MLVU
Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
The dev set and the test set use different questions and option counts, so their scores are not comparable. The test answers became public on March 18th, 2025.
- Released
- June 2024
- Kind
- Long videos
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Qwen 3.8 Max #29 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026
- Last model added
- August 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
The evaluation of Long Video Understanding (LVU) performance poses an important but challenging research problem. Despite previous efforts, the existing video understanding benchmarks are severely constrained by several issues, especially the insufficient lengths of videos, a lack of diversity in video types and evaluation tasks, and the inappropriateness for evaluating LVU performances. To address the above problems, we propose a new benchmark called MLVU (Multi-task Long Video Understanding Benchmark) for the comprehensive and in-depth evaluation of LVU. MLVU presents the following critical values: 1) The substantial and flexible extension of video lengths, which enables the benchmark to evaluate LVU performance across a wide range of durations. 2) The inclusion of various video genres, e.g., movies, surveillance footage, egocentric videos, cartoons, game videos, etc., which reflects the models' LVU performances in different scenarios. 3) The development of diversified evaluation tasks, which enables a comprehensive examination of MLLMs' key abilities in long-video understanding. The empirical study with 23 latest MLLMs reveals significant room for improvement in today's technique, as all existing methods struggle with most of the evaluation tasks and exhibit severe performance degradation when handling longer videos. Additionally, it suggests that factors such as context length, image-understanding ability, and the choice of LLM backbone can play critical roles in future advancements. We anticipate that MLVU will advance the research of long video understanding by providing a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of MLLMs.
Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 90.8% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
VideoLLAMA3-7B leads with 47.7% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 90.8%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 90.8
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 87.4
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 87.3
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 86.8
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 86.7
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 86.7
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 86.6
Qwen3.6 27B
- 86.2
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 85.9
Qwen3.5-27B
- 85.6
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 84.4
Qwen3.5-9B
- 83.8
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 82.8
Qwen3.5-4B
- 82.8
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B
- 82.1
Seed1.5-VL
- 78.2
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 76.2
Qwen3.5-2B
- 75.2
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 74.6
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 74.3 Reka Edge
- 73.6
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL
- 65.6
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- 1
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- 2
Qwen3.7-Plus 87.4%
- 3
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 87.3%
- 4
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 86.8%
- 5
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 86.7%
- 6
Qwen 3.6 Plus 86.7%
- 7
Qwen3.6 27B 86.6%
- 8
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 86.2%
- 9
Qwen3.5-27B 85.9%
- 10
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 85.6%
- 11
Qwen3.5-9B 84.4%
- 12
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 83.8%
- 13
Qwen3.5-4B 82.8%
- 14
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 82.8%
- 15
Seed1.5-VL 82.1%
- 16
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 78.2%
- 17
Qwen3.5-2B 76.2%
- 18
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 75.2%
- 19
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 74.6%
- 20 Reka Edge 74.3%
- 21
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 73.6%
- 22
Qwen3.5-0.8B 65.6%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 VideoLLAMA3-7B <=180 frm 47.7%
- 2 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 32 frm 47.2%
- 3 Video-XL-7B 256 frm 45.5%
- 4
VILA1.5-40B 14 frm 44.2%
- 5 LongVA-7B 256 frm 41.1%
- 6 Qwen-VL-Max 10 frm 34.2%
- 7 sharegpt4video-8b 16 frm 33.8%
- 8 Video-LLaVA-7B 8 frm 30.7%
- 9 Claude 3 Opus 16 frm 25%
Source: Official MLVU leaderboard
- 90.8
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 87.4
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 87.3
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 86.8
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 86.7
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 86.7
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 86.6
Qwen3.6 27B
- 86.2
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 85.9
Qwen3.5-27B
- 85.6
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 84.4
Qwen3.5-9B
- 83.8
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 82.8
Qwen3.5-4B
- 82.8
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B
- 82.1
Seed1.5-VL
- 78.2
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 76.2
Qwen3.5-2B
- 75.2
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 74.6
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 74.3 Reka Edge
- 73.6
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL
- 65.6
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- 47.7 VideoLLAMA3-7B
- 47.2 LLaVA-OneVision 72B
- 45.5 Video-XL-7B
- 44.2
VILA1.5-40B
- 41.1 LongVA-7B
- 34.2 Qwen-VL-Max
- 33.8 sharegpt4video-8b
- 30.7 Video-LLaVA-7B
- 25.0 Claude 3 Opus
- 1
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- 2
Qwen3.7-Plus 87.4%
- 3
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 87.3%
- 4
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 86.8%
- 5
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 86.7%
- 6
Qwen 3.6 Plus 86.7%
- 7
Qwen3.6 27B 86.6%
- 8
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 86.2%
- 9
Qwen3.5-27B 85.9%
- 10
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 85.6%
- 11
Qwen3.5-9B 84.4%
- 12
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 83.8%
- 13
Qwen3.5-4B 82.8%
- 14
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 82.8%
- 15
Seed1.5-VL 82.1%
- 16
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 78.2%
- 17
Qwen3.5-2B 76.2%
- 18
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 75.2%
- 19
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 74.6%
- 20 Reka Edge 74.3%
- 21
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 73.6%
- 22
Qwen3.5-0.8B 65.6%
- 23 VideoLLAMA3-7B <=180 frm 47.7%
- 24 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 32 frm 47.2%
- 25 Video-XL-7B 256 frm 45.5%
- 26
VILA1.5-40B 14 frm 44.2%
- 27 LongVA-7B 256 frm 41.1%
- 28 Qwen-VL-Max 10 frm 34.2%
- 29 sharegpt4video-8b 16 frm 33.8%
- 30 Video-LLaVA-7B 8 frm 30.7%
- 31 Claude 3 Opus 16 frm 25%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official MLVU leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 90.8% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 87.4% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 87.3% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 86.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 86.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 86.7% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 86.6% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 86.2% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 85.9% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 85.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 84.4% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 83.8% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 82.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 82.8% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 82.1% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 78.2% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 76.2% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 75.2% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 74.6% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | Reka Edge | 74.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 73.6% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 65.6% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VideoLLAMA3-7B | 47.7% | <=180 frm | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | LLaVA-OneVision 72B | 47.2% | 32 frm | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Video-XL-7B | 45.5% | 256 frm | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 44.2% | 14 frm | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | LongVA-7B | 41.1% | 256 frm | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Qwen-VL-Max | 34.2% | 10 frm | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | sharegpt4video-8b | 33.8% | 16 frm | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Video-LLaVA-7B | 30.7% | 8 frm | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Claude 3 Opus | 25% | 16 frm | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 90.8% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 87.4% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 87.3% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 86.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 86.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 86.7% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 86.6% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 86.2% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 85.9% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 85.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 84.4% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 83.8% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 82.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 82.8% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 82.1% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 78.2% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 76.2% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 75.2% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 74.6% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | Reka Edge | 74.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 73.6% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 65.6% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | VideoLLAMA3-7B | 47.7% | <=180 frm | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | LLaVA-OneVision 72B | 47.2% | 32 frm | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | Video-XL-7B | 45.5% | 256 frm | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | | 44.2% | 14 frm | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | LongVA-7B | 41.1% | 256 frm | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | Qwen-VL-Max | 34.2% | 10 frm | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 29 | sharegpt4video-8b | 33.8% | 16 frm | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 30 | Video-LLaVA-7B | 30.7% | 8 frm | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 31 | Claude 3 Opus | 25% | 16 frm | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 35 entries, 9 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
7 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in June 2024 Number one over time 8 models have held number one with claims included since its release in June 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official MLVU leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Qwen’s own number for Qwen3.5 397B-A17B passed 85% in February 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official MLVU leaderboard and labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2026 | 90.8 | MLVU (M-Avg) | |
| Jun 1, 2026 | 87.4 | MLVU (M-Avg) | |
| May 25, 2026 | 82.8 | MLVU | |
| Apr 22, 2026 | 86.6 | MLVU | |
| Apr 15, 2026 | 86.2 | MLVU | |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 86.7 | MLVU (M-Avg) | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 86.8 | MLVU(M-Avg) | |
| Mar 11, 2026 | Reka Edge | 74.3 | MLVU |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 65.6 | MLVU 65.6/-- (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 76.2 | MLVU 76.2/-- (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 82.8 | MLVU | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 84.4 | MLVU | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 85.6 | MLVU | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 85.9 | MLVU | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 87.3 | MLVU | |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 86.7 | MLVU (M-Avg) | |
| Sep 23, 2025 | 83.8 | MLVU | |
| Sep 22, 2025 | 75.2 | MLVU | |
| Aug 25, 2025 | 78.2 | MLVU | |
| May 12, 2025 | 82.1 | MLVU | |
| Jan 28, 2025 | 74.6 | MLVU_M-Avg_dev |
8 system cards report it, from 5 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2026 | | 82.8 | MLVU (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Apr 17, 2026 | | 86.8 | MLVU (M-Avg) (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 83.8 | MLVU M-Avg (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Nov 6, 2025 | | 73.6 | MLVU (M-Avg), reasoning off only (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Sep 22, 2025 | | 75.2 | MLVU, Instruct (Table 9). Thinking 72.9 (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| Aug 25, 2025 | | 78.2 | MLVU (M-Avg) (Table 2, Table 9) | Capabilities |
| May 11, 2025 | | 82.1 | MLVU, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 81.8 | Capabilities |
| Feb 19, 2025 | | 74.6 | MLVU M-Avg (Table 8) | Capabilities |
More in Audio and video
- Video-MMMU In use 300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
- TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%