Benchmark Almanac

Code2Video-Compass

Claude Opus 5.5 1.07 leads since October 2026
Not in model cards

Multimodal models write programs that render complete videos from text, an image or a video. The default Overall board ranks models by their mean rank across quality metrics, so a lower score is better.

It had 41 Hugging Face paper upvotes and 8 GitHub stars. HeyGen's Code2Video Benchmark on Kaggle is a different test.

Released
October 2026
Kind
Video generation
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Code
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Code-based video generation offers fine-grained control, targeted editing, and component reuse compared with direct video generation. This approach requires multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to translate visual and temporal requirements into executable programs that produce complete videos. However, existing code-based benchmarks primarily target specialized tasks, leaving complete video creation across diverse creative categories and input modalities insufficiently evaluated. We introduce Code2Video-Compass, a general-purpose benchmark for code-based video generation across text-to-video (T2V), image-to-video (I2V), and video-to-video (V2V) settings. Code2Video-Compass comprises 2,104 tasks spanning 10 categories, 24 subtypes, and three complexity dimensions covering construction, dynamic animation, and state dependency. It combines tasks curated from textual instructions and visual references with corresponding T2V, I2V, and V2V tasks derived from complete professional and user-created videos. We propose a dual-level evaluation framework combining 12 objective metrics and five subjective metrics. Objective evaluation covers operational performance, video quality, text-video alignment, and reference fidelity, while subjective evaluation uses an MLLM judge to evaluate instruction following and holistic video quality. Extensive evaluation of 15 recent proprietary and open-weight MLLMs from nine families reveals that even leading models face challenges in reliably generating high-quality complete videos aligned with textual and visual requirements, with performance generally declining as construction, dynamic animation, and state-dependency complexity increases. We anticipate that Code2Video-Compass will advance reliable, coherent, and controllable code-based video generation and inspire broader progress in programmatic visual creation.

Abstract of Code2Video-Compass: A Comprehensive Benchmark for General-Purpose Code-Based Video Generation across T2V, I2V, and V2V (arXiv:2610.28416, CC0)
15
Models scored on its own leaderboard

Claude Opus 5.5 leads with 1.07

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

  1. 1 Claude Opus 5.5 medium 1.07
  2. 2 Claude Sonnet 5.5 high 1.93
  3. 3 GPT-6 Astra 4.17
  4. 4 GPT-6.1 Sol medium 4.77
  5. 5 Gemini 3.8 Flash medium 5.53
  6. 6 Claude Haiku 5.5 medium 5.60
  7. 7 MiMo-V2.6 Pro enabled 7.40
  8. 8 GPT-6 Luna medium 7.40
  9. 9 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash high 8.00
  10. 10 Kimi K3 max 9.87
  11. 11 GLM-5.3-Flash max 10.5
  12. 12 Qwen 3.8 Max xhigh 12.0
  13. 13 Qwen3.8 Flash xhigh 12.9
  14. 14 Qwen 3.8 27B xhigh 13.8
  15. 15 MiniMax-M3 adaptive 15.0

Source: Official Code2Video-Compass leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 5.5 1.07 medium Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Sonnet 5.5 1.93 high Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-6 Astra 4.17 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-6.1 Sol 4.77 medium Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 3.8 Flash 5.53 medium Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Haiku 5.5 5.60 medium Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
7 MiMo-V2.6 Pro 7.40 enabled Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-6 Luna 7.40 medium Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
9 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 8.00 high Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Kimi K3 9.87 max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
11 GLM-5.3-Flash 10.5 max Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen 3.8 Max 12.0 xhigh Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Qwen3.8 Flash 12.9 xhigh Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
14 Qwen 3.8 27B 13.8 xhigh Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
15 MiniMax-M3 15.0 adaptive Jun 2026 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard 1 leader

Source: Official Code2Video-Compass leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0.00 5.00 10.0 15.0 2026 0.00 5.00 10.0 15.0 2026

Source: Official Code2Video-Compass leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%