Benchmark Almanac

MLVU

Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8% leads since August 2026
VideoLLAMA3-7B 47.7% leads since June 2024
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8% leads since August 2026
In use

Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.

The dev set and the test set use different questions and option counts, so their scores are not comparable. The test answers became public on March 18th, 2025.

Made by
BAAI + partners
Released
June 2024
Kind
Long videos
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen 3.8 Max #29 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2026
Last model added
August 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

The evaluation of Long Video Understanding (LVU) performance poses an important but challenging research problem. Despite previous efforts, the existing video understanding benchmarks are severely constrained by several issues, especially the insufficient lengths of videos, a lack of diversity in video types and evaluation tasks, and the inappropriateness for evaluating LVU performances. To address the above problems, we propose a new benchmark called MLVU (Multi-task Long Video Understanding Benchmark) for the comprehensive and in-depth evaluation of LVU. MLVU presents the following critical values: 1) The substantial and flexible extension of video lengths, which enables the benchmark to evaluate LVU performance across a wide range of durations. 2) The inclusion of various video genres, e.g., movies, surveillance footage, egocentric videos, cartoons, game videos, etc., which reflects the models' LVU performances in different scenarios. 3) The development of diversified evaluation tasks, which enables a comprehensive examination of MLLMs' key abilities in long-video understanding. The empirical study with 23 latest MLLMs reveals significant room for improvement in today's technique, as all existing methods struggle with most of the evaluation tasks and exhibit severe performance degradation when handling longer videos. Additionally, it suggests that factors such as context length, image-understanding ability, and the choice of LLM backbone can play critical roles in future advancements. We anticipate that MLVU will advance the research of long video understanding by providing a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of MLLMs.

Abstract of MLVU: Benchmarking Multi-task Long Video Understanding (arXiv:2406.04264, CC0)
22
Models scored in lab cards
21
Launch posts list it, from 5 labs
8
System cards report it, from 5 labs

Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 90.8% among models released by August 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

VideoLLAMA3-7B leads with 47.7% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 90.8%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
  2. 2 Qwen3.7-Plus 87.4%
  3. 3 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 87.3%
  4. 4 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 86.8%
  5. 5 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 86.7%
  6. 6 Qwen 3.6 Plus 86.7%
  7. 7 Qwen3.6 27B 86.6%
  8. 8 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 86.2%
  9. 9 Qwen3.5-27B 85.9%
  10. 10 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 85.6%
  11. 11 Qwen3.5-9B 84.4%
  12. 12 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 83.8%
  13. 13 Qwen3.5-4B 82.8%
  14. 14 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 82.8%
  15. 15 Seed1.5-VL 82.1%
  16. 16 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 78.2%
  17. 17 Qwen3.5-2B 76.2%
  18. 18 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 75.2%
  19. 19 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 74.6%
  20. 20 Reka Edge 74.3%
  21. 21 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 73.6%
  22. 22 Qwen3.5-0.8B 65.6%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Sources: Labs’ model cards and official MLVU leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8% Aug 2026 Lab model card
2 Qwen3.7-Plus 87.4% Jun 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 87.3% Feb 2026 Lab model card
4 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 86.8% Mar 2026 Lab model card
5 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 86.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
6 Qwen 3.6 Plus 86.7% Apr 2026 Lab model card
7 Qwen3.6 27B 86.6% Apr 2026 Lab model card
8 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 86.2% Apr 2026 Lab model card
9 Qwen3.5-27B 85.9% Feb 2026 Lab model card
10 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 85.6% Feb 2026 Lab model card
11 Qwen3.5-9B 84.4% Mar 2026 Lab model card
12 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 83.8% Sep 2025 Lab model card
13 Qwen3.5-4B 82.8% Mar 2026 Lab model card
14 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 82.8% May 2026 Lab model card
15 Seed1.5-VL 82.1% May 2025 Lab model card
16 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 78.2% Aug 2025 Lab model card
17 Qwen3.5-2B 76.2% Mar 2026 Lab model card
18 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 75.2% Sep 2025 Lab model card
19 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 74.6% Jan 2025 Lab model card
20 Reka Edge 74.3% Mar 2026 Lab model card
21 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 73.6% Nov 2025 Lab model card
22 Qwen3.5-0.8B 65.6% Mar 2026 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 VideoLLAMA3-7B 47.7% <=180 frm Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
2 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 47.2% 32 frm Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Video-XL-7B 45.5% 256 frm Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
4 VILA1.5-40B 44.2% 14 frm Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
5 LongVA-7B 41.1% 256 frm Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen-VL-Max 34.2% 10 frm Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
7 sharegpt4video-8b 33.8% 16 frm May 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Video-LLaVA-7B 30.7% 8 frm Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
9 Claude 3 Opus 25% 16 frm Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8% Aug 2026 Lab model card
2 Qwen3.7-Plus 87.4% Jun 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 87.3% Feb 2026 Lab model card
4 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 86.8% Mar 2026 Lab model card
5 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 86.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
6 Qwen 3.6 Plus 86.7% Apr 2026 Lab model card
7 Qwen3.6 27B 86.6% Apr 2026 Lab model card
8 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 86.2% Apr 2026 Lab model card
9 Qwen3.5-27B 85.9% Feb 2026 Lab model card
10 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 85.6% Feb 2026 Lab model card
11 Qwen3.5-9B 84.4% Mar 2026 Lab model card
12 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 83.8% Sep 2025 Lab model card
13 Qwen3.5-4B 82.8% Mar 2026 Lab model card
14 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 82.8% May 2026 Lab model card
15 Seed1.5-VL 82.1% May 2025 Lab model card
16 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 78.2% Aug 2025 Lab model card
17 Qwen3.5-2B 76.2% Mar 2026 Lab model card
18 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 75.2% Sep 2025 Lab model card
19 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 74.6% Jan 2025 Lab model card
20 Reka Edge 74.3% Mar 2026 Lab model card
21 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 73.6% Nov 2025 Lab model card
22 Qwen3.5-0.8B 65.6% Mar 2026 Lab model card
23 VideoLLAMA3-7B 47.7% <=180 frm Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
24 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 47.2% 32 frm Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
25 Video-XL-7B 45.5% 256 frm Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
26 VILA1.5-40B 44.2% 14 frm Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
27 LongVA-7B 41.1% 256 frm Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
28 Qwen-VL-Max 34.2% 10 frm Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
29 sharegpt4video-8b 33.8% 16 frm May 2024 Official leaderboard
30 Video-LLaVA-7B 30.7% 8 frm Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
31 Claude 3 Opus 25% 16 frm Feb 2024 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 35 entries, 9 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

7 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in June 2024 Number one over time 8 models have held number one with claims included since its release in June 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Other labs Qwen ByteDance Seed
Own leaderboard Not tested since Oct 2024
Lab claims Passed 85% in Feb 2026, by Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%

Sources: Official MLVU leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Qwen’s own number for Qwen3.5 397B-A17B passed 85% in February 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B Qwen2.5-VL-72B VideoLLAMA3-7B Qwen-VL-Max 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B

Sources: Official MLVU leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
ByteDance Seed
Shanghai AI Lab
Reka
Kuaishou
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 3, 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8 MLVU (M-Avg)
Jun 1, 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 87.4 MLVU (M-Avg)
May 25, 2026 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 82.8 MLVU
Apr 22, 2026 Qwen3.6 27B 86.6 MLVU
Apr 15, 2026 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 86.2 MLVU
Apr 2, 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 86.7 MLVU (M-Avg)
Mar 30, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 86.8 MLVU(M-Avg)
Mar 11, 2026 Reka Edge 74.3 MLVU
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-0.8B 65.6 MLVU 65.6/-- (with CI / without CI)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-2B 76.2 MLVU 76.2/-- (with CI / without CI)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-4B 82.8 MLVU
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-9B 84.4 MLVU
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 85.6 MLVU
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-27B 85.9 MLVU
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 87.3 MLVU
Feb 16, 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 86.7 MLVU (M-Avg)
Sep 23, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 83.8 MLVU
Sep 22, 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 75.2 MLVU
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 78.2 MLVU
May 12, 2025 Seed1.5-VL 82.1 MLVU
Jan 28, 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 74.6 MLVU_M-Avg_dev

8 system cards report it, from 5 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 9, 2026 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B technical report 82.8 MLVU (Table 2) Capabilities
Apr 17, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 86.8 MLVU (M-Avg) (Table 6) Capabilities
Nov 26, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 83.8 MLVU M-Avg (Table 2) Capabilities
Nov 6, 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL technical report 73.6 MLVU (M-Avg), reasoning off only (Table 3) Capabilities
Sep 22, 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B technical report 75.2 MLVU, Instruct (Table 9). Thinking 72.9 (Table 10) Capabilities
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 78.2 MLVU (M-Avg) (Table 2, Table 9) Capabilities
May 11, 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 82.1 MLVU, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 81.8 Capabilities
Feb 19, 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 74.6 MLVU M-Avg (Table 8) Capabilities

More in Audio and video

All 232 in Audio and video
  • Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
  • LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization. Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
  • MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
  • FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better. Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
  • VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules. Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
  • TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%