Benchmark Almanac

SUPERChem

Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4% leads since August 2026
GPT-5 39.6% leads since December 2025
Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4% leads since August 2026
In use

Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score.

Humans scored 40.3% at release and GPT-5 (High) scored 38.5%. ByteDance Seed reports the text-only form.

Made by
Zhao et al.
Released
December 2025
Kind
Genomics and life sciences
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2026
Last model added
August 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Current benchmarks for evaluating the chemical reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) are limited by oversimplified tasks, lack of process-level evaluation, and misalignment with expert-level chemistry skills. To address these issues, we introduce SUPERChem, a benchmark of 500 expert-curated reasoning-intensive chemistry problems, covering diverse subfields and provided in both multimodal and text-only formats. Original content and an iterative curation pipeline eliminate flawed items and mitigate data contamination. Each problem is paired with an expert-authored solution path, enabling Reasoning Path Fidelity (RPF) scoring to evaluate reasoning quality beyond final-answer accuracy. Evaluations against a human baseline of 40.3% accuracy show that even the best-performing model, GPT-5 (High), reaches only 38.5%, followed closely by Gemini 2.5 Pro (37.9%) and DeepSeek-V3.1-Think (37.3%). SUPERChem elicits multi-step, multimodal reasoning, reveals model-dependent effects of visual information, and distinguishes high-fidelity reasoners from heuristic ones. By providing a challenging benchmark and a reliable evaluation framework, SUPERChem aims to facilitate the advancement of LLMs toward expert-level chemical intelligence. The dataset of the benchmark is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/ZehuaZhao/SUPERChem.

Abstract of SUPERChem: A Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark in Chemistry (arXiv:2512.01274, CC0)
5
Models scored in lab cards
4
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Tencent Hy4 preview leads with 66.4% among models released by August 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

GPT-5 leads with 39.6% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Tencent Hy4 preview leads with 66.4%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
  2. 2 Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  3. 3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 55%
  4. 4 Tencent Hy3 54.9%
  5. 5 Seed2.0 Pro 51.6%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4% Aug 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed2.1 Pro 59.8% Jun 2026 Lab model card
3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 55% Apr 2026 Lab model card
4 Tencent Hy3 54.9% Jul 2026 Lab model card
5 Seed2.0 Pro 51.6% Feb 2026 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5 39.6% Text-Only; high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
2 DeepSeek-V3.1 37.3% Text-Only; thinking Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
3 o3 30.6% Text-Only Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 29.4% Text-Only Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 26.4% Text-Only Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
6 GPT-4.1 12.2% Multimodal Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4% Aug 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed2.1 Pro 59.8% Jun 2026 Lab model card
3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 55% Apr 2026 Lab model card
4 Tencent Hy3 54.9% Jul 2026 Lab model card
5 Seed2.0 Pro 51.6% Feb 2026 Lab model card
6 GPT-5 39.6% Text-Only; high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
7 DeepSeek-V3.1 37.3% Text-Only; thinking Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
8 o3 30.6% Text-Only Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 29.4% Text-Only Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 26.4% Text-Only Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
11 GPT-4.1 12.2% Multimodal Apr 2025 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 8 entries, 6 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

More effort adds a median 27 points

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
GPT-5
Text-Only; … Multimodal;… Multimodal;… Text-Only; … Multimodal;…
39.6%
DeepSeek-V3.1
Text-Only Text-Only; …
37.3%
o3
Multimodal Text-Only
30.6%
GPT-4.1
Text-Only
12.2%

Source: Official SUPERChem leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
GPT-5 Text-Only; high 39.6%
GPT-5 Multimodal; high 38.5%
DeepSeek-V3.1 Text-Only; thinking 37.3%
GPT-5 Multimodal; medium 36.8%
GPT-5 Text-Only; medium 35.6%
o3 Text-Only 30.6%
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 Text-Only 29.4%
GPT-5 Text-Only; low 29.3%
GPT-5 Multimodal; low 28.1%
o3 Multimodal 27.6%
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 Text-Only 26.4%
DeepSeek-V3.1 Text-Only 23.2%
GPT-5 Multimodal; minimal 15.1%
GPT-5 Text-Only; minimal 12.9%
GPT-4.1 Multimodal 12.2%
GPT-4.1 Text-Only 12%

4 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in December 2025 Number one over time 5 models have held number one with claims included since its release in December 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI ByteDance Seed Tencent
Own leaderboard Not tested since Dec 2025
GPT-5 39.6%
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2026

Sources: Official SUPERChem leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Tencent Hy4 preview Seed2.1 Pro Seed2.0 Lite (0428) GPT-5 o3 GPT-4.1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Tencent Hy4 preview Seed2.1 Pro

Sources: Official SUPERChem leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
Tencent
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 28, 2026 Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4 SUPERChem
Jul 2, 2026 Tencent Hy3 54.9 SuperChem
Apr 28, 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 55 Superchem (text-only)
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 51.6 Superchem (text-only)

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 23, 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 59.8 SuperChem (Table 11) Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 51.6 Superchem (text-only) (Table 3). Table 13 prints 53.0 Capabilities

More in Biology and chemistry

All 109 in Biology and chemistry
  • GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-5.6 Sol 31.5%
  • LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3%
  • MedChemBench (OpenAI) In use Models answer chemistry questions from an OpenAI internal set, grouped with OpenAI's life science research evaluations. OpenAI has not published the task format. GPT-Rosalind-6 49.6%
  • ProtocolQA Open-Ended In use Models correct errors in published lab protocols using open-ended questions adapted from LAB-Bench ProtocolQA. Scored as pass@1. GPT-6 Cyber 47.2%
  • MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. gpt-oss-120b 47.5%
  • TOMG-Bench In use Models generate molecules from natural language requests in three tasks: molecule editing, molecule optimization and customized generation. Each output is checked for validity and for meeting the requested properties. GPT-3.5 Turbo 18.6%