Benchmark Almanac

Bioweapons acquisition uplift trial (Anthropic)

Claude Opus 4 2.53 leads since May 2025
Only in system cards

Participants draft a bioweapons acquisition plan over two days with or without model access. Score is the uplift ratio of model group over control.

In-house Anthropic human uplift trial graded by Deloitte with a rubric. The tasks are not public.

Made by
Anthropic
Kind
Hazardous knowledge
Level
Expert
Scored
Graded by people
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
Kept private
Strongest model tested
Claude Opus 4 #108 on the capability index
Last in a system card
May 2025
Last model added
May 2025
3
Models scored in lab cards
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Claude Opus 4 leads with 2.53 among models released by May 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in May 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Opus 4 2.53
  2. 2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 2.10
  3. 3 Claude Sonnet 4 1.70

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 4 2.53 May 2025 Lab model card
2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 2.10 Feb 2025 Lab model card
3 Claude Sonnet 4 1.70 May 2025 Lab model card

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Lab claims Not tested since May 2025

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2025 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2025

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
May 22, 2025 Claude Sonnet 4 system card 1.7 Bioweapons acquisition uplift trial, total uplift 1.70x over internet-only control, earlier snapshot. Sonnet 4 group raw score 42% ± 11%, control 25% ± 13% (7.2.4.1) Bio and chem risk
May 22, 2025 Claude Opus 4 system card 2.53 Bioweapons acquisition uplift trial, total uplift 2.53x over internet-only control. Opus 4 group raw score 63% ± 13%, control 25% ± 13% (7.2.4.1) Bio and chem risk
Feb 24, 2025 Claude 3.7 Sonnet system card 2.1 Bioweapons acquisition uplift trial, within-group uplift ~2.1X with a variant of Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Sepal 50% ± 21% vs control 24% ± 9%, Anthropic 57% ± 20% vs control 27% ± 9% (7.1.4, Figure 15) Bio and chem risk

More in Biology and chemistry

All 108 in Biology and chemistry
  • GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-5.6 Sol 31.5%
  • SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score. Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4%
  • LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3%
  • MedChemBench (OpenAI) In use Models answer chemistry questions from an OpenAI internal set, grouped with OpenAI's life science research evaluations. OpenAI has not published the task format. GPT-Rosalind-6 49.6%
  • ProtocolQA Open-Ended In use Models correct errors in published lab protocols using open-ended questions adapted from LAB-Bench ProtocolQA. Scored as pass@1. GPT-6 Cyber 47.2%
  • MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. gpt-oss-120b 47.5%