VoiceBench
Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
The suite grew after release: mmsu joined the leaderboard in 2024-12, and bbh and wildvoice in 2025-04. The Overall score now averages nine subsets, so early Overall scores are not comparable.
- Made by
- CUHK-Shenzhen
- Released
- October 2024
- Kind
- Audio understanding and voice
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Inkling-Small #67 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- September 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Building on the success of large language models (LLMs), recent advancements such as GPT-4o have enabled real-time speech interactions through LLM-based voice assistants, offering a significantly improved user experience compared to traditional text-based interactions. However, the absence of benchmarks designed to evaluate these speech interaction capabilities has hindered progress of LLM-based voice assistants development. Current evaluations focus primarily on automatic speech recognition (ASR) or general knowledge evaluation with clean speeches, neglecting the more intricate, real-world scenarios that involve diverse speaker characteristics, environmental and content factors. To address this, we introduce VoiceBench, the first benchmark designed to provide a multi-faceted evaluation of LLM-based voice assistants. VoiceBench also includes both real and synthetic spoken instructions that incorporate the above three key real-world variations. Extensive experiments reveal the limitations of current LLM-based voice assistant models and offer valuable insights for future research and development in this field.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 93.1%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B leads with 89.4% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus leads with 93.1%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
- 1
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
- 2
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 91.6%
- 3
Inkling 91.4%
- 4
Inkling-Small 90.1%
- 5
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 89.4%
- 6
LongCat-Flash-Omni 88.7%
- 7
Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 87.8%
- 8
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 85.5%
- 9
TML-Interaction-Small 82.1%
- 10
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 80.3%
- 11 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 76.9%
- 12
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 74.1%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 89.4
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B
- 88.8
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 81.8
Ultravox v0.6 Llama 3.3 70B
- 76.9 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct
- 74.9
Ultravox v0.5 Llama 3.1 8B
- 72.1
Ultravox v0.4.1 Llama 3.1 8B
- 71.3
Baichuan-Omni-1.5
- 69.3
Baichuan-Audio-Instruct
- 64.5 VITA-1.5
- 64.3
Phi-4-multimodal
- 57.5
Ultravox v0.5 Llama 3.2 1B
- 56.5 GLM-4-Voice-9B
- 55.8
Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct
- 50.8
Step-Audio-Chat
- 29.5
Moshi
- 1
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 89.4%
- 2
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B thinking 88.8%
- 3
Ultravox v0.6 Llama 3.3 70B 81.8%
- 4 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 76.9%
- 5
Ultravox v0.5 Llama 3.1 8B 74.9%
- 6
Ultravox v0.4.1 Llama 3.1 8B 72.1%
- 7
Baichuan-Omni-1.5 71.3%
- 8
Baichuan-Audio-Instruct 69.3%
- 9 VITA-1.5 64.5%
- 10
Phi-4-multimodal 64.3%
- 11
Ultravox v0.5 Llama 3.2 1B 57.5%
- 12 GLM-4-Voice-9B 56.5%
- 13
Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct 55.8%
- 14
Step-Audio-Chat 50.8%
- 15
Moshi 29.5%
Source: Official VoiceBench leaderboard
- 93.1
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 91.6
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash
- 91.4
Inkling
- 90.1
Inkling-Small
- 89.4
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B
- 88.8
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 88.7
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 87.8
Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash
- 82.1
TML-Interaction-Small
- 81.8
Ultravox v0.6 Llama 3.3 70B
- 80.3
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B
- 76.9 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct
- 74.9
Ultravox v0.5 Llama 3.1 8B
- 74.1
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 72.1
Ultravox v0.4.1 Llama 3.1 8B
- 71.3
Baichuan-Omni-1.5
- 69.3
Baichuan-Audio-Instruct
- 64.5 VITA-1.5
- 64.3
Phi-4-multimodal
- 57.5
Ultravox v0.5 Llama 3.2 1B
- 56.5 GLM-4-Voice-9B
- 55.8
Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct
- 50.8
Step-Audio-Chat
- 29.5
Moshi
- 1
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
- 2
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 91.6%
- 3
Inkling 91.4%
- 4
Inkling-Small 90.1%
- 5
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 89.4%
- 6
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B thinking 88.8%
- 7
LongCat-Flash-Omni 88.7%
- 8
Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 87.8%
- 9
TML-Interaction-Small 82.1%
- 10
Ultravox v0.6 Llama 3.3 70B 81.8%
- 11
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 80.3%
- 12 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 76.9%
- 13
Ultravox v0.5 Llama 3.1 8B 74.9%
- 14
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 74.1%
- 15
Ultravox v0.4.1 Llama 3.1 8B 72.1%
- 16
Baichuan-Omni-1.5 71.3%
- 17
Baichuan-Audio-Instruct 69.3%
- 18 VITA-1.5 64.5%
- 19
Phi-4-multimodal 64.3%
- 20
Ultravox v0.5 Llama 3.2 1B 57.5%
- 21 GLM-4-Voice-9B 56.5%
- 22
Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct 55.8%
- 23
Step-Audio-Chat 50.8%
- 24
Moshi 29.5%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official VoiceBench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 93.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 91.6% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 91.4% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 90.1% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 89.4% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 88.7% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 87.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 85.5% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 82.1% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 80.3% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct | 76.9% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 74.1% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 89.4% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 88.8% | thinking | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | | 81.8% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct | 76.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 74.9% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 72.1% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 71.3% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 69.3% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | VITA-1.5 | 64.5% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 64.3% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 57.5% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | GLM-4-Voice-9B | 56.5% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 55.8% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 50.8% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 29.5% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 93.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 91.6% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 91.4% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 90.1% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 89.4% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 88.8% | thinking | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 88.7% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 87.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 82.1% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 81.8% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 80.3% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct | 76.9% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 74.9% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 74.1% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 72.1% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 71.3% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 69.3% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | VITA-1.5 | 64.5% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 64.3% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 57.5% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | GLM-4-Voice-9B | 56.5% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 55.8% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 50.8% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | | 29.5% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 46 entries, 15 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
5 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in October 2024 8 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in October 2024 8 models have held number one with claims included since its release in October 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official VoiceBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B on the official leaderboard passed 85% in September 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official VoiceBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | 91.6 | VoiceBench Audio Interaction | |
| Jul 30, 2026 | 90.1 | VoiceBench | |
| Jul 15, 2026 | 91.4 | VoiceBench | |
| May 11, 2026 | 82.1 | IFEval (VoiceBench) accuracy, audio | |
| Apr 28, 2026 | 89.4 | Voice interaction (Speech Instruction Following) | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 87.8 | VoiceBench, Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 93.1 | VoiceBench | |
| Oct 31, 2025 | 88.7 | Mean of VoiceBench AlpacaEval 4.94 / CommonEval 4.32 (GPT scores x20) / OpenBookQA 93.41 / SDQA 82.46 / MMSU 81.95 / AdvBench 100 / IFEval 77.99, computed by the almanac | |
| Sep 22, 2025 | 85.5 | VoiceBench Overall | |
| Apr 25, 2025 | Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct | 76.9 | VoiceBench Avg (AlpacaEval 4.46, CommonEval 3.97, SD-QA 63.12, MMSU 62.17, OpenBookQA 83.52, IFEval 61.10, AdvBench 100.00) |
| Mar 27, 2025 | 74.1 | VoiceBench Avg |
12 system cards report it, from 7 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | | 80.3 | Voicebench, reasoning, 72.60 non-reasoning (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| Sep 22, 2026 | | 91.6 | VoiceBench (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| Jul 30, 2026 | | 90.1 | VoiceBench (5. Evaluations table) | Capabilities |
| Jul 15, 2026 | | 91.4 | VoiceBench (5. Evaluations table, effort 0.99) | Capabilities |
| Apr 27, 2026 | | 89.4 | VoiceBench Avg, reasoning on (Table 8). Nine spoken subsets from 71.4 (SD-QA) to 100 (AdvBench) | Capabilities |
| Apr 17, 2026 | | 93.1 | VoiceBench (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Feb 4, 2026 | | VoiceBench AlpacaEval 4.62, CommonEval 3.74, SD-QA 77.58, MMSU 84.68, OpenBookQA 92.97, IFEval 72.67, AdvBench 99.23, no overall score (Table 7) | Capabilities | |
| Oct 31, 2025 | | VoiceBench AlpacaEval 4.94, CommonEval 4.32, OpenBookQA 93.41, SDQA 82.46, MMSU 81.95, AdvBench 100, IFEval 77.99, no overall score (Table 11) | Capabilities | |
| Sep 22, 2025 | | 85.5 | VoiceBench Overall, Instruct (Table 7). Thinking 88.8 | Capabilities |
| Jul 17, 2025 | | Openbook QA (Chen et al., 2024, the VoiceBench subset) 88.4, no overall VoiceBench score (Table 8) | Capabilities | |
| Apr 25, 2025 | Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct technical report | 76.9 | VoiceBench Avg (Table 6). AlpacaEval 4.46, CommonEval 3.97, SD-QA 63.12, MMSU 62.17, OpenBookQA 83.52, IFEval 61.10, AdvBench 100.00 | Capabilities |
| Mar 26, 2025 | | 74.1 | VoiceBench Avg (Table 3). AlpacaEval 4.49, CommonEval 3.93, SD-QA 55.71, MMSU 61.32, OpenBookQA 81.10, IFEval 52.87, AdvBench 99.42 | Capabilities |
3 lab claims next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 2 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 85.5% VoiceBench Overall | 88.8% Leaderboard, thinking | −3.3 pts |
| Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct | 76.9% VoiceBench Avg (AlpacaEval 4.46, CommonEval 3.97, SD-QA 63.12, MMSU 62.17, OpenBookQA 83.52, IFEval 61.10, AdvBench 100.00) | 76.9% Leaderboard | Same |
| | 89.4% VoiceBench Avg, reasoning on (Table 8). Nine spoken subsets from 71.4 (SD-QA) to 100 (AdvBench) | 89.4% Leaderboard | Same |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%