Benchmark Almanac

MolecularIQ

gpt-oss-120b 47.5% leads since January 2026
Intern-S2-397B 62.4% leads since September 2026
In use

Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer.

Released
January 2026
Kind
Genomics and life sciences
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 #123 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
September 2026
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

A molecule's properties are fundamentally determined by its composition and structure encoded in its molecular graph. Thus, reasoning about molecular properties requires the ability to parse and understand the molecular graph. Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to chemistry, tackling tasks such as molecular name conversion, captioning, text-guided generation, and property or reaction prediction. Most existing benchmarks emphasize general chemical knowledge, rely on literature or surrogate labels that risk leakage or bias, or reduce evaluation to multiple-choice questions. We introduce MolecularIQ, a molecular structure reasoning benchmark focused exclusively on symbolically verifiable tasks. MolecularIQ enables fine-grained evaluation of reasoning over molecular graphs and reveals capability patterns that localize model failures to specific tasks and molecular structures. This provides actionable insights into the strengths and limitations of current chemistry LLMs and guides the development of models that reason faithfully over molecular structure.

Abstract of MolecularIQ: Characterizing Chemical Reasoning Capabilities Through Symbolic Verification on Molecular Graphs (arXiv:2601.15279, CC0)
36
Entries on its own leaderboard, 17 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

gpt-oss-120b leads with 47.5% among models released by September 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

Intern-S2-397B leads with 62.4%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 gpt-oss-120b high 47.5%
  2. 2 Qwen-3 235B [snapshot unspecified] 39.2%
  3. 3 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 37.1%
  4. 4 gpt-oss-20b high 35.8%
  5. 5 Qwen-3 Next 80B 32.3%
  6. 6 GPT-OSS 20B (Med) 27.3%
  7. 7 GPT-OSS 120B (Med) 26.5%
  8. 8 SEED-OSS 24.3%
  9. 9 Qwen-3 30B 22.7%
  10. 10 GLM-4.6 16.2%
  11. 11 Qwen3-32B 15.6%
  12. 12 Qwen3-14B 13.1%
  13. 13 Qwen3-8B 11.2%
  14. 14 Nemotron-Nano 9B v2 11.1%
  15. 15 Llama 3.3 70B 8.97%
  16. 16 ChemDFM-R-14B 8.73%
  17. 17 Mistral-Small 8.29%
  18. 18 Gemma 3 27B 7.82%
  19. 19 Gemma 2 27B 6.92%
  20. 20 Qwen2.5-14B 6.63%
  21. 21 Ether0 6.52%
  22. 22 Gemma 3 12B 5.13%
  23. 23 Qwen2.5-7B 5.07%
  24. 24 TxGemma-27B 4.96%
  25. 25 Llama 3-8B 4.67%
  26. 26 Gemma 2 9B 3.95%
  27. 27 ChemDFM-8B 3.59%
  28. 28 MolReasoner-Cap 3.46%
  29. 29 MolReasoner-Gen 3.23%
  30. 30 Llama 2-13B 3.06%
  31. 31 TxGemma-9B 2.57%
  32. 32 ChemDFM-13B 2.37%
  33. 33 Llama-3 MolInst 2.03%
  34. 34 LlaSMol 1.55%
  35. 35 ChemLLM 1.40%
  36. 36 Mistral 7B v0.1 1.19%

Source: Official MolecularIQ leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 gpt-oss-120b 47.5% high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen-3 235B [snapshot unspecified] 39.2% Official leaderboard
3 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 37.1% May 2025 Official leaderboard
4 gpt-oss-20b 35.8% high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen-3 Next 80B 32.3% Official leaderboard
6 GPT-OSS 20B (Med) 27.3% Official leaderboard
7 GPT-OSS 120B (Med) 26.5% Official leaderboard
8 SEED-OSS 24.3% Official leaderboard
9 Qwen-3 30B 22.7% Official leaderboard
10 GLM-4.6 16.2% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen3-32B 15.6% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen3-14B 13.1% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Qwen3-8B 11.2% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Nemotron-Nano 9B v2 11.1% Official leaderboard
15 Llama 3.3 70B 8.97% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
16 ChemDFM-R-14B 8.73% Official leaderboard
17 Mistral-Small 8.29% Official leaderboard
18 Gemma 3 27B 7.82% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Gemma 2 27B 6.92% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
20 Qwen2.5-14B 6.63% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
21 Ether0 6.52% Official leaderboard
22 Gemma 3 12B 5.13% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
23 Qwen2.5-7B 5.07% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
24 TxGemma-27B 4.96% Official leaderboard
25 Llama 3-8B 4.67% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
26 Gemma 2 9B 3.95% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
27 ChemDFM-8B 3.59% Official leaderboard
28 MolReasoner-Cap 3.46% Official leaderboard
29 MolReasoner-Gen 3.23% Official leaderboard
30 Llama 2-13B 3.06% Jul 2023 Official leaderboard
31 TxGemma-9B 2.57% Official leaderboard
32 ChemDFM-13B 2.37% Official leaderboard
33 Llama-3 MolInst 2.03% Official leaderboard
34 LlaSMol 1.55% Official leaderboard
35 ChemLLM 1.40% Official leaderboard
36 Mistral 7B v0.1 1.19% Sep 2023 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Intern-S2-397B 62.4% Sep 2026 Lab model card
2 gpt-oss-120b 47.5% high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
3 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 37.1% May 2025 Official leaderboard
4 gpt-oss-20b 35.8% high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
5 GLM-4.6 16.2% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen3-32B 15.6% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen3-14B 13.1% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen3-8B 11.2% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Llama 3.3 70B 8.97% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Gemma 3 27B 7.82% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Gemma 2 27B 6.92% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen2.5-14B 6.63% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Gemma 3 12B 5.13% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Qwen2.5-7B 5.07% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Llama 3-8B 4.67% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
16 Gemma 2 9B 3.95% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Llama 2-13B 3.06% Jul 2023 Official leaderboard
18 Mistral 7B v0.1 1.19% Sep 2023 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in January 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jan 2026
gpt-oss-120b 47.5%

Source: Official MolecularIQ leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Intern-S2-397B gpt-oss-120b DeepSeek-R1 Qwen3-32B Llama 3.3 70B Llama 3-8B Llama 2-13B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Intern-S2-397B gpt-oss-120b

Sources: Official MolecularIQ leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Shanghai AI Lab
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 13, 2026 Intern-S2-397B 62.4 MolecularIQ

More in Biology and chemistry

All 109 in Biology and chemistry
  • GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-5.6 Sol 31.5%
  • SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score. Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
  • LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3%
  • MedChemBench (OpenAI) In use Models answer chemistry questions from an OpenAI internal set, grouped with OpenAI's life science research evaluations. OpenAI has not published the task format. GPT-Rosalind-6 49.6%
  • ProtocolQA Open-Ended In use Models correct errors in published lab protocols using open-ended questions adapted from LAB-Bench ProtocolQA. Scored as pass@1. GPT-6 Cyber 47.2%
  • TOMG-Bench In use Models generate molecules from natural language requests in three tasks: molecule editing, molecule optimization and customized generation. Each output is checked for validity and for meeting the requested properties. GPT-3.5 Turbo 18.6%