.3% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 62.1% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | Grok 4 Fast | 51.2% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 50.5% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 49.2% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 48.5% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 47.9% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 45% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | OpenAI deep research | 42.9% | reasoning: -; browsing: Yes | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | o1 | 29.1% | reasoning: Yes; browsing: No | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 17.7% | reasoning: Yes; browsing: No | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | o4-mini | 15.2% | reasoning: Yes; browsing: No | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | | 13.2% | reasoning: Yes; browsing: No | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | | 11.1% | reasoning: Yes; browsing: No | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | | 7.60% | reasoning: No; browsing: No | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | | 6.90% | reasoning: No; browsing: No | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | | 6.60% | reasoning: No; browsing: No | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 23 entries, 9 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
7 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in April 2025 Number one over time 8 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official BrowseComp-ZH leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official BrowseComp-ZH leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in February 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2026 | 69.5 | Browsecomp-zh | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 62.1 | Browsecomp-zh | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 69.9 | Browsecomp-zh | |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 70.3 | BrowseComp-zh | |
| Feb 14, 2026 | 82.4 | BrowseComp-zh | |
| Feb 11, 2026 | GLM-5 | 72.7 | BrowseComp-Zh |
| Feb 6, 2026 | 64.7 | BrowseComp-zh | |
| Feb 2, 2026 | 73.7 | Best of BrowseComp-ZH 66.9 / BrowseComp-ZH (w/ Context Manager) 73.7 | |
| Jan 14, 2026 | 77.7 | Best of BrowseComp-zh (Pass@1, 24 answers revised) 69.0 / with context management 77.7 | |
| Dec 22, 2025 | GLM-4.7 | 66.6 | BrowseComp-Zh |
| Dec 18, 2025 | 81.3 | BrowseComp-zh | |
| Dec 1, 2025 | 65 | BrowseCompZh (Pass@1) | |
| Nov 6, 2025 | Kimi K2 Thinking | 62.3 | BrowseComp-ZH, w/ tools |
| Oct 27, 2025 | 48.5 | BrowseComp-zh | |
| Sep 29, 2025 | 47.9 | BrowseComp-zh | |
| Sep 22, 2025 | 45 | BrowseComp-zh | |
| Sep 19, 2025 | Grok 4 Fast | 51.2 | BrowseComp (zh) pass@1 |
| Sep 2, 2025 | 50.5 | BC-zh 32.1 GUI-only (50.5 with GUI-SDK) | |
| Aug 21, 2025 | 49.2 | BrowseComp_zh |
8 system cards report it, from 6 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 81.3 | BrowseComp-zh (Table 4). The 2.3 text says 78.5 | Capabilities |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GLM-5 technical report | 72.7 | BrowseComp-ZH (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 82.4 | BrowseComp-zh, search agent (Table 11) | Capabilities |
| Feb 11, 2026 | | 66.9 | BrowseComp-ZH, avg@3 (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Feb 4, 2026 | | 64.7 | BrowseComp-zh (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jan 23, 2026 | | 77.7 | BrowseComp-zh (Pass@1), 24 answers revised, with context management (Table 2). Without context management 69.0 | Capabilities |
| Dec 1, 2025 | | 65 | BrowseCompZh (Pass@1), DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Sep 29, 2025 | | 47.9 | BrowseComp_zh (Acc.), search agent, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp (Table 1) | Capabilities |
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%