SUPERChem
Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score.
Humans scored 40.3% at release and GPT-5 (High) scored 38.5%. ByteDance Seed reports the text-only form.
- Made by
- Zhao et al.
- Released
- December 2025
- Kind
- Genomics and life sciences
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026
- Last model added
- August 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Current benchmarks for evaluating the chemical reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) are limited by oversimplified tasks, lack of process-level evaluation, and misalignment with expert-level chemistry skills. To address these issues, we introduce SUPERChem, a benchmark of 500 expert-curated reasoning-intensive chemistry problems, covering diverse subfields and provided in both multimodal and text-only formats. Original content and an iterative curation pipeline eliminate flawed items and mitigate data contamination. Each problem is paired with an expert-authored solution path, enabling Reasoning Path Fidelity (RPF) scoring to evaluate reasoning quality beyond final-answer accuracy. Evaluations against a human baseline of 40.3% accuracy show that even the best-performing model, GPT-5 (High), reaches only 38.5%, followed closely by Gemini 2.5 Pro (37.9%) and DeepSeek-V3.1-Think (37.3%). SUPERChem elicits multi-step, multimodal reasoning, reveals model-dependent effects of visual information, and distinguishes high-fidelity reasoners from heuristic ones. By providing a challenging benchmark and a reliable evaluation framework, SUPERChem aims to facilitate the advancement of LLMs toward expert-level chemical intelligence. The dataset of the benchmark is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/ZehuaZhao/SUPERChem.
Tencent Hy4 preview leads with 66.4% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
GPT-5 leads with 39.6% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Tencent Hy4 preview leads with 66.4%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1
Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
- 2
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- 3
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 55%
- 4
Tencent Hy3 54.9%
- 5
Seed2.0 Pro 51.6%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 GPT-5 Text-Only; high 39.6%
- 2
DeepSeek-V3.1 Text-Only; thinking 37.3%
- 3 o3 Text-Only 30.6%
- 4
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025, Text-Only 29.4%
- 5
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025, Text-Only 26.4%
- 6 GPT-4.1 Multimodal 12.2%
Source: Official SUPERChem leaderboard
- 1
Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
- 2
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- 3
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 55%
- 4
Tencent Hy3 54.9%
- 5
Seed2.0 Pro 51.6%
- 6 GPT-5 Text-Only; high 39.6%
- 7
DeepSeek-V3.1 Text-Only; thinking 37.3%
- 8 o3 Text-Only 30.6%
- 9
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025, Text-Only 29.4%
- 10
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025, Text-Only 26.4%
- 11 GPT-4.1 Multimodal 12.2%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official SUPERChem leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 66.4% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 59.8% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 55% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 54.9% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 51.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5 | 39.6% | Text-Only; high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 37.3% | Text-Only; thinking | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | o3 | 30.6% | Text-Only | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 29.4% | Text-Only | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 26.4% | Text-Only | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | GPT-4.1 | 12.2% | Multimodal | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 66.4% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 59.8% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 55% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 54.9% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 51.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | GPT-5 | 39.6% | Text-Only; high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 37.3% | Text-Only; thinking | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | o3 | 30.6% | Text-Only | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 29.4% | Text-Only | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 26.4% | Text-Only | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | GPT-4.1 | 12.2% | Multimodal | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 8 entries, 6 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
More effort adds a median 27 points
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official SUPERChem leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 | Text-Only; high | 39.6% | |||
| GPT-5 | Multimodal; high | 38.5% | |||
| | Text-Only; thinking | 37.3% | |||
| GPT-5 | Multimodal; medium | 36.8% | |||
| GPT-5 | Text-Only; medium | 35.6% | |||
| o3 | Text-Only | 30.6% | |||
| | Text-Only | 29.4% | |||
| GPT-5 | Text-Only; low | 29.3% | |||
| GPT-5 | Multimodal; low | 28.1% | |||
| o3 | Multimodal | 27.6% | |||
| | Text-Only | 26.4% | |||
| | Text-Only | 23.2% | |||
| GPT-5 | Multimodal; minimal | 15.1% | |||
| GPT-5 | Text-Only; minimal | 12.9% | |||
| GPT-4.1 | Multimodal | 12.2% | |||
| GPT-4.1 | Text-Only | 12% |
4 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in December 2025 Number one over time 5 models have held number one with claims included since its release in December 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official SUPERChem leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official SUPERChem leaderboard and labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2026 | 66.4 | SUPERChem | |
| Jul 2, 2026 | 54.9 | SuperChem | |
| Apr 28, 2026 | 55 | Superchem (text-only) | |
| Feb 14, 2026 | 51.6 | Superchem (text-only) |
2 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | | 59.8 | SuperChem (Table 11) | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 51.6 | Superchem (text-only) (Table 3). Table 13 prints 53.0 | Capabilities |
More in Biology and chemistry
- GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-5.6 Sol 31.5%
- LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3%
- MedChemBench (OpenAI) In use Models answer chemistry questions from an OpenAI internal set, grouped with OpenAI's life science research evaluations. OpenAI has not published the task format. GPT-Rosalind-6 49.6%
- ProtocolQA Open-Ended In use Models correct errors in published lab protocols using open-ended questions adapted from LAB-Bench ProtocolQA. Scored as pass@1. GPT-6 Cyber 47.2%
- MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. gpt-oss-120b 47.5%
- TOMG-Bench In use Models generate molecules from natural language requests in three tasks: molecule editing, molecule optimization and customized generation. Each output is checked for validity and for meeting the requested properties. GPT-3.5 Turbo 18.6%