Benchmark Almanac

VoiceBench

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1% leads since March 2026
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 89.4% leads since April 2026
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1% leads since March 2026
In use

Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.

The suite grew after release: mmsu joined the leaderboard in 2024-12, and bbh and wildvoice in 2025-04. The Overall score now averages nine subsets, so early Overall scores are not comparable.

Made by
CUHK-Shenzhen
Released
October 2024
Kind
Audio understanding and voice
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Inkling-Small #67 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
September 2026
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Building on the success of large language models (LLMs), recent advancements such as GPT-4o have enabled real-time speech interactions through LLM-based voice assistants, offering a significantly improved user experience compared to traditional text-based interactions. However, the absence of benchmarks designed to evaluate these speech interaction capabilities has hindered progress of LLM-based voice assistants development. Current evaluations focus primarily on automatic speech recognition (ASR) or general knowledge evaluation with clean speeches, neglecting the more intricate, real-world scenarios that involve diverse speaker characteristics, environmental and content factors. To address this, we introduce VoiceBench, the first benchmark designed to provide a multi-faceted evaluation of LLM-based voice assistants. VoiceBench also includes both real and synthetic spoken instructions that incorporate the above three key real-world variations. Extensive experiments reveal the limitations of current LLM-based voice assistant models and offer valuable insights for future research and development in this field.

Abstract of VoiceBench: Benchmarking LLM-Based Voice Assistants (arXiv:2410.17196, CC0)
12
Models scored in lab cards
11
Launch posts list it, from 5 labs
12
System cards report it, from 7 labs

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 93.1%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B leads with 89.4% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 93.1%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  2. 2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 91.6%
  3. 3 Inkling 91.4%
  4. 4 Inkling-Small 90.1%
  5. 5 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 89.4%
  6. 6 LongCat-Flash-Omni 88.7%
  7. 7 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 87.8%
  8. 8 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 85.5%
  9. 9 TML-Interaction-Small 82.1%
  10. 10 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 80.3%
  11. 11 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 76.9%
  12. 12 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 74.1%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1% Mar 2026 Lab model card
2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 91.6% Sep 2026 Lab model card
3 Inkling 91.4% Jul 2026 Lab model card
4 Inkling-Small 90.1% Jul 2026 Lab model card
5 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 89.4% Apr 2026 Lab model card
6 LongCat-Flash-Omni 88.7% Oct 2025 Lab model card
7 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 87.8% Mar 2026 Lab model card
8 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 85.5% Sep 2025 Lab model card
9 TML-Interaction-Small 82.1% May 2026 Lab model card
10 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 80.3% Oct 2026 Lab model card
11 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 76.9% Apr 2025 Lab model card
12 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 74.1% Mar 2025 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 89.4% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 88.8% thinking Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Ultravox v0.6 Llama 3.3 70B 81.8% May 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 76.9% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Ultravox v0.5 Llama 3.1 8B 74.9% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Ultravox v0.4.1 Llama 3.1 8B 72.1% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
7 Baichuan-Omni-1.5 71.3% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Baichuan-Audio-Instruct 69.3% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
9 VITA-1.5 64.5% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Phi-4-multimodal 64.3% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Ultravox v0.5 Llama 3.2 1B 57.5% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
12 GLM-4-Voice-9B 56.5% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct 55.8% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
14 Step-Audio-Chat 50.8% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
15 Moshi 29.5% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1% Mar 2026 Lab model card
2 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 91.6% Sep 2026 Lab model card
3 Inkling 91.4% Jul 2026 Lab model card
4 Inkling-Small 90.1% Jul 2026 Lab model card
5 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 89.4% Apr 2026 Lab model card
6 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 88.8% thinking Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
7 LongCat-Flash-Omni 88.7% Oct 2025 Lab model card
8 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 87.8% Mar 2026 Lab model card
9 TML-Interaction-Small 82.1% May 2026 Lab model card
10 Ultravox v0.6 Llama 3.3 70B 81.8% May 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 80.3% Oct 2026 Lab model card
12 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 76.9% Apr 2025 Lab model card
13 Ultravox v0.5 Llama 3.1 8B 74.9% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 74.1% Mar 2025 Lab model card
15 Ultravox v0.4.1 Llama 3.1 8B 72.1% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
16 Baichuan-Omni-1.5 71.3% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
17 Baichuan-Audio-Instruct 69.3% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
18 VITA-1.5 64.5% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
19 Phi-4-multimodal 64.3% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Ultravox v0.5 Llama 3.2 1B 57.5% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
21 GLM-4-Voice-9B 56.5% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
22 Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct 55.8% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
23 Step-Audio-Chat 50.8% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
24 Moshi 29.5% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 46 entries, 15 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

5 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in October 2024 8 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in October 2024 8 models have held number one with claims included since its release in October 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Qwen Z.ai Fixie.ai (Ultravox) Moonshot AI NVIDIA Meituan
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in Sep 2025, by Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
Lab claims Passed 85% in Sep 2025, by Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B

Sources: Official VoiceBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B on the official leaderboard passed 85% in September 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B Ultravox v0.6 Llama 3.3 70B Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct Ultravox v0.4.1 Llama 3.1 8B GLM-4-Voice-9B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus Ultravox v0.6 Llama 3.3 70B

Sources: Official VoiceBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
Moonshot AI
Meituan
NVIDIA
Thinking Machines
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 18, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 91.6 VoiceBench Audio Interaction
Jul 30, 2026 Inkling-Small 90.1 VoiceBench
Jul 15, 2026 Inkling 91.4 VoiceBench
May 11, 2026 TML-Interaction-Small 82.1 IFEval (VoiceBench) accuracy, audio
Apr 28, 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 89.4 Voice interaction (Speech Instruction Following)
Mar 30, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 87.8 VoiceBench, Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash
Mar 30, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1 VoiceBench
Oct 31, 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 88.7 Mean of VoiceBench AlpacaEval 4.94 / CommonEval 4.32 (GPT scores x20) / OpenBookQA 93.41 / SDQA 82.46 / MMSU 81.95 / AdvBench 100 / IFEval 77.99, computed by the almanac
Sep 22, 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 85.5 VoiceBench Overall
Apr 25, 2025 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 76.9 VoiceBench Avg (AlpacaEval 4.46, CommonEval 3.97, SD-QA 63.12, MMSU 62.17, OpenBookQA 83.52, IFEval 61.10, AdvBench 100.00)
Mar 27, 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 74.1 VoiceBench Avg

12 system cards report it, from 7 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 23, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B technical report 80.3 Voicebench, reasoning, 72.60 non-reasoning (Table 8) Capabilities
Sep 22, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash technical report 91.6 VoiceBench (Table 4) Capabilities
Jul 30, 2026 Inkling-Small model card 90.1 VoiceBench (5. Evaluations table) Capabilities
Jul 15, 2026 Inkling model card 91.4 VoiceBench (5. Evaluations table, effort 0.99) Capabilities
Apr 27, 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B technical report 89.4 VoiceBench Avg, reasoning on (Table 8). Nine spoken subsets from 71.4 (SD-QA) to 100 (AdvBench) Capabilities
Apr 17, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 93.1 VoiceBench (Table 5) Capabilities
Feb 4, 2026 ERNIE 5.0 technical report VoiceBench AlpacaEval 4.62, CommonEval 3.74, SD-QA 77.58, MMSU 84.68, OpenBookQA 92.97, IFEval 72.67, AdvBench 99.23, no overall score (Table 7) Capabilities
Oct 31, 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report VoiceBench AlpacaEval 4.94, CommonEval 4.32, OpenBookQA 93.41, SDQA 82.46, MMSU 81.95, AdvBench 100, IFEval 77.99, no overall score (Table 11) Capabilities
Sep 22, 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B technical report 85.5 VoiceBench Overall, Instruct (Table 7). Thinking 88.8 Capabilities
Jul 17, 2025 Voxtral Small technical report Openbook QA (Chen et al., 2024, the VoiceBench subset) 88.4, no overall VoiceBench score (Table 8) Capabilities
Apr 25, 2025 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct technical report 76.9 VoiceBench Avg (Table 6). AlpacaEval 4.46, CommonEval 3.97, SD-QA 63.12, MMSU 62.17, OpenBookQA 83.52, IFEval 61.10, AdvBench 100.00 Capabilities
Mar 26, 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B technical report 74.1 VoiceBench Avg (Table 3). AlpacaEval 4.49, CommonEval 3.93, SD-QA 55.71, MMSU 61.32, OpenBookQA 81.10, IFEval 52.87, AdvBench 99.42 Capabilities

3 lab claims next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 2 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 85.5% VoiceBench Overall 88.8% Leaderboard, thinking −3.3 pts
Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 76.9% VoiceBench Avg (AlpacaEval 4.46, CommonEval 3.97, SD-QA 63.12, MMSU 62.17, OpenBookQA 83.52, IFEval 61.10, AdvBench 100.00) 76.9% Leaderboard Same
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 89.4% VoiceBench Avg, reasoning on (Table 8). Nine spoken subsets from 71.4 (SD-QA) to 100 (AdvBench) 89.4% Leaderboard Same

More in Audio and video

All 233 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%