Video-MMMU
300 expert-level lecture videos with questions testing perception, comprehension and adaptation of knowledge. Accuracy.
Frame sampling differs across labs.
- Made by
- NTU S-Lab (LMMs-Lab)
- Released
- January 2025
- Kind
- Video understanding
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Qwen 3.8 Max #29 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026
- Last model added
- August 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Humans acquire knowledge through three cognitive stages: perceiving information, comprehending knowledge, and adapting knowledge to solve novel problems. Videos serve as an effective medium for this learning process, facilitating a progression through these cognitive stages. However, existing video benchmarks fail to systematically evaluate the knowledge acquisition capabilities in Large Multimodal Models (LMMs). To address this gap, we introduce Video-MMMU, a multi-modal, multi-disciplinary benchmark designed to assess LMMs' ability to acquire and utilize knowledge from videos. Video-MMMU features a curated collection of 300 expert-level videos and 900 human-annotated questions across six disciplines, evaluating knowledge acquisition through stage-aligned question-answer pairs: Perception, Comprehension, and Adaptation. A proposed knowledge gain metric, Δknowledge, quantifies improvement in performance after video viewing. Evaluation of LMMs reveals a steep decline in performance as cognitive demands increase and highlights a significant gap between human and model knowledge acquisition, underscoring the need for methods to enhance LMMs' capability to learn and adapt from videos.
Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 88.7% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
GPT-5 leads with 84.6% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 88.7%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 88.7
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 88.3
Seed2.0 Lite (0428)
- 87.6
Gemini 3 Pro
- 86.9
Gemini 3 Flash
- 86.9
Seed2.0 Pro
- 86.6 Kimi K2.5
- 85.4
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 84.8
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- 84.7
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 84.6 GPT-5
- 84.6
MiniMax-M3
- 84.4
Qwen3.6 27B
- 84.0
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 83.7
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 83.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 82.7
Seed1.8
- 82.5 GPT-5 mini
- 82.3
Qwen3.5-27B
- 82.0
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 81.4
Seed1.5-VL
- 81.1
ERNIE 5.0
- 80.4
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 80.0
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 80.0
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B
- 79.2
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 78.9
Qwen3.5-9B
- 74.7 GLM-4.6V
- 74.1
Qwen3.5-4B
- 72.4 GLM-4.5V
- 67.5
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 66.8 GPT-5 nano
- 65.2 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506
- 62.1
Qwen3.5-2B
- 61.0 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 60.2
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 44.3
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- 1
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- 2
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 88.3%
- 3
Gemini 3 Pro 87.6%
- 4
Gemini 3 Flash 86.9%
- 5
Seed2.0 Pro 86.9%
- 6 Kimi K2.5 86.6%
- 7
Qwen3.7-Plus 85.4%
- 8
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 84.8%
- 9
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 84.7%
- 10 GPT-5 84.6%
- 11
MiniMax-M3 84.6%
- 12
Qwen3.6 27B 84.4%
- 13
Qwen 3.6 Plus 84%
- 14
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 83.7%
- 15
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 83.6%
- 16
Seed1.8 82.7%
- 17 GPT-5 mini 82.5%
- 18
Qwen3.5-27B 82.3%
- 19
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 82%
- 20
Seed1.5-VL 81.4%
- 21
ERNIE 5.0 81.1%
- 22
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 80.4%
- 23
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 80%
- 24
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 80%
- 25
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 79.2%
- 26
Qwen3.5-9B 78.9%
- 27 GLM-4.6V 74.7%
- 28
Qwen3.5-4B 74.1%
- 29 GLM-4.5V 72.4%
- 30
LongCat-Flash-Omni 67.5%
- 31 GPT-5 nano 66.8%
- 32 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 65.2%
- 33
Qwen3.5-2B 62.1%
- 34 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 61%
- 35
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 60.2%
- 36
Qwen3.5-0.8B 44.3%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 84.6 GPT-5
- 83.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 83.3 o3
- 66.0
Keye-VL-1.5-8B
- 65.8 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 65.2 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506
- 61.2 GPT-4o
- 60.2
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 53.9
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 50.8 Aria
- 49.8
Gemini 1.5 Flash
- 49.7 LLaVA-Video-72B-Qwen2
- 48.3 LLaVA-OneVision 72B
- 47.4
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 47.0 VideoLLAMA3-7B
- 42.0
mPLUG-Owl3-7B
- 41.8
MAmmoTH-VL-8B
- 37.4
InternVL2-8B
- 36.1 LLaVA-Video-7B-Qwen2
- 34.0
VILA1.5-40B
- 33.9
LLaVA-OneVision 7B
- 30.0
Llama 3.2 11B
- 24.0 LongVA-7B
- 20.9
Llama-3-VILA1.5-8B
- 1 GPT-5 84.6%
- 2
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 83.6%
- 3 o3 83.3%
- 4
Keye-VL-1.5-8B 66%
- 5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 65.8%
- 6 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 65.2%
- 7 GPT-4o Aug 2024 61.2%
- 8
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 60.2%
- 9
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 53.9%
- 10 Aria 50.8%
- 11
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 49.8%
- 12 LLaVA-Video-72B-Qwen2 49.7%
- 13 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 48.3%
- 14
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 47.4%
- 15 VideoLLAMA3-7B 47%
- 16
mPLUG-Owl3-7B 42%
- 17
MAmmoTH-VL-8B 41.8%
- 18
InternVL2-8B 37.4%
- 19 LLaVA-Video-7B-Qwen2 36.1%
- 20
VILA1.5-40B 34%
- 21
LLaVA-OneVision 7B 33.9%
- 22
Llama 3.2 11B 30%
- 23 LongVA-7B 24%
- 24
Llama-3-VILA1.5-8B 20.9%
Source: Official Video-MMMU leaderboard
- 88.7
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 88.3
Seed2.0 Lite (0428)
- 87.6
Gemini 3 Pro
- 86.9
Gemini 3 Flash
- 86.9
Seed2.0 Pro
- 86.6 Kimi K2.5
- 85.4
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 84.8
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- 84.7
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 84.6 GPT-5
- 84.6
MiniMax-M3
- 84.4
Qwen3.6 27B
- 84.0
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 83.7
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 83.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 83.3 o3
- 82.7
Seed1.8
- 82.5 GPT-5 mini
- 82.3
Qwen3.5-27B
- 82.0
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 81.4
Seed1.5-VL
- 81.1
ERNIE 5.0
- 80.4
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 80.0
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 80.0
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B
- 79.2
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 78.9
Qwen3.5-9B
- 74.7 GLM-4.6V
- 74.1
Qwen3.5-4B
- 72.4 GLM-4.5V
- 67.5
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 66.8 GPT-5 nano
- 66.0
Keye-VL-1.5-8B
- 65.8 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 65.2 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506
- 62.1
Qwen3.5-2B
- 61.2 GPT-4o
- 61.0 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 60.2
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 53.9
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 50.8 Aria
- 49.8
Gemini 1.5 Flash
- 49.7 LLaVA-Video-72B-Qwen2
- 48.3 LLaVA-OneVision 72B
- 47.4
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 47.0 VideoLLAMA3-7B
- 44.3
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- 42.0
mPLUG-Owl3-7B
- 41.8
MAmmoTH-VL-8B
- 37.4
InternVL2-8B
- 36.1 LLaVA-Video-7B-Qwen2
- 34.0
VILA1.5-40B
- 33.9
LLaVA-OneVision 7B
- 30.0
Llama 3.2 11B
- 24.0 LongVA-7B
- 20.9
Llama-3-VILA1.5-8B
- 1
Qwen 3.8 Max 88.7%
- 2
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 88.3%
- 3
Gemini 3 Pro 87.6%
- 4
Gemini 3 Flash 86.9%
- 5
Seed2.0 Pro 86.9%
- 6 Kimi K2.5 86.6%
- 7
Qwen3.7-Plus 85.4%
- 8
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 84.8%
- 9
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 84.7%
- 10 GPT-5 84.6%
- 11
MiniMax-M3 84.6%
- 12
Qwen3.6 27B 84.4%
- 13
Qwen 3.6 Plus 84%
- 14
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 83.7%
- 15
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 83.6%
- 16 o3 83.3%
- 17
Seed1.8 82.7%
- 18 GPT-5 mini 82.5%
- 19
Qwen3.5-27B 82.3%
- 20
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 82%
- 21
Seed1.5-VL 81.4%
- 22
ERNIE 5.0 81.1%
- 23
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 80.4%
- 24
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 80%
- 25
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 80%
- 26
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 79.2%
- 27
Qwen3.5-9B 78.9%
- 28 GLM-4.6V 74.7%
- 29
Qwen3.5-4B 74.1%
- 30 GLM-4.5V 72.4%
- 31
LongCat-Flash-Omni 67.5%
- 32 GPT-5 nano 66.8%
- 33
Keye-VL-1.5-8B 66%
- 34 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 65.8%
- 35 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 65.2%
- 36
Qwen3.5-2B 62.1%
- 37 GPT-4o Aug 2024 61.2%
- 38 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 61%
- 39
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 60.2%
- 40
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 53.9%
- 41 Aria 50.8%
- 42
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 49.8%
- 43 LLaVA-Video-72B-Qwen2 49.7%
- 44 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 48.3%
- 45
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 47.4%
- 46 VideoLLAMA3-7B 47%
- 47
Qwen3.5-0.8B 44.3%
- 48
mPLUG-Owl3-7B 42%
- 49
MAmmoTH-VL-8B 41.8%
- 50
InternVL2-8B 37.4%
- 51 LLaVA-Video-7B-Qwen2 36.1%
- 52
VILA1.5-40B 34%
- 53
LLaVA-OneVision 7B 33.9%
- 54
Llama 3.2 11B 30%
- 55 LongVA-7B 24%
- 56
Llama-3-VILA1.5-8B 20.9%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official Video-MMMU leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 88.7% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 88.3% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 87.6% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 86.9% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 86.9% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | Kimi K2.5 | 86.6% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 85.4% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 84.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 84.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | GPT-5 | 84.6% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 84.6% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 84.4% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 84% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 83.7% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 83.6% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 82.7% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | GPT-5 mini | 82.5% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 82.3% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 82% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 81.4% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 81.1% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 80.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | | 80% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 80% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | | 79.2% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | | 78.9% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | GLM-4.6V | 74.7% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | | 74.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | GLM-4.5V | 72.4% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | | 67.5% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 31 | GPT-5 nano | 66.8% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 32 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 | 65.2% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 33 | | 62.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 34 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 61% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 35 | | 60.2% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 36 | | 44.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5 | 84.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 83.6% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | o3 | 83.3% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 66% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 65.8% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 | 65.2% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | GPT-4o Aug 2024 | 61.2% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 60.2% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 53.9% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Aria | 50.8% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 49.8% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | LLaVA-Video-72B-Qwen2 | 49.7% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | LLaVA-OneVision 72B | 48.3% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 47.4% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | VideoLLAMA3-7B | 47% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 42% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 41.8% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 37.4% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | LLaVA-Video-7B-Qwen2 | 36.1% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 34% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | 33.9% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 30% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | LongVA-7B | 24% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | | 20.9% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 88.7% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 88.3% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 87.6% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 86.9% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 86.9% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | Kimi K2.5 | 86.6% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 85.4% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 84.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 84.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | GPT-5 | 84.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 84.6% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 84.4% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 84% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 83.7% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 83.6% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | o3 | 83.3% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 82.7% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | GPT-5 mini | 82.5% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 82.3% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 82% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 81.4% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 81.1% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | | 80.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 80% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | | 80% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | | 79.2% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | | 78.9% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | GLM-4.6V | 74.7% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | | 74.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | GLM-4.5V | 72.4% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 31 | | 67.5% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 32 | GPT-5 nano | 66.8% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 33 | | 66% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 65.8% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 | 65.2% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | | 62.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 37 | GPT-4o Aug 2024 | 61.2% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 61% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 39 | | 60.2% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | | 53.9% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | Aria | 50.8% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | | 49.8% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | LLaVA-Video-72B-Qwen2 | 49.7% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | LLaVA-OneVision 72B | 48.3% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | | 47.4% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | VideoLLAMA3-7B | 47% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | | 44.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 48 | | 42% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | | 41.8% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | | 37.4% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | LLaVA-Video-7B-Qwen2 | 36.1% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 52 | | 34% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | | 33.9% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 54 | | 30% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | LongVA-7B | 24% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | | 20.9% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 28 entries, 24 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
7 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in January 2025 4 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in January 2025 7 models have held number one with claims included since its release in January 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official Video-MMMU leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Google DeepMind’s own number for Gemini 3 Pro passed 85% in November 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official Video-MMMU leaderboard and labs’ model cards
2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2026 | 88.7 | VideoMMMU | |
| Jun 1, 2026 | 85.4 | VideoMMMU | |
| Jun 1, 2026 | 84.6 | Video-MMMU | |
| May 25, 2026 | 80 | VideoMMMU | |
| Apr 28, 2026 | 88.3 | VideoMMMU | |
| Apr 22, 2026 | 84.4 | VideoMMMU | |
| Apr 15, 2026 | 83.7 | VideoMMMU | |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 84 | VideoMMMU | |
| Mar 3, 2026 | 84.8 | Video-MMMU | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 44.3 | VideoMMMU 44.3/-- (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 62.1 | VideoMMMU 62.1/-- (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 74.1 | VideoMMMU | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 78.9 | VideoMMMU | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 80.4 | VideoMMMU | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 82.3 | VideoMMMU | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 82 | VideoMMMU | |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 84.7 | VideoMMMU | |
| Feb 6, 2026 | 81.1 | Video-MMMU | |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Kimi K2.5 | 86.6 | VideoMMMU |
| Dec 18, 2025 | 82.7 | VideoMMMU | |
| Dec 17, 2025 | 86.9 | Video-MMMU | |
| Dec 8, 2025 | GLM-4.6V | 74.7 | VideoMMMU |
| Nov 18, 2025 | 87.6 | Video-MMMU | |
| Oct 31, 2025 | 67.5 | Video-MMMU | |
| Sep 23, 2025 | 80 | VideoMMMU | |
| Aug 11, 2025 | GLM-4.5V | 72.4 | VideoMMMU |
| Aug 7, 2025 | GPT-5 nano | 66.8 | VideoMMMU, max frame 256 |
| Aug 7, 2025 | GPT-5 mini | 82.5 | VideoMMMU, max frame 256 |
| Aug 7, 2025 | GPT-5 | 84.6 | VideoMMMU Video-based multimodal reasoning (max frame 256) |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 61 | VideoMMMU |
| Jun 21, 2025 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 | 65.2 | VideoMMMU (Pass@1) |
| Jun 17, 2025 | 83.6 | VideoMMMU | |
| May 12, 2025 | 81.4 | Video-MMMU |
16 system cards report it, from 8 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2026 | | 80 | Video-MMMU (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 82.7 | VideoMMMU (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Mar 3, 2026 | | 84.8 | Video-MMMU (results table, p.4) | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 86.9 | VideoMMMU (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Feb 4, 2026 | | 81.1 | Video-MMMU (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Jan 30, 2026 | Kimi K2.5 technical report | 86.6 | VideoMMMU (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| Jan 1, 2026 | GLM-4.6V technical report | 74.7 | VideoMMMU, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 80 | VideoMMMU (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Oct 31, 2025 | | 67.5 | Video-MMMU (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Aug 13, 2025 | GLM-4.5V technical report | 72.4 | VideoMMMU, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jul 7, 2025 | | 83.6 | VideoMMMU, test, 0-shot (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Jul 7, 2025 | | 79.2 | VideoMMMU, test, 0-shot (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report | 61 | VideoMMMU, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jun 23, 2025 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 technical report | 65.2 | VideoMMMU (Pass@1) (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| May 11, 2025 | | 81.4 | Video-MMMU, thinking (Table 7). Non-thinking 72.1 | Capabilities |
| Feb 19, 2025 | | 60.2 | Video-MMMU (Table 8) | Capabilities |
4 lab claims next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 4 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 | 65.2% VideoMMMU (Pass@1) | 65.2% Leaderboard | Same |
| | 60.2% Video-MMMU (Table 8) | 60.2% Leaderboard | Same |
| | 83.6% VideoMMMU | 83.6% Leaderboard | Same |
| GPT-5 | 84.6% VideoMMMU Video-based multimodal reasoning (max frame 256) | 84.6% Leaderboard | Same |
More in Audio and video
- LVBench In use Hours-long video understanding with multiple-choice questions on reasoning, grounding and summarization.
Gemini 4 Argon 91.7%
- MMVU In use 3,000 expert-annotated questions on videos across 27 disciplines. Multiple-choice and open-ended accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 82.4%
- MLVU In use Multi-task long video understanding (minutes to hours) with multiple-choice and generation tasks. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 90.8%
- FLEURS In use Models transcribe read speech in 102 languages built from FLoRes-101 sentences. Model cards usually report word error rate, so lower scores are better.
Phi-4-multimodal 4.00%
- VoiceBench In use Spoken instructions with speaker, environment and content variation. Voice assistant responses scored by GPT judge or rules.
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 93.1%
- TVBench In use Models answer multiple-choice questions on 10 temporal video tasks, such as action counting and ordering, that static frames cannot solve. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 81.9%