Toolathlon
108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state.
Verified final release June 30th, 2026. Do not mix with original-version scores.
- Made by
- HKUST NLP
- Released
- October 2025
- Kind
- Apps and MCP servers
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Fable 5 #11 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- July 2026
- Last model added
- July 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Real-world language agents must handle complex, multi-step workflows across diverse Apps. For instance, an agent may manage emails by coordinating with calendars and file systems, or monitor a production database to detect anomalies and generate reports following an operating manual. However, existing language agent benchmarks often focus on narrow domains or simplified tasks that lack the diversity, realism, and long-horizon complexity required to evaluate agents' real-world performance. To address this gap, we introduce the Tool Decathlon (dubbed as Toolathlon), a benchmark for language agents offering diverse Apps and tools, realistic environment setup, and reliable execution-based evaluation. Toolathlon spans 32 software applications and 604 tools, ranging from everyday platforms such as Google Calendar and Notion to professional ones like WooCommerce, Kubernetes, and BigQuery. Most of the tools are based on a high-quality set of Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers that we may have revised or implemented ourselves. Unlike prior works, which primarily ensure functional realism but offer limited environment state diversity, we provide realistic initial environment states from real software, such as Canvas courses with dozens of students or real financial spreadsheets. This benchmark includes 108 manually sourced or crafted tasks in total, requiring interacting with multiple Apps over around 20 turns on average to complete. Each task is strictly verifiable through dedicated evaluation scripts. Comprehensive evaluation of SOTA models highlights their significant shortcomings: the best-performing model, Claude-4.5-Sonnet, achieves only a 38.6% success rate with 20.2 tool calling turns on average, while the top open-weights model DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp reaches 20.1%. We expect Toolathlon to drive the development of more capable language agents for real-world, long-horizon task execution.
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads with 56.5% among models released by May 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
Claude Fable 5 leads with 61.7%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in May 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 15 more
- 56.5
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 55.6 GPT-5.5
- 54.6 GPT-5.4
- 52.8 Claude Opus 4.7
- 52.8
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 51.9 GPT-5.3 Codex
- 50.0 Kimi K2.6
- 49.4
Gemini 3 Flash
- 48.8
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 48.2
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 47.2 Claude Opus 4.6
- 46.3
MiniMax-M2.7
- 44.8 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 43.8 GPT-5.2
- 43.5 Claude Opus 4.5
- 42.9 GPT-5.4 Mini
- 40.7
MiniMax-M2.1
- 40.7 GLM-5.1
- 39.8
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 39.2 GLM-5
- 38.9 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 38.3
MiniMax-M2.5
- 38.3
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 37.7 GPT-5
- 37.7
Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)
- 37.0 GPT-5.1
- 36.4
Gemini 3 Pro
- 35.5 GPT-5.4 Nano
- 35.2
DeepSeek-V3.2
- 31.5
Qwen3.5-27B
- 29.9 Claude Sonnet 4
- 28.7
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 27.8 Kimi K2.5
- 27.5 Grok 4
- 26.9
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 26.2 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 23.8 GLM-4.7
- 20.1
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
- 18.8 GLM-4.6
- 18.5 grok-code-fast-1
- 18.5 Grok 4 Fast
- 17.6 Kimi K2 Thinking
- 17.0 o3
- 14.8 o4-mini
- 14.5
Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B
- 14.5 GPT-5 mini
- 14.2
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- 13.0 Kimi K2
- 10.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 3.70
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 1
Gemini 3.5 Flash 56.5%
- 2 GPT-5.5 xhigh 55.6%
- 3 GPT-5.4 xhigh 54.6%
- 4 Claude Opus 4.7 52.8%
- 5
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 52.8%
- 6 GPT-5.3 Codex 51.9%
- 7 Kimi K2.6 50%
- 8
Gemini 3 Flash 49.4%
- 9
Gemini 3.1 Pro 48.8%
- 10
DeepSeek-V4-Flash max 48.2%
- 11 Claude Opus 4.6 47.2%
- 12
MiniMax-M2.7 46.3%
- 13 Claude Sonnet 4.6 44.8%
- 14 GPT-5.2 xhigh 43.8%
- 15 Claude Opus 4.5 43.5%
- 16 GPT-5.4 Mini 42.9%
- 17
MiniMax-M2.1 40.7%
- 18 GLM-5.1 40.7%
- 19
Qwen 3.6 Plus 39.8%
- 20 GLM-5 39.2%
- 21 Claude Sonnet 4.5 38.9%
- 22
MiniMax-M2.5 38.3%
- 23
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 38.3%
- 24 GPT-5 high 37.7%
- 25
Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B) 37.7%
- 26 GPT-5.1 37%
- 27
Gemini 3 Pro 36.4%
- 28 GPT-5.4 Nano xhigh 35.5%
- 29
DeepSeek-V3.2 35.2%
- 30
Qwen3.5-27B 31.5%
- 31 Claude Sonnet 4 29.9%
- 32
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 28.7%
- 33 Kimi K2.5 27.8%
- 34 Grok 4 27.5%
- 35
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 26.9%
- 36 Claude Haiku 4.5 26.2%
- 37 GLM-4.7 23.8%
- 38
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp 20.1%
- 39 GLM-4.6 18.8%
- 40 grok-code-fast-1 18.5%
- 41 Grok 4 Fast 18.5%
- 42 Kimi K2 Thinking 17.6%
- 43 o3 17%
- 44 o4-mini 14.8%
- 45
Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 14.5%
- 46 GPT-5 mini 14.5%
- 47
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 14.2%
- 48 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 13%
- 49
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 10.5%
- 50
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 3.70%
Source: Official Toolathlon leaderboard
- 61.7 Claude Fable 5
- 59.9 Claude Opus 4.8
- 58.0 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 56.5
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 55.6 GPT-5.5
- 54.6 GPT-5.4
- 54.3 Claude Sonnet 5
- 53.4 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 53.1 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 52.8 Claude Opus 4.7
- 52.8
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 51.9 GPT-5.3 Codex
- 50.6
Seed2.1 Pro
- 50.0 Kimi K2.6
- 49.5
Step 3.7 Flash
- 49.4
Gemini 3 Flash
- 48.8
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 48.5
Tencent Hy3
- 48.2
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 48.2 GLM-5.2
- 47.2 Claude Opus 4.6
- 46.3
MiniMax-M2.7
- 44.8 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 43.8 GPT-5.2
- 43.5 Claude Opus 4.5
- 43.5
MiniMax-M2.1
- 42.9 GPT-5.4 Mini
- 40.7 GLM-5.1
- 39.8
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 39.2 GLM-5
- 38.9 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 38.3
MiniMax-M2.5
- 38.3
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 37.7 GPT-5
- 37.7
Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B)
- 37.0 GPT-5.1
- 36.4
Gemini 3 Pro
- 35.5 GPT-5.4 Nano
- 35.2
DeepSeek-V3.2
- 31.5
Qwen3.5-27B
- 29.9 Claude Sonnet 4
- 28.7
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 27.8 Kimi K2.5
- 27.5 Grok 4
- 26.9
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 26.2 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 23.8 GLM-4.7
- 20.1
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
- 18.8 GLM-4.6
- 18.8
MiniMax-M2
- 18.5 grok-code-fast-1
- 18.5 Grok 4 Fast
- 17.6 Kimi K2 Thinking
- 17.0 o3
- 14.8 o4-mini
- 14.5
Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B
- 14.5 GPT-5 mini
- 14.2
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- 13.0 Kimi K2
- 10.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 3.70
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 1 Claude Fable 5 61.7%
- 2 Claude Opus 4.8 59.9%
- 3 GPT-5.6 Sol 58%
- 4
Gemini 3.5 Flash 56.5%
- 5 GPT-5.5 xhigh 55.6%
- 6 GPT-5.4 xhigh 54.6%
- 7 Claude Sonnet 5 54.3%
- 8 GPT-5.6 Luna 53.4%
- 9 GPT-5.6 Terra 53.1%
- 10 Claude Opus 4.7 52.8%
- 11
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 52.8%
- 12 GPT-5.3 Codex 51.9%
- 13
Seed2.1 Pro 50.6%
- 14 Kimi K2.6 50%
- 15
Step 3.7 Flash 49.5%
- 16
Gemini 3 Flash 49.4%
- 17
Gemini 3.1 Pro 48.8%
- 18
Tencent Hy3 48.5%
- 19
DeepSeek-V4-Flash max 48.2%
- 20 GLM-5.2 48.2%
- 21 Claude Opus 4.6 47.2%
- 22
MiniMax-M2.7 46.3%
- 23 Claude Sonnet 4.6 44.8%
- 24 GPT-5.2 xhigh 43.8%
- 25 Claude Opus 4.5 43.5%
- 26
MiniMax-M2.1 43.5%
- 27 GPT-5.4 Mini 42.9%
- 28 GLM-5.1 40.7%
- 29
Qwen 3.6 Plus 39.8%
- 30 GLM-5 39.2%
- 31 Claude Sonnet 4.5 38.9%
- 32
MiniMax-M2.5 38.3%
- 33
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 38.3%
- 34 GPT-5 high 37.7%
- 35
Qwen 3.5 Plus (hosted 397B-A17B) 37.7%
- 36 GPT-5.1 37%
- 37
Gemini 3 Pro 36.4%
- 38 GPT-5.4 Nano xhigh 35.5%
- 39
DeepSeek-V3.2 35.2%
- 40
Qwen3.5-27B 31.5%
- 41 Claude Sonnet 4 29.9%
- 42
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 28.7%
- 43 Kimi K2.5 27.8%
- 44 Grok 4 27.5%
- 45
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 26.9%
- 46 Claude Haiku 4.5 26.2%
- 47 GLM-4.7 23.8%
- 48
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp 20.1%
- 49 GLM-4.6 18.8%
- 50
MiniMax-M2 18.8%
- 51 grok-code-fast-1 18.5%
- 52 Grok 4 Fast 18.5%
- 53 Kimi K2 Thinking 17.6%
- 54 o3 17%
- 55 o4-mini 14.8%
- 56
Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 14.5%
- 57 GPT-5 mini 14.5%
- 58
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 14.2%
- 59 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 13%
- 60
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 10.5%
- 61
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 3.70%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official Toolathlon leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 56.5% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-5.5 | 55.6% | xhigh | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-5.4 | 54.6% | xhigh | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 52.8% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 52.8% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | GPT-5.3 Codex | 51.9% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Kimi K2.6 | 50% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 49.4% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 48.8% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 48.2% | max | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 47.2% | Claude Agent SDK | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 46.3% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 44.8% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | GPT-5.2 | 43.8% | xhigh, Responses API | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 43.5% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 42.9% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 40.7% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | GLM-5.1 | 40.7% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 39.8% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | GLM-5 | 39.2% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 38.9% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 38.3% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 38.3% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | GPT-5 | 37.7% | high, Responses API | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | | 37.7% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | GPT-5.1 | 37% | Responses API | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | | 36.4% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | GPT-5.4 Nano | 35.5% | xhigh | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 29 | | 35.2% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 31.5% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 29.9% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | | 28.7% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | Kimi K2.5 | 27.8% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | Grok 4 | 27.5% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | | 26.9% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 26.2% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | GLM-4.7 | 23.8% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | | 20.1% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | GLM-4.6 | 18.8% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | grok-code-fast-1 | 18.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | Grok 4 Fast | 18.5% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | Kimi K2 Thinking | 17.6% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | o3 | 17% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | o4-mini | 14.8% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | | 14.5% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | GPT-5 mini | 14.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | | 14.2% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | Kimi K2 Sep 2025 | 13% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | | 10.5% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | | 3.70% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5 | 61.7% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 59.9% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 58% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 56.5% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GPT-5.5 | 55.6% | xhigh | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | GPT-5.4 | 54.6% | xhigh | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 54.3% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 53.4% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 53.1% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 52.8% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 52.8% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | GPT-5.3 Codex | 51.9% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 50.6% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | Kimi K2.6 | 50% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 49.5% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 49.4% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 48.8% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 48.5% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 48.2% | max | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | GLM-5.2 | 48.2% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 47.2% | Claude Agent SDK | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | | 46.3% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 44.8% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | GPT-5.2 | 43.8% | xhigh, Responses API | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 43.5% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 43.5% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 42.9% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | GLM-5.1 | 40.7% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 39.8% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | GLM-5 | 39.2% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 38.9% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | | 38.3% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | | 38.3% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | GPT-5 | 37.7% | high, Responses API | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 35 | | 37.7% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | GPT-5.1 | 37% | Responses API | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 37 | | 36.4% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | GPT-5.4 Nano | 35.5% | xhigh | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 39 | | 35.2% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | | 31.5% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 29.9% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | | 28.7% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | Kimi K2.5 | 27.8% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | Grok 4 | 27.5% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | | 26.9% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 26.2% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | GLM-4.7 | 23.8% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | | 20.1% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | GLM-4.6 | 18.8% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | | 18.8% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 51 | grok-code-fast-1 | 18.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 52 | Grok 4 Fast | 18.5% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | Kimi K2 Thinking | 17.6% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 54 | o3 | 17% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | o4-mini | 14.8% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | | 14.5% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 57 | GPT-5 mini | 14.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 58 | | 14.2% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 59 | Kimi K2 Sep 2025 | 13% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 60 | | 10.5% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 61 | | 3.70% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 29 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
8 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in October 2025 10 models have held number one with claims included since its release in October 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official Toolathlon leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official Toolathlon leaderboard and labs’ model cards
4 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 53.4 | Toolathlon |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 53.1 | Toolathlon |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 58 | Toolathlon |
| Jul 2, 2026 | 48.5 | Toolathlon | |
| Jun 23, 2026 | 50.6 | Toolathlon | |
| Jun 16, 2026 | GLM-5.2 | 48.2 | Tool-Decathlon |
| May 29, 2026 | 49.5 | Toolathlon (internal fixed version) | |
| May 19, 2026 | 56.5 | Toolathlon | |
| Apr 24, 2026 | 47.8 | Toolathlon (Pass@1), V4-Flash Max | |
| Apr 24, 2026 | 51.8 | Toolathlon (Pass@1) | |
| Apr 23, 2026 | GPT-5.5 | 55.6 | Toolathlon |
| Apr 20, 2026 | Kimi K2.6 | 50 | Toolathlon |
| Apr 15, 2026 | 26.9 | Tool Decathlon | |
| Apr 7, 2026 | GLM-5.1 | 40.7 | Tool-Decathlon |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 39.8 | Tool Decathlon | |
| Mar 18, 2026 | 46.3 | Toolathlon (Toolathon in text) | |
| Mar 17, 2026 | GPT-5.4 Nano | 35.5 | Toolathlon |
| Mar 17, 2026 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 42.9 | Toolathlon |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GPT-5.4 | 54.6 | Toolathlon |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 38.3 | Tool Decathlon | |
| Feb 11, 2026 | GLM-5 | 38 | Tool-Decathlon |
| Dec 23, 2025 | 43.5 | Toolathlon | |
| Dec 17, 2025 | 49.4 | Toolathlon | |
| Dec 1, 2025 | 35.2 | Tool-Decathlon (Pass@1) |
12 system cards report it, from 6 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5 system card | 54.3 | Toolathlon, 108 tasks, internal harness, Pass@1 over three trials, max effort (Pass@3 63.0, Pass^3 40.7) (Table 8.11.5.A) | Capabilities |
| Jun 23, 2026 | | 50.6 | Toolathlon, Pass@1 (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jun 9, 2026 | Claude Fable 5 system card | 61.7 | Toolathlon, 108 tasks, internal harness, Pass@1 over 3 trials, adaptive thinking at max effort; Pass@3 68.5, Pass^3 55.6, 19.8 average turns (Table 8.17.8.A) | Capabilities |
| May 28, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 system card | 59.9 | Toolathlon Pass@1 over 3 trials on 108 tasks, internal harness, max effort (Pass@3 67.6, Pass^3 48.1) (8.13.7, Figure 8.13.7.A) | Capabilities |
| May 26, 2026 | | 18.8 | Toolathlon, MiniMax-M2 bar, printed label (Figure 9) | Capabilities |
| May 26, 2026 | | 46.3 | Toolathlon (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| May 26, 2026 | | 38.3 | Toolathlon (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| May 19, 2026 | | 56.5 | Toolathlon (results table, p.4) | Capabilities |
| Apr 26, 2026 | | 51.8 | Toolathlon (Pass@1), named Tool-Decathlon in 5.3.1, DS-V4-Pro Max (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Apr 26, 2026 | | 47.8 | Toolathlon (Pass@1), DeepSeek-V4-Flash Max (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GLM-5 technical report | 39.2 | Tool-Decathlon (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| Dec 1, 2025 | | 35.2 | Tool-Decathlon (Pass@1), DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
The lab's number comes out ahead in 1 of 3 pairs that differ
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 15 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 43.5% Toolathlon | 40.7% Leaderboard | +2.8 pts |
| | 51.8% Toolathlon (Pass@1) | 52.8% Leaderboard | −1.0 pts |
| | 47.8% Toolathlon (Pass@1), V4-Flash Max | 48.2% Leaderboard, max | −0.4 pts |
| | 35.2% Tool-Decathlon (Pass@1) | 35.2% Leaderboard | Same |
| | 49.4% Toolathlon | 49.4% Leaderboard | Same |
| GLM-5 | 39.2% Tool-Decathlon (Table 7) | 39.2% Leaderboard | Same |
| | 38.3% Tool Decathlon | 38.3% Leaderboard | Same |
| GPT-5.4 | 54.6% Toolathlon | 54.6% Leaderboard, xhigh | Same |
| GPT-5.4 Mini | 42.9% Toolathlon | 42.9% Leaderboard | Same |
| GPT-5.4 Nano | 35.5% Toolathlon | 35.5% Leaderboard, xhigh | Same |
| | 46.3% Toolathlon (Toolathon in text) | 46.3% Leaderboard | Same |
| | 39.8% Tool Decathlon | 39.8% Leaderboard | Same |
| GLM-5.1 | 40.7% Tool-Decathlon | 40.7% Leaderboard | Same |
| | 26.9% Tool Decathlon | 26.9% Leaderboard | Same |
| Kimi K2.6 | 50% Toolathlon | 50% Leaderboard | Same |
| GPT-5.5 | 55.6% Toolathlon | 55.6% Leaderboard, xhigh | Same |
| | 56.5% Toolathlon | 56.5% Leaderboard | Same |
| | 38.3% Toolathlon (Table 4) | 38.3% Leaderboard | Same |
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
Source: Official leaderboards
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%
- Claw-Eval In use 300 human-verified agent tasks (service orchestration, multimodal, multi-turn dialogue) audited via traces and snapshots. Rubric scores with Pass^3 consistency. Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.4%