LOCA-Bench
Agentic tasks whose environment state is scaled to grow context length while task semantics stay fixed. Success rate versus context length.
15 seed tasks adapted from Toolathlon. Tests context-management strategies as part of the agent.
- Made by
- HKUST NLP
- Released
- February 2026
- Kind
- Reasoning over long documents
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5.2 #50 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- October 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of carrying out long-running, real-world tasks. However, as the amount of context grows, their reliability often deteriorates, a phenomenon known as "context rot". Existing long-context benchmarks primarily focus on single-step settings that evaluate a model's ability to retrieve information from a long snippet. In realistic scenarios, however, LLMs often need to act as agents that explore environments, follow instructions and plans, extract useful information, and predict correct actions under a dynamically growing context. To assess language agents in such settings, we introduce LOCA-bench (a benchmark for LOng-Context Agents). Given a task prompt, LOCA-bench leverages automated and scalable control of environment states to regulate the agent's context length. This design enables LOCA-bench to extend the context length potentially to infinity in a controlled way while keeping the underlying task semantics fixed. LOCA-bench evaluates language agents as a combination of models and scaffolds, including various context management strategies. While agent performance generally degrades as the environment states grow more complex, advanced context management techniques can substantially improve the overall success rate. We open-source LOCA-bench to provide a platform for evaluating models and scaffolds in long-context, agentic scenarios: https://github.com/hkust-nlp/LOCA-bench
GPT-5.2 leads with 21.3% among models released by February 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash leads with 60.3%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in February 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 GPT-5.2 medium 21.3%
- 2
Gemini 3 Flash 20%
- 3 Claude Opus 4.5 14.7%
- 4
DeepSeek-V3.2 thinking 6.70%
- 5
MiniMax-M2.5 6.70%
- 6 GLM-4.7 5.30%
- 7
MiniMax-M2.1 5.30%
- 8 Kimi K2.5 4.00%
- 9 GLM-5 4.00%
- 10 K2 thinking 2.70%
Source: Official LOCA-Bench leaderboard
- 1
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 60.3%
- 2
MiniMax-M3 49.3%
- 3 GPT-5.2 medium 21.3%
- 4
Gemini 3 Flash 20%
- 5 Claude Opus 4.5 14.7%
- 6
DeepSeek-V3.2 thinking 6.70%
- 7
MiniMax-M2.5 6.70%
- 8 GLM-4.7 5.30%
- 9
MiniMax-M2.1 5.30%
- 10 Kimi K2.5 4.00%
- 11 GLM-5 4.00%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official LOCA-Bench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.2 | 21.3% | medium | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 20% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 14.7% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 6.70% | thinking | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 6.70% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | GLM-4.7 | 5.30% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 5.30% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Kimi K2.5 | 4.00% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | GLM-5 | 4.00% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | K2 | 2.70% | thinking | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 60.3% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 49.3% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | GPT-5.2 | 21.3% | medium | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 20% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 14.7% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 6.70% | thinking | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 6.70% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | GLM-4.7 | 5.30% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 5.30% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Kimi K2.5 | 4.00% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | GLM-5 | 4.00% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in February 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official LOCA-Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official LOCA-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2026 | 60.3 | LOCA-Bench 256K | |
| Jun 1, 2026 | 49.3 | LOCA-Bench (256k) |
More in Long context
- MRCR v2 In use Multi-round coreference: retrieve the n-th of several similar requests hidden in a long synthetic conversation, up to 1M tokens.
Muse Spark 1.3 98.5%
- LongBench v2 In use 503 multiple-choice questions over 8K-2M-word contexts (QA, dialogue, code repos, structured data). Accuracy.
Inkling 2 Small 70.6%
- GraphWalks In use A graph is given as an edge list in long context. The model answers BFS or parent queries, scored by F1. Claude Fable 5 99.96%
- OpenAI MRCR v2 In use Models read a long synthetic chat that hides 2, 4 or 8 identical writing requests and must reproduce the response to the i-th one. Scored by mean string match ratio per context bin.
Gemini 3.7 Flash 89%
- CL-bench In use Model must learn new knowledge from a supplied long context (rules, procedures, data) and solve tasks. Strict LLM-verified rubrics. GPT-5.4 27.9%
- AA-LCR 1.1 In use Models answer 100 questions that need reasoning across sets of real documents of about 100K tokens. An LLM equality checker with a fixed system prompt compares each answer with the key.
Step 5 Preview 88.3%