Benchmark Almanac

LifeSciBench

GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3% leads since October 2026
GPT-5.5 51.9% leads since June 2026
GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3% leads since October 2026
In use

Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate.

750 expert-authored tasks over seven workflows and seven biological domains. 1,062 task artifacts, 173 scientist contributors, 19,020 rubric criteria and 453 expert reviewers. Launched 17 June 2026.

Made by
OpenAI
Released
June 2026
Kind
Genomics and life sciences
Level
Expert
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Strongest model tested
GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
September 2026
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026
5
Models scored in lab cards
4
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

GPT-Rosalind-6 leads with 61.3%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

GPT-5.5 leads with 51.9% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

GPT-Rosalind-6 leads with 61.3%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3%
  2. 2 GPT-6 Astra 60.3%
  3. 3 GPT-5.6 Sol 59.9%
  4. 4 GPT-5.6 Terra 56%
  5. 5 GPT-5.6 Luna 51.2%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Source: Official LifeSciBench leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3% Oct 2026 Lab model card
2 GPT-6 Astra 60.3% Sep 2026 Lab model card
3 GPT-5.6 Sol 59.9% Jul 2026 Lab model card
4 GPT-5.6 Terra 56% Jul 2026 Lab model card
5 GPT-5.6 Luna 51.2% Jul 2026 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.5 51.9% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3.1 Pro 51.5% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-5.4 47.9% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Grok 4.3 39.9% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3% Oct 2026 Lab model card
2 GPT-6 Astra 60.3% Sep 2026 Lab model card
3 GPT-5.6 Sol 59.9% Jul 2026 Lab model card
4 GPT-5.6 Terra 56% Jul 2026 Lab model card
5 GPT-5.5 51.9% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini 3.1 Pro 51.5% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
7 GPT-5.6 Luna 51.2% Jul 2026 Lab model card
8 GPT-5.4 47.9% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Grok 4.3 39.9% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 5 entries, 4 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

3 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in June 2026 Number one over time 4 models have held number one with claims included since its release in June 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2026
GPT-5.5 51.9%
Lab claims 3 leaders

Sources: Official LifeSciBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-Rosalind-6 GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.5 Gemini 3.1 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-Rosalind-6 GPT-5.5

Sources: Official LifeSciBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

OpenAI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 3, 2026 GPT-6 Astra 60.3 LifeSciBench
Jul 9, 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna 51.2 LifeSciBench
Jul 9, 2026 GPT-5.6 Terra 56 LifeSciBench
Jul 9, 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol 59.9 LifeSciBench (Sol, max)

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 30, 2026 GPT-Rosalind-6 system card 61.3 LifeSciBench Gold, highest reasoning budget, average score Capabilities

More in Biology and chemistry

All 109 in Biology and chemistry
  • GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-5.6 Sol 31.5%
  • SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score. Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
  • MedChemBench (OpenAI) In use Models answer chemistry questions from an OpenAI internal set, grouped with OpenAI's life science research evaluations. OpenAI has not published the task format. GPT-Rosalind-6 49.6%
  • ProtocolQA Open-Ended In use Models correct errors in published lab protocols using open-ended questions adapted from LAB-Bench ProtocolQA. Scored as pass@1. GPT-6 Cyber 47.2%
  • MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. gpt-oss-120b 47.5%
  • TOMG-Bench In use Models generate molecules from natural language requests in three tasks: molecule editing, molecule optimization and customized generation. Each output is checked for validity and for meeting the requested properties. GPT-3.5 Turbo 18.6%