CBRN expert red teaming
Experts try to extract uplift beyond a web baseline across staged CBRN attack scenarios.
In-house Google DeepMind evaluation. Results are usually qualitative or rubric scores per scenario.
- Made by
- Google DeepMind
- Released
- November 2025
- Kind
- Hazardous knowledge
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Graded by people
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- Kept private
- Last in a system card
- October 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
6
System cards report it, from 1 lab
No scores here yet
No lab, leaderboard or Epoch AI run has reported a score for CBRN expert red teaming yet.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
6 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 |  Gemini 4 Argon system card | Biological expert red teaming, mean 0-100 rubric score per scenario, no overall: BIO-1 91.2, BIO-2 88.5, BIO-3 73.1 vs web baselines 69.6, 62.3, 75.3 (Table 3.3, 3.2.1.3). Chemical, radiological and nuclear red teaming reported qualitatively (3.2.1.4) | Bio and chem risk | |
| Oct 13, 2026 | Gemini 4 Argon model card | CBRN expert red teaming: measurable uplift over web baselines in two biological scenarios, biological CCL cannot be ruled out, no score (Frontier Safety table, p.11) | Bio and chem risk | |
| Aug 13, 2026 | Gemini 3.7 Flash model card | CBRN expert red teaming: modest uplift over web baselines, alert threshold reached, CCL not reached, no score (Frontier Safety table, p.8) | Bio and chem risk | |
| Aug 13, 2026 | Gemini 3.7 Flash system card | Expert red teaming, aggregated 0-100 rubric scores vs web baseline: BIO-1 77.6 (web 69.6), BIO-2 79.1 (web 67.0), chemical scenarios 71.1 (web 47.0) and 68.9 (web 41.0). No overall score (CBRN, Results, p.10 and 13) | Bio and chem risk | |
| Feb 19, 2026 | Gemini 3.1 Pro model card | CBRN (Deep Think mode): accurate and actionable information but not novel or complete enough for critical stages, CCL not reached, no score (FSF results table, p.8) | Bio and chem risk | |
| Nov 18, 2025 | Gemini 3 Pro system card | Red-Teaming: minimal uplift over web baseline across all four domains, no score (CBRN, p.7 to 8) | Bio and chem risk |
More in Biology and chemistry
- GeneBench Pro In use Agents analyze messy simulated genomics and biology datasets to estimate a decision-relevant quantity across 129 problems. Scored automatically against known answers. GPT-5.6 Sol 31.5%
- SUPERChem In use Models solve 500 expert-written chemistry reasoning problems, offered in multimodal and text-only forms. Expert solution paths also allow a reasoning path score.
Tencent Hy4 preview 66.4% - LifeSciBench In use Models complete 750 expert-written life science research tasks, often with attached figures, tables, or sequence files. Graded against expert rubrics as score and pass rate. GPT-Rosalind-6 61.3%
- MedChemBench (OpenAI) In use Models answer chemistry questions from an OpenAI internal set, grouped with OpenAI's life science research evaluations. OpenAI has not published the task format. GPT-Rosalind-6 49.6%
- ProtocolQA Open-Ended In use Models correct errors in published lab protocols using open-ended questions adapted from LAB-Bench ProtocolQA. Scored as pass@1. GPT-6 Cyber 47.2%
- MolecularIQ In use Models answer questions about molecular graphs, such as counting, indexing and constrained generation, and a symbolic checker verifies each answer. gpt-oss-120b 47.5%