Benchmark Almanac

BIOBench (ByteDance Seed)

Seed2.0 Pro 53.5% leads since February 2026
Fading

Models answer 150 olympiad-level biology questions, 80% of them with images. Domain experts annotated and reviewed each question.

In-house Seed benchmark. It is a different test from BioBench by Samuel Stevens (arXiv 2511.16315). Format is a guess.

Made by
ByteDance Seed
Released
December 2025
Kind
Genomics and life sciences
Level
Competition
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
Kept private
Last in a launch post
December 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
March 2026
2
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Seed2.0 Pro leads with 53.5%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Seed2.0 Pro 53.5%
  2. 2 Seed1.8 42.3%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.0 Pro 53.5% Feb 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed1.8 42.3% Dec 2025 Lab model card

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in December 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

ByteDance Seed
Lab claims Not tested since Mar 2026
Seed2.0 Pro 53.5%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro Seed1.8 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro Seed1.8

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in December 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Dec 18, 2025 Seed1.8 42.3 BIOBench (internal)

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Mar 21, 2026 Seed1.8 model card 42.3 BIOBench (Table 1) Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 53.5 BIObench (Table 13). Its rival columns repeat the BABE row of Table 3 Capabilities

More in Biology and chemistry

All 109 in Biology and chemistry
  • GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-5.6 Sol 31.5%
  • SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score. Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
  • LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3%
  • MedChemBench (OpenAI) In use Models answer chemistry questions from an OpenAI internal set, grouped with OpenAI's life science research evaluations. OpenAI has not published the task format. GPT-Rosalind-6 49.6%
  • ProtocolQA Open-Ended In use Models correct errors in published lab protocols using open-ended questions adapted from LAB-Bench ProtocolQA. Scored as pass@1. GPT-6 Cyber 47.2%
  • MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. gpt-oss-120b 47.5%