Benchmark Almanac

BrowseComp-ZH

Seed2.0 Pro 82.4% leads since February 2026
OpenAI deep research 42.9% leads since April 2025
Seed2.0 Pro 82.4% leads since February 2026
Fading

Agents browse the Chinese web to answer 289 multi-hop questions with short, verifiable answers. Scored by accuracy.

Released
April 2025
Kind
Deep research
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B #77 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
February 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
March 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

As large language models (LLMs) evolve into tool-using agents, the ability to browse the web in real-time has become a critical yardstick for measuring their reasoning and retrieval competence. Existing benchmarks such as BrowseComp concentrate on English and overlook the linguistic, infrastructural, and censorship-related complexities of other major information ecosystems – most notably Chinese. To address this gap, we introduce BrowseComp-ZH, a high-difficulty benchmark purpose-built to comprehensively evaluate LLM agents on the Chinese web. BrowseComp-ZH consists of 289 multi-hop questions spanning 11 diverse domains. Each question is reverse-engineered from a short, objective, and easily verifiable answer (e.g., a date, number, or proper noun). A two-stage quality control protocol is applied to strive for high question difficulty and answer uniqueness. We benchmark over 20 state-of-the-art language models and agentic search systems on our proposed BrowseComp-ZH. Despite their strong conversational and retrieval capabilities, most models struggle severely: a large number achieve accuracy rates below 10%, and only a handful exceed 20%. Even the best-performing system, OpenAI's DeepResearch, reaches just 42.9%. These results demonstrate the considerable difficulty of BrowseComp-ZH, where success demands not only effective retrieval strategies, but also sophisticated reasoning and information reconciliation – capabilities that current models still struggle to master. Our dataset, construction guidelines, and benchmark results have been publicly released at https://github.com/PALIN2018/BrowseComp-ZH.

Abstract of BrowseComp-ZH: Benchmarking Web Browsing Ability of Large Language Models in Chinese (arXiv:2504.19314, CC0)
19
Models scored in lab cards
19
Launch posts list it, from 10 labs
8
System cards report it, from 6 labs

Seed2.0 Pro leads with 82.4% among models released by February 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

OpenAI deep research leads with 42.9% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Seed2.0 Pro leads with 82.4%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in February 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Seed2.0 Pro 82.4%
  2. 2 Seed1.8 81.3%
  3. 3 LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 77.7%
  4. 4 Step 3.5 Flash 73.7%
  5. 5 GLM-5 72.7%
  6. 6 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 70.3%
  7. 7 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 69.9%
  8. 8 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 69.5%
  9. 9 GLM-4.7 66.6%
  10. 10 DeepSeek-V3.2 65%
  11. 11 ERNIE 5.0 64.7%
  12. 12 Kimi K2 Thinking 62.3%
  13. 13 Qwen3.5-27B 62.1%
  14. 14 Grok 4 Fast 51.2%
  15. 15 UI-TARS-2 50.5%
  16. 16 DeepSeek-V3.1 49.2%
  17. 17 MiniMax-M2 48.5%
  18. 18 DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp 47.9%
  19. 19 DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus 45%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Sources: Labs’ model cards and official BrowseComp-ZH leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.0 Pro 82.4% Feb 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed1.8 81.3% Dec 2025 Lab model card
3 LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 77.7% Jan 2026 Lab model card
4 Step 3.5 Flash 73.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
5 GLM-5 72.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
6 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 70.3% Feb 2026 Lab model card
7 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 69.9% Feb 2026 Lab model card
8 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 69.5% Feb 2026 Lab model card
9 GLM-4.7 66.6% Dec 2025 Lab model card
10 DeepSeek-V3.2 65% Dec 2025 Lab model card
11 ERNIE 5.0 64.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
12 Kimi K2 Thinking 62.3% Nov 2025 Lab model card
13 Qwen3.5-27B 62.1% Feb 2026 Lab model card
14 Grok 4 Fast 51.2% Sep 2025 Lab model card
15 UI-TARS-2 50.5% Sep 2025 Lab model card
16 DeepSeek-V3.1 49.2% Aug 2025 Lab model card
17 MiniMax-M2 48.5% Oct 2025 Lab model card
18 DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp 47.9% Sep 2025 Lab model card
19 DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus 45% Sep 2025 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 OpenAI deep research 42.9% reasoning: -; browsing: Yes Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
2 o1 29.1% reasoning: Yes; browsing: No Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 17.7% reasoning: Yes; browsing: No Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
4 o4-mini 15.2% reasoning: Yes; browsing: No Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3-235B-A22B 13.2% reasoning: Yes; browsing: No Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
6 QwQ-32B 11.1% reasoning: Yes; browsing: No Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen2.5-Max 7.60% reasoning: No; browsing: No Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 6.90% reasoning: No; browsing: No Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen2.5-72B 6.60% reasoning: No; browsing: No Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.0 Pro 82.4% Feb 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed1.8 81.3% Dec 2025 Lab model card
3 LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 77.7% Jan 2026 Lab model card
4 Step 3.5 Flash 73.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
5 GLM-5 72.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
6 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 70.3% Feb 2026 Lab model card
7 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 69.9% Feb 2026 Lab model card
8 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 69.5% Feb 2026 Lab model card
9 GLM-4.7 66.6% Dec 2025 Lab model card
10 DeepSeek-V3.2 65% Dec 2025 Lab model card
11 ERNIE 5.0 64.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
12 Kimi K2 Thinking 62.3% Nov 2025 Lab model card
13 Qwen3.5-27B 62.1% Feb 2026 Lab model card
14 Grok 4 Fast 51.2% Sep 2025 Lab model card
15 UI-TARS-2 50.5% Sep 2025 Lab model card
16 DeepSeek-V3.1 49.2% Aug 2025 Lab model card
17 MiniMax-M2 48.5% Oct 2025 Lab model card
18 DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp 47.9% Sep 2025 Lab model card
19 DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus 45% Sep 2025 Lab model card
20 OpenAI deep research 42.9% reasoning: -; browsing: Yes Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
21 o1 29.1% reasoning: Yes; browsing: No Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
22 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 17.7% reasoning: Yes; browsing: No Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
23 o4-mini 15.2% reasoning: Yes; browsing: No Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
24 Qwen3-235B-A22B 13.2% reasoning: Yes; browsing: No Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
25 QwQ-32B 11.1% reasoning: Yes; browsing: No Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
26 Qwen2.5-Max 7.60% reasoning: No; browsing: No Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
27 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 6.90% reasoning: No; browsing: No Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
28 Qwen2.5-72B 6.60% reasoning: No; browsing: No Sep 2024 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 23 entries, 9 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

7 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in April 2025 Number one over time 8 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI DeepSeek ByteDance Seed xAI Moonshot AI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2025
Lab claims Not tested since Mar 2026
Seed2.0 Pro 82.4%

Sources: Official BrowseComp-ZH leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro DeepSeek-V3.2 Grok 4 Fast OpenAI deep research o1 Qwen2.5-72B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro DeepSeek-V3.2

Sources: Official BrowseComp-ZH leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in February 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

DeepSeek
ByteDance Seed
xAI
MiniMax
Moonshot AI
Z.ai
Meituan
StepFun
Baidu
Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 69.5 Browsecomp-zh
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-27B 62.1 Browsecomp-zh
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 69.9 Browsecomp-zh
Feb 16, 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 70.3 BrowseComp-zh
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 82.4 BrowseComp-zh
Feb 11, 2026 GLM-5 72.7 BrowseComp-Zh
Feb 6, 2026 ERNIE 5.0 64.7 BrowseComp-zh
Feb 2, 2026 Step 3.5 Flash 73.7 Best of BrowseComp-ZH 66.9 / BrowseComp-ZH (w/ Context Manager) 73.7
Jan 14, 2026 LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 77.7 Best of BrowseComp-zh (Pass@1, 24 answers revised) 69.0 / with context management 77.7
Dec 22, 2025 GLM-4.7 66.6 BrowseComp-Zh
Dec 18, 2025 Seed1.8 81.3 BrowseComp-zh
Dec 1, 2025 DeepSeek-V3.2 65 BrowseCompZh (Pass@1)
Nov 6, 2025 Kimi K2 Thinking 62.3 BrowseComp-ZH, w/ tools
Oct 27, 2025 MiniMax-M2 48.5 BrowseComp-zh
Sep 29, 2025 DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp 47.9 BrowseComp-zh
Sep 22, 2025 DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus 45 BrowseComp-zh
Sep 19, 2025 Grok 4 Fast 51.2 BrowseComp (zh) pass@1
Sep 2, 2025 UI-TARS-2 50.5 BC-zh 32.1 GUI-only (50.5 with GUI-SDK)
Aug 21, 2025 DeepSeek-V3.1 49.2 BrowseComp_zh

8 system cards report it, from 6 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Mar 21, 2026 Seed1.8 model card 81.3 BrowseComp-zh (Table 4). The 2.3 text says 78.5 Capabilities
Feb 17, 2026 GLM-5 technical report 72.7 BrowseComp-ZH (Table 7) Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 82.4 BrowseComp-zh, search agent (Table 11) Capabilities
Feb 11, 2026 Step 3.5 Flash technical report 66.9 BrowseComp-ZH, avg@3 (Table 5) Capabilities
Feb 4, 2026 ERNIE 5.0 technical report 64.7 BrowseComp-zh (Table 2) Capabilities
Jan 23, 2026 LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 technical report 77.7 BrowseComp-zh (Pass@1), 24 answers revised, with context management (Table 2). Without context management 69.0 Capabilities
Dec 1, 2025 DeepSeek-V3.2 technical report 65 BrowseCompZh (Pass@1), DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Sep 29, 2025 DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp technical report 47.9 BrowseComp_zh (Acc.), search agent, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp (Table 1) Capabilities

More in Tool use

All 144 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%